Comparison of outcomes of retrograde intramedullary nailing versus locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 936 patients in 16 studies

Double plating is a suitable option for periprosthetic distal femur fracture compared to single plate fixation and distal femoral arthroplasty

Aims

The purpose of this study was to compare reoperation and revision rates of double plating (DP), single plating using a lateral locking plate (SP), or distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFFs).

Methods

All patients with PDFF primarily treated with DP, SP, or DFA between 2008 and 2022 at a university teaching hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was revision surgery for failure following DP, SP, or DFA. Secondary outcome measures included any reoperation, length of hospital stay, and mortality. All basic demographic and relevant implant and injury details were collected. Radiological analysis included fracture classification and evaluation of metaphyseal and medial comminution.

Results

A total of 111 PDFFs (111 patients, median age 82 years (interquartile range (IQR) 75 to 88), 86% female) with 32 (29%) Su classification 1, 37 (34%) Su 2, and 40 (37%) Su 3 fractures were included. The median follow-up was 2.5 years (IQR 1.2 to 5.0). DP, SP, and DFA were used in 15, 66, and 30 patients, respectively. Compared to SP, patients treated with DP were more likely to have metaphyseal comminution (47% vs 14%; p = 0.009), to be low fractures (47% vs 11%; p = 0.009), and to be anatomically reduced (100% vs 71%; p = 0.030). Patients selected for DFA displayed comparable amounts of medial/metaphyseal comminution as those who underwent DP. At a minimum follow-up of two years, revision surgery for failure was performed in 11 (9.9%) cases at a median of five months (IQR 2 to 9): 0 DP patients (0%), 9 SP (14%), and 2 DFA (6.7%) (p = 0.249).

Conclusion

Using a strategy of DP fixation in fractures, where the fracture was low but there was enough distal bone to accommodate locking screws, and where there is metaphyseal comminution, resulted in equivalent survival free from revision or reoperation compared to DFA and SP fixation.

Which fixation produces the best outcome for distal femoral fractures? Meta-analysis and systematic review of retrograde nailing versus distal femoral plating in 2432 patients and 33 studies

PURPOSE

The distal femur comprises a wide intramedullary cavity and thin cortical bone. Firm internal fixation of comminuted fractures with displacement is challenging. Although many comparative studies have reported retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN) and distal femoral plating (DFP) as the usual fixation methods for distal femoral fractures, no clear conclusion has been reached. Therefore, a meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinical and radiological results were conducted to determine the appropriate treatment method for distal femoral fractures.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to December 19, 2022, was performed using predefined criteria. Studies comparing the effects of RIN and DFP were considered. The analyzed outcome measures included duration of surgery, blood loss, time to union, delayed union, nonunion, malalignment, implant failure, infection, reoperation, limb length discrepancy, range of motion, persistent anterior knee pain, knee stiffness, and functional scores. Meta-analysis of pooled data was conducted using a random-effects model to determine the standard mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies with 2,432 patients were included. Compared to DFP, RIN was associated with a shorter time to fracture union (SMD, 1.83 months; 95% CI - 2.76 to - 0.90; P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of postoperative infection (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.94; P = 0.03). Pooled analysis revealed no significant differences in other outcome measures between the two treatment modalities.

CONCLUSION

In distal femoral fractures, RIN had a shorter bone union time and was more resistant to infection than DFP. However, there were no significant differences in the other clinical parameters. Therefore, the characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of RIN and DFP should be carefully identified, and appropriate treatment should be provided based on the patient's medical condition and fracture pattern.

Comparative study of retrograde intramedullary nailing versus locking extramedullary plating in complete articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution of the distal femur

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the distal femur with metaphyseal comminution and complete intra-articular involvement (AO/OTA classifications 33C2 and 33C3) present challenges for reduction and fixation. However, an optimal fixation method remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of locking extramedullary plating (LEP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN) for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and May 2022, 80 patients (45 men and 35 women; average age, 56.7 years) diagnosed with AO/OTA 33C2 and 33C3 were treated with either LEP or RIN and followed up for at least one year. Post-operative evaluations included radiographic assessments of bone union rate, timing, and alignment. Clinically, the knee joint range of motion (ROM), lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade were analyzed. The complications were also compared.

RESULTS

36 underwent LEP and 44 underwent RIN. Bone union was observed in 69.4% and 63.6% of the patients in the LEP and RIN groups, respectively (p = 0.64). The average union time was 6.9 months for the LEP group and 6.6 months for the RIN group (p = 0.51). A tendency toward varus deformity was observed in the RIN group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in knee ROM, LEFS, or KL grade. Complications included non-union (33.8%; RIN, 11; LEP, 16), varus deformity (5%; RIN, 4; LEP, 0), infection (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), heterotrophic ossification (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), and wound dehiscence (2.5%; RIN, 2; LEP, 0).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical fixation methods, RIN and LEP, for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution showed similar clinical and radiological outcomes. However, regardless of the type of fixation device used, there was a reduced rate of bone union owing to high energy and a less favorable prognosis.

Intraoperative Fracture during the Insertion of Advanced Locking Screws (T2 Alpha Femur Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing System): Report of Two Cases and Identifying Causes and Prevention

Background: Recently, the T2 alpha nailing system (Stryker, Inc.), which has advanced locking screws that can attach a screw to a rod, has been used worldwide and is expected to improve fracture fixation. We analyzed two cases of supracondylar femoral fractures in older adult patients, in which intraoperative fractures occurred during the insertion of advanced locking screws of the T2 alpha femur retrograde intramedullary nail. Case presentation: A 93-year-old and an 82-year-old woman each underwent T2 alpha femur retrograde nail fixation for supracondylar femur fractures at separate hospitals, and advanced locking screws were used as the proximal transverse locking screws. In both patients, a fracture line was observed at the proximal screw postoperatively, and the fractures were refixed with distal cable wiring and/or femoral distal plates. The patients were subsequently discharged from the same facility with no remarkable pain. Conclusions: When inserting advanced locking screws, it is necessary to enlarge the screw hole in the near-bone cortex with a counterbore drill, which might add torque to the bone cortex that could result in fractures. If the sleeve is distant from the bone, the counterbore drill will not reach the bone, the screw hole will not expand, and the insertion of advanced locking screws will apply a strong torque to the bone cortex and may result in fracture. Moreover, it is important to confirm that the counterbore drill is securely inserted under fluoroscopy and to carefully enlarge the bony foramen manually to prevent fractures during screw insertion.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing with supplemental plate and lag screws allows early weight bearing following distal end-segment femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) in a low-resource setting

PURPOSE

To underline the feasibility of achieving early weight bearing in patients with distal end-segment femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing and supplemental plate or lag screws in the absence of C-arm.

METHODS

41 distal end-segment femur fractures (DFFs) included in the study were treated with SIGN nails with or without a side plate in a center that lacked intraoperative fluoroscopy and fracture table. A medial or lateral para-patellar incision was used for fracture reduction, nail insertion and side plate placement. Follow-ups were done at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Distal end-segment fractures constituted 13.2% of all femur fractures treated. The patients' mean age and range were 49.6 and 23-83 years respectively. They were mostly injured in road traffic accidents. 27 were daily-income earners. By the 12th week post-operatively, 82.1% of them could flex their knee beyond 90°, all of them could bear weight fully, and 71.8% could squat & smile.

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted the procedure for retrograde nailing of DFFs in a setting without the requisite facilities for minimally-invasive surgeries. The findings demonstrated the feasibility of achieving an expedited weight bearing for the predominantly daily-income-earning victims to ensure early return to work and poverty reduction. While the small sample size is a limitation, the study does provide information that could serve as a basis for future randomized controlled trials in low-resource settings.

Distal femur fractures: basic science and international perspectives

Distal femur fractures are challenging injuries to manage, and complication rates remain high. This article summarizes the international and basic science perspectives regarding distal femoral fractures that were presented at the 2022 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting. We review a number of critical concepts that can be considered to optimize the treatment of these difficult fractures. These include biomechanical considerations for distal femur fixation constructs, emerging treatments to prevent post-traumatic arthritis, both systemic and local biologic treatments to optimize nonunion management, the relative advantages and disadvantages of plate versus nail versus dual-implant constructs, and finally important factors which determine outcomes. A robust understanding of these principles can significantly improve success rates and minimize complications in the treatment of these challenging injuries.

Management of distal femoral fractures with metaphyseal and articular comminution (AO/OTA 33C) using nail and plate fixation: a technical note and case series of 14 patients

PURPOSE

To describe the surgical technique and the outcome of a case series of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33C) treated with a nail-plate combination (NPC) implant.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a case series of 14 patients with comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (DFF) treated with an intramedullary retrograde nail in combination with a lateral low-contact condylar locking plate, in a period between June 2020 and January 2023 at a Level 1 trauma center. Baseline demographic and clinical data were recorded. Time to bone healing, function using Schatzker Lambert Score, and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients, 8 males and 6 females, with a total of 15 NPC implants, were included in this study. Eight out of 14 patients had open fractures, all with a Gustilo Anderson type IIIA exposure. The mean age was 48.5 ± 18.05 years. The median follow-up was 392 days, with only one patient lost to follow-up. 11 out of 15 implants achieved complete radiographic consolidation during follow-up, at a mean of 5.40 ± 1.07 months. At the 12-month follow-up, all patients could fully bear weight painlessly or with mild pain. Schatzker Lambert Score was excellent for 4 patients, good for 2 patients, fair for 5 patients, and failure for 2 patients. The main postoperative complications were rigidity (3 cases), limb shortening (2 cases), and septic non-union (1 case).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the nail-plate combination (NPC) may provide a more effective surgical technique for addressing the challenges associated with comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33C).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4