Influence of the basicity of internal bases in diiron model complexes on hydrides formation and their transformation into protonated diiron hexacarbonyl form

Iron(0) tricarbonyl η4-1-azadiene complexes and their catalytic performance in the hydroboration of ketones, aldehydes and aldimines via a non-iron hydride pathway

Six iron(0) tricarbonyl complexes (1a-f) with a η⁴-1-azadiene moiety were prepared and their performance in the hydroboration of unsaturated organic compounds was investigated. All the complexes exhibit catalytic activity towards hydroboration of ketones, aldehydes and aldimines with pinacolborane (HBpin) as a hydride source to lead to secondary alcohols, primary alcohols, and secondary amines, respectively, after hydrolysis of the hydroboration products. Of the iron(0) tricarbonyl complexes, complex 1e is the most robust one and was employed throughout the catalytic investigation. Its preference towards the three types of substrates is as follows: aldimines > aldehydes ≫ ketones. In total, 24 substrates were examined for the catalytic hydroboration reactivity and generally, isolation yields ranging from 40% to 95% were achieved. Mechanistic investigation suggests that the catalytic hydroboration of the substrates proceeds via intramolecular hydride transfer without going through an Fe-H intermediate. As indicated by ¹H NMR spectroscopic monitoring, the substrates and the borane agent bind to the iron centre and the imine N atom, respectively, which facilitates the hydride transfer by activating the B-H bond and polarizing the double bond of the substrates.

Proton-coupled electron transfer in the reduction of diiron hexacarbonyl complexes and its enhancement on the electrocatalytic reduction of protons by a pendant basic group

The pendant basic groups in a diiron complex acted as proton relay to ease the kinetic resistance in proton reduction and enhance proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET).

Enhancement in catalytic proton reduction by an internal base in a diiron pentacarbonyl complex: its synthesis, characterisation, inter-conversion and electrochemical investigation

An internal base bound to one of the diiron undergoes dissociation under a CO atmosphere and the freed base group as a proton relay enhances the catalysis of proton reduction.

Synthesis of Diiron(I) Dithiolato Carbonyl Complexes

Virtually all organosulfur compounds react with Fe(0) carbonyls to give the title complexes. These reactions are reviewed in light of major advances over the past few decades, spurred by interest in Fe2(μ-SR)2(CO)x centers at the active sites of the [FeFe]-hydrogenase enzymes. The most useful synthetic route to Fe2(μ-SR)2(CO)6 involves the reaction of thiols with Fe2(CO)9 and Fe3(CO)12. Such reactions can proceed via mono-, di-, and triiron intermediates. The reactivity of Fe(0) carbonyls toward thiols is highly chemoselective, and the resulting dithiolato complexes are fairly rugged. Thus, many complexes tolerate further synthetic elaboration directed at the organic substituents. A second major route involves alkylation of Fe2(μ-S2)(CO)6, Fe2(μ-SH)2(CO)6, and Li2Fe2(μ-S)2(CO)6. This approach is especially useful for azadithiolates Fe2[(μ-SCH2)2NR](CO)6. Elaborate complexes arise via addition of the FeSH group to electrophilic alkenes, alkynes, and carbonyls. Although the first example of Fe2(μ-SR)2(CO)6 was prepared from ferrous reagents, ferrous compounds are infrequently used, although the Fe(II)(SR)2 + Fe(0) condensation reaction is promising. Almost invariably low-yielding, the reaction of Fe3(CO)12, S8, and a variety of unsaturated substrates results in C-H activation, affording otherwise inaccessible derivatives. Thiones and related C═S-containing reagents are highly reactive toward Fe(0), often giving complexes derived from substituted methanedithiolates and C-H activation.

Brønsted-Lowry Acid Strength of Metal Hydride and Dihydrogen Complexes

Transition metal hydride complexes are usually amphoteric, not only acting as hydride donors, but also as Brønsted-Lowry acids. A simple additive ligand acidity constant equation (LAC for short) allows the estimation of the acid dissociation constant Ka(LAC) of diamagnetic transition metal hydride and dihydrogen complexes. It is remarkably successful in systematizing diverse reports of over 450 reactions of acids with metal complexes and bases with metal hydrides and dihydrogen complexes, including catalytic cycles where these reactions are proposed or observed. There are links between pKa(LAC) and pKa(THF), pKa(DCM), pKa(MeCN) for neutral and cationic acids. For the groups from chromium to nickel, tables are provided that order the acidity of metal hydride and dihydrogen complexes from most acidic (pKa(LAC) -18) to least acidic (pKa(LAC) 50). Figures are constructed showing metal acids above the solvent pKa scales and organic acids below to summarize a large amount of information. Acid-base features are analyzed for catalysts from chromium to gold for ionic hydrogenations, bifunctional catalysts for hydrogen oxidation and evolution electrocatalysis, H/D exchange, olefin hydrogenation and isomerization, hydrogenation of ketones, aldehydes, imines, and carbon dioxide, hydrogenases and their model complexes, and palladium catalysts with hydride intermediates.

Hydrogen generation: aromatic dithiolate-bridged metal carbonyl complexes as hydrogenase catalytic site models

The design, syntheses and characteristics of metal carbonyl complexes with aromatic dithiolate linkers reported as bioinspired hydrogenase catalytic site models are described and reviewed. Among these the complexes capable of hydrogen generation have been discussed in detail. Comparisons have been made with carbonyl complexes having alkyl dithiolates as linkers between metal centers.

The reactions of pyridinyl thioesters with triiron dodecacarbonyl: their novel diiron carbonyl complexes and mechanistic investigations

Reaction of Fe(3)(CO)(12) with pyridinyl thioester ligand PyCH(2)SCOCH(3) (L(1), Py = pyridin-2-yl) produced complex, [Fe(2)(κ-COCH(3))(μ-SCH(2)Py)(CO)(5)] (1) (PyCH(2)S = pyridin-2-ylmethanethiolate). When complex 1 reacted with PPh(3), a monosubstituted complex, [Fe(2)(κ-COCH(3))(μ-SCH(2)Py)(CO)(4)PPh(3)] (2), was derived. Reaction of the same precursor with analogous thioester ligand PyCH(2)SCOPy (L(2)) generated three novel diiron complexes, [Fe(2)(κ-Py)(μ-SCH(2)Py)(CO)(5)] (3), [Fe(2)(κ-Py)'(μ-SCH(2)Py)(CO)(5)] (4), and [Fe(2)(κ-Py)(μ-SCH(2)Py)(CO)(6)] (5). Complexes 3 and 4 are structural isomers. Complex 5 could be converted into complex 4 but the conversion from complex 5 to the isomer 3 was not observed. All the five complexes were fully characterised using FTIR, NMR, and other techniques. Their structures were determined using X-ray single crystal diffraction analysis. The oxidative formation of complexes 1, 3, 4, and 5 involved C-S and/or C-C bonds cleavages. To probe possible mechanisms for these cleavages, DFT calculations were performed. From the calculations, viable reaction pathways leading to the formation of all the isolated products were delineated. The results of the theoretic calculations also allowed rationalisation of the experimental observations.