The pressure in the temporomandibular joint in the patients with maxillofacial deformities

Biomechanical effects of mandibular deviation on the temporomandibular joint in patients with mandibular prognathism under incisal occlusion

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of mandibular deviation on the TMJ in patients with mandibular prognathism before and after orthognathic surgery using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

METHODS

Eight patients with mandibular prognathism without deviation, eight patients with mandibular prognathism with deviation and sixteen normal subjects were recruited. Three-dimensional models of the maxillofacial were reconstructed using MIMICS. Nine muscle forces were used to simulate incisal occlusion and contact was used to simulate fossa-disc-condyle interactions.

RESULTS

Before surgery, the stress in the TMJ was generally greater in the Pre-MD&MP group than in the Pre-MD group; it was much greater in both groups than in the control group, ranging from about 2 to 12 times as great in the Pre-MD group and from about 5 to 64 times as great in the Pre-MD&MP group. After orthognathic surgeries, the stresses in the Post-MP&MD were significantly reduced by approximately 21.7 % to 93.4 %. And in the Post-MP group, the stresses were reduced by approximately 1.4 % to 51.1 %.

CONCLUSION

Mandibular deviation exacerbated the abnormal stress distribution in the TMJ of patients with mandibular prognathism. Orthognathic surgeries could improve the stress distribution in patients with mandibular prognathism (with and without deviation). TMD was closely related to the stress levels of the TMJ.

Evaluation of the effect of unilateral mastication on the morphology of temporomandibular joint from the perspective of dynamic joint space

BACKGROUND

Unbalanced alterations of temporomandibular joint morphology were associated with unilaterally masticatory habits.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of unilateral mastication on the remodelling of the temporomandibular joint using dynamic joint space.

METHODS

Twelve volunteers with non-maxillofacial deformity and healthy temporomandibular joints were recruited. The 3D models of the mandible and the maxilla were reconstructed according to computed tomography. The subjects were asked to masticate French fries and peanuts unilaterally, which was recorded by a 3D motion capture system. The dynamic joint space during unilateral mastication was analysed.

RESULTS

During early closure, the joint space reduction on the non-masticatory side was significantly greater than on the masticatory side (p < .05). During later closure, the joint space reduction on the non-masticatory side was significantly lower than that on the masticatory side (p < .05). The difference in joint space reduction between both sides was greater than the French fries while masticating the peanuts.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral mastication resulted in a different major pressure area on the bilateral TMJs. Therefore, unilateral mastication might be an essential factor in the bilateral asymmetrical remodelling of the TMJ.

The biomechanical effects of bimaxillary osteotomies to the patients with mandibular retraction under incisal clenching

The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical effect of bimaxillary osteotomies on patients with mandibular retraction. Mandibular retraction, as a typical maxillofacial deformity, and has great adverse effects on TMJ. Bimaxillary osteotomies are widely used to correct symptoms of mandibular retraction. It is necessary to understand the effect of surgery on temporomandibular disc (TMJ). Five patients with mandibular retraction and 10 asymptomatic subjects were involved in this study. Finite element models of preoperative, postoperative and control group were constructed based on the CT data. Nine sets of concentrated forces were used to simulate the muscle effect and contact method was used to simulate the interaction within the TMJs and dentitions. The results showed that bimaxillary osteotomies could effectively improve the maxillofacial morphology and alleviate the overload in TMJ. The facial asymmetry and right chewing side preference could cause imbalanced stress distributions in the TMJs and interfere the surgical treatment.

Three-dimensional theoretical model for effectively describing the effect of craniomaxillofacial structural factors on loading situation in the temporomandibular joint

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) overloading is considered a primary cause of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD). Accordingly, craniomaxillofacial structural parameters affect the loading situation in the TMJ. However, no effective method exists for quantitatively measuring the loading variation in human TMJs. Clinical statistics, which draws from general rules from large amounts of clinical data, cannot entry for exploring the underlying biomechanical mechanism in craniomaxillofacial system. The finite element method (FEM) is an effective tool for analyze the stress and load on TMJs for several cases in a short period of time; however, it is difficult to generalize general patterns through calculations between different cases due to the different geometric characteristics and occlusal contacts between each case.

METHODS

(1) This study included 88 subjects with 176 unilateral data to measure angle (α) of the distance to the plane of occlusion. The bone destruction score was evaluated for clinical statistics. To rule out effects of the potential factors and ensure the generality of the study, one participant with no obvious bone destruction was selected as the standard case for establishing the three-dimensional (3D) theoretical model and FEM. (2) Three groups of forces, including biting, muscles and joint reaction forces on mandible, were adopted to establish a 3D theoretical model. (3) By modifying the sagittal α and coronal three types of deviation angle (φ) of the original model, nine candidate models were obtained for the FEM studies.

RESULTS

(1) The static equilibrium equations, were used to establish a 3D theoretical model for describing the loading of the TMJ. The theoretical model was validated by monotonously modifying the structural parameter in comparison to two-dimensional theoretical models reported previously; (2) The force on the TMJ gradually decreased with α, and this trend was validated by both clinic statistics and FEM results; (3) The effects of the three types of deviation angle were different. The results of the case where only rotating biting forces were considered was consistent with clinical statistics, indicating that the side with lower α experiences higher TMJ load. (4) Changing the unilateral proportionality coefficients of biting and muscle force produced opposite effects, wherein the effects of the muscle force were stronger than those of the biting forces.

CONCLUSIONS

A negative correlation was observed between the joint load and α. Among the three types of asymmetric deformities, occlusal deviations were the primary factors leading to TMD. Unilateral occlusion can result in a greater load on the ipsilateral joint and should be avoided when using the side corresponding to the TMD. This study provides a theoretical basis for the biomechanical mechanism of TMD and also enables the targeted mitigation and treatment of TMD through structural modification.

The biomechanical effects of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bimaxillary osteotomies to the patients with maxillofacial deformities under incisal clenching

OBJECTIVE

Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and bimaxillary osteotomies (BSSRO plus Lefort1 osteotomy) are widely used to solve maxillofacial deformities. The effect of the surgeries on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is still not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the preoperative and postoperative stress environment of the patients and to compare the biomechanical differences of the two surgeries.

METHODS

Ten patients were performed BSSRO and fourteen underwent bimaxillary osteotomies. Eleven asymptomatic subjects were recruited to be the control group. The muscle forces of incisal clenching were applied on the finite element models. And contact was used to simulate the interactions within the TMJs.

RESULTS

two kinds of surgeries could not completely eliminate the negative biomechanical distribution within the TMJs.

CONCLUSION

Compared to BSSRO only, the bimaxillary osteotomies could better repair the biomechanical environment of the TMJs under incisal clenching. And the TMD symptoms were strongly related to the stress distributions of the TMJs.