Is Supraclavicular Artery Island flap (SAI) a viable alternative to Free Tissue Transfer (FTT) in head and neck reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Submental island flap versus supraclavicular island flap in oral tongue cancer reconstruction: Perioperative and functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

The primary treatment for oral tongue cancer in both early and advanced stages involves surgical resection, which often affects tongue function. When microvascular free flaps are unsuitable for tongue reconstruction following cancer ablation, locoregional pedicled flaps become viable alternatives, for example, submental and supraclavicular island flaps. This study compares perioperative and functional outcomes between submental and supraclavicular flaps in tongue cancer reconstruction.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed the outcomes of 46 patients who underwent tongue resection and reconstruction with a submental or supraclavicular island flap between January 2015 and December 2022. We evaluated patient demographics, flap outcomes, postoperative complications, and speech and swallowing outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 24 submental and 22 supraclavicular island flap reconstructions. While demographic data were similar between the two groups, the submental island flap group had significantly shorter operative times than the supraclavicular group (291 and 347 min, respectively, p = 0.018), reduced hospital stays (14.8 and 18.6 days, respectively, p = 0.016), fewer major recipient site complications necessitating interventions under general anesthesia (1 and 6 patients, respectively, p = 0.043), and less recipient wound dehiscence (1 and 8 patients, respectively, p = 0.009). Speech and swallowing outcomes were comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The submental island flap appears to be a more favorable option for tongue reconstruction than the supraclavicular island flap, offering advantages in operative time, length of hospital stays, and lower rates of major complications and wound dehiscence.

Safe and reliable use of supraclavicular flaps for head and neck reconstruction

The supraclavicular flap is a regional flap in the supraclavicular area nourished by the transverse cervical or supraclavicular arteries. This flap gained popularity in the 2000s as it requires less surgical time than free flap reconstruction and has minimal donor-site morbidity. However, a high rate of postoperative complications has been reported. Moreover, there is ongoing debate regarding the indications and limitations of this flap. In this study, we confined the flap design to the supraclavicular fossa, considering flap vascularity and in an effort to minimize donor site morbidity. Between 2014 and 2023, we performed supraclavicular flap reconstruction in 3 cases of cervical skin defects and 1 case of a pharyngeal mucosal defect. The average defect and flap sizes were 7×3.9 cm and 11.5×4.4 cm, respectively. The lower border of the flap remained above the clavicle, and the lateral border did not exceed the acromioclavicular joint. When the flaps were transferred using the transposition method, the angle of transposition was limited to <90 degrees. When the VY advancement or turnover method was selected, we paid attention to the tension-free flap inset. We successfully reconstructed the defects without flap-related complications, and donor site scars were inconspicuous in all patients. In conclusion, we believe that confining the flap design to the supraclavicular fossa, limiting the indications of this flap to the reconstruction of medium-sized defects, and using tension-free flap insets are important for the successful application of this flap.