Clinical outcomes of patients 80 years of age and older with soft tissue sarcoma

Tolerability and Outcomes for Treatment of Older Myxoid Liposarcoma Population

BACKGROUND

Myxoid liposarcoma predominantly affects young and middle-aged individuals, and little is known regarding treatment tolerability and outcomes in older patients. This study aims to better understand this older patient population.

METHODS

This single institution retrospective study included patients aged 70 years and older with localized (non-metastatic) myxoid liposarcoma.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included. The median age was 75 years, and 9 (56%) were female. Fourteen (88%) were extremity tumors and two (12%) were trunk. The median tumor size was 10.4 cm (range, 3.6 to 28 cm). Five (31%) tumors had a round cell component. All patients had surgery. Fourteen (88%) had perioperative radiation, and three (19%) had perioperative chemotherapy. One patient had postoperative infection, and one patient had neutropenic fever from preoperative chemotherapy. The median follow up from surgery was 6.3 years. Eight (50%) patients died from MLPS. The median relapse-free survival and overall survival were 34 months and 75 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most older patients with localized MLPS received perioperative radiation therapy with surgery, and few serious toxicities were reported. Even with treatment, half of the patients relapsed.

Treatment Strategy for Elderly Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgical resection is the standard treatment for localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS), while systemic chemotherapy for advanced STS may be considered. However, less aggressive treatment is often administered to elderly patients with STS. Undertreatment may compromise the cure rate and survival of these individuals. We review the literatures and emphasize the importance of standard treatment for STS in elderly patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The outcome of surgical resection of STS in older individuals is comparable to that of younger ones, as long as patients are selected based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS). Likewise, systemic treatment may prove beneficial as long as the risk of complications is estimated with a geriatric assessment. Elderly patients with STS benefit from standard treatment as long as the risks of surgical and systemic complications are assessed respectively with the ASA-PS and GA. Novel clinical trials with broader eligibility criteria are also necessary for elderly patients because of the increasing population of the elderly patients in the future.

Prognostic Nomogram and a Risk Classification System for Predicting Overall Survival of Elderly Patients with Fibrosarcoma: A Population-Based Study

Background

The objective of this study was to develop a nomogram model and risk classification system to predict overall survival in elderly patients with fibrosarcoma.

Methods

The study retrospectively collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database relating to elderly patients diagnosed with fibrosarcoma between 1975 and 2015. Independent prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses on the training set to construct a nomogram model for predicting the overall survival of patients at 3, 5, and 10 years. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves were used to evaluate the discrimination and predictive accuracy of the model. Decision curve analysis was used for assessing the clinical utility of the model.

Result

A total of 357 elderly fibrosarcoma patients from the SEER database were included in our analysis, randomly classified into a training set (252) and a validation set (105). The multivariate Cox regression analysis of the training set demonstrated that age, surgery, grade, chemotherapy, and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors. The ROC showed good model discrimination, with AUC values of 0.837, 0.808, and 0.806 for 3, 5, and 10 years in the training set and 0.769, 0.779, and 0.770 for 3, 5, and 10 years in the validation set, respectively. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis showed that the model has high predictive accuracy and a high clinical application. In addition, a risk classification system was constructed to differentiate patients into three different mortality risk groups accurately.

Conclusion

The nomogram model and risk classification system constructed by us help optimize patients' treatment decisions to improve prognosis.

The Real-Life Journey of Elderly Patients in Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcomas: A Retrospective Analysis from a Sarcoma Referral Center

The high complexity of multimodality treatment frequently results in undertreatment of elderly sarcoma patients, and this may be one of the factors that influence their prognosis. We describe the real-life approach to a population of patients aged over 70 with both soft tissue (STS) and bone sarcomas (BS) followed by our Sarcoma Disease Management Team from 2012 to 2017. One-hundred and twenty-three patients with a median age of 77 years (range: 70–92) were identified. STS were the most common histological subtypes (94%) and the grade was high in 79/123 patients (64%). At diagnosis, 88% of patients had localized disease (LD) and 12% were metastatic (MD). Overall, 96% of patients with LD underwent surgery, 46/54 (85%) with high grade STS patients underwent complementary radiotherapy, and 10/54 (19%) received adjuvant treatments. Twelve out of 33 patients who relapsed (36%) underwent local therapies. Seventeen (52%) and eight (24%) patients were treated with first-line and second-line medical treatments, respectively. Tolerability to systemic treatments was fairly good. Overall, 21% of the patients with advanced disease were candidates for best supportive care alone. Our case series of elderly patients with both STS and BS shows that personalized multidisciplinary treatment can nevertheless be offered to this frail population in order to control the evolution of disease.

Using the Barthel Index to Assess Activities of Daily Living after Musculoskeletal Tumour Surgery: A Single-centre Observational Study

Objective

The objective of the current study was to find the factors affecting the activities of daily living, as evaluated by the Barthel Index, at the end of rehabilitation after musculoskeletal tumour surgery. Further, we evaluated whether the Barthel Index correlates with functional scores that are specific to musculoskeletal tumours at final follow-up.

Methods

The activities of daily living of 190 patients who underwent postoperative rehabilitation after surgery to treat musculoskeletal tumours were evaluated at the end of the program using the Barthel Index. Functional evaluation at the time of final follow-up observation was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score.

Results

The post-rehabilitation Barthel Index was significantly lower in elderly patients aged more than 60 years and in those with malignant tumours and tumours larger than 10 cm. Malignancy and large tumour size were risk factors for a low Barthel Index. There was significant correlation between the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score/Toronto Extremity Salvage Score at final functional evaluation and the Barthel Index at the end of rehabilitation.

Conclusion

The Barthel Index is a simple method to assess the activities of daily living and can potentially predict disease-specific health-related quality of life at final functional evaluation after musculoskeletal tumour surgery.