Joint distraction and early mobilization using a new dynamic external finger fixator for the treatment of fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

Hand-Specific External Fixation for Treatment of Complex Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries

Background

Complex proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fractures are challenging injuries to treat. There are multiple established treatment methods available for these injuries, including dynamic external fixation. This study reports the outcomes of complex PIPJ fractures treated with a hand-specific external fixation device.

Methods

Twenty-five fingers in 25 patients were treated with the DigiFix external fixator device for treatment of a PIPJ dorsal fracture dislocation (n = 16) or pilon fracture (n = 9). There were 16 males and 9 females with a mean age of 40 years (range: 14-75 years) at the time of injury. The median time from injury to surgery was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 5; range: 3-49). Chart and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

The average duration of external fixation was 41 days (range: 26-62 days). At a mean follow-up of 28 weeks (range: 12-105 weeks), the mean PIPJ flexion was 82 (range: 30-105 degrees), extension was -10° (range: -30 to 0 degrees), and flexion/extension arc of motion was 72 degrees (range: 30-95 degrees). Final mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 21.5 (range: 0-65.8). There were zero major complications and six (24%) minor complications, including superficial cellulitis (4) and stiffness (2).

Conclusion

Dynamic external fixation for the treatment of complex PIPJ injuries allows for early range of motion and leads to favorable outcomes. This hand-specific external fixator has a reproducible technique which results in predictable and reliable PIPJ distraction.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Dorsal Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Using a Plate: A Series of 37 Patients

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation with a plate is one of the alternative treatments for fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. However, it does not always lead to satisfactory results. The aim of this cohort study is to describe the surgical procedure and discuss the factors affecting the treatment results. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 37 cases of consecutive unstable dorsal fracture-dislocation of the PIP joint treated using a mini-plate. The volar fragments were sandwiched with a plate and dorsal cortex, and screws were used as subchondral support. The average rate of articular involvement was 55.5%. Five patients had concomitant injuries. The mean age of the patients was 40.6 years. Mean time between injury and operation was 11.1 days. The average postoperative follow-up duration was 11 months. Active ranges of motion, % total active motion (TAM) were evaluated postoperatively. The patients were divided into two groups according from Strickland score and Gaine score. Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test and a logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the factors affecting the results. Results: The average active flexion, flexion contracture at the PIP joint, and % TAM were 86.3°, 10.5° and 80.6%, respectively. Group I included 24 patients who had both excellent and good scores. Group II included 13 patients who had neither excellent nor good scores. When the groups were compared, there was no significant relationship between the type of fracture-dislocation and the extent of articular involvement. There were significant associations between outcomes and patient age, period from injury to surgical intervention and presence of concomitant injuries. Conclusions: We concluded that meticulous surgical technique leads to satisfactory results. However, factors, including the patient's age, time from injury to surgery and the presence of concomitant injuries needing adjacent joint immobilisation, contribute to unsatisfactory outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Surgical Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations: A Review of Outcomes

Background: Treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fracture-dislocations is difficult given the potential long-term complications of the involved finger and entire hand. Several surgical methods have been utilized for management of these injuries, none of which have shown consistently favorable results. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to report the post-operative outcomes of multiple treatment modalities for PIPJ fracture-dislocations in various studies. Methods: A literature review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all articles on PIPJ fracture-dislocations. Outcomes of interest included PIPJ range of motion, grip strength (% of contralateral hand), and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, hand (QuickDASH). Articles were distributed into 5 groups by surgical method: open reduction, percutaneous fixation, dynamic external fixation, extension-block pinning, and hemi-hamate arthroplasty. Results: Forty-eight of 1679 total screened articles were included. The weighted means of post-operative range of motion (ROM; degrees) at final follow-up were open reduction 84.7 (n = 146), percutaneous fixation 86.5 (n = 32), dynamic external fixation 81.7 (n = 389), extension-block pinning 83.6 (n = 85), and hemi-hamate arthroplasty 79.3 (n = 52). Dorsal fracture-dislocations, regardless of surgical method, had an average ROM of 83.2 (n = 321), grip strength 91% (n = 132), and QuickDASH of 6.6 (n = 59) while pilon injuries had an average ROM of 80.2 (n = 48), grip strength 100% (n = 13), and QuickDASH of 11.4 (n = 13). Conclusion: Percutaneous fixation yielded the highest post-operative ROM at final follow-up while extension-block pinning resulted in the greatest grip strength. While dorsal fracture-dislocations produced higher average ROM and lower QuickDASH score, pilon fractures produced a higher grip strength. No treatment method or fracture type yielded consistently better outcomes than another.

Simplified Kirschner‑wire-based dynamic external fixator for unstable proximal interphalangeal joint fractures

PURPOSE

Ligamentotaxis is a well-established treatment modality for treating challenging articular fractures. Many devices have been evolved to apply this principle to complex proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fractures. Although they gave satisfactory results, these devices were sometimes costly, complex and cumbersome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term functional and radiological outcomes of treating complex intra-articular PIPJ fractures using a simplified, preloaded Kirschner‑wire (K‑wire)-based dynamic external fixator.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with intraarticular PIPJ fractures, who fulfilled the study selection criteria, have been treated during 2018 and included in this prospective study after the approval of the responsible institutional ethics committee. Plain radiographs were used for assessing fracture reduction, congruity and healing. The visual analogue sore (VAS) and the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) were used for functional evaluation. PIPJ range of motion (ROM) and hand grip-strength were also assessed.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, all patients had no residual pain. The average PIPJ-ROM was 76.4 ± 23.51°, and the average grip-strength was 85 ± 13.95% as compared to the healthy side. The mean normalized MHQ score was 83 ± 12.63 points, with 4, 13, and 3 patients had excellent, good, and fair results retrospectively. Complications included pin tract infection (one case), stress fracture related to the applied wires (one case), and flexion contractures (four cases; three of them were symptomatic).

CONCLUSIONS

The used fixator technique is simple, reliable, available, reproducible, time-saving and cost-effective for managing complex PIPJ fractures while allowing early joint mobilization, which proven effective in achieving high satisfactory functional results.

Current methods, outcomes and challenges for the treatment of hand fractures

In treating hand fractures, we have to make a proper decision about conservative treatment versus surgical intervention and decide on individual surgical methods. This article reviews recent publications, technical advances, and outcome measures in treating metacarpal fractures, phalangeal fractures, complex fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joints, bony mallet fingers, and fractures of the thumb. My personal preferences and considerations are presented. At the end, the current challenges that hand surgeons are facing in treating frequent phalangeal and metacarpal fractures are discussed.