Retrospective study to evaluate the clinical significance of a second rise in C-reactive protein level following instrumented spinal fusion surgery

Death of the P Value? Bayesian Statistics for Orthopaedic Surgeons

Statistical interpretation is foundational to evidence-based medicine. Frequentist (P value testing) and Bayesian statistics are two major approaches for hypothesis testing. Studies analyzed with Bayesian methods are increasingly common with a 4-fold increase in the past 10 years. The Bayesian approach can align with clinical decision making by interpreting smaller differences that are not limited by P values and misleading claims of "trends toward significance." Both methods follow a workflow that includes sampling, hypothesis testing, interpretation, and iteration. Frequentist methodology is familiar and common. However, the limitations are the misunderstanding, misuse, and deceptively simple utility of interpreting dichotomous P values. Bayesian approaches are relatively less common and provide an alternative approach to trial design and data interpretation. Marginal differences elucidated by Bayesian methods may be perceived as less decisive than a P value that may reject a null hypothesis. The purposes of this review are to introduce Bayesian principles and Bayes theorem, define how pretest probability and known information may inform diagnostic testing using an example from prosthetic joint infection, contrast Bayesian and frequentist approaches using an example from the VANCO orthopaedic prospective trial, and describe the criteria for critically reviewing Bayesian studies.

Is an Elevated Preoperative CRP Level a Predictive Factor for Wound Healing Disorders following Lumbar Spine Surgery?

Postoperative wound infections are a prevalent concern among the hospital-associated infections in Europe, leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased morbidity and mortality, and substantial patient burdens. Addressing the root causes of this complication is crucial, especially given the rising number of spine surgeries due to aging populations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 3019 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery over a decade in our department. The study aimed to assess the predictors of wound healing disorders, focusing on laboratory values, particularly inflammatory parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 3019 patients, 2.5% (N = 74) experienced deep or superficial wound healing disorders, showing the significant correlation between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and these disorders (p = 0.004). A multivariate analysis identified several factors, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac comorbidity, surgical duration, dural injury, and blood loss, as being correlated with wound healing disorders.

CONCLUSION

Demographic factors, pre-existing conditions, and perioperative variables play a role in the occurrence of adverse effects related to wound healing disorders. Elevated CRP levels serve as an indicator of increased infection risk, though they are not a definitive diagnostic tool for wound healing disorders.

Efficacy of Antibiotic Bone Cement in the Treatment of Burkholderia cepacia Infection After Spinal Internal Fixation Surgery: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the number of spinal internal fixation operations has increased significantly, correlating with an elevated risk of postoperative surgical site infection and a rising incidence rate. While the conventional treatment approach involves surgical debridement combined with antibiotic administration, there is a notable gap in reported strategies for Burkholderia cepacia infection and patients exhibiting multidrug resistance.

METHODS

Surgical site infection occurred in a patient following internal fixation surgery for thoracic vertebral fractures. Despite the application of systemic antibiotics and regular dressing changes, no improvement was observed. Bacterial culture and drug sensitivity experiments revealed a multidrug-resistant Burkholderia cepacia infection. Two comprehensive debridement procedures were performed along with continuous post-operative irrigation combined with antibiotic administration; however, no significant improvement was observed. The patient's infection was significantly controlled following treatment with vancomycin loaded bone cement.

RESULTS

Following spinal internal fixation surgery, the management of a B. cepacian infection with multidrug resistance presented a significant challenge, despite the application of debridement procedures and systemic antibiotics. In this case, after 20 days of treatment with vancomycin-loaded bone cement, the patient's C-reactive protein level decreased to 54 mg/L, was normalized by February, and normal levels were maintained in the surgical area 1 month and 6 months after bone cement removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of vancomycin-loaded bone cement proves effective in treating postoperative B. cepacian infection in a multidrug-resistant case following spinal internal fixation surgery.

Establishment of a suitable combination of serological markers to diagnose surgical site infection following spine surgery: A novel surgical site infection scoring system

BACKGROUND

The accuracy rates of several effective serological markers of surgical site infection following spine surgery are unclear. We aimed to verify the accuracy of each significant marker and identify the most suitable and effective combination of these markers for the diagnosis of surgical site infection following spine surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 329 patients who underwent spine surgery for causes other than infectious spondylitis, including 9 patients with surgical site infection. Complete blood cell count, differential counts, and C-reactive protein levels were measured preoperatively and postoperatively (days 2 and 7). Serological data were compared among non-surgical site infection and surgical site infection cases. Cutoff values for items presenting significant differences were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Ratios in each serological factor at each time-point were compared. Combinations of these factors on postoperative day 7 and ratio items were investigated to determine the most suitable combination comprising the least number of items.

RESULTS

Significant differences were noted among four factors on postoperative day 7, except for the lymphocyte count. For the ratio items, significant differences were observed among 6 items. The combination of these ten markers was examined; each factor was assigned 1 point. The most suitable combination comprising 4 items, including neutrophil count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte count ratio, and C-reactive protein ratio, presented an AUC of 0.95, with a cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity of 3 points, 0.89, and 0.92, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of four markers is the most suitable criterion for the surgical site infection scoring system following spine surgery, where scores of ≥3 points strongly indicate surgical site infection. This criterion may be a strong tool for detecting surgical site infection.

A Novel Technique for Treating Early Deep Surgical Site Infection After Posterior Lumbar Fusion with Instrumentation

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a novel technique of using incisional vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) after 1-stage incision suture combined with closed suction irrigation system (CSIS) for treating early deep surgical site infection (SSI) after posterior lumbar fusion with instrumentation and to compare it with traditional CSIS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Patients with early deep SSI after posterior lumbar fusion with instrumentation from January 2013 to May 2020 who were treated by meticulous debridement followed by either CSIS or incisional VAC after 1-stage incision suture combined with CSIS were identified. The demographic characteristics, treatment features, and outcomes were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment methods.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients (48/5016, 0.96%) developed early deep SSI, 46 of whom were enrolled in this study. This included 24 patients in the CSIS group (group 1) and 22 patients in the incisional VAC after 1-stage incision suture combined with CSIS group (group 2). All patients received follow-up, with an average of 19.7 months (range, 13-30 months). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics in both groups (P > 0.05). The number of VAC foam dressing or ordinary dressing changes (P < 0.001), number of debridements (P = 0.028), intravenous antibiotic duration (P = 0.042), oral antibiotic duration (P = 0.019), and hospital stay (P = 0.029) in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 2. The irrigation duration in group 1 was significantly shorter than that in group 2 (P = 0.007). All patients were eventually cured with satisfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CSIS, incisional VAC after 1-stage incision suture combined with CSIS may be recommended considering that it has fewer dressing changes, fewer debridements, longer irrigation duration, shorter duration of antibiotic use, shorter hospital stay, and more convenient nursing care.

Clinical presentation and diagnosis of acute postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII)

Acute postoperative infections after surgical interventions on the spinal column are associated with prolonged treatment duration, poor patient outcomes, and a high socioeconomic burden. In the field of joint replacement, guidelines have been established with recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of such complications, but in spinal surgery there are no definitions permitting distinction between early and late infections and no specific instructions for their management. Various factors increase the risk of acute postoperative infection, including blood transfusions, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, urinary tract infection, injury of the dura mater, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >2, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and surgical revision. We suggest defining all infections occurring within the first 4 weeks after spinal surgery as early infections. The symptoms are pain at rest, on motion, and/or pressure pain, abnormal warmth, local erythema, circumscribed swelling of the wound, and newly occurring secretion. Together with laboratory parameters such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocytes, a central role is played by imaging in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although diagnosis can be hampered by the presence of postoperative fluid collections such as edema or hematoma or by artifacts from an implant. Once an infection has been confirmed, immediate wound revision with debridement and rinsing (sodium hypochlorite) is essential. Intraoperatively it may prove advantageous to use jet lavage and administer vancomycin. We recommend leaving the implant in place in cases of acute postoperative infection. Patients who are not conditional for surgery can first receive antibiotic suppression treatment before surgery at a later date. In such cases initial computed tomography (CT)-guided aspiration or drain insertion can take place.