Preoperative factors associated with extension gap in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study on continuous determination of distraction force

The flexion-extension gap is predictive of patient-reported outcome measures after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the association between the flexion-extension gap difference and patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of 60 cruciate-retaining single-radius TKAs. Soft tissue balancing was measured using an offset seesaw tensioner and centre-type digital knee balancer under joint distraction forces of 20-50 lbf and 1.5 times body mass index (1.5 BMI). At the last follow up of 2.0-6.5 (mean, 4.5) years postoperatively, patients were asked if they perceived their knee joint as 'natural' (26 knees) or 'artificial' (34 knees). Age, sex, and the flexion-extension gap were compared between the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine cut-off values of variables predictive of a natural joint perception.

RESULTS

Natural joint perception was associated with a greater flexion-extension gap difference under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI (P = 0.016), higher knee function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, P = 0.019), and quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension, P = 0.029). A gap difference of 0.95 mm under 1.5 BMI distraction predicted a natural joint perception post-TKA (sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 88.5%). Using a gap threshold of 1.0 mm under a 1.5 BMI distraction force yielded significant between-group differences in postoperative flexion (P = 0.040), satisfaction (P = 0.043), knee joint function (P < 0.001), quality of life (P = 0.032), and posterior femoral condylar offset (P = 0.037) CONCLUSION: A flexion-extension gap difference ≥1.0 mm under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI predicted superior outcomes, including patient satisfaction, after cruciate-retaining TKA. It was suggested that posterior femoral condylar offset could influence this finding.

Spinopelvic mismatch is associated with patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 15 years

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely performed; yet, up to 25% of patients are dissatisfied with outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the association between a spinopelvic mismatch and patient-reported outcomes after TKA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 101 TKAs performed for osteoarthritis, at a mean 14.6 (range, 10.0-18.0) years post-surgery. Postoperative knee joint perception was evaluated as 'artificial', with or without restrictions, or 'natural'. Age, sex and the spinopelvic mismatch were compared between the 'artificial' (n = 54) and 'natural' (n = 47) perception groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors of an artificial perception, with a receiver operating characteristic curve to identify cut-off values for significant factors.

RESULTS

A spinopelvic mismatch, defined as a pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) ≥ 10°, was associated with an artificial perception (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.22; P = 0.023). An artificial joint perception was related to lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR, P = 0.021) and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D, P = 0.025) scores. The cut-off PI-LL of 11° differentiated the groups with a sensitivity of 87.0% and specificity of 91.9%. Postoperative KOOS-JR (P < 0.001), EQ-5D (P = 0.014), satisfaction (P = 0.015), knee extension angle (P = 0.024), and perception (P = 0.032) differed between the groups when the PI-LL threshold was set at 10°.

CONCLUSION

A spinopelvic mismatch (PI-LL ≥ 10°) is associated with a risk of artificial perception of function after TKA. Measurement of the PI-LL could assist patients and surgeons to predict TKA outcomes.