Evaluation of Anterior Coverage in Children With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Using Transverse Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 2 Years Is Predictive of Future Radiographic Coverage.
J Pediatr Orthop 2022;
42:e874-e877. [PMID:
35749759 DOI:
10.1097/bpo.0000000000002196]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Although normal anterior acetabular coverage provides stability to the hip, acetabular retroversion leads to femoroacetabular impingement related to hip osteoarthritis. Previous studies have focused on acetabular version and anteroposterior coverage in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH); however, the correlation between anteroposterior coverage and acetabular development is unclear. We measured anteroposterior acetabular coverage in DDH patients using transverse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent bony acetabular growth, and evaluated the correlation of those findings.
METHODS
We evaluated 37 DDH (dislocations) in 36 patients who underwent MRI at 2 years of age. The mean age was 2.2±0.3 years at the time of MRI (1.6±0.4 y after reduction) and 6.0±0.1 years at the time of plain radiography for the Severin classification. On MRI scans, we measured the cartilaginous center-edge angle (CCEA) and cartilaginous acetabular-head index (CAHI) in the coronal plane and the anterior and posterior cartilaginous center-edge angles (AC-CEA and PC-CEA, respectively) in the transverse plane. Severin I or II was defined as a good outcome and III or IV as a poor outcome.
RESULTS
In the evaluations conducted at 2 years of age, the mean CCEA, CAHI, AC-CEA, and PC-CEA were 14±9 degrees, 66%±10%, 39±8 degrees, and 77±7 degrees, respectively; the CEA at 6 years of age was 13±7 degrees. Twelve and 25 hips were classified in the good and poor outcome groups, respectively. Although CCEA, CAHI, and AC-CEA were significantly associated with the outcome in a single regression analysis ( P <0.05), only AC-CEA was significant in the multiple regression analysis with a stepwise selection method ( P =0.018). The cutoff AC-CEA value for a good outcome was 38 degrees (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 68%) using a receiver operating characteristic curve.
CONCLUSIONS
Among MRI findings for acetabular cartilaginous morphology, AC-CEA was strongly associated with the outcome. Anteroposterior coverage was correlated with bony acetabular growth in childhood, and anterior coverage was particularly important for subsequent acetabular growth.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV-case series.
Collapse