Anteromedial plating without filling the gap in open wedge high tibial osteotomy may increase the risk of screw breakage, which can be reduced by medial plating and bone-substitute insertion

Effect of plate design on maintenance of anterior and posterior gaps and posterior tibial slope after cyclic loading in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A biomechanical study using porcine's tibia

Purpose

We aimed to investigate whether a plate adapted to the anatomy of the proximal medial porcine's tibia would provide maintenance of the anterior gap (AG), posterior gap (PG) and posterior tibial slope (PTS).

Methods

Twenty-seven porcine tibias were biomechanically evaluated by performing MOWHTO and placing TOMOFIX (n = 9), AC plate (n = 9) and TriS (n = 9) anteromedially. Cyclic testing (800 N, 2000 cycles, 0.5 Hz) was performed to investigate the PTS over time for MOWHTO. The particular displacement calculated from the maximum to the minimum point with the load-displacement curve along the mechanical axis during cyclic testing, the final AG and PG changes at the osteotomy site, the increased PTS calculated by subtracting AG from PG after 2000 cycles were compared among the three groups. The displacement was evaluated by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and changes in AG and PG and increased PTS were evaluated by one-way ANOVA. The sample size for α and β errors were <0.05 and <0.20, and the effect size was 0.64 for one-way ANOVA and 0.49 for repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

There were no significant differences in displacement among the groups. A significant difference was observed in the AG (p = 0.044) and PG (p = 0.0085) changes. There were no significant differences in increased PTS among the groups.

Conclusion

When anteromedially placed, the AC plate and TriS resulted in significant maintenance of AG and PG compared with that of TOMOFIX in MOWHTO after cyclic loading.

Level of Evidence

Level Ⅳ.

Flexion Contracture in Knee Osteoarthritis Can Be Fully Eliminated by Hybrid Closed Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using a Reduction-Insertion-Compression Handle

In conventional closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) with preservation of the medial hinge, flexion contracture cannot be improved because of the two-dimensional correction. Conversely, in hybrid CWHTO, for which the name is derived from a hybrid of the lateral closing and medial opening, the medial cortex is intentionally disrupted. The medial hinge disruption enables three-dimensional correction, which helps eliminate flexion contracture by decreasing posterior tibial slope (PTS). The fine adjustment of the anterior closing distance and thigh-compression technique further facilitates PTS control. In this study, we describe the use of the Reduction-Insertion-Compression Handle (RICH), which maximizes the benefits of hybrid CWHTO. This device permits accurate osteotomy reduction, easy screw insertion, and assists with providing sufficient compressive force at the osteotomy site, as well as the elimination of the flexion contracture. This Technical Note presents the details of using the RICH and the associated advantages and disadvantages in hybrid CWHTO for medial compartmental knee arthritis.

Lack of Efficacy of Bone Void Filling Materials in Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review the clinical and radiologic outcomes of isolated medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies with different bone void filling materials and to compare the outcomes by network meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis included searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to July 30, 2022, for clinical comparative studies comparing 2 or more bone void filling materials in patients undergoing medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies. We performed Bayesian random-effect network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation frameworks to rate the certainty of evidence, calculate the absolute effects, and present the findings. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

In total, 2,755 citations were identified by our search, of which 25 eligible trials, including 10 randomized controlled trials and 15 nonrandomized comparative trials (NCTs) enrolled 1,420 participants and 6 different interventions (autografts, allografts, synthetic grafts, mixed grafts, xenografts, and without grafts). There were some concerns on the risk of bias assessment among randomized controlled trials, and the median Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 6 for NCTs. All fillers showed no significantly superior treatment effects when compared with unfilled group in final Knee Society Scoring, Western Ontario and McMasters Universities score, time to bone union (TBU), and loss of correction (LOC). Exceptionally, moderate-certainty evidence suggested that autograft would produce superior incidence of complete bone union (CBU) than the unfilled at postoperative 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 13.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-95.6), whereas low- to very low-certainty evidence suggested allografts (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06-0.52) and synthetic grafts (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.68) would result in inferior CBU. Low-certainty evidence suggested allografts would result in larger LOC angle than unfilled group (mean difference 1.1, 95% CI 0.1-2.3). As for TBU, low-certainty evidence suggested mixed grafts would take longer time to reach clinical bone union (mean difference -14.04, 95% CI -21.0 to -6.9).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of efficacy for different bone void filling materials to result better outcomes in Knee Society Scoring, Western Ontario and McMasters Universities score, TBU, and LOC than without graft. Although applying the autografts would produce a superior possibility of radiologic CBU than other fillers, because of the inclusion of NCTs, the overall certainty of the evidence synthesis is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅲ, meta-analysis of Level I randomized controlled trials and Level Ⅱ∼Ⅲ non-randomized comparative trails.

Forgivingness of an Anteromedially Positioned Small Locked Plate for High Tibial Osteotomy in Case of Overcorrection and Lateral Hinge Fracture

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) represents a sensible treatment option for patients with moderate unicondylar osteoarthritis of the knee and extraarticular malalignment. The possibility of a continuously variable correction setting and a surgical approach low in complications has meant that the medial opening osteotomy has prevailed over the past decades. The objective of the present study was to determine whether anteromedially positioned small plates are nevertheless forgiving under biomechanically unfavourable conditions (overcorrection and lateral hinge fracture). In this study, a simulated HTO was performed on composite tibiae with a 10-mm wedge and fixed-angle anteromedial osteosynthesis with a small implant. Force was applied axially in a neutral mechanical axis, a slight and a marked overcorrection into valgus, with and without a lateral hinge fracture in each case. At the same time, a physiological gait with a dual-peak force profile and a peak load of 2.4 kN was simulated. Interfragmentary motion and rigidity were determined. The rigidity of the osteosynthesis increased over the cycles investigated. A slight overcorrection into valgus led to the lowest interfragmentary motion, compared with pronounced valgisation and neutral alignment. A lateral hinge fracture led to a significant decrease in rigidity and increase in interfragmentary motion. However, in no case was the limit of 1 mm interfragmentary motion critical for osteotomy healing exceeded. The degree of correction of the leg axis, and the presence of a lateral hinge fracture, have an influence on rigidity and interfragmentary motion. From a mechanically neutral axis ranging up to pronounced overcorrection, the implant investigated offers sufficient stability to allow healing of the osteotomy, even if a lateral hinge fracture is present.

Risk of interference between the tibial tunnel and locking screws in medial meniscus posterior root repair and open wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the frequency of interference between locking screws for the plate fixation and tibial tunnels differs depending on the tibial tunnel positions in a surgical simulation of the transtibial pull-out repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) in patients undergoing biplanar open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).

METHODS

Sixty-five patients (75 knees) who underwent OWHTO with TomoFix small plate (Depuy Synthes, PA, USA) for medial knee osteoarthritis with varus malalignment were enrolled in this study. Surgical simulation of transtibial pull-out repair of MMPRTs was performed using postoperative computed tomography images. The tibial tunnel was created in the anatomical attachment area of the medial meniscus posterior root. Another aperture of the tibial tunnel was created on the anteromedial (AM) tibial cortex, the posteromedial (PM) tibial cortex, and the anterolateral (AL) tibial cortex in the proximal tibial fragment. The frequency of interference between the tibial tunnel and A-D locking screws was compared in the 3 tibial tunnel positions. In each tibial tunnel position, the locking plate position with and without interference between the tibial tunnel and at least one locking screw was compared.

RESULTS

For screw A, the frequency of interference with the tibial tunnel in the AL position was higher than that in the AM (P = 0.048) and PM positions (P <  0.001). For screws B and C, the frequency of interference with the tibial tunnel in the AM position was higher than that in the PM (P <  0.001, P = 0.007) and AL positions (P <  0.001, P = 0.001), respectively. For screw D, there was no difference in the frequency of interference with the tibial tunnel among the three positions. The frequency of interference between the tibial tunnel and at least one screw in the AM position was 100%, which was higher than that in the PM (P <  0.001) and AL positions (P <  0.001). In the PM position, the locking plate was placed more posteriorly in the group where the locking screw interfered with the tibial tunnel. In the AL position, the locking plate was placed more parallel to the medial/lateral axis of the tibial plateau in the interference group.

CONCLUSION

Making the tibial tunnel in the AM position should be avoided because interference with locking screws was inevitable. When the tibial tunnel is created in the PM position, interference between the tibial tunnel and screw C should be paid attention. Anterior placement of the locking plate could be useful to prevent interference between locking screws and the tibial tunnel in the PM position. In addition, when the tibial tunnel is created in the AL position, interference between the tibial tunnel and especially screw A among screws A-C should be paid attention. Placing the locking plate in an anteromedial direction could be useful to prevent interference between locking screws and the tibial tunnel in the AL position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.