Management Quandary. Radiation and chemotherapy effect on reproduction in a teenage cancer survivor

Pathological features, clinical presentations and prognostic factors of ovarian large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and review of published literature

Background

There is no consensus on the optimal chemotherapy regimen and the prognostic factors for ovarian large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), a rare type of tumor. The objective of the present study is to present the case of a recent encounter of pure ovarian LCNEC and perform a brief review to summarize the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of 57 cases of LCNEC patients that have been previously reported.

Method: case presentation

Eligible studies were searched for online and 57 cases with clear follow-up data were found to have been reported. We present the 58th case, which is of a 70-year-old woman with stage IIIc primary pure LCNEC of the ovary. The initial symptom of this patient was abdominal distension (more than 2 months). A recent ultrasound test showed a solid-cystic mass occupying the pelvic and abdominal cavity. She received two courses of cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy. No signs of nonclinical or radiological evidence of disease recurrence was found at follow-up examinations during the first 3 months after operation. A retrospective review of these 58 cases was conducted and survival curves were estimated. Using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Conclusion

The patients included were aged between 18 and 80 years. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed that the median overall survival was 10.000 months, while 26 (44.83%) patients died within 12 months. We compared the overall mean survival time of all patients with that of stage I patients (42.418 vs 42.047 months), which suggests that ovarian LCNEC has a very poor prognosis even at stage I. Mean survival was longer for patients who had undergone postoperative chemotherapy than for those without postoperative chemotherapy (48.082 vs 9.778 months). A small series, such as this, does not provide adequate data to establish a firm correlation between the postoperative chemotherapy and prognosis (p = 0.176). In our review of 58 cases with ovarian LCNEC, prognosis was unfavorable in most cases. Given the rarity of LCNEC, it is highly recommended that a global medical database of ovarian LCNEC and a standard system of diagnosis and treatment is established.

Ovarian tissue preservation, present and clinical perspectives

Ovarian tissue preservation and transplantation are intended for women undergoing aggressive regimens of chemical and/or radiological therapy, bone marrow transplantation or stem cell transplantation. Main indications for the procedure are neoplastic diseases and autoimmune disorders. The first live human birth after ovarian tissue autotransplantation was successfully done in 2002. Cryopreserved ovarian tissue can be autografted either orthotopically or heterotopically. Neovascularization of the implanted tissue is essential for the procedure. Vascular transplantation seems to be the best approach for avoiding follicular loss and extending the lifespan of the ovarian grafts. The procedure, regardless of whether ortho- or heterotopic, is connected with a risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells. This can be minimized by multiple ovary biopsies, thorough histological examination and molecular genetic techniques. Introducing ovarian tissue transplantation into clinical practice requires many problems to be solved. Standardization of the freeze-thaw protocol is one of the most important issues. Solving the problem of transient graft ischemia is also essential. Eventually, the future safety of the method requires the development of efficient tests to detect the presence of neoplastic cells in the transplanted tissue.