1
|
Veth VB, Keukens A, Reijs A, Bongers MY, Mijatovic V, Coppus SFPJ, Maas JWM. Recurrence after surgery for endometrioma: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Fertil Steril 2024:S0015-0282(24)00629-0. [PMID: 39098538 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Endometriosis is an inflammatory disease, with different forms of expression and a variety of complaints. An endometrioma, an ovarian cyst with endometrium-like lining, is one of the most common expressions of abdominal endometriosis. These endometriomas can, in addition to medical treatment, be treated surgically. After surgery, hormonal therapy is still frequently used for the treatment of endometriosis in general and prevention of recurrence of endometriomas specifically. However, not all women want or can receive postoperative hormonal treatment. It is important for this group to determine the risk of anatomical recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after surgery for an endometrioma. OBJECTIVE To determine the recurrence rate for surgically treated endometrioma without postoperative hormonal treatment. DATA SOURCES We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analyses, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched until May 2023. The literature search was limited to women with endometrioma who received surgical treatment without postoperative hormonal treatment. STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS A distinction was made in study design including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort and retrospective studies. For assessment of risk of bias, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions assessment tool were used. MAIN OUTCOMES The outcome measure included in this review was endometrioma recurrence. RESULTS We screened 5,367 articles, of which 97 were systematically reviewed and 55 were included in this systematic review. Twelve of these were RCTs, 11 were prospective cohort studies, and 32 were retrospective studies. Nine RCTs had a low risk of bias. For non-RCTs, only 3 studies had a low risk of bias. Data of 23 studies were pooled in meta-analyses, performed for follow-up periods of 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. These studies showed recurrence rates of 4%, 14%, 17%, and 27%, respectively. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE In the meta-analysis, at 24 months after surgery, the endometrioma recurrence rate showed a weighted mean of up to 27%. In this study, we aimed to determine the recurrence rate of endometrioma after surgical treatment in women without postoperative hormonal treatment use. The recurrence rates were up to 27%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle B Veth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Anne Keukens
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk Reijs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies Y Bongers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Velja Mijatovic
- Department of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sjors F P J Coppus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jacques W M Maas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chauhan S, More A, Chauhan V, Kathane A. Endometriosis: A Review of Clinical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Pathogenesis. Cureus 2022; 14:e28864. [PMID: 36225394 PMCID: PMC9537113 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis is a condition that affects women of reproductive age, and it is distinguished by the development of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is frequently accompanied by persistent pelvic discomfort and infertility. This investigation looks into recent findings on clinical manifestation to help doctors and improve women's health. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to review on clinical diagnosis of endometriosis. The search strategy contained the terms “endometriosis” and “clinical diagnosis.” All research articles published between 1960 and 2021 were included in the search. The findings were then categorized to summarize the evidence. There was a total of 29 instances of endometriosis discovered. The patients' ages varied from 20 to 45 years old, with a median of 28.8 years and a mean of 29.4±7.7 years. Dysmenorrhea is a common disorder among adolescent girls experiencing various physical and emotional symptoms which have a detrimental influence on their quality of life. In this study, scar endometriosis was shown to be the more common variety of endometriosis, with 50% of cases predominantly developing at the lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) scar site. As a result, women with endometriosis are more likely to have miscarriages, and the quality of their embryos declines as a result.
Collapse
|
3
|
An Unusual Case of a Large Extraovarian Endometrioma in an Adolescent. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2022; 2022:1675353. [PMID: 35845972 PMCID: PMC9286997 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1675353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis in adolescents is often underrecognized and is a contributing factor to significant delays in its diagnosis and management. Extraovarian endometrioma is uncommon, especially in the adolescent age range. We report on a rare case of a large extraovarian endometrioma involving the terminal ileum in an adolescent who presented with abdominal pain and a pelvic mass and its subsequent surgical management. It emphasizes the importance of having a broad differential diagnosis and considers endometriosis in any adolescent with pelvic pain and mass, especially in an atypical context. Increased awareness, education, and research on endometriosis in this young population are essential in order to overcome existing challenges in the early diagnosis and optimal management of this chronic gynaecological condition and avoid morbidity associated with advanced disease.
Collapse
|
4
|
Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, King K, Kvaskoff M, Nap A, Petersen K, Saridogan E, Tomassetti C, van Hanegem N, Vulliemoz N, Vermeulen N. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022:hoac009. [PMID: 35350465 PMCID: PMC8951218 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 448] [Impact Index Per Article: 224.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How should endometriosis be diagnosed and managed based on the best available evidence from published literature? SUMMARY ANSWER The current guideline provides 109 recommendations on diagnosis, treatments for pain and infertility, management of disease recurrence, asymptomatic or extrapelvic disease, endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women, prevention and the association with cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Endometriosis is a chronic condition with a plethora of presentations in terms of not only the occurrence of lesions, but also the presence of signs and symptoms. The most important symptoms include pain and infertility. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. After formulation of key questions by a group of experts, literature searches and assessments were performed. Papers published up to 1 December 2020 and written in English were included in the literature review. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed within specialist subgroups and then presented to the core guideline development group (GDG) until consensus was reached. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the GDG and the ESHRE Executive Committee. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE This guideline aims to help clinicians to apply best care for women with endometriosis. Although studies mostly focus on women of reproductive age, the guideline also addresses endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women. The guideline outlines the diagnostic process for endometriosis, which challenges laparoscopy and histology as gold standard diagnostic tests. The options for treatment of endometriosis-associated pain symptoms include analgesics, medical treatments and surgery. Non-pharmacological treatments are also discussed. For management of endometriosis-associated infertility, surgical treatment and/or medically assisted reproduction are feasible. While most of the more recent studies confirm previous ESHRE recommendations, there are five topics in which significant changes to recommendations were required and changes in clinical practice are to be expected. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The guideline describes different management options but, based on existing evidence, no firm recommendations could be formulated on the most appropriate treatments. Also, for specific clinical issues, such as asymptomatic endometriosis or extrapelvic endometriosis, the evidence is too scarce to make evidence-based recommendations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in endometriosis care, based on the best evidence currently available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to stimulate further studies in endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payments. C.M.B. reports grants from Bayer Healthcare and the European Commission; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with ObsEva (Data Safety Monitoring Group) and Myovant (Scientific Advisory Group). A.B. reports grants from FEMaLE executive board member and European Commission Horizon 2020 grant; consulting fees from Ethicon Endo Surgery, Medtronic; honoraria for lectures from Ethicon; and support for meeting attendance from Gedeon Richter; A.H. reports grants from MRC, NIHR, CSO, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring; Consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Nordic Pharma, Chugai and Benevolent Al Bio Limited all paid to the institution; a pending patent on Serum endometriosis biomarker; he is also Chair of TSC for STOP-OHSS and CERM trials. O.H. reports consulting fees and speaker's fees from Gedeon Richter and Bayer AG; support for attending meetings from Gedeon-Richter, and leadership roles at the Finnish Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Nordic federation of the societies of obstetrics and gynecology. L.K. reports consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; support for attending meetings from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; he also has a leadership role in the German Society of Gynecological Endocrinology (DGGEF). M.K. reports grants from French Foundation for Medical Research (FRM), Australian Ministry of Health, Medical Research Future Fund and French National Cancer Institute; support for meeting attendance from European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), European Congress on Endometriosis (EEC) and ESHRE; She is an advisory Board Member, FEMaLe Project (Finding Endometriosis Using Machine Learning), Scientific Committee Chair for the French Foundation for Research on Endometriosis and Scientific Committee Chair for the ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort. A.N. reports grants from Merck SA and Ferring; speaker fees from Merck SA and Ferring; support for meeting attendance from Merck SA; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; she also is a board member of medical advisory board, Endometriosis Society, the Netherlands (patients advocacy group) and an executive board member of the World Endometriosis Society. E.S. reports grants from National Institute for Health Research UK, Rosetrees Trust, Barts and the London Charity; Royalties from De Gruyter (book editor); consulting fees from Hologic; speakers fees from Hologic, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Intuitive, Olympus and Karl Storz; Participation in the Medicines for Women's Health Expert Advisory Group with Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA); he is also Ambassador for the World Endometriosis Society. C.T. reports grants from Merck SA; Consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; speaker fees from Merck SA, all paid to the institution; and support for meeting attendance from Ferring, Gedeon Richter and Merck SA. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. DISCLAIMER This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders has been obtained. Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. ESHRE makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically excludes any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian M Becker
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, Endometriosis CaRe
Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Attila Bokor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University,
Budapest, Hungary
| | - Oskari Heikinheimo
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki
University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrew Horne
- EXPPECT Centre for Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain, MRC Centre for Reproductive
Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Femke Jansen
- EndoHome—Endometriosis Association Belgium, Belgium
| | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital
Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | | | - Marina Kvaskoff
- Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Inserm, Gustave Roussy,
“Exposome and Heredity” Team, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Annemiek Nap
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen,
The Netherlands
| | | | - Ertan Saridogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London
Hospital, London, UK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College
London, London, UK
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Center,
University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, LEERM (Lab of
Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine), KU Leuven, Leuven,
Belgium
| | - Nehalennia van Hanegem
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center
Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Vulliemoz
- Department of Woman Mother Child, Fertility Medicine and Gynaecological
Endocrinology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology,
Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Benagiano G, Guo S. Age-dependent phenotypes of ovarian endometriomas. Reprod Med Biol 2022; 21:e12438. [PMID: 35386381 PMCID: PMC8967305 DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To analyze the characteristics of the ovarian endometrioma (OE) across the life span of a woman. In the past, the OE has traditionally been viewed as a single, monolithic disease. Today, there are emerging data indicating that OE phenotypes differ according to the age of the woman. Method A narrative review of original articles on OE indexed by PubMed. Results When appearing in infancy and early adolescence, OE may be the consequence of endometrial cells retrogradely shed with neonatal uterine bleeding. The post-menarcheal variant, manifesting itself during full adolescence, is singularly frequent in the presence of vaginal or uterine outflow obstructive anomalies. The typical and most frequent adult phenotype is characterized by increasing fibrosis and a tendency to progress; its mere presence exerts a detrimental effect on the surrounding healthy ovarian tissue. In postmenopause, an old lesion may be reactivated in the presence of exogenous or endogenous estrogens, or even be produced ex novo; rarely, it can spread to a variety of organs and structures and even degenerate causing malignancies. Conclusions Given the existence of these variants, it is important to agree on management guidelines that take into consideration these different phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sun‐Wei Guo
- Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Somboonporn W, Kantawee K. Recurrent ovarian endometrioma after conservative surgery: A retrospective study. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/2305-0500.335858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
7
|
Abstract
Early diagnosis and long-term management of endometriosis is important in adolescent girls considering their potential for future pregnancy and need for preventing disease progression. However, symptoms and clinical findings of adolescent endometriosis may differ from those of typical adult endometriosis, making diagnosis difficult. In adolescents, menstrual pain may present as acyclic and unresponsive to commonly used medication. Typical imaging findings in adult endometriosis, such as ovarian endometriotic cysts and fibrotic scars, are less common in adolescents. Peritoneal lesions, characteristic of early-stage endometriosis, are commonly found in this age group. It should be noted that endometriosis may also be found in adolescents before menarche, because of premenarcheal endometriosis or congenital uterine anomaly and outflow obstruction; the latter requiring surgical correction. Although surgery is reported to be effective for pain, postsurgical recurrence rate is high, and the effect of hormonal treatment is controversial. The optimal timing for surgical intervention also remains to be determined. Here, we aim to identify the unique characteristics of endometriosis in adolescents to achieve early diagnosis and optimal management for this group of patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiang D, Zhang X, Shi J, Tao D, Nie X. Risk factors for ovarian endometrioma recurrence following surgical excision: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 304:589-598. [PMID: 34148122 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06129-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Exploring potential risk factors for OMA recurrence, thereby contributing to the individual management of the disease and improving the patients' prognosis. METHODS Data sources PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang data were searched systematically before October 2020. We computed the pooled odd ratios or the standard mean difference with their corresponding 95% confidence interval to investigate the impact of involved risk factors on endometrioma recurrence. RESULTS The pooled findings of this meta-analysis demonstrated that endometrioma relapse was closely related to age at surgery [SMD (95% CI): - 0.28 (- - 0.38 to - 0.17), P < 0.00001], CA125 level [SMD (95% CI): 0.51 (0.14-0.88), P = 0.007], cyst size [SMD (95% CI): 0.35 (0.08-0.62), P = 0.01], dysmenorrhea [OR (95% CI): 1.47 (1.07-2.02), P = 0.02], endometriosis-related surgery history [OR (95% CI): 2.60 (1.84-3.67), P < 0.00001], pre-operative medication [OR (95% CI): 2.13 (1.41-3.22), P = 0.0003], rASRM score [SMD (95% CI): 0.33 (0.20-0.46), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, post-operative pregnancy was indicated a protective factor for preventing the OMA recurrence after surgery [OR (95% CI): 0.22 (0.09-0.56), P = 0.001] CONCLUSION: Age at surgery, CA125 level, cyst size, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis-related surgery history, pre-operative medication, rASRM score were risk factors for endometrioma relapse. In addition, post-operative pregnancy was a protective factor for preventing recurrence after surgery. However, the effect of bilateral involvement, combination with adenomyosis, or post-operative medication on endometrioma relapse need further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danni Jiang
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China
| | - Xuxing Zhang
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China
| | - Jiaqi Shi
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China
| | - Dongmei Tao
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning, China
| | - Xiaocui Nie
- Department of Gynecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, 87 Danan Street, Shenyang, 110011, Liaoning, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Benagiano G, Bianchi P, Guo SW. Endometriosis in adolescent and young women. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73:523-535. [PMID: 33876904 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04764-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis in adolescence represents a specific variant of the disease with its own characteristics and, in some cases, even a possibly different pathogenesis. It has its own clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. The condition is not rare as once thought and certainly deserves attention in view of increasing evidence of its likely progressive nature. Numerous theories for Its pathogenesis have been formulated and they have been divided into two main categories: the 'in-situ' and the 'transplantation' hypotheses. Clinical manifestations include as the prevailing symptom a persistent chronic pelvic pain, despite medical treatment, manifested under various forms: dysmenorrhea, acyclic chronic pain, acute abdominal pain and migraines. These symptoms can substantially affect the quality of life on an adolescent. At histopathology, adolescent endometriosis is characterized by a high proportion of subtle, clear, red or vesicular implants and by the rarity of deep nodules. Frequently, the picture includes ovarian endometriomas. In some adolescent girls, lesions may regress or even disappear, probably through immune suppression; in others, chronic stress, unhealthy diet or lifestyle such as high-fat diet, may accelerate lesional progression and cause symptoms. Classically, management of adolescent endometriosis has been centered on attempts to treat dysmenorrhea; today both medical and surgical modalities have the potential to improve quality of life, alleviate symptoms, prevent the development of more severe disease and minimize risks for future fertility in adolescents. Nonetheless, at present, medical treatments are considered the first line of interventions in treating young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Benagiano
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gynecology and Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy -
| | - Paola Bianchi
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sun-Wei Guo
- Shanghai Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Orazov M, Abitova M, Khamoshina M, Volkova S, Aryutin D, Shustova V. OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOSIS: THE MODERN POSSIBILITIES OF RELAPSE PREDICTION. REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.37800/rm2020-1-30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The article summarizes the current understanding of risk factors and mechanisms of ovarian endometriosis relapses,
This article summarizes the current understanding of risk factors for relapse, mechanisms of recurrence of endometrioid ovarian cysts, as well as the potential for their prediction using genetic and molecular-biological predictors.
Collapse
|
11
|
Song XC, Yu X, Luo M, Yu Q, Zhu L. Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Symptoms of 85 Adolescents with Endometriosis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2020; 33:519-523. [PMID: 32619717 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Endometriosis is the most common cause of secondary dysmenorrhea among adolescents. Data on postoperative symptoms of the disease in adolescents are limited. In this study we aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and postoperative symptoms of adolescent endometriosis in our center. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary care institution. PARTICIPANTS Eighty-five adolescents with surgically confirmed endometriosis, age younger than 19 years, were included. INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical characteristics including demographic factors, pelvic symptoms, and changes of pelvic pain after surgery. RESULTS Of 11,236 patients with endometriosis who received surgical treatment between January 2008 and January 2018 in our department, 85 adolescents (85/11,236; 0.76%) were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 16.3 (±2.4) years and pelvic pain was the main symptoms which occurred in 73/85 (85.9%). Forty-four of the 85 patients (51.8%) had associated genital malformations. The patients with genital malformations tended to present with a younger age at the time of surgery (15.1 ± 2.4 vs 17.6 ± 1.7 years; P < .001) and a shorter duration of symptoms to time of surgery (1.5 ± 1.3 vs 2.3 ± 2.1 years; P = .033). The median follow-up time was 56 months (range, 24-140 months) after surgery, and the pelvic pain had disappeared in 41.7% of patients, improved in 38.3% of patients, and had no change or worsened in 20.0% patients. CONCLUSION Pelvic pain was the main symptom in adolescents with endometriosis and was greatly improved after surgery. It should also be noted that genital malformation might be an important factor in younger adolescents with endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Chen Song
- Department of General Gynecological Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Yu
- Department of General Gynecological Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
| | - Min Luo
- Department of Gynecological Endocrine and Reproductive Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Yu
- Department of Gynecological Endocrine and Reproductive Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lan Zhu
- Department of General Gynecological Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gałczyński K, Jóźwik M, Lewkowicz D, Semczuk-Sikora A, Semczuk A. Ovarian endometrioma - a possible finding in adolescent girls and young women: a mini-review. J Ovarian Res 2019; 12:104. [PMID: 31699129 PMCID: PMC6839067 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0582-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Young girls before menarche or menstruating adolescent women may experience long-term drug-resistant chronic pelvic pain, as well as other symptoms associated with pelvic mass. In such cases, it is of great importance to consider ovarian endometrioma in the differential diagnosis. In general, endometrioma is recognized as an ovarian cyst. However, in most cases, the pathology represents pseudocyst with a partial or complete endometrial-like lining with extraovarian adhesions and endometriotic implants which are likely to occur at the sites of ovarian adhesions and at the ceiling of the ovarian fossa. Ovarian endometriomas occur in 17–44% patients with endometriosis and account for 35% of all benign ovarian cysts. The time span from the onset of menarche to the time of endometrioma formation, which requires surgical intervention, has been evaluated to be a minimum of 4 years. The pathogenesis of early-life endometrioma may be different from other types of endometriosis. Diagnosis is often delayed, especially in adolescents, who tend to wait too long before seeking professional help. The three specific aims of treatment in adolescents with endometriosis and endometriomas are control of symptoms, prevention of further progression of the disease as well as preservation of fertility. Increasing evidence demonstrates association between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian cancer. In the present mini-review, we draw the particular attention of clinicians to such a possibility, even if relatively infrequently reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Gałczyński
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Konarskiego str. 2, 08-110, Siedlce, Poland.,Second Department of Gynecological Oncology, St. John's of Dukla Cancer Center of Lublin, Jaczewskiego str. 7, 20-090, Lublin, Poland
| | - Maciej Jóźwik
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Białystok Medical University, Kilińskiego str. 1, 15-089, Białystok, Poland
| | - Dorota Lewkowicz
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Lublin Medical University, Jaczewskiego str. 8b, 20-090, Lublin, Poland
| | - Anna Semczuk-Sikora
- Department of Pathology of Pregnancy, Lublin Medical University, Staszica str. 16, 20-081, Lublin, Poland
| | - Andrzej Semczuk
- IIND Department of Gynecology, Lublin Medical University, Jaczewskiego str. 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ceccaroni M, Bounous VE, Clarizia R, Mautone D, Mabrouk M. Recurrent endometriosis: a battle against an unknown enemy. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2019; 24:464-474. [PMID: 31550940 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1662391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Recurrence of endometriosis after conservative surgery is not an uncommon finding. There is no uniformity, however, on what the term 'recurrence' means. Recurrence is variously defined in the literature as the relapse of pain, clinical or instrumental detection of an endometriotic lesion, repeat rise in CA 125 levels, or evidence of recurrence found during repeat surgery. Consequently, the reported recurrence rate varies widely (0-89%) in the different series, depending on its definition and the type of study performed. As endometriosis recurrence seems to be an indeterminate enemy, we set out to examine exactly what we were fighting in our everyday battle. In this narrative review, we aimed to seek an answer to questions related to endometriosis recurrence, some of which are often asked by our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecological Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Elisabetta Bounous
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Clarizia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecological Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniele Mautone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gynaecological Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Mohamed Mabrouk
- Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhu S, Zhu Y, Liu Y, Zhang H. Comparison of Outcomes of Different Postoperative Hormone Therapy in the Treatment of Ovarian Endometriosis: A Brief Report. Adv Ther 2018; 35:857-863. [PMID: 29873006 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0715-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hormone therapy is widely used in the treatment of patients with ovarian endometriosis after surgery, and progestin and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) are two of the most widely used hormones. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of progestin and GnRH in the treatment of ovarian endometriosis after surgery. METHODS A total of 399 patients with ovarian endometriosis were included and divided into four groups to receive different treatments. Group A received no postoperative hormone therapy; patients in group B1 and B2 were treated with different doses of norethindrone (progestin, 1.2 and 5 mg/day, respectively); patients in group C were treated with GnRH (2.0 mg every 2 weeks). Treatment outcomes including menstrual bleeding profiles, cumulative recurrence rate, incidence of complications, and endometrioma diameter in the case of recurrence were recorded and compared between groups. RESULTS Compared with group A, group B1, B2 and C showed significantly improved menstrual bleeding profiles and reduced cumulative recurrence rate and endometrioma diameter after recurrence. In addition, compared with group C, menstrual bleeding profiles were significantly improved and cumulative recurrence rate and endometrioma diameter were significantly reduced in group B1 and B2. No significant differences in incidence of complications during treatment were found among groups. After treatment, recurrence rate and endometrioma diameter were significantly increased in group B1, B2, and C. CONCLUSION Both progestin and GnRH can significantly improve the conditions of patients with ovarian endometriosis after surgery, but progestin may be a better choice. Both therapies are challenged by the increased recurrence rate and endometrioma diameter after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songnan Zhu
- Department of Gynaecological, Tianjin Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Nankai District, Tianjin, China.
| | - Yingjun Zhu
- Department of Gynaecological, Tianjin Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Nankai District, Tianjin, China
| | - Yabo Liu
- Department of Gynaecological, Tianjin Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Nankai District, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Gynaecological, Tianjin Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Nankai District, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saraswat L, Ayansina D, Cooper KG, Bhattacharya S, Horne AW, Bhattacharya S. Impact of endometriosis on risk of further gynaecological surgery and cancer: a national cohort study. BJOG 2018; 125:64-72. [PMID: 28952173 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term risk of further gynaecological surgery and cancer in women with endometriosis. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING Scotland. PARTICIPANTS 281 937 women with nearly 5 million person years (4 923 628) of follow up from 1981 to 2010. METHODS In this national population-based study we compared 17 834 women with a new surgical diagnosis of endometriosis with 83 303 women with no evidence of endometriosis at laparoscopy, 162 966 women who underwent laparoscopic sterilisation, and 17 834 age-matched women from the general population. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Risk of further gynaecological surgery, number and type of repeat surgery and time to repeat surgery from the diagnosis of endometriosis. Cancer outcomes included subsequent risk of all cancer, gynaecological and non-gynaecological cancers. RESULTS Women with endometriosis had a significantly higher risk of further surgery when compared with women with no evidence of endometriosis at laparoscopy [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69, 95% (confidence interval) CI 1.65-1.73], women who had undergone laparoscopic sterilisation (HR 3.30, 95% CI 3.23-3.37) and age-matched women from the general population (HR 5.95, 95% CI 5.71-6.20). They also have an increased risk of ovarian cancer when compared with general population counterparts (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.08-2.89) or those with laparoscopic sterilisation (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.2-2.45). CONCLUSION Women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis face an increased risk of multiple surgery. They have a higher chance of developing ovarian cancer in comparison with the general population and women with laparoscopic sterilisation. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Women with endometriosis face an increased risk of recurrent surgery and developing ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Saraswat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - D Ayansina
- Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - K G Cooper
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - S Bhattacharya
- Dugald Baird Centre, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A W Horne
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - S Bhattacharya
- Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|