Adolescent-Parent Dyadic Retention in an Interview Study and Changes in Willingness to Participate in a Hypothetical Microbicide Safety Study

Not Quite Meeting the Mark: College Experiences for Patients With Celiac Disease

Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD), the current treatment for celiac disease (CD), is socially challenging for adolescents, especially in the college setting. We conducted a survey of factors contributing to GFD adherence during college among patients meeting the ESPGHAN criteria for CD. One-hundred-one young adults (18 years and older) were contacted; 59 completed the survey, of which 47 were enrolled or had attended college. The survey was developed by the study team. Most patients were able to maintain strict adherence to the GFD, whereas at college and reported that GF food was available and consistent with expectations. Nearly all participants reported a lack of resources for students with CD. Strong family support helped, and school stress and lack of peer support impeded diet adherence. Although colleges may meet the basic needs of celiac students, the availability and quality of gluten-free options, and improved campus resources are needed.

Adolescent and Parent Perceptions about Participation in Biomedical Sexual Health Trials

Given the burden of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among adolescents who are legal minors, it is critical that they be included in biomedical sexual health trials to ensure that new prevention and treatment interventions are safe, effective, and acceptable for their use. However, adolescents are often not well represented in clinical trials. We provide an overview of the available evidence regarding adolescent and parent willingness for adolescents to participate in biomedical sexual health trials, parental involvement in the permission-consent process, management of differences and discord among adolescents and parents, and parental involvement throughout the study period. We also outline recommendations for current practice and areas for future research.

A Research Agenda for Emergency Medicine-based Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to identify key questions for emergency medicine (EM)-based adolescent sexual and reproductive health and to develop an evidence-based research agenda.

METHODS

We recruited national content experts to serve as advisory group members and used a modified Delphi technique to develop consensus around actionable research questions related to EM-based adolescent reproductive and sexual health care. Author subgroups conducted literature reviews and developed the initial list of research questions, which were iteratively refined with advisory members. External stakeholders then independently rated each item for its importance in expanding the evidence base (1 = not important to 5 = very important) via electronic survey.

RESULTS

Our final list of 24 research questions included items that intersected all sexual and reproductive health topics as well as questions specific to human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted infections (HIV/STIs), pregnancy prevention, confidentiality/consent, public health, and barriers and facilitators to care. External stakeholders rated items related to HIV/STI, cost-effectiveness, brief intervention for sexual risk reduction, and implementation and dissemination as most important.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified critical questions to inform EM-based adolescent sexual and reproductive health research. Because evidence-based care has potential to improve health outcomes while reducing costs associated with HIV/STI and unintended pregnancy, funders and researchers should consider increasing attention to these key questions.

Adolescents' and Parents' Attitudes Toward Adolescent Clinical Trial Participation: Changes Over One Year

Little is known about how adolescents' and parents' thoughts about participation in clinical trials change over time. In this study, adolescent (14-17 years)-parent dyads were asked about willingness to participate in a hypothetical reproductive health study. A year later, they were asked how their thoughts about the study had changed. Qualitative responses were coded and analyzed using framework analysis. Thirty-two percent of adolescents and 18% of parents reported changes in thoughts; reasons included general changes in perception, clearer understanding, new knowledge or experiences, increased maturity/age of adolescents, and changes in participants independent of the study. Adolescents and parents may benefit from learning about studies multiple times, and investigators should account for development and new experiences to optimize adolescent research enrollment.