Adolescent Self-Reported Use of Highly Effective Contraception: Does Provider Counseling Matter?

Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review

Purpose: Poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias are believed to compromise adolescent and young adult sexual and reproductive health service quality. The results of focus group discussions with global youth leaders and sexual and reproductive health implementing organizations indicated that poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias serve as key barriers to care access for the youth. Methods: A narrative review was conducted to describe how poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias impose barriers on young people seeking sexual and reproductive health services and to examine how point of service evaluations have assessed these factors. Results: 4544 peer-reviewed publications were screened, of which 95 met the inclusion criteria. To these articles, another 16 grey literature documents were included, resulting in a total of 111 documents included in the review. Conclusion: Poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias represent significant barriers for young people seeking sexual and reproductive health services across diverse geographic and sociocultural contexts. The authors found that present evaluation methods do not appropriately account for the importance of these factors and that new performance improvement indicators are needed.

Educational Multimedia Tool Compared With Routine Care for the Uptake of Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Individuals With High-Risk Pregnancies: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether an intervention with a multimedia educational tool, compared with routine care, would increase the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) at 12 weeks postpartum in individuals with high-risk pregnancies.

METHODS

In this single-center randomized trial, we assigned individuals aged 13-50 years with high-risk pregnancies to either a multimedia educational tool or routine care. Participants were included during pregnancy through postpartum day 1. Those randomized to the multimedia educational tool (MET) group were provided a tablet with the preloaded 3-5-minute multimedia presentation (https://prezi.com/view/jpFrXaPnnxuqRkcI3A4a/), which was viewed without the presence of research staff and resent by secure email every 4 weeks if undelivered. The primary outcome was uptake of LARC (implant or intrauterine device) within 12 weeks of delivery. The secondary outcomes included overall use of any method of contraception and composite maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. A priori estimates indicated that 380 participants were needed to detect a 40% difference in use of LARC (baseline 40%; alpha=0.05, power=0.8, assumed loss to follow-up 20%). Relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT), along with 95% CIs, were calculated.

RESULTS

From July 2020 through December 2020, 536 persons were screened and 380 randomized as follows: 190 for the multimedia educational tool and 190 for routine care. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. The primary outcome-available for more than 90% of participants-was higher in the MET group (32.4%) than in the routine care (RC) group (20.9%) (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.09-2.21; NNT nine, with 95% CI 5-42). Overall use of contraception was also higher in the MET group than in the RC group (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.32).

CONCLUSION

Among individuals with high-risk pregnancies, compared with routine care, use of a multimedia-based educational tool increased the uptake of postpartum LARC by 55%.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04291040.

FUNDING SOURCE

Funded in part by Investigator-Initiated studies of Organon.

A comparison of contraceptive services for adolescents at school-based versus community health centers in Oregon

OBJECTIVE

To compare Oregon school-based health centers (SBHCs) with community health centers (CHCs) as sources of adolescent contraceptive services.

DATA SOURCES

Oregon electronic health record data, 2012-2016.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared clinic-level counseling rates and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) provision, adolescent populations served, and visit-level LARC provision time trends. We evaluated adjusted associations between LARC provision and Title X participation by clinic type.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

We used diagnosis and procedure codes to identify contraceptive counseling and provision visits, excluding visits for adolescents not at risk of pregnancy.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

CHCs were more likely to provide LARC on-site than SBHCs (67.2% vs. 36.4%, respectively). LARC provision increased more at SBHCs (5.8-fold) than CHCs (2-fold) over time. SBHCs provided more counseling visits per clinic (255 vs. 142) and served more young and non-White adolescents than CHCs. The adjusted probability of LARC provision at Title X SBHCs was higher than non-Title X SBHCs (4.4% [3.9-4.9] vs. 1.7% [1.4-2.0]), but there was no significant association at CHCs.

CONCLUSIONS

In Oregon, CHCs and SBHCs are both important sources of adolescent contraceptive services, and Title X plays a crucial role in SBHCs. Compared with CHCs, SBHCs provided more counseling, showed a larger increase in LARC provision over time, and served more younger and non-White adolescents.