Compensatory Ovarian Hypertrophy after Unilateral Oophorectomy: Evaluation of Ovarian Volumes in Pediatric and Adolescent Populations

Ovarian absence: a systematic literature review and case series report

Ovarian absence is an uncommon condition that most frequently presents unilaterally. Several etiologies for the condition have been proposed, including torsion, vascular accident, and embryological defect. A systematic review was conducted to describe the clinical presentation of ovarian absence, as well as its associations with other congenital anomalies, through a systematic search of Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Exclusion criteria included cases with suspicion for Differences of Sex Development, lack of surgically-confirmed ovarian absence, and karyotypes other than 46XX. Our search yielded 12,120 citations, of which 79 studies were included. 10 additional studies were found by citation chasing resulting in a total 113 cases including two unpublished cases presented in this review. Abdominal/pelvic pain (30%) and infertility/subfertility (19%) were the most frequent presentations. Ovarian abnormalities were not noted in 28% of cases with pre-operative ovarian imaging results. Approximately 17% of cases had concomitant uterine abnormalities, while 22% had renal abnormalities. Renal abnormalities were more likely in patients with uterine abnormalities (p < 0.005). Torsion or vascular etiology was the most frequently suspected etiology of ovarian absence (52%), followed by indeterminate (27%) and embryologic etiology (21%). Most cases of ovarian absence are likely attributable to torsion or vascular accidents, despite many references to the condition as "agenesis" in the literature. Imaging may fail to correctly diagnose ovarian absence, and diagnostic laparoscopy may be preferable in many cases as genitourinary anatomy and fertility considerations can be assessed during the procedure. Fertility is likely minimally or not affected in women with unilateral ovarian absence.

Live birth and pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of unilateral oophorectomy (UO) on the rates of live birth and pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Search of databases of published articles.

PATIENT(S)

The final analytical cohort encompassed 1,057 IVF/ICSI cycles in women with previous UO and 45,813 IVF/ICSI cycles in control women. Eighteen studies were identified by database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and cited references. The review encompassed studies published up to June 1, 2021.

INTERVENTION(S)

UO prior to IVF/ICSI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcomes were the rates of live birth and pregnancy following IVF/ICSI. The secondary outcomes included the amount of gonadotropins administered for ovarian stimulation and the number of retrieved oocytes.

RESULT(S)

The studies were rated from medium to high quality (from 5 to 8) according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. All studies were observational, with inherent bias, and heterogeneity was high. The primary outcome of live birth had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.91, z = -2.72). The OR for pregnancy rate per initiated treatment cycle was also significantly lower in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, z = -3.35). Additionally, the dose of administered gonadotropins was significantly higher and the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly lower in women with UO.

CONCLUSION(S)

The meta-analysis showed a significant detrimental effect of UO on the rates of live birth and pregnancy. The analysis further supports previous data showing a decreased sensitivity to gonadotropins and a lower number of recovered oocytes in women with previous UO.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO 2020, CRD42020160313.