Corrected QT Interval Prolongation in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients on Methadone for Cancer-Related Pain

A Narrative Review of Pain in Pediatric Oncology: The Opioid Option

Opioid therapy is the mainstay for managing pain in pediatric oncology. This narrative review describes the current literature regarding opioids for pediatric cancer pain. The review explores the multifaceted landscape of opioid utilization in this population, including the role of opioids in certain clinical circumstances, modalities of opioid delivery, unique opioids, outpatient and at-home pain management strategies, and other key concepts such as breakthrough pain. This review highlights the importance of individualized dosing and multimodal approaches to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Drawing from a wide range of evidence, this review offers insights to optimize pediatric oncology pain management.

Routine Monitoring of QTc Interval as a Barrier for Efficient Use of Methadone in Palliative Care

BACKGROUND

Methadone is a commonly prescribed opioid amongst cancer patients. It has unique pharmacological properties which can benefit in treating complex pain syndromes and neuropathic pain. However, strict guidelines have been created in a generalized manner for chronic pain and long-term survival patients. These guidelines, such as QT interval monitoring can lead to limitations for methadone use in patients with comfort-associated goals. We present two cases of patients with metastatic cancer who were treated for pain with methadone and had to undergo opioid rotation due to abnormal QT intervals.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Case one was a female with open ulcerated wounds due to metastatic breast cancer who presented with uncontrolled pain on her current opioid regimen. She achieved pain relief when rotated to methadone but a repeat electrocardiogram a few months later showed QTc prolongation. She underwent opioid rotation with different medications, but her pain remained poorly controlled. Case two was a female with poorly controlled pain in the setting of bilateral breast cancer. She presented with concerns for opioid-induced neurotoxicity and was rotated to methadone. She achieved optimal pain relief. A few weeks later, her machine read QT interval was prolonged and she was rotated off methadone. The electrocardiogram was manually read which showed a normal QT interval and she was restarted on methadone with pain relief.

CONCLUSION

In the palliative care setting, monitoring QTc per chronic pain guidelines may lead to uncontrolled pain and a significant impact on quality of life.

Methadone for Cancer Pain Management in Children: A Review of Literature

Pain associated with cancer is a common feature among children and adolescents. Among opioids, methadone is a unique drug for its multiple mechanisms of action. Methadone is currently underutilized in children. The use of methadone for cancer pain management in children was assessed in a systematic review. Altogether, 141 children receiving methadone were examined, and another 126 children were assessed for QT prolongation. In the clinical studies, modalities of use, dosing, and duration of assessment were highly variable. In general, methadone was effective and well tolerated with a limited tendency for dose increases. QT prolongation was reported in a percentage of patients independently of the dosages or other variables. The majority of studies considered the use of methadone to be safe and effective in children. Despite methadone possessing interesting properties that make this drug unique in a pediatric context, data is limited, and the literature available is based on retrospective studies. Methadone could be an effective, inexpensive, and versatile medication in children with cancer who have pain. This drug deserves more interest and should prompt studies of better quality with a larger number of patients.

Comparison of the 2005 Montreal Criteria and the 2019 Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium Criteria for the Diagnosis of Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy

The comparison between the diagnostic criteria for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) first proposed in 2005 (2005 Montreal criteria), and those redefined in the 2019 Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium (2019 CCC criteria) has generated significant controversy. Importantly, the predictive value of these criteria in cirrhotic patients (CPs) remains unclear to this date. Thus, the present study aims to compare the 2 sets of criteria and investigate their predictive value in CPs. Between April 2021 and April 2023, a total of 104 CPs with an average age of 46.4 ± 8.9 years, who had no history of other cardiac diseases or malignancies were enrolled in this prospective single-center observational cohort study, conducted at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Various echocardiographic indicators were measured and assessed for their prognostic value and association with clinical outcomes. The prevalence of CCM was found to be comparable when evaluated using both the 2019 CCC and 2005 Montreal criteria (54.8% vs 44.2%, p = 0.161). However, the diagnosis of systolic dysfunction was significantly different between the 2 criteria (52.9% vs 1.0%, p <0.001). Among patients with systolic dysfunction, 27.9% had reduced left ventricular global longitudinal strain, while 25% had increased left ventricular global longitudinal strain. Moreover, fewer patients were diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction (DD) using the 2019 CCC criteria (4.8% vs 44.2%, p <0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that CPs who had encephalopathy, a high model for end-stage liver disease score, and DD diagnosed using the 2019 CCC criteria exhibited a poorer prognosis. In conclusion, although the prevalence of CCM according to both criteria is similar, the consistency is poor, indicating that they are not the same group of patients. Importantly, CPs with DD diagnosed according to the 2019 CCC criteria might be associated with increased adverse events.

Managing Pain and Discomfort in Children with Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately 15,600 children are diagnosed with cancer annually. Many of these children have cancer-related pain that improves with cancer treatment, but some develop intractable pain from cancer progression or sequelae from treatment modalities. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical evaluation of the literature relevant to pain management in children with cancer. We intend to emphasize important and up-to-date findings in pharmacology, interventional pain management, and complementary and alternative medicine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alternative medications and routes of administration, complementary and alternative medicine techniques, and interventional pain procedures offer possible routes for a multi-pronged pediatric cancer pain management plan, although high-level data is often lacking. To improve pediatric cancer pain management, a multifaceted approach embracing the biopsychosocial model of pain is recommended, incorporating evidence-based pharmacology, complementary and alternative medicine techniques, and if needed, interventional pain procedures.

Effect of methadone on QTc in infants

OBJECTIVE

Methadone has been associated with prolongation of the QTc interval (QTc) on electrocardiogram (ECG). In infants, the effects of methadone on the QTc are not well described. Our study's objective is to evaluate the QTc in infants being treated with methadone.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in infants receiving methadone. We collected demographic data, methadone dose, and QTc. A blinded-to-disease-state pediatric electrophysiologist determined the QTc. Baseline ECG was defined as an ECG obtained while not on methadone therapy, and QTc on baseline ECG was compared with treatment QTc. A significant change was defined as any absolute QTc greater than 500 or a QTc greater than 460 with an increase from baseline of greater than 40 ms.

RESULTS

A total of 44 infants comprised the study population. The mean gestational age was 32.3 ± 5.51 weeks. The median age of initiation was 66 days. The median dose was 0.52 mg/kg/day in oral methadone equivalents. Nine patients were on high dose methadone (>1 mg/kg/day in oral methadone equivalents). The mean baseline QTc was 421 ± 27 and the mean change on methadone was -2 ms. No patient had a QTc greater than 500 on methadone. One patient had a QTc of 467 and 46 ms change from baseline, with no clinically significant impact.

CONCLUSION

In our study population, methadone did not significantly prolong the QTc. Further prospective study is warranted to determine the utility and frequency of ECGs in infants receiving methadone.

Methadone for Cancer Pain in Pediatric End-of-Life Care

BACKGROUND

The goal of adequate pain control becomes increasingly salient for children with cancer and their families as the patients approach the end of life. Methadone is one option that is particularly desirable in end-of-life care given its long duration of action and NMDA antagonism that may help in controlling pain refractory to conventional opioids. The purpose of this study was to describe a single institution's experience with methadone for the treatment of cancer pain in pediatric end-of-life care.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, single-center study included all patients during a 9-year period who died in the inpatient setting and were receiving methadone in their last 30 days of life.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified, 18 (90%) of whom received methadone for nociceptive pain. The median duration of methadone use was 32 days (range 2-323 days). Methadone doses ranged from 0.09 to 7.76 mg/kg per day. There were no instances of discontinuing methadone due to an increased QTc interval. No episodes of torsades de pointes were observed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with pediatric cancer who are nearing the end of life, methadone is a valuable adjunctive therapy to treat nociceptive and neuropathic pain and to prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia and opioid tolerance. An individualized approach to dosage and route should be considered based on specific clinical circumstances.

Methadone in Cancer Pain

Methadone has been an unique, versatile, cost effective, synthetic opioid utilized in nociceptive as well as neuropathic pain. Pain and palliative care physicians started accepting methadone in treatment of complex pain associated with advanced cancer and neuropathic pain syndromes in which conventional opioids were no longer effective. The challenge is in accepting methadone as a main stream first line opioid, from being considered as a second line replacement/substitution drug all these years. Methadone has a significant role as opioid rotation in refractory cancer pain, especially when started early leading to successful conversion. Advantages of methadone in paediatric patients with advanced cancer were its safety and efficacy as a first-choice opioid, availability as a liquid formulation and its infrequent dose requirements. Methadone is neither recommended nor justified to be used as an anti-cancer drug and its role as an anti-cancer agent is a misconception. Many guidelines were proposed after 2008 to address methadone safety. Most of them emphasized on prevention of cardiac arrhythmia and association of methadone with QTc prolongation rather than address the real issue. Methadone has been established to be safe when used in opioid naïve patients with careful titration instituted in an ambulatory setting and has equal success in opioid rotation in outpatient setup. Methadone prescription should be carried out by experienced pain and palliative care providers with careful dose titration and clinical monitoring.

Emerging Challenges to the Safe and Effective Use of Methadone for Cancer-Related Pain in Paediatric and Adult Patient Populations

Methadone continues to be an important medication for the treatment of paediatric and adult cancer-related pain. Appropriate patient selection to ensure safe and effective treatment by a team of clinicians who appreciate and are familiar with methadone and its unique pharmacology is crucial. Unlike morphine and other more common opioids, methadone is purported to have involvement with delta-opioid receptor and higher affinity as an N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist. Clinically this gives it the advantage of being effective for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain, but also may be useful in the setting of tolerance to other opioids. Methadone also comes in multiple available formulations that can be administrated through a variety of routes beyond the oral route. Challenges with methadone in treating cancer-related pain include drug interactions specifically as it relates to new targeted cancer therapies. Recent guidelines recommend electrocardiogram monitoring with methadone and there is potential for additive cardiac toxicity in the oncology setting. Appropriate dosing of methadone for pain management given age, organ dysfunction, and patients who are on methadone maintenance therapy are also key factors. This article aims to provide clinicians with evidence and clinical practice guidelines for safe and appropriate use of methadone including indication, initiation, and monitoring given its complexity for management of pain in the dynamic oncology setting.