Development and Validation of a Uremic Pruritus Treatment Algorithm and Patient Information Toolkit in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and End Stage Kidney Disease

Development and Validation of a Treatment Algorithm for Osteoarthritis Pain Management in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis

Background

Although osteoarthritis is common in the hemodialysis population and leads to poor health outcomes, pain management is challenged by the absence of clinical guidance. A treatment algorithm was developed and validated to aid hemodialysis clinicians in managing osteoarthritis pain.

Objective

The objective was to develop and validate a treatment algorithm for managing osteoarthritis pain in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Design

A validation study was conducted based on Lynn's method for content validation.

Setting

To develop and validate a treatment algorithm, interviews were conducted virtually by the primary researcher with clinicians from various institutions across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area in Ontario.

Patients

The treatment algorithm was developed and validated for the management of osteoarthritis pain in patients on hemodialysis. Patients were not involved in the development or validation of the tool.

Measurements

The algorithm was measured for content and face validity. Content validity was measured by calculating the content validity index of each component (I-CVI) of the algorithm and the overall scale validity index (S-CVI). Face validity was assessed by calculating the percentage of positive responses to the face validity statements.

Methods

A draft algorithm was developed based on literature searches and expert opinion and validated by interviewing nephrology and pain management clinicians. Through consecutive rounds of 1:1 interviews, content and face validity were assessed by asking participants to rate the relevance of each component of the algorithm and indicate their level of agreeability with a series of statements. Following each round, the I-CVI of the algorithm as well as the S-CVI was calculated and the percentage of positive responses to the statements was determined. The research team revised the algorithm in response to the findings. The final algorithm provides a stepwise approach to the non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic management of pain, including topical, oral, and opioid use.

Results

A total of 18 clinicians from 7 institutions across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area were interviewed (10 pharmacists, 5 nurse practitioners, and 3 physicians). The average S-CVI of the algorithm across all 3 rounds was 0.93. At least 78% of participants provided positive responses to the face validity statements.

Limitations

An algorithm was developed based on input from clinicians working in the province of Ontario, limiting the generalizability of the algorithm across provinces. In addition, the algorithm did not include the perspectives of primary care providers or patients/caregivers.

Conclusions

An algorithm for the management of osteoarthritis pain in the hemodialysis population was developed and validated through expert review to standardize practices and encourage clinicians to use evidence-based treatments and address the psychosocial symptoms of pain. As the algorithm possesses a high degree of content and face validity, it may improve osteoarthritis pain management among patients undergoing hemodialysis. Future research will assess the implementation of the algorithm across hemodialysis settings.

Modulation of the kappa and mu opioid axis for the treatment of chronic pruritus: A review of basic science and clinical implications

Introduction

Treating chronic pruritus is challenging for dermatologists due to the lack of therapeutic options. We review the effects of κ-opioid receptor (KOR) and μ-opioid receptor (MOR) in the modulation of itch, summarize evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of opioid receptor–targeting agents in chronic pruritus, and address clinical considerations.

Results

Preclinical studies have found neural pathways underlying detection, transmission, and modulation of itch signaling and spotlighted the importance of neuronal KOR and MOR in itch perception. Clinical reports suggest that opioid axis modulation may be the basis for the successful treatment of chronic itch. Several agents (MOR antagonist naltrexone; KOR agonists nalfurafine and difelikefalin; dual-acting KOR agonists/MOR antagonists butorphanol and nalbuphine) have been evaluated for treating chronic pruritus in case series, small studies, and clinical trials; nalbuphine has progressed through preliminary (phase II/III) studies in uremic pruritus and prurigo nodularis. The antipruritic efficacy of these agents has been observed across multiple disorders with disparate etiologies, suggesting the potential utility of this class to provide a unified approach to chronic pruritus treatment.

Conclusions

The relative safety of these agents, including a reduced potential for dependence versus MOR-agonist analgesics, should help overcome resistance to the use of opioid receptor–targeting agents in chronic pruritus treatment.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus: A Glance at Novel and Lesser-Known Treatments

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP), also known as uremic pruritus, has been associated with increased mortality and lower quality of life among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The relentless nature of the condition is mainly due to its diverse and complex etiologies, which are still being studied. Despite the introduction of many agents to treat it, the resolution rates of CKD-aP still remain unsatisfactory. This study sought to review the lesser-known/novel treatments and establish a relationship between their mechanism of action and the proposed etiologies implicated in CKD-aP. We also discuss the role of dialysis modification in managing CKD-aP.

A decent proportion of the reviewed studies have proposed that the agents analyzed in them act through hampering inflammation. Interestingly, the results of two agents alluded to the role of dysbiosis in CKD-aP. The addition of hemoperfusion to the dialysis regimen of patients with CKD-aP improved the severity of their symptoms.

The featured treatments could be tried in patients with intractable symptoms. However, additional research is needed to confirm the findings reported in these studies. A better understanding of the pathologic mechanisms is required to help guide the development of agents that can better treat CKD-aP.

Development and validation of a constipation treatment toolkit for patients on hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

The cause of constipation is multifactorial and common problem for patients on hemodialysis. A lack of strong evidence on suitable treatment strategies means there is an unorganized approach to selecting therapies, which can exacerbate constipation or worsen symptoms. Clinicians and patients would benefit from a content and face validated treatment algorithm for treating constipation. In this study, our objective was to develop and content and face validate a constipation treatment toolkit for patients on hemodialysis, consisting of treatment algorithm, and patient information tools (pamphlet and video).

METHODS

Literature searches were performed to develop an initial toolkit using Lynn's method for developing content-valid clinical tools. Content and face validity were evaluated as per Lynn's method for determining content validity; the algorithm was evaluated by Canadian nephrology clinicians, while patient information tools were evaluated by clinicians and patients. Components were rated on a Likert scale for content relevance and on a 5-point scale for face validity. After each round, the content validity index (CVI) score was calculated and revisions were made based on feedback.

FINDINGS

A total of 23 clinicians and 15 patients were interviewed across three validation rounds. After three rounds, the treatment algorithm achieved content (overall CVI = 0.93) and face (91% agreement) validity. Our patient information tools achieved content and face validity (pamphlet overall CVI = 0.99, 85.5% agreement; video overall CVI = 0.99, 90.5% agreement).

DISCUSSION

A treatment algorithm and patient information toolkit for the treatment of constipation in patients on hemodialysis were content and face validated via expert review. Further research will be needed to ascertain the effectiveness and implementation of this toolkit.

Development and Validation of Nine Deprescribing Algorithms for Patients on Hemodialysis to Decrease Polypharmacy

Background:

Polypharmacy is ubiquitous in patients on hemodialysis (HD), and increases risk of adverse events, medication interactions, nonadherence, and mortality. Appropriately applied deprescribing can potentially minimize polypharmacy risks. Existing guidelines are unsuitable for nephrology clinicians as they lack specific instructions on how to deprescribe and which safety parameters to monitor.

Objective:

To develop and validate deprescribing algorithms for nine medication classes to decrease polypharmacy in patients on HD.

Design:

Questionnaires and materials sent electronically.

Participants:

Nephrology practitioners across Canada (nephrologists, nurse practitioners, renal pharmacists).

Methods:

A literature search was performed to develop the initial algorithms via Lynn’s method for development of content-valid clinical tools. Content and face validity of the algorithms was evaluated over three interview rounds using Lynn’s method for determining content validity. Canadian nephrology clinicians each evaluated three algorithms (15 clinicians per round, 45 clinicians in total) by rating each algorithm component on a four-point Likert scale for relevance; face validity was rated on a five-point scale. After each round, content validity index of each component was calculated and revisions made based on feedback. If content validity was not achieved after three rounds, additional rounds were completed until content validity was achieved.

Results:

After three rounds of validation, six algorithms achieved content validity. After an additional round, the remaining three algorithms achieved content validity. The proportion of clinicians rating each face validity statement as “Agree” or “Strongly Agree” ranged from 84% to 95% (average of all five questions, across three rounds).

Limitations:

Algorithm development was guided by existing deprescribing protocols intended for the general population and the expert opinions of our study team, due to a lack of background literature on HD-specific deprescribing protocols. There is no universally accepted method for the validation of clinical decision-making tools.

Conclusions:

Nine medication-specific deprescribing algorithms for patients on HD were developed and validated by clinician review. Our algorithms are the first medication-specific, patient-centric deprescribing guidelines developed and validated for patients on HD.