Caregivers' Death-Preparedness States Impact Caregiving Outcomes and Patients' End-of-Life Care

Caregiver Burden and Readiness in Patients with Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The Chain Mediation Effect of Disease Uncertainty and Mental Resilience

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the mediating effects of caregiver illness uncertainty and psychological resilience in caregiver burden and readiness in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). This can help improve caregiver readiness in patients with moderate-to-severe TBIs.

METHODS

A purposive sampling method was used to recruit patients with moderate-to-severe TBIs, and their caregivers, who were hospitalized in the Department of Neurosurgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University between October 2022 and August 2023. The Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, Mishel Uncertainty In Scale for Family Member, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and Caregivers Preparedness Scale, as well as general information questionnaire, were used to conduct the survey.

RESULTS

Caregiver readiness correlated with caregiver burden, illness uncertainty, and psychological resilience in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI (P < 0.01). Caregiver readiness was not only directly affected by caregiver burden (95% confidence interval: -0.510, -0.196) but was also affected through the chain mediation of illness uncertainty and psychological resilience (95% confidence interval: -0.146, -0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Caregiver burden in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI influences caregiver readiness levels and is mediated by illness uncertainty and psychological resilience. By improving caregivers' illness uncertainty and increasing their psychological resilience, the impact of low caregiver readiness caused by high caregiver burden could be reduced.

Factors Associated With Family Surrogate Decisional-Regret Trajectories

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES

The scarce research on factors associated with surrogate decisional regret overlooks longitudinal, heterogenous decisional-regret experiences and fractionally examines factors from the three decision-process framework stages: decision antecedents, decision-making process, and decision outcomes. This study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by focusing on factors modifiable by high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care.

METHODS

This observational study used a prior cohort of 377 family surrogates of terminal-cancer patients to examine factors associated with their membership in the four preidentified distinct decisional-regret trajectories: resilient, delayed-recovery, late-emerging, and increasing-prolonged trajectories from EOL-care decision making through the first two bereavement years by multinomial logistic regression modeling using the resilient trajectory as reference.

RESULTS

Decision antecedent factors: Financial sufficiency and heavier caregiving burden increased odds for the delayed-recovery trajectory. Spousal loss, higher perceived social support during an EOL-care decision, and more postloss depressive symptoms increased odds for the late-emerging trajectory. More pre- and postloss depressive symptoms increased odds for the increasing-prolonged trajectory. Decision-making process factors: Making an anticancer treatment decision and higher decision conflict increased odds for the delayed-recovery and increasing-prolonged trajectories. Making a life-sustaining-treatment decision increased membership in the three more profound trajectories. Decision outcome factors: Greater surrogate appraisal of quality of dying and death lowered odds for the three more profound trajectories. Patient receipt of anticancer or life-sustaining treatments increased odds for the late-emerging trajectory.

CONCLUSION

Surrogate membership in decisional-regret trajectories was associated with decision antecedent, decision-making process, and decision outcome factors. Effective interventions should target identified modifiable factors to address surrogate decisional regret.

Factors of preparedness for loss from cancer among Taiwanese family caregivers

This cohort study investigated factors associated with 336 Taiwanese family caregivers' emotional and cognitive preparedness for death of a loved one with terminal cancer. Caregivers' death-preparedness states (no-death-preparedness [as reference], cognitive-death-preparedness-only, emotional-death-preparedness-only, and sufficient-death-preparedness states) were previously identified. Associations of factors with these states were determined by a hierarchical generalized linear model. Financial hardship decreased caregivers' likelihood for the emotional-death-preparedness-only and sufficient-death-preparedness states. Physician prognostic disclosure increased membership in the cognitive-death-preparedness-only and sufficient-death-preparedness states. The better the quality of the patient-caregiver relationship, the higher the odds for the emotional-death-preparedness-only and sufficient-death-preparedness states, whereas the greater the tendency for caregivers to communicate end-of-life issues with their loved one, the lower the odds for emotional-death-preparedness-only state membership. Stronger coping capacity increased membership in the emotional-death-preparedness-only state, but perceived social support was not associated with state membership. Providing effective interventions tailored to at-risk family caregivers' specific needs may facilitate their death preparedness.

Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel symptom management care delivery intervention for caregivers receiving home hospice care: The I-HoME protocol

BACKGROUND

Terminally ill patients experience high symptom burden at the end of life (EoL), even when receiving hospice care. In the U.S., family caregivers play a critical role in managing symptoms experienced by patients receiving home hospice services. Yet, most caregivers don't receive sufficient support or formal training in symptom management. Therefore, providing additional visits and education to caregivers could potentially improve outcomes for both patient and caregiver. In response, we developed the Improving Home hospice Management of End-of-life issues through technology (I-HoME) intervention, a program designed for family caregivers of home hospice patients. This paper describes the intervention, study design, and protocol used to evaluate the intervention.

METHODS

The I-HoME study is a pilot randomized controlled trial aimed at reducing patient symptom burden through weekly tele-visits and education videos to benefit the patient's family caregiver. One hundred caregivers will be randomized to hospice care with (n = 50) or without (n = 50) the I-HoME intervention. Primary outcomes include intervention feasibility (e.g., accrual, attrition, use of the intervention) and acceptability (e.g., caregivers' comfort accessing the tele-visits and satisfaction). We will also examine preliminary efficacy using validated patient symptom burden and caregiver outcome measures (i.e., burden, depression, anxiety, satisfaction).

CONCLUSION

The trial is evaluating a novel symptom management intervention that supports caregivers of patients receiving home hospice services. The intervention employs a multi-pronged approach that provides needed services at a time when close contact and support is crucial. This research could lead to advances in how care gets delivered in the home hospice setting.

Associations of surrogates' death-preparedness states with decisional conflict and heightened decisional regret over cancer patients' last 6 months of life

OBJECTIVE

Preparing family surrogates for patient death and end-of-life (EOL) decision making may reduce surrogate decisional conflict and regret. Preparedness for patient death involves cognitive and emotional preparedness. We assessed the associations of surrogates' death-preparedness states (that integrate both cognitive and emotional preparedness for patient death) with surrogates' decisional conflict and regret.

METHODS

Associations of 173 surrogates' death-preparedness states (no, cognitive-only, emotional-only, and sufficient preparedness states) with decisional conflict (measured by the Decision Conflict Scale) and heightened decisional regret (Decision Regret Scale scores >25) were evaluated using hierarchical linear modeling and hierarchical generalized linear modeling, respectively, during a longitudinal observational study at a medical center over cancer patients' last 6 months.

RESULTS

Surrogates reported high decisional conflict (mean [standard deviation] = 41.48 [6.05]), and 52.7% of assessments exceeded the threshold for heightened decisional regret. Surrogates in the cognitive-only preparedness state reported a significantly higher level of decisional conflict (β = 3.010 [95% CI = 1.124, 4.896]) than those in the sufficient preparedness state. Surrogates in the no (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] [95% CI] = 0.293 [0.113, 0.733]) and emotional-only (AOR [95% CI] = 0.359 [0.149, 0.866]) preparedness states were less likely to suffer heightened decisional regret than those in the sufficient preparedness state.

CONCLUSIONS

Surrogates' decisional conflict and heightened decisional regret are associated with their death-preparedness states. Improving emotional preparedness for the patient's death among surrogates in the cognitive-only preparedness state and meeting the specific needs of those in the no, emotional-only, and sufficient preparedness states are actionable high-quality EOL-care interventions that may lessen decisional conflict and decisional regret.

Awareness of Imminent Death: Results From a Mixed Methods Study of Israeli Family Caregivers' Perceptions of Their Awareness and That of the Patients for Whom They Cared

We studied levels of awareness of impending death in older patients and their family caregivers. Using a mixed methods approach, we interviewed 70 family caregivers in Israel. Of the caregivers, 64% reported having been aware of the impending death, 33% were unaware, and 3% uncertain. Caregivers reported their perception that 36% of patients were aware, 27% unaware, and for 37% they were uncertain about the patient's awareness. Mechanisms that increased caregivers' awareness were specific diagnosis, significant deterioration in health, preparation by a health professional, or patient preparations for death. This study clarifies processes which aid awareness, and the relationship between awareness and actual preparation for dying.