1
|
Elizalde J, Lumibao J, Lizarondo L. Barriers and facilitators to health professionals' engagement in quality improvement initiatives: a mixed-methods systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2024; 36:mzae041. [PMID: 38727534 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Quality improvement (QI) initiatives in healthcare are crucial for enhancing service quality and healthcare outcomes. The success of these initiatives depends on the active engagement of healthcare professionals, which can be influenced by several factors within the healthcare system. This systematic review synthesized the factors influencing healthcare professionals' engagement in QI projects, focusing on identifying both barriers and facilitators. A mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) was conducted using the JBI methodology for MMSR. Databases such as MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase were searched for studies that explored barriers and facilitators to QI engagement of health professionals in the clinical setting. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The extracted data were synthesized using the JBI convergent integrated approach to MMSR. Eighteen studies (seven qualitative, nine quantitative, and two mixed-methods) published between 2007 and 2023 were included in the review. The analysis revealed barriers and facilitators to engagement in QI initiatives at different levels of the health system. At the QI program level, the engagement of health professionals to QI was influenced by the approach to QI, evidence underpinning the QI initiative, QI knowledge and training, and access to QI specialists. At the health professional level, barriers and facilitators were related to their organizational role, motivation, perceptions about QI, and collaborations with individuals and groups. At the organizational level, factors related to culture and climate, leadership, available resources (including human resource and workload, infrastructure, and incentives), and institutional priorities influenced health professionals' participation in QI. This review highlights the complex interplay of organizational, individual, and QI program level factors that influence the engagement of healthcare professionals in QI. Overcoming these complex barriers and leveraging facilitators is crucial for enhancing participation in QI efforts. The findings underscore the need for a multi-level strategy that focuses on creating a conducive organizational culture, providing robust leadership, and ensuring adequate resources and training for healthcare professionals. Such strategies hold the potential to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of QI initiatives in healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Elizalde
- College of Medicine, De La Salle University, Dasmariñas, Cavite 4114, Philippines
| | - Jommel Lumibao
- Quality Department, Qatar Red Crescent, Doha 202449, Qatar
| | - Lucylynn Lizarondo
- JBI, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luthy SK, Humphrey L, Keefer P. Benchmarking Pediatric Palliative Care Delivery. Hosp Pediatr 2024; 14:e15-e17. [PMID: 38044711 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K Luthy
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Lisa Humphrey
- Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Patricia Keefer
- Pediatric Palliative Care Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Özdemir Koyu H, Algül G, Kilicarslan Törüner E. Realities and ideals: Experiences and needs of pediatric oncology nurses in communication processes with children and their families at the end-of-life period: A photovoice qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci 2023; 25:685-699. [PMID: 37931643 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Effective communication in end-of-life care for pediatric cancer patients is crucial. Yet, limited research focuses on the communication experiences of pediatric oncology nurses during this period. This study aims to investigate the communication experiences and needs of these nurses with children and their families during the end-of-life period. A qualitative study design with photo voice methodology was followed. The research was conducted with 16 pediatric oncology nurses working in the pediatric oncology wards of a university hospital between January and May 2023. Data were collected the "Characteristic Information Form", "Semi-Structured Interview Form", and photovoice methodology. Data were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. Most of the nurses are at the undergraduate level, and their working experience in pediatric oncology wards ranges from 4 months to 17 years. Seven main themes emerged: Optimistic Communication-Interaction, Mindfulness, Active Coping, Behavioral Actions, Death Uncertainty Dilemma, Interpersonal and Environmental Factors, and Discrepancy between Ideals and Reality. The study sheds light on the importance of pediatric oncology nurses' ideals versus realities upstream approach in communicating with end-of-life children and their families, empowering pediatric oncology nurses on the journey to ideal end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazal Özdemir Koyu
- Nursing Faculty Department of Pediatric Nursing, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gökce Algül
- Health Research and Application Center, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boyden JY, Bogetz JF, Johnston EE, Thienprayoon R, Williams CSP, McNeil MJ, Patneaude A, Widger KA, Rosenberg AR, Ananth P. Measuring Pediatric Palliative Care Quality: Challenges and Opportunities. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:e483-e495. [PMID: 36736860 PMCID: PMC10106436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric palliative care (PPC) programs vary widely in structure, staffing, funding, and patient census, resulting in inconsistency in service provision. Improving the quality of palliative care for children living with serious illness and their families requires measuring care quality, ensuring that quality measurement is embedded into day-to-day clinical practice, and aligning quality measurement with healthcare policy priorities. Yet, numerous challenges exist in measuring PPC quality. This paper provides an overview of PPC quality measurement, including challenges, current initiatives, and future opportunities. While important strides toward addressing quality measurement challenges in PPC have been made, including ongoing quality measurement initiatives like the Cambia Metrics Project, the PPC What Matters Most study, and collaborative learning networks, more work remains. Providing high-quality PPC to all children and families will require a multi-pronged approach. In this paper, we suggest several strategies for advancing high-quality PPC, which includes 1) considering how and by whom success is defined, 2) evaluating, adapting, and developing PPC measures, including those that address care disparities within PPC for historically marginalized and excluded communities, 3) improving the infrastructure with which to routinely and prospectively measure, monitor, and report clinical and administrative quality measures, 4) increasing endorsement of PPC quality measures by prominent quality organizations to facilitate accountability and possible reimbursement, and 5) integrating PPC-specific quality measures into the administrative, funding, and policy landscape of pediatric healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackelyn Y Boyden
- Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing (J.Y.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Jori F Bogetz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care (J.F.B.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; Center for Clinical and Translational Research (J.F.B.), Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Emily E Johnston
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology (E.E.J.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham (E.E.J.), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Rachel Thienprayoon
- Department of Anesthesia, Division of Palliative Care, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (R.T.), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (R.T.), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Conrad S P Williams
- Palliative Care Program and Department of Pediatrics (C.S.P.W.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Michael J McNeil
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Global Pediatric Medicine (M.J.M.), Memphis, Tennessee, USA; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Division of Quality and Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology (M.J.M.), Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Arika Patneaude
- Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Hospital (A.P.), Seattle, Washington, USA; University of Washington School of Social Work (A.P.), Seattle, Washington, USA; Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics (A.P.), Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kimberley A Widger
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing (K.A.W.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Hospital for Sick Children (K.A.W.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (A.R.S.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School (A.R.S.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Prasanna Ananth
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine (P.A.), New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center (P.A.), New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|