Palliative Care Interventions Effects on Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

Mobile App-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Critically Ill Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Few person-centered, scalable models of collaborative intensive care unit (ICU) clinician-palliative care specialist care exist.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of a collaborative palliative care intervention compared to usual care among family members of patients in the ICU.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This parallel-group randomized clinical trial with patient-level randomization was conducted between April 2021 and September 2023. The study was set at 6 medical and surgical ICUs in 1 academic hospital and 1 community hospital. The study participants included critically ill older adult patients with 1 of 11 poor outcome phenotypes, their family members with elevated palliative care needs, and their attending ICU physicians.

Intervention

An automated electronic health record-integrated, mobile application-based communication platform that displayed family-reported needs over 7 days, coached ICU attending physicians on addressing needs, and prompted palliative care consultation if needs were not reduced within 3 study days.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was change in the family-reported Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) score between study days 1 and 3. The 13-item NEST score is a number between 0 and 130, with higher scores indicating a greater need. Secondary outcomes included quality of communication and goal of care concordance, as well as 3-month psychological distress.

Results

Of 151 family members, the mean (SD) age was 57.4 (12.9) years, and 110 (72.9%) were female. Of 151 patients, the mean (SD) age was 69.8 (9.7) years, and 86 (57.0%) were male. Thirty-five ICU physicians were male (68.6%). Seventy-six patients were randomized to the intervention group and 75 to the control group. Treatment group differences in estimated mean NEST scores were similar at 3 days between the intervention and control groups (-3.1 vs -2.0, respectively; estimated mean difference in differences, -1.3 points [95% CI, -6.0 to 3.5]) and 7 days (-2.3 vs -2.2, respectively; estimated mean difference in differences, 0 points [95% CI, -6.2 to 6.2]). Median (IQR) need scores were lower among individuals who remained in the ICU at day 3 for intervention participants vs controls (24.5 [16.5-34.5] vs 27.5 [13.0-40.0], respectively); median (IQR) need scores were also lower among those who remained in the ICU at day 7 for intervention vs controls (22.0 [11.0-35.0] vs 28.0 [14.0-35.0], respectively). Goal concordance, quality of communication, and psychological distress symptoms did not differ. Twenty-nine intervention participants (38.2%) had palliative care consultations, compared to only 3 (4.0%) among controls, (P < .001); 66 intervention participants (87.0%) had a family meeting, compared to 48 (64.0%) among controls (P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, a collaborative, person-centered, ICU-based palliative care intervention had no effect on palliative care needs or psychological distress compared to usual care despite a higher frequency of palliative care consultations and family meetings among intervention participants.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04414787.

Our Unrealized Imperative: Integrating Mental Health Care into Hospice and Palliative Care

The field of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM) has its roots in the principles, promulgated by Dame Cicely Saunders, that patient and family are the unit of care and that comprehensive integration of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual care is necessary to address suffering in all its dimensions. Although we aspire to provide comprehensive care for our patients, most hospice and palliative care (HPM) physicians lack basic competencies for identifying and managing patients with psychological distress and mental health distress and disorders, a growing segment of our clinical population. In this article, I argue that we are not living up to the founding values of our field in how we practice, how we educate our trainees, our research, and in how we pursue our own professional development as faculty. The history of our field, the nature of our clinical workforce, the culture of PC, and our educational programs all contribute to our current practice model, which is not adequate to meet the mental health needs of our patients. I propose strategies to address these challenges focused on enhancing integration between psychiatry/psychology and HPM, changes in fellowship education and faculty development, addressing the stigma against people with mental health diagnoses, and addressing system and cultural challenges that limit our ability to provide the kind of comprehensive, integrative care that our field aspires to.

Palliative Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Descriptive Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) is the standard of care for patients with serious medical illnesses, or those conditions associated with high risk of mortality and negative impact on quality of life (QOL). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the gold standard treatment for certain psychiatric conditions, which may co-occur with serious medical illnesses. However, the use of "palliative ECT" (PECT) in this context is understudied.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive retrospective cohort study reviewing the indications, outcomes, and regimens of PECT. We included patients who had an ECT consultation, in addition to either a PC consultation or a do-not-attempt-resuscitation code status between 2018 and 2023.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients met our inclusion criteria, and 21 received ECT. The cohort was predominantly female (70%) with a mean age of 67.6 (range 25-90). Catatonia (64.5%) and treatment-resistant depressive disorder (35.5%) were the most common indications for ECT. At the time of ECT consultation, 16 patients (51.6%) had a serious medical illness, including cancer (19.4%) or end-organ disease (22.6%). Fourteen patients had major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) (45.2%). Surrogate decision-makers consented for ECT in 64.5% of cases. All 21 patients who received ECT experienced psychiatric symptom improvement. ECT was associated with reduced mortality risk in 5 (23.8%) cases. Five patients initially misdiagnosed with MNCD experienced recovery in cognitive function after ECT, and the diagnosis was revised to depression-related cognitive dysfunction. Eight patients retained a comorbid MNCD diagnosis but experienced a mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) improvement of 5 points (range 0 to 17) with ECT.

DISCUSSION

This work highlights the use of ECT among patients with serious medical illnesses, identifying cases when ECT was beneficial or deemed unsuitable. Patients with serious medical illnesses who also had an indication for ECT experienced improved QOL with ECT. Misdiagnoses, such as confusing depression-related cognitive dysfunction and catatonia for MNCD, were effectively addressed through ECT. The findings underscore the importance of cross-specialty collaboration between C-L psychiatry and PC.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who receive PECT experience reduced suffering and improved QOL. PECT may be helpful in scenarios of life-threatening psychiatric illnesses, terminal medical illnesses with comorbid treatment-refractory psychiatric illnesses, and diagnostic uncertainty with MNCD.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About the Psychiatric Manifestations of Nonpsychiatric Serious Illness and Treatments

Mental health issues are widespread and significant among individuals with serious illness. Among patients receiving palliative care (PC), psychiatric comorbidities are common and impact patient quality of life. Despite their prevalence, PC clinicians face challenges in effectively addressing the intricate relationship between medical and psychiatric disorders due to their complex, intertwined and bidirectionally influential nature. This article, created collaboratively with a team of psychiatric-palliative care experts, is the second in a two-part series examining the bidirectional relationship between medical and psychiatric illness in PC. This article explores 10 prevalent psychiatric manifestations associated with severe illness and its treatment. Building upon the first article, which focused on 10 common physical manifestations of psychiatric illness among patients receiving PC, these two articles advocate for an integrated approach to PC that prioritizes mental and emotional wellbeing across the continuum of serious illness.

Do People Prefer Home Palliative Care? A Survey Study and Assessment of Associated Factors in China

Objectives: This study examined people's preference for the location to receive palliative care services and determined the associated factors. Methods: A questionnaire with reference to the Chinese version of the Hospice Attitude Scale and the Death Correspondence Scale was designed, piloted, revised, and distributed online and in person to collect data (N = 762). Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of relevant factors. Results: The average age of the participants was 38.1, with a relatively even gender distribution. Over 90% of the participants were either single/never married (44.9%) or married with children (46.0%). 58.1% of the respondents (N = 428) indicated that they would like to receive palliative care at home, compared to 41.9% who preferred receiving such care in institutions or other places (N = 309). Each time people's attitudes toward death became one point more positive, they were 10.2% more likely to choose to receive palliative care services at home. People with a neutral attitude toward palliative care, single/never married or divorced with children, and having/had an occupation in health and social work had higher odds of preferring receiving palliative care at home. Those who had poor self-rated health or with an educational background of primary school or lower or some college had lower odds of preferring receiving palliative care at home. Conclusions: The research showed that attitudes toward death and other factors were associated with people's preferences for palliative care locations. More accessible and affordable community-based and home-based palliative care services should be further explored and provided.

Interventions for behavioral health comorbidities in the hospice setting: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Behavioral health (BH) comorbidities in hospice patients are widespread and impact important outcomes, including symptom burden, quality of life, and caregiver wellbeing. However, evidence-based BH interventions tailored for the hospice setting remain understudied.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review with the objective of mapping studies of interventions for BH comorbidities in the hospice setting. We included empirical studies among hospice patients of interventions with BH outcomes. We abstracted data on study design, intervention type, and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Our search generated 7,672 unique results, of which 37 were ultimately included in our analysis. Studies represented 16 regions, with the United Kingdom (n=13) most represented. The most frequent intervention type was complementary and alternative interventions (n=13), followed by psychotherapeutic interventions (n=12). Most of the studies were either pilot or feasibility investigations. Fifteen studies employed a randomized controlled trial design. The most frequently utilized measurement tools for BH outcomes included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Seventeen studies demonstrated statistically significant results in a BH outcome measure. BH conditions prevalent among hospice patients that were the focus of intervention efforts included depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and general psychological distress. No study focused on trauma-related disorders or substance use disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review reveals a concerning gap in research regarding evidence-based BH interventions in hospice settings, especially in the U.S. Despite extensive utilization of hospice care services and the high prevalence of BH conditions among hospice patients, randomized controlled trials focused on improving BH outcomes remain scant. The current BH practices, like the widespread use of benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, may not be rooted in robust evidence, underscoring an urgent need for investment in hospice research infrastructure and tailored clinical trials to test behavioral approaches to mitigate mental health outcomes at the end of life.

Palliative Care Psychiatry: Building Synergy Across the Spectrum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Palliative care (PC) psychiatry is a growing subspecialty focusing on improving the mental health of those with serious medical conditions and their caregivers. This review elucidates the current practice and ongoing evolution of PC psychiatry.

RECENT FINDINGS

PC psychiatry leverages training and clinical practices from both PC and psychiatry, addressing a wide range of needs, including enhanced psychiatric care for patients with serious medical illness, PC access for patients with medical needs in psychiatric settings, and PC-informed psychiatric approaches for individuals with treatment-refractory serious mental illness. PC psychiatry is practiced by a diverse workforce comprising hospice and palliative medicine-trained psychiatrists, psycho-oncologists, geriatric psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, and non-psychiatrist PC clinicians. As a result, PC psychiatry faces challenges in defining its operational scope. The manuscript outlines the growth, current state, and prospects of PC psychiatry. It examines its roles across various healthcare settings, including medical, integrated care, and psychiatric environments, highlighting the unique challenges and opportunities in each. PC psychiatry is a vibrant and growing subspecialty of psychiatry that must be operationalized to continue its developmental trajectory. There is a need for a distinct professional identity for PC psychiatry, strategies to navigate administrative and regulatory hurdles, and greater support for novel clinical, educational, and research initiatives.

Mental Health Integration and Delivery in the Hospice and Palliative Medicine Setting: A National Survey of Clinicians

CONTEXT

Mental health comorbidities among individuals with serious illness are prevalent and negatively impact outcomes. Mental healthcare is a core domain of palliative care, but little is known about the experiences of palliative care clinicians delivering such care.

OBJECTIVES

This national survey aimed to characterize the frequency with which palliative care providers encounter and manage common psychiatric comorbidities, evaluate the degree of mental health integration in their practice settings, and prioritize strategies to meet the mental health needs of palliative care patients.

METHODS

A e-survey distributed to the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine membership.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eight palliative care clinicians (predominantly physicians) were included in the analysis. Mood, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders were frequently encountered comorbidities that many respondents felt comfortable managing. Respondents felt less comfortable with other psychiatric comorbidities. Eighty percent of respondents noted that patients' mental health status impacted their comfort delivering general palliative care at least some of the time. Mental health screening tool use varied and access to specialist referral or to integrated psychiatrists/psychologists was low. Respondents were unsatisfied with mental health training opportunities.

CONCLUSION

Palliative care clinicians play a crucial role in addressing mental health comorbidities, but gaps exist in care. Integrated mental health care models, streamlined referral systems, and increased training opportunities can improve mental healthcare for patients with serious illness.