Therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin using an LC-MS/MS method: Analysis of 421 measurements in a naturalistic clinical setting

Integrated identification-quantification (ID-Quant) workflow utilizing UPLC-QTOF-MS for the therapeutic drug monitoring of multi-component antibiotics without pure standards: Validation using teicoplanin

The lack of individual pure standard has hampered the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for multi-component antibiotics in clinical laboratories. Here, we aimed to develop an integrated identification-quantification (ID-Quant) workflow based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS) to enable the comprehensive determination of all teicoplanin components without needing pure standards. The workflow comprises three steps. First, non-targeted MSE full scanning was used to detect and identify all potential ingredients. Then, characteristic product ions were selected to generate a quantitative time-of-flight multiple reaction monitoring (Tof-MRM) method. Finally, the constituent composition of teicoplanin injection was determined and utilized as an alternative reference standard to monitor the teicoplanin ingredients in human serum samples. As a result, nine teicoplanin analogs were identified from teicoplanin injection (Sanofi-Aventis, France). The overall performance of the Tof-MRM method was satisfactory in terms of linearity, precision, accuracy, and limits of detection. Utilizing the drug as standard, the individual concentrations for each component in patient serum were determined to be 0.120 µg/mL (A3-1), 0.020 µg/mL (N-1), 0.550 µg/mL (N-2), 0.730 µg/mL (A2-1), 4.26 µg/mL (A2-2,3), 4.79 µg/mL (A2-4,5), and 0.290 µg/mL (N-3), respectively. The distribution pattern of teicoplanin components was also discovered to differ from that in the drug injection. Overall, this integrated ID-Quant workflow based on UHPLC-QTOF-MS enables the robust quantitation of all teicoplanin analogs without the need for individual pure standard. This approach could help address the standard unavailability problem in the TDM of multi-component antibiotics.

Overview of therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical practice

With the rapid development of clinical pharmacy in China, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has become an essential tool for guiding rational clinical drug use and is widely concerned. TDM is a tool that combines pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic knowledge to optimize personalized drug therapy, which can improve treatment outcomes, reduce drug-drug toxicity, and avoid the risk of developing drug resistance. To effectively implement TDM, accurate and sophisticated analytical methods are required. By researching the literature published in recent years, we summarize the types of commonly monitored drugs, therapeutic windows, and clinical assays and track the trends and hot spots of therapeutic drug monitoring. The purpose is to provide guidelines for clinical blood drug concentration monitoring, to implement individualized drug delivery programs better, to ensure the rational use of drugs for patients, and to provide a reference for the group to carry out related topics in the future.

Optimal Use and Need for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Children: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antimicrobial that treats serious invasive infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, such as the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Despite some comparable advantages, there is no guideline or clinical recommendation for teicoplanin in the pediatric population, unlike vancomycin where abundant studies and the recently revised guideline on therapeutic drug level monitoring (TDM) exist.

METHODS

The systematic review was performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews. Two authors (JSC and SHY) searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using relevant terms independently.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were finally included with a total of 1,380 patients. TDM was available in 2,739 samples collected in the nine studies. Dosing regimens varied widely, and eight studies used recommended dosing regimens. Timing for measuring TDM was mostly 72-96 hours or longer after the initiation of the first dose, which was expected to be a steady-state. The majority of studies had target trough levels of 10 µg/mL or above. Three studies reported that the clinical efficacy and treatment success rate of teicoplanin was 71.4%, 87.5%, and 88%. Adverse events associated with teicoplanin use were described in six studies with a focus on renal and/or hepatic impairment. Except for one study, no significant relation was noted between the incidence of adverse events and trough concentration.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence on teicoplanin trough levels in pediatric populations is insufficient due to heterogeneity. However, target trough levels with favorable clinical efficacy are achievable by recommended dosing regimen in the majority of patients.

Quantification of Teicoplanin Using the HPLC-UV Method for Clinical Applications in Critically Ill Patients in Korea

A high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UV) method has been used to quantify teicoplanin concentrations in human plasma. However, the limited analytical accuracy of previously bioanalytical methods for teicoplanin has given rise to uncertainty due to the use of an external standard. In this study, an internal standard (IS), polymyxin B, was applied to devise a precise, accurate, and feasible HPLC-UV method. The deproteinized plasma sample containing teicoplanin and an IS of acetonitrile was chromatographed on a C18 column with an acidic mobile phase consisting of NaH₂PO₄ buffer and acetonitrile (78:22, v/v) by isocratic elution and detection at 220 nm. The linearity was in the range 7.8–500 mg/L calculated by the ratio of the teicoplanin signal to the IS signal. This analytical method, validated by FDA guidelines with ICH Q2 (R1), was successfully applied to analyze the plasma samples of patients in the intensive care unit for treating serious resistant bacterial infectious diseases, such as those by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. The methods suggested the potential for use in routine clinical practice for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin, providing both improved accuracy and a wide range of linearity from lower than steady-state trough concentrations (10 mg/L) to much higher concentrations.

Therapeutic Drug Level Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Korean Pediatric Patients with Normal versus Impaired Renal Function

BACKGROUND

Teicoplanin is used to treat serious gram-positive infections. Optimal teicoplanin trough levels are considered to be ≥ 10 μg/mL. Despite its wide use in various clinical settings, data on teicoplanin trough level in pediatric patients are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic drug level monitoring of teicoplanin in Korean pediatric patients, including those with impaired renal function.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years old) who received teicoplanin from September 2014 to April 2018. The regimen included a loading dose of 10 mg/kg/dose at 12 hours' interval three times in a row, and a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg/dose commenced at 24 hours of interval after the loading dose, with a maximum of 400 mg/dose, respectively. The first therapeutic drug levels were measured. Distribution and characteristics of trough levels in patients with decreased renal function and those with bacteremia were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 187 trough levels were collected from 143 patients. Hematologic and oncologic diseases were the most common underlying diseases (83.2%, n = 119). One hundred eighty trough levels were first measured, and their median value was 16.2 μg/mL (range, 2.3-100 μg/mL) and the median interval between initial teicoplanin injection and 1st trough level was 96.5 hours (range 47.6-179.3 hours). Lower steady-state levels were observed in younger age group (median, 13.5 vs. 18.0 μg/mL, P = 0.038). Median trough levels were higher in patients with decreased renal functions (P < 0.001). In addition, among eight with gram-positive bacteremia, seven of them had a favorable outcome.

CONCLUSION

This study provides additive information on trough level monitoring of teicoplanin in children with impaired renal function and treatment effect in patients with gram-positive bacteremia. Careful monitoring for steady state trough levels of teicoplanin is warranted.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Nephrotoxicity of Teicoplanin Therapy in Chinese Children: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

This study aims to 1) describe the distribution characteristics of teicoplanin trough concentration (C_min) and explore the related influencing factors and 2) evaluate the nephrotoxicity of teicoplanin in children.

Patients and Methods

A cohort of children who were treated with teicoplanin intravenously were included in this retrospective study. Regression analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with the fluctuations of teicoplanin C_min and the development of nephrotoxicity. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify the population at high risk for teicoplanin nephrotoxicity.

Results

A total of 269 plasma samples from 186 children were collected. Underexposure (C_min < 10 mg/L) was documented in 52.7% of cases. The C_min/dose after administering the loading dose was strongly associated with age (P = 0.008), weight (P = 0.039), and serum creatinine (P = 0.022). The C_min/dose after administering the maintenance dose was strongly associated with gender (P = 0.014) and serum creatinine (P = 0.006). C_min (P = 0.012) and the concomitant treatment with amphotericin B (P = 0.001) were the independent risk factors for teicoplanin-related nephrotoxicity. Children who were concomitantly treated by amphotericin B with teicoplanin C_min > 9.81 mg/L or patients with teicoplanin C_min > 21.94 mg/L were at high risk for nephrotoxicity.

Conclusion

The fluctuations of teicoplanin C_min could be affected by age, weight, gender, and serum creatinine. C_min and concomitant treatment with amphotericin B were the independent risk factors for nephrotoxicity. We suggested that the therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin should be performed in children.

Review of Chromatographic Methods Coupled with Modern Detection Techniques Applied in the Therapeutic Drugs Monitoring (TDM)

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a tool used to integrate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics knowledge to optimize and personalize various drug therapies. The optimization of drug dosing may improve treatment outcomes, reduce toxicity, and reduce the risk of developing drug resistance. To adequately implement TDM, accurate and precise analytical procedures are required. In clinical practice, blood is the most commonly used matrix for TDM; however, less invasive samples, such as dried blood spots or non-invasive saliva samples, are increasingly being used. The choice of sample preparation method, type of column packing, mobile phase composition, and detection method is important to ensure accurate drug measurement and to avoid interference from matrix effects and drug metabolites. Most of the reported procedures used liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) techniques due to its high selectivity and sensitivity. High-performance chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) methods are also used when a simpler and more cost-effective methodology is desired for clinical monitoring. The application of high-performance chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) with and without derivatization processes and high-performance chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC-ED) techniques for the analysis of various drugs in biological samples for TDM have been described less often. Before chromatographic analysis, samples were pretreated by various procedures-most often by protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction, and solid-phase extraction, rarely by microextraction by packed sorbent, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. The aim of this article is to review the recent literature (2010-2020) regarding the use of liquid chromatography with various detection techniques for TDM.

Bioactive Glass as a Nanoporous Drug Delivery System for Teicoplanin

Bioactive glass (BG) was made by the sol–gel method and doped with boron (B) to increase its bioactivity. Microstructures of BG and B-doped BG were observed by scanning electron microscopy, and phase identification was performed using an X-ray diffraction diffractometer. The ion concentrations released after soaking in simulated body fluid (SBF) for 1, 4, and 7 days were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and the pH value of the SBF was measured after soaking samples to determine the variation in the environment. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis was performed to further verify the characteristics of mesoporous structures. High performance liquid chromatography was used to evaluate the drug delivery ability of teicoplanin. Results demonstrated that B-doped BG performed significantly better than BG in parameters assessed by the BET analysis. B-doped BG has nanopores and more rough structures, which is advantageous for drug delivery as there are more porous structures available for drug adsorption. Moreover, B-doped BG was shown to be effective for keeping pH values stable and releasing B ions during soaking in SBF. The cumulative release of teicoplanin from BG and B-doped BG reached 20.09% and 3.17% on the first day, respectively. The drug release gradually slowed, reaching 29.43% and 4.83% after 7 days, respectively. The results demonstrate that the proposed bioactive glass has potential as a drug delivery system.

Interlaboratory analysis of teicoplanin plasma concentration assays among Chinese laboratories

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Teicoplanin is widely used for the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. Since there is a good correlation between trough levels and clinical outcome, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended to achieve better clinical curative effects. However, TDM of teicoplanin is not routine in China. So, a programme was initiated in 2017, including both HPLC method establishment and interlaboratory quality assessment, for the measurement of teicoplanin.

METHODS

A main centre and a quality control centre were set up in the study. An HPLC-based method of teicoplanin determination in plasma was developed by the main centre. Analysis was performed using a Waters Symmetry C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm). The mobile phase was NaH₂ PO₄ (0.01 mol/L) and acetonitrile (75:25 v/v; pH 3.3), with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and a detection wavelength of 215 nm. Piperacillin sodium was selected as an internal standard (IS). Twenty-six additional TDM centres were then recruited to adopt this method. Then, all the centres were asked to take part in a quality control assessment evaluated by the quality control centre.

RESULTS

For all TDM centres, linearity of teicoplanin concentration ranges was between 3.125 and 100 µg/mL. Intraday and interday accuracies ranged from 87.1% to 118.4%. Intraday and interday precision ranged from 0.3% to 13.8%. Therapeutic drug monitoring centres all passed inter-room quality assessment. All samples tested met the acceptance criteria. Then, 542 samples were collected. Patients with sub-optimal (≤10 mg/L) plasma teicoplanin concentrations constituted 42% of the total study population.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, a simple, rapid and accurate HPLC method for determining teicoplanin levels was successfully applied to therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice for twenty-seven TDM centres in China. The results demonstrated excellent interlaboratory agreement for teicoplanin testing and provide support for clinical laboratory quality management and results inter-accreditation.

Evaluating the optimal dose of teicoplanin with therapeutic drug monitoring: not too high for adverse event, not too low for treatment efficacy

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of teicoplanin is aimed at minimizing the clinical impact of pharmacokinetic variability; however, its benefits are still being defined. We performed a retrospective study of teicoplanin TDM focusing on the dose-serum concentration relationship and clinical outcomes in a clinical setting. From January 2017 to December 2018, patients receiving teicoplanin ≥ 72 h with TDM were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups: non-loading (NL) group, low-dose loading (LD) group (loading dose < 9 mg/kg), and high-dose loading (HD) group (≥ 9 mg/kg). Serum teicoplanin trough concentration (C_min) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated in each regimen. A subgroup of patients with bacteremia was analyzed to evaluate clinical efficacy. Among 65 patients, 12, 18, and 35 were grouped in NL, LD, and HD, respectively. Achievement rates of C_min > 20 mg/L within 10 days were significantly different among the groups (25.0%, 38.9%, and 68.6% in the NL, LD, and HD groups, respectively; P = 0.014). Fourteen patients (21.5%) had AEs, and higher C_min over 10 days (adjusted odds ratio 2.08 per every 20 mg/L increases, 95% CI 1.13-3.84, P = 0.019) and age ≥ 65 years (P = 0.009) were identified as independent risk factors. In the subgroup analysis, HD regimen (P = 0.050) and high mean C_min over 10 days (P = 0.025) were significantly associated with treatment success. Although HL regimen could achieve C_min targets and improve clinical outcome during teicoplanin treatment, high C_min was associated with AEs during treatment. Routine TDM can be helpful to optimize teicoplanin administration.