Determination of tacrolimus, three mono-demethylated metabolites and a M1 tautomer in human whole blood by liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry

Tacrolimus Monitoring in Liver Transplant Recipients, Posttransplant Cholestasis: A Comparative Between 2 Commercial Immunoassays and a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method

BACKGROUND

Cholestasis commonly occurs after orthotopic liver transplantation. It can be extrahepatic because of mechanical obstruction or intrahepatic because of various causes. During cholestasis episodes, blood concentrations of tacrolimus (TAC) metabolites may increase, potentially affecting TAC concentrations measured by immunoassays. This study aimed to simultaneously evaluate the analytical performance of 2 TAC immunoassays, a quantitative microsphere system (QMS) immunoassay, and chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as a reference method in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

This single-center study included 265 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. In total, 942 blood samples were collected. TAC trough concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS and 2 immunoassays in parallel. The plasma concentrations of conjugated bilirubin were measured in all samples. The results were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and Passing-Bablok regressions.

RESULTS

The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that the TAC QMS immunoassay has a significant bias (+37%) compared with LC-MS/MS, and this bias was higher in patients with cholestasis with hyperbilirubinemia (≤+70% in patients with conjugated bilirubin >150 µmol/L). In comparison, the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay showed acceptable analytical performance in patients with hyperbilirubinemia (bias <10%).

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with previous findings, the TAC QMS immunoassay showed a positive bias compared with LC-MS/MS. This bias is remarkably high in patients with cholestasis and hyperbilirubinemia, suggesting the cross-reactivity of TAC metabolites with the monoclonal antibody used in the QMS immunoassay.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model combined with reverse dose method to study the nephrotoxic tolerance dose of tacrolimus

Nephrotoxicity is the most common side effect that severely limits the clinical application of tacrolimus (TAC), an immunosuppressive agent used in kidney transplant patients. This study aimed to explore the tolerated dose of nephrotoxicity of TAC in individuals with different CYP3A5 genotypes and liver conditions. We established a human whole-body physiological pharmacokinetic (WB-PBPK) model and validated it using data from previous clinical studies. Following the injection of 1 mg/kg TAC into the tail veins of male rats, we developed a rat PBPK model utilizing the drug concentration-time curve obtained by LC-MS/MS. Next, we converted the established rat PBPK model into the human kidney PBPK model. To establish renal concentrations, the BMCL5 of the in vitro CCK-8 toxicity response curve (drug concentration range: 2-80 mol/L) was extrapolated. To further investigate the acceptable levels of nephrotoxicity for several distinct CYP3A5 genotypes and varied hepatic function populations, oral dosing regimens were extrapolated utilizing in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). The PBPK model indicated the tolerated doses of nephrotoxicity were 0.14-0.185 mg/kg (CYP3A5 expressors) and 0.13-0.155 mg/kg (CYP3A5 non-expressors) in normal healthy subjects and 0.07-0.09 mg/kg (CYP3A5 expressors) and 0.06-0.08 mg/kg (CYP3A5 non-expressors) in patients with mild hepatic insufficiency. Further, patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency tolerated doses of 0.045-0.06 mg/kg (CYP3A5 expressors) and 0.04-0.05 mg/kg (CYP3A5 non-expressors), while in patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency, doses of 0.028-0.04 mg/kg (CYP3A5 expressors) and 0.022-0.03 mg/kg (CYP3A5 non-expressors) were tolerated. Overall, our study highlights the combined usage of the PBPK model and the IVIVE approach as a valuable tool for predicting toxicity tolerated doses of a drug in a specific group.

Importance of tautomerism in drugs

Tautomerism is an important phenomenon exhibited by many drugs. As we discuss in this review, identifying the different tautomers of drugs and exploring their importance in the mechanisms of drug action are integral components of current drug discovery. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infrared (IR), ultraviolet (UV), Raman, and terahertz spectroscopic techniques, as well as X-ray diffraction, are useful for exploring drug tautomerism. Quantum chemical methods, in association with pharmacoinformatics tools, are being used to evaluate tautomeric preferences in terms of energy effects. Desmotropy (i.e., tautomeric polymorphism) of the drugs is particularly important in drug delivery studies.

Tacrolimus induces a pro-fibrotic response in donor-derived human proximal tubule cells dependent on common variants of the CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genes

BACKGROUND

Common genetic variants of the enzymes and efflux pump involved in tacrolimus disposition have been associated with calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, but their importance is unclear because of the multifactorial background of renal fibrosis. This study explores the pro-fibrotic response of tacrolimus exposure in relation to the differential capacity for tacrolimus metabolism in proximal tubule cells (PTCs) with a variable (pharmaco)genetic background.

METHODS

PTCs were obtained from protocol allograft biopsies with different combinations of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 variants and were incubated with tacrolimus within the concentration range found in vivo. Gene and protein expression, CYP3A5 and P-glycoprotein function, and tacrolimus metabolites were measured in PTC. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression was assessed in protocol biopsies of kidney allograft recipients.

RESULTS

PTCs produce CTGF in response to escalating tacrolimus exposure, which is approximately 2-fold higher in cells with the CYP3A5*1 and ABCB1 TT combination in vitro. Increasing tacrolimus exposure results in relative higher generation of the main tacrolimus metabolite {13-O-desmethyl tacrolimus [M1]} in cells with this same genetic background. Protocol biopsies show a larger increase in in vivo CTGF tissue expression over time in TT vs. CC/CT but was not affected by the CYP3A5 genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus exposure induces a pro-fibrotic response in a PTC model in function of the donor pharmacogenetic background associated with tacrolimus metabolism. This finding provides a mechanistic insight into the nephrotoxicity associated with tacrolimus treatment and offers opportunities for a tailored immunosuppressive treatment.