Use of paralysis in silo-assisted closure of gastroschisis

Improving outcomes for uncomplicated gastroschisis: clinical practice guidelines from the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee

BACKGROUND

The authors sought better outcomes for uncomplicated gastroschisis through development of clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

The authors and the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidenced-based Practice Committee used an iterative process and chose two questions to develop clinical practice guidelines regarding (1) standardized nutrition protocols and (2) postnatal management strategies. An English language search of PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library Database identified literature published between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2019, with snowballing to 2022. The Appraisal of Guideline, Research and Evaluation reporting checklist was followed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included with a Level of Evidence that ranged from 2 to 5 and recommendation Grades B-D. Nine evaluated standardized nutrition protocols and 24 examined postnatal management strategies. The adherence to gastroschisis-specific nutrition protocols promotes intestinal feeding and reduces TPN administration. The implementation of a standardized postnatal clinical management protocol is often significantly associated with shorter hospital stays, less mechanical ventilation use, and fewer infections.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of comparative studies to guide practice changes that improve uncomplicated gastroschisis outcomes. The implementation of gastroschisis-specific feeding and clinical care protocols is recommended. Feeding protocols often significantly reduce TPN administration, although the length of hospital stay may not consistently decrease.

Management of Gastroschisis: Timing of Delivery, Antibiotic Usage, and Closure Considerations (A Systematic Review From the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes & Evidence Based Practice Committee)

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists for the initial management of infants with gastroschisis.

METHODS

The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Outcomes and Evidenced-based Practice Committee (OEBPC) developed three a priori questions about gastroschisis for a qualitative systematic review. We reviewed English-language publications between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2019. This project describes the findings of a systematic review of the three questions regarding: 1) optimal delivery timing, 2) antibiotic use, and 3) closure considerations.

RESULTS

1339 articles were screened for eligibility; 92 manuscripts were selected and reviewed. The included studies had a Level of Evidence that ranged from 2 to 4 and recommendation Grades B-D. Twenty-eight addressed optimal timing of delivery, 5 pertained to antibiotic use, and 59 discussed closure considerations (Figure 1). Delivery after 37 weeks post-conceptual age is considered optimal. Prophylactic antibiotics covering skin flora are adequate to reduce infection risk until definitive closure. Studies support primary fascial repair, without staged silo reduction, when abdominal domain and hemodynamics permit. A sutureless repair is safe, effective, and does not delay feeding or extend length of stay. Sedation and intubation are not routinely required for a sutureless closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the large number of studies addressing the above-mentioned facets of gastroschisis management, the data quality is poor. A wide variation in gastroschisis management was documented, indicating a need for high quality RCTs to provide an evidence-based approach when caring for these infants.

TYPE OF STUDY

Qualitative systematic review of Level 1-4 studies.

A Gastroschisis bundle: effects of a quality improvement protocol on morbidity and mortality

OBJECTIVE

Gastroschisis incidence is rising. Survival in developed countries is over 95%. However, in underdeveloped countries, mortality is higher than 15% often due to sepsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on morbidity and mortality of a Quality Improvement Protocol for out-born gastroschisis patients.

METHODS

The protocol consisted in facilitating transport, primary or staged reduction at the bedside and sutureless closure, without anesthesia, PICC lines and early feeding. Data was prospectively collected for the Protocol Group (PG) treated between June 2014 through March 2016 and compared to the last consecutive patients Historical Group (HG). Primary outcome was mortality.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

need for and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), time to first feed (TFF) after closure, parenteral nutrition (TPN), length of stay (LOS) and sepsis. Data were analyzed using χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

92 patients were included (46 HG and 46 PG). Demographic data were homogeneous. Mortality decreased from 22% to 2% (p = 0.007). Mechanical ventilation use decreased from 100% to 57% (p = <0.001), ventilator days from 14 to 3 median days (p = <0.0001), TPN days: 27 to 21 median days (p = 0.026), sepsis decreased from 70% to 37% (p = 0.003) and anesthesia from a 100% to 15% (p = <0.001), respectively. No difference was found in NPO or LOS.

CONCLUSION

A major improvement in the morbidity and mortality rates was achieved, with outcomes comparable to those reported in developed countries. It was suitable for all patients with gastroschisis. We believe this protocol can be implemented in other centers to reduce morbidity and mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Variability in outcomes after gastroschisis closure across U.S. children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing gastroschisis closure, the effects of timing of closure and patient and hospital-level characteristics on length of stay (LOS) and time to enteral autonomy are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the Pediatric Health Information System, we compared neonates who underwent early (within 1day of birth) versus delayed (>1day after birth) gastroschisis closure from 2005 to 2013. We evaluated the relationship between time to closure and both LOS and days on total parenteral nutrition (TPN).

RESULTS

Of 4459 neonates with gastroschisis, 43.9% underwent early closure and 56.1% underwent delayed closure. Delayed closure, complicated gastroschisis, government insurance, lower birth weight, older age at closure, and complex chronic conditions were associated with longer LOS and days on TPN (all p<0.05). There was significant inter-hospital variability in both outcomes, after adjusting for patient- and hospital-level characteristics, including hospitals' gastroschisis and neonatal volumes, median age at closure, and percentages of complicated and delayed gastroschisis patients, (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Delayed gastroschisis closure is associated with longer LOS and duration of TPN, even after excluding complicated cases. Furthermore, after controlling for hospital volume, rate of complicated gastroschisis, and timing of closure, the persistent inter-hospital variability suggests that practice variability is partially responsible for these differences.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Variability of outcome reporting in Hirschsprung's Disease and gastroschisis: a systematic review

Heterogeneity in outcome reporting limits identification of gold-standard treatments for Hirschsprung’s Disease(HD) and gastroschisis. This review aimed to identify which outcomes are currently investigated in HD and gastroschisis research so as to counter this heterogeneity through informing development of a core outcome set(COS). Two systematic reviews were conducted. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared surgical interventions for primary treatment of HD in review one, and gastroschisis in review two. Studies available only as abstracts were excluded from analysis of reporting transparency. Thirty-five HD studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 74 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was faecal incontinence (32 studies, 91%). Seven of the 28 assessed studies (25%) met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. Thirty gastroschisis studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 62 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was length of stay (24 studies, 80%). None of the assessed studies met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. This review demonstrates that heterogeneity in outcome reporting and a significant risk of reporting bias exist in HD and gastroschisis research. Development of a COS could counter these problems, and the outcome lists developed from this review could be used in that process.