1
|
Ethical considerations in the management of infants with severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Semin Perinatol 2022; 46:151599. [PMID: 35450739 DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2022.151599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Intrinsic and extrinsic factors unique to neonatal care can complicate predictions of neurological outcomes for infants who suffer from severe intraventricular hemorrhage. While care decisions are driven by the same bioethical principles used in other domains, neurological prognostication can challenge concepts of futility, require careful examination of parental values, uncover biases and/or potentially compromise the best interests of the future child. In the following chapter we will review bioethical principles and relevant concepts, explore challenges to decision-making surrounding diagnoses of severe intraventricular hemorrhage and conclude with a brief review of practical approaches for counseling parents about neurodevelopmental impairment given the constraints of prognostic uncertainty and assumptions related to quality of life. We will argue that neurological findings alone, even in the setting of severe intraventricular hemorrhage, often do not constitute enough evidence for redirection of care but can be permissible when the entire neonatal condition is considered.
Collapse
|
2
|
Campbell H, Check J, Kuban KCK, Leviton A, Joseph RM, Frazier JA, Douglass LM, Roell K, Allred EN, Fordham LA, Hooper SR, Jara H, Paneth N, Mokrova I, Ru H, Santos HP, Fry RC, O’Shea TM. Neonatal Cranial Ultrasound Findings among Infants Born Extremely Preterm: Associations with Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 10 Years of Age. J Pediatr 2021; 237:197-205.e4. [PMID: 34090894 PMCID: PMC8478718 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.05.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between neonatal cranial ultrasound (CUS) abnormalities among infants born extremely preterm and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 10 years of age. STUDY DESIGN In a multicenter birth cohort of infants born at <28 weeks of gestation, 889 of 1198 survivors were evaluated for neurologic, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes at 10 years of age. Sonographic markers of white matter damage (WMD) included echolucencies in the brain parenchyma and moderate to severe ventricular enlargement. Neonatal CUS findings were classified as intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) without WMD, IVH with WMD, WMD without IVH, and neither IVH nor WMD. RESULTS WMD without IVH was associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7, 7.4), cerebral palsy (OR 14.3, 95% CI 6.5, 31.5), and epilepsy (OR 6.9; 95% CI 2.9, 16.8). Similar associations were found for WMD accompanied by IVH. Isolated IVH was not significantly associated these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Among children born extremely preterm, CUS abnormalities, particularly those indicative of WMD, are predictive of neurodevelopmental impairments at 10 years of age. The strongest associations were found with cerebral palsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Campbell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jennifer Check
- Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Karl C. K. Kuban
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Alan Leviton
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert M Joseph
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Jean A. Frazier
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Laurie M. Douglass
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Kyle Roell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Elizabeth N. Allred
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lynn Ansley Fordham
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stephen R. Hooper
- Department of Allied Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hernan Jara
- Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Nigel Paneth
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI
| | | | - Hongyu Ru
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hudson P. Santos
- Biobehavioral Laboratory, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rebecca C. Fry
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - T. Michael O’Shea
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Neuroimaging of the preterm infant is a common assessment performed in the NICU. Timely and focused studies can be used for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic information. However, significant variability exists among neonatal units as to which modalities are used and when imaging studies are obtained. Appropriate timing and selection of neuroimaging studies can help identify neonates with brain injury who may require therapeutic intervention or who may be at risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. This clinical report reviews the different modalities of imaging broadly available to the clinician. Evidence-based indications for each modality, optimal timing of examinations, and prognostic value are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan L Hand
- Department of Pediatrics, New York City Health + Hospitals/Kings County, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York;
| | - Renée A Shellhaas
- Pediatric Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Sarah S Milla
- Departments of Radiology and Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wightman A, Kett J, Campelia G, Wilfond BS. The Relational Potential Standard: Rethinking the Ethical Justification for Life-Sustaining Treatment for Children with Profound Cognitive Disabilities. Hastings Cent Rep 2020; 49:18-25. [PMID: 31269258 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
In this era of rapidly advancing biomedical technologies, it is not unusual for parents of children with profound cognitive disabilities to ask clinicians to provide invasive life-sustaining treatments. Parental requests for such interventions pose a moral dilemma to the treating medical team, as there may be a discrepancy between the team's perception of the child's best interest and the apparent rationale underlying a parent's request. This gap highlights the limitation of the best interest standard in cases where, due to a neurodevelopmental disorder or brain injury, the child's capabilities are severely limited and their interests may be difficult to discern. The harm principle is also inadequate for decision-making in response to these parental requests. To address these limitations, and inspired in part by John Arras's work on the relational potential standard, we propose an integration of care ethics within pediatric decision-making using a new version of this standard. The potential for children to be in caring and loving relationships with their parents, what we will call "relational potential," may provide an ethical justification for clinicians to support parental requests for life-sustaining treatments.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bogetz J, Wilfond BS, Wightman A. Moving Beyond Using the Term Poor Prognosis in Children With Severe Neurological Impairment: A Linguistic Shortcut Better Avoided. JAMA Pediatr 2020; 174:11-12. [PMID: 31764955 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jori Bogetz
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle
| | - Aaron Wightman
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Integrating neurocritical care approaches into neonatology: should all infants be treated equitably? J Perinatol 2015; 35:977-81. [PMID: 26248128 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2015.95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
To improve the neurologic outcomes for infants with brain injury, neonatal providers are increasingly implementing neurocritical care approaches into clinical practice. Term infants with brain injury have been principal beneficiaries of neurologically-integrated care models to date, as evidenced by the widespread adoption of therapeutic hypothermia protocols for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Innovative therapeutic and diagnostic support for very low birth weight infants with brain injury has lagged behind. Given that concern for significant future neurodevelopmental impairment can lead to decisions to withdraw life supportive care at any gestational age, providing families with accurate prognostic information is essential for all infants. Current variable application of multidisciplinary neurocritical care approaches to infants at different gestational ages may be ethically problematic and reflect distinct perceptions of brain injury for infants born extremely premature.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaeppler C, Switchenko N, DiGeronimo R, Yoder BA. Do normal head ultrasounds need repeating in infants less than 30 weeks gestation? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 29:2428-33. [PMID: 26414689 DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1086741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current head ultrasound (HUS) screening recommendations in preterm infants often include a repeat HUS, regardless of initial findings. The objective of this study is to determine the rate of subsequent severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), ventriculomegaly (VM), or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) among infants < 30 weeks gestation (EGA) with a normal HUS at day of life (DOL) 4-10. METHODS Retrospectively collected data were analyzed for all infants < 30 weeks EGA cared for in one NICU from 1 January 2010 to 31 August 2014. Infants with severe congenital anomalies were excluded. We reviewed the first three HUSs and last documented HUS. Severe IVH was defined as > Papile grade 2 and significant interval HUS change was defined as development of severe IVH, PVL, or VM. RESULTS Of the 383 infants who had an initial screening HUS between DOL 4 and 10, 258 (67%) were initially normal and repeat screening was performed in 228 of these. None developed severe IVH on follow-up HUS. One infant developed VM secondary to GBS meningitis, and one developed echogenicity concerning for PVL that later resolved. CONCLUSIONS Among very preterm infants with a normal HUS between DOL 4 and 10, routine follow-up HUS is unlikely to identify a significant change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert DiGeronimo
- a Department of Pediatrics and.,b Division of Neonatology , University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Bradley A Yoder
- a Department of Pediatrics and.,b Division of Neonatology , University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Infants born at the limits of viability present neonatologists in particular and society in general with difficult challenges. Ethical and legal considerations establish a framework for action, although this varies between countries, departments and individuals and shows dynamic changes over time. This brief review includes a vignette telling a familiar story. In this case, the parents ask searching questions and the caring, knowledgeable neonatologist uses up-to-date information to offer empathic and thoughtful guidance - a challenge for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S Shinwell
- Department of Neonatology, Ziv Medical Center, Bar-Ilan University, Tsfat, Israel
| |
Collapse
|