Variation in Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants

Non-invasive ventilatory support in neonates: An evidence-based update

Non-invasive ventilatory support (NIV) is considered the gold standard in the care of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). NIV from birth is superior to mechanical ventilation (MV) for the prevention of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), with a number needed to treat between 25 and 35. Various methods of NIV are available, some of them extensively researched and with well proven efficacy, whilst others are needing further research. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has replaced routine invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) for the initial stabilization and the treatment of RDS. Choosing the most suitable form of NIV and the most appropriate patient interface depends on several factors, including gestational age, underlying lung pathophysiology and the local facilities. In this review, we present the currently available evidence on NIV as primary ventilatory support to preventing intubation and for secondary ventilatory support, following extubation. We review nCPAP, nasal high-flow cannula, nasal intermittent positive airway pressure ventilation, bi-level positive airway pressure, nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and nasal neurally adjusted ventilatory assist modes. We also discuss most suitable NIV devices and patient interfaces during resuscitation of the newborn in the delivery room.

Pediatric Simulation of Intrinsic PEEP and Patient-Ventilator Trigger Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND

Intrinsic PEEP during mechanical ventilation occurs when there is insufficient time for expiration to functional residual capacity before the next inspiration, resulting in air trapping. Increased expiratory resistance (R_E), too rapid of a patient or ventilator breathing rate, or a longer inspiratory to expiratory time ratio (T_I/T_E) can all be causes of intrinsic PEEP. Intrinsic PEEP can result in increased work of breathing and patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) during patient-triggered breaths. We hypothesized that the difference between intrinsic PEEP and ventilator PEEP acts as an inspiratory load resulting in trigger asynchrony that needs to be overcome by increased respiratory muscle pressure (P_mus).

METHODS

Using a Servo lung model (ASL 5000) and LTV 1200 ventilator in pressure control mode, we developed a passive model demonstrating how elevated R_E increases intrinsic PEEP above ventilator PEEP. We also developed an active model investigating the effects of R_E and intrinsic PEEP on trigger asynchrony (expressed as percentage of patient-initiated breaths that failed to trigger). We then studied if trigger asynchrony could be reduced by increased P_mus.

RESULTS

Intrinsic PEEP increased significantly with increasing R_E (r = 0.97, P = .006). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both R_E and negative P_mus levels affect trigger asynchrony (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A passive lung model describes the development of increasing intrinsic PEEP with increasing R_E at a given ventilator breathing rate. An active lung model shows how this can lead to trigger asynchrony since the P_mus needed to trigger a breath is greater with increased R_E, as the inspiratory muscles must overcome intrinsic PEEP. This model will lend itself to the study of intrinsic PEEP engendered by a higher ventilator breathing rate, as well as higher T_I/T_E, and will be useful in ventilator simulation scenarios of PVA. The model also suggests that increasing ventilator PEEP to match intrinsic PEEP can improve trigger asynchrony through a reduction in R_E.

Update on ventilatory management of extremely preterm infants-A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit perspective

Extremely preterm infants commonly suffer from respiratory distress syndrome. Ventilatory management of these infants starts from birth and includes decisions such as timing of respiratory support in relation to umbilical cord management, oxygenation targets, and options of positive pressure support. The approach of early intubation and surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube has been challenged in recent years by primary noninvasive respiratory support and newer methods of surfactant administration via thin catheters. Available data comparing the thin catheter method to endotracheal tube and delayed extubation in extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation did not show differences in survival free of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Data from numerous randomized trials comparing conventional ventilation with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation did not show differences in meaningful outcomes. Among conventional modes of ventilation, there is good evidence to favor volume-targeted ventilation over pressure-limited ventilation. The former reduces the combined risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death and several important secondary outcomes without an increase in adverse events. There are no evidence-based guidelines to set positive end-expiratory pressure in ventilated preterm infants. Recent research suggests that the forced oscillation technique may help to find the lowest positive end-expiratory pressure at which lung recruitment is optimal. Benefits and risks of the various modes of noninvasive ventilation depend on the clinical setting, degree of prematurity, severity of lung disease, and competency of staff in treating associated complications. Respiratory care after discharge includes home oxygen therapy, lung function monitoring, weaning from medication started in the neonatal unit, and treatment of asthma-like symptoms.

Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants-"The OPTTIMMAL-Trial"-Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Background

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applies positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and has been shown to reduce the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. However, CPAP failure rates of 50% are reported in large randomized controlled trials. A possible explanation for these failure rates is the application of insufficient low levels of PEEP during nasal CPAP treatment to maintain adequate functional residual capacity shortly after birth. The optimum PEEP level to treat symptoms of respiratory distress in very low birth weight infants has not been assessed in clinical studies. The aim of the study is to compare two different PEEP levels during nasal CPAP treatment in preterm infants.

Methods

In this randomized multicenter trial, 216 preterm infants born at 26 + 0–29 + 6 gestational weeks will be allocated to receive a higher (6–8 cmH₂O) or a lower (3–5 cmH₂O) PEEP during neonatal resuscitation and the first 120 h of life. The PEEP level within each group will be titrated throughout the intervention based on the FiO₂ (fraction of inspired oxygen concentration) requirements to keep oxygenation within the target range. The primary outcome is defined as the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation for > 1 h or being not ventilated but reaching one of the two pre-defined CPAP failure criteria (FiO₂ > 0.5 for > 1 h or pCO₂ ≥ 70 mmHg in two consecutive blood gas analyses at least 2 h apart).

Discussion

Based on available data from the literature, the optimum level of PEEP that most effectively treats respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is unknown, since the majority of large clinical trials applied a wide range of PEEP levels (4–8 cmH₂O). The rationale for our study hypothesis is that the early application of a higher PEEP level will more effectively counteract the collapsing properties of the immature and surfactant-deficient lungs and that the level of inspired oxygen may serve as a surrogate marker to guide PEEP titration. Finding the optimum noninvasive continuous distending pressure during early nasal CPAP is required to improve CPAP efficacy and as a consequence to reduce the exposure to ventilator-induced lung injury and the incidence of chronic lung disease in this vulnerable population of very preterm infants.

Trial registration

drks.de DRKS00019940. Registered on March 13, 2020

Increased peak end-expiratory pressure in ventilated preterm lambs changes cerebral microvascular perfusion: direct synchrotron microangiography assessment

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves oxygenation in mechanically ventilated preterm neonates by preventing lung collapse. However, high PEEP may alter cerebral blood flow secondarily to the increased intrathoracic pressure, predisposing to brain injury. The precise effects of high PEEP on cerebral hemodynamics in the preterm brain are unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of PEEP on microvessels in the preterm brain by using synchrotron radiation (SR) microangiography, which enables in vivo real-time high-resolution imaging of the cerebral vasculature. Preterm lambs (0.8 gestation, n = 4) were delivered via caesarean section, anesthetized, and ventilated. SR microangiography of the right cerebral hemisphere was performed with iodine contrast administered into the right carotid artery during PEEP ventilation of 5 and 10 cmH₂O. Carotid blood flow was measured using an ultrasonic flow probe placed around the left carotid artery. An increase of PEEP from 5 to 10 cmH₂O increased the diameter of small cerebral vessels (<150 µm) but decreased the diameter of larger cerebral vessels (>500 µm) in all four lambs. Additionally, the higher PEEP increased the cerebral contrast transit time in three of the four lambs. Carotid blood flow increased in two lambs, which also had increased carbon dioxide levels during PEEP 10. Our results suggest that PEEP of 10 cmH₂O alters the preterm cerebral hemodynamics, with prolonged cerebral blood flow transit and engorgement of small cerebral microvessels likely due to the increased intrathoracic pressure. These microvascular changes are generally not reflected in global assessment of cerebral blood flow or oxygenation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY An increase of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 5 to 10 cmH₂O increased the diameter of small cerebral vessels (<150 µm) but decreased the diameter of larger cerebral vessels (>500 µm). This suggests increased intrathoracic pressure due to high PEEP can drive microvessel engorgement in the preterm brain, which may play a role in cerebrovascular injury.

A novel approach using volumetric dynamic airway computed tomography to determine positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings to maintain airway patency in ventilated infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key mechanical ventilator setting in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Excessive PEEP can result in insufficient carbon dioxide elimination and lung damage, while insufficient PEEP can result in impaired gas exchange secondary to airway and alveolar collapse. Determining PEEP settings based on clinical parameters alone is challenging and variable.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using dynamic airway CT to determine the lowest PEEP setting sufficient to maintain expiratory central airway patency of at least 50% of the inspiratory cross-sectional area in children with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all infants with BPD who underwent volumetric CT with a dynamic airway protocol for PEEP optimization from December 2014 through April 2019. Sixteen infants with BPD underwent 17 CT exams. Each CT exam consisted of acquisitions spanning the trachea and mainstem bronchi. We measured cross-sectional area of the trachea and mainstem bronchi and qualitatively assessed the amount of atelectasis. We documented changes in management as a result of the CT exam.

RESULTS

The average effective dose was 0.1-0.8 mSv/scan. Of 17 CT exams, PEEP was increased in 9, decreased in 3 and unchanged after 5 exams.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic airway CT shows promise to assist the clinician in determining PEEP settings to maintain airway patency in infants with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. Further evaluation of the impact of this maneuver on gas exchange, cardiac output and other physiological measures is needed.

Positive end-expiratory pressure for preterm infants requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome or bronchopulmonary dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) is a common therapy for neonatal respiratory failure. While CMV facilitates gas exchange, it may simultaneously injure the lungs. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has received less attention than other ventilation parameters when considering this benefit-risk balance. While an appropriate PEEP level may result in clinical benefits, both inappropriately low or high levels may cause harm. An appropriate PEEP level may also be best achieved by an individualized approach.

OBJECTIVES

1. To compare the effects of PEEP levels in preterm infants requiring CMV for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). We compare both: zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) (0 cm H₂O) versus any PEEP and low (< 5 cm H₂O) vs high (≥ 5 cm H₂O) PEEP.2. To compare the effects of PEEP levels in preterm infants requiring CMV for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We compare both: ZEEP (0 cm H₂O) vs any PEEP and low (< 5 cm H₂O) versus high (≥ 5 cm H₂O) PEEP.3. To compare the effects of different methods for individualizing PEEP to an optimal level in preterm newborn infants requiring CMV for RDS.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL to 14 February 2018. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials studying preterm infants born at less than 37 weeks' gestational age, requiring CMV and undergoing randomization to either different PEEP levels (RDS or BPD); or, two or more alternative methods for individualizing PEEP levels (RDS only). We included cross-over trials but limited outcomes to those from the first cross-over period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed data collection and analysis according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence for prespecified key clinically relevant outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials met the inclusion criteria. Two cross-over trials with 28 participants compared different PEEP levels in infants with RDS. Meta-analysis was limited to short-term measures of pulmonary gas exchange and showed no differences between low and high PEEP.We identified no trials comparing PEEP levels in infants with BPD.Two trials enrolling 44 participants compared different methods for individualizing PEEP in infants with RDS. Both trials compared an oxygenation-guided lung-recruitment maneuver (LRM) with gradual PEEP level titrations for individualizing PEEP to routine care (control). Meta-analysis showed no difference between LRM and control on mortality by hospital discharge (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 5.77); there was no statistically significant difference on BPD, with an effect estimate favoring LRM (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.07); and a statistically significant difference favoring LRM for the outcome of duration of ventilatory support (mean difference -1.06 days, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.26; moderate heterogeneity, I² = 67%). Short-term oxygenation measures also favored LRM. We graded the quality of the evidence as low for all key outcomes due to risk of bias and imprecision of the effect estimates.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There continues to be insufficient evidence to guide PEEP level selection for preterm infants on CMV for RDS or BPD. Low-quality data suggests that selecting PEEP levels through the application of an oxygenation-guided LRM may result in clinical benefit. Well-conducted randomized trials, particularly to further evaluate the potential benefits of oxygenation-guided LRMs, are needed.