Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects after Home Birth and Early Postnatal Discharge

Diagnostic value of reversed differential cyanosis in (supra)cardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous return

BACKGROUND

To investigate the occurrence of reversed differential cyanosis (RDC) in case of (supra)cardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous return (TAPVR), we explored the hemodynamic changes and oxygen saturation levels during the fetal-to-neonatal transition in (supra)cardiac TAPVR, thereby revealing determinant factors of RDC.

METHODS

A computational model was used to simulate the cardiovascular fetal-to-neonatal transition up to 24 h after birth. Abnormalities associated with TAPVR, like patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate (PPHN), were imposed on the model. Hemodynamic impact on flow distribution and right-sided pressures as well as oxygen saturations were assessed.

RESULTS

Model findings demonstrated that RDC in (supra)cardiac TAPVR was dependent on two key factors: (1) the type of pulmonary venous connection being supracardiac or cardiac, and (2) the presence of a patent ductus arteriosus exhibiting right-to-left shunting. Persistence of RDC was mainly determined by the latter; an increase in pulmonary-to-systemic pressure difference by PPHN or PDA-induced pulmonary over-circulation contributed to persistence of RDC.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significance of RDC in (supra)cardiac TAPVR and suggests to incorporate early screening ( < 24 h after birth) and to consider RDC as an immediate fail in screening protocols to ensure prompt detection of (supra)cardiac TAPVR.

IMPACT

Utilizing a validated computational model for the cardiovascular fetal-to-neonatal transition, this study sheds light on the complex hemodynamics in neonates with (supra)cardiac Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Return (TAPVR). Model findings suggest that the often-present pulmonary over-circulation in neonates with TAPVR might significantly contribute to the anomaly's frequent omission during pulse-oximetry screening beyond the first 24 h after birth. This study highlights the diagnostic value of reversed differential cyanosis in early screenings within the first 24 h after birth. By including RDC as an immediate fail in early pulse-oximetry screenings, the likelihood of missing (supra)cardiac TAPVR cases could be reduced.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination and Pulse Oximetry for Critical Congenital Cardiac Disease Screening in Newborns

BACKGROUND

Newborns with a critical congenital heart disease left undiagnosed and untreated have a substantial risk for serious complications and subsequent failure to thrive. Prenatal ultrasound screening is not widely available, nor is postnatal echocardiography. Physical examination is the standard for postnatal screening. Pulse oximetry has been proposed in numerous studies as an alternative screening method. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the diagnostic accuracies of both screening methods separately and combined.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Embase, PubMed, and Global Health databases up to 30 November 2023 was conducted with the following keywords: critical congenital heart disease, physical examination, clinical scores, pulse oximetry, and echocardiography. The search included all studies conducted in the newborn period using both physical examination and pulse oximetry as screening methods and excluded newborns admitted to the intensive care unit. All studies were assessed for risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 score. The review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 statement guideline.

RESULTS

Out of 2711 articles, 20 articles were selected as eligible for meta-analysis. Cumulatively, the sample included 872,549 screened newborns. The pooled sensitivity of the physical examination screening method was found to be 0.69 (0.66-0.73 (95% CI)) and specificity was found to be 0.98 (0.98-0.98). For the pulse oximetry screening method, the pooled sensitivity and specificity yielded 0.78 (0.75-0.82) and 0.99 (0.99-0.99), respectively. The combined method of screening yielded improved diagnostic characteristics at a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (0.91-0.95) and 0.98 (0.98-0.98, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates that combining both physical examination and pulse oximetry to screen for critical congenital heart disease exceeds the accuracy of either separate method. The main limitation is that solely newborns with suspected critical congenital heart disease were subjected to the reference standard. We recommend adapting both methods to screen for critical congenital heart diseases, especially in settings lacking standard fetal ultrasound screening. To increase the sensitivity further, we recommend increasing the screening time window and employing the peripheral perfusion index.

Feasibility of screening for critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry in Indonesia

BACKGROUND

Screening of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is a routine procedure in many countries, but not in Indonesia. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing CCHD screening with pulse oximetry for newborns in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at four hospitals in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Newborns aged 24-48 hours who met the inclusion criteria were screened on the right hand and left or right foot using a pulse oximeter. Positive results were indicated by: either (1) SpO2 level < 90% in one extremity, (2) SpO2 level of 90-94% in both right hand and either foot on three measurements conducted 1 hour apart, or (3) a saturation difference > 3% between the upper and lower extremity on three measurements conducted 1 hour apart. Positive findings were confirmed by echocardiography.

RESULTS

Of 1452 newborns eligible for screening, 10 had positive results and were referred for echocardiographic evaluation. Of those, 8 (6 per 1000 live birth, 8/1452) had CCHD. Barriers found during screening processes were associated with hospital procedures, equipment, healthcare personnel, and condition of the newborn.

CONCLUSION

Pulse oximetry screening might be feasible to be implemented within the routine newborn care setting for CCHD in Indonesia. In order to successfully implement pulse oximetry screening to identify CCHD in Indonesia, the barriers will need to be addressed.

Saturation screening for neonatal hypoxaemia within 6 h of life: Not all about congenital cardiac disease

AIMS

To assess the outcomes of an early oxygen saturation screening programme in apparently healthy newborns for the detection of cardiac and non-cardiac disease. To describe the aetiology and incidence of infants with oxygen saturations <95% in the first 6 h of life and describe the management to discharge. In addition, we sought to identify any risk factors for failed early saturations.

METHODS

This is a retrospective hospital cohort assessing outcomes of an early saturation screening programme performed in apparently healthy newborns. Infants with oxygen saturations less than 95% were identified and their clinical notes were hand-searched. Descriptive statistics were used to present demographics, proportion of infants who passed or failed screening, subsequent diagnoses and short-term outcome. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent associations of clinical factors (birthweight, gestation, elective caesarean section and gender) with failed screening.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2019, 14 956 healthy newborns were assessed within the first 6 h, 94 (0.63%) failed the early saturation screen. The most common causes for saturation <95% were respiratory disease or delayed transition. There were 31 (33%) infants admitted to the NICU with an additional baby requiring emergency transfer to a cardiac centre. Infants were 28 times more likely to have saturations <95% if born by elective caesarean section (odds ratio 28, conflict of interest (18.54-42.82)).

CONCLUSION

In apparently healthy newborns, early assessment of oxygen saturation, combined with clinical assessment and subsequent intervention can identify important conditions and should be considered as standard care.

Newborn Pulse Oximetry for Infants Born Out-of-Hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Conventional timing of newborn pulse oximetry screening is not ideal for infants born out-of-hospital. We implemented a newborn pulse oximetry screen to align with typical midwifery care and measure its efficacy at detecting critical congenital heart disease.

METHODS

Cohort study of expectant mothers and infants mainly from the Amish and Mennonite (Plain) communities with limited prenatal ultrasound use. Newborns were screened at 1 to 4 hours of life ("early screen") and 24 to 48 hours of life ("late screen"). Newborns were followed up to 6 weeks after delivery to report outcomes. Early screen, late screen, and combined results were analyzed on the basis of strict algorithm interpretation ("algorithm") and the midwife's interpretation in the field ("field") because these did not correspond in all cases.

RESULTS

Pulse oximetry screening in 3019 newborns (85% Plain; 50% male; 43% with a prenatal ultrasound) detected critical congenital heart disease in 3 infants. Sensitivity of combined early and late screen was 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.4% to 99.2%) for algorithm interpretation and 100% (95% CI 29.2% to 100%) for field interpretation. Positive predictive value was similar for the field interpretation (8.8%; 95% CI 1.9% to 23.7%) and algorithm interpretation (5.4%; 95% CI 0.7% to 18.2%). False-positive rates were ≤1.2% for both algorithm and field interpretations. Other pathologies (noncritical congenital heart disease, pulmonary issues, or infection) were reported in 12 of the false-positive cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Newborn pulse oximetry can be adapted to the out-of-hospital setting without compromising sensitivity or prohibitively increasing false-positive rates.

Evaluation of Pulse Oximetry Screening Rates Among the Midwife-Attended Out-of-Hospital Birth Community in Michigan

INTRODUCTION

In Michigan, pulse oximetry screening rates for critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) are assessed for birthing hospitals but have not been assessed for the midwife-attended births that occur in the out-of-hospital birth community. This analysis was conducted to determine pulse oximetry screening rates among the midwife-attended out-of-hospital birth community in Michigan overall, and among midwives provided with loaned pulse oximeters from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).

METHODS

Records for midwife-attended out-of-hospital births between April 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were linked via probabilistic matching with newborn screening records. Pulse oximetry screening rates were calculated for the midwife-attended out-of-hospital birth population overall, by midwife, and stratified by receipt of loaned pulse oximeters from MDHHS. Births from midwives who attended 5 or more nonhospital births during the study period were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 3410 midwife-attended out-of-hospital births, 20.8% (n = 710) reported as having received a pulse oximetry screening for CCHDs. For births attended by midwives who received pulse oximeters from MDHHS, 50.5% had pulse oximetry screening results reported, compared with 12.7% among births attended by midwives without a loaned pulse oximeter. Of the 78 total midwives, 18% (n = 14) reported pulse oximetry screening results on more than half of the births they attended. Of the 14 midwives who received a pulse oximeter from MDHHS, 50.0% (n = 7) reported screening results for more than half of all births they attended.

DISCUSSION

Our findings indicate that CCHD screening rates are low among midwife-attended out-of-hospital birth community. Screening rates were higher among midwives who received a pulse oximeter from MDHHS, but fewer than half of the attended births had a reported pulse oximetry screening. Further discussions with the midwife-attended out-of-hospital birth community to better understand screening barriers may be beneficial.

Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects: A Life-Saving Test for All Newborn Babies

Congenital heart defects (CHD) are the commonest congenital malformations and remain a major cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity in the developed world [...]

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects following homebirth and early discharge

Pulse oximetry (PO) screening is used to screen newborns for critical congenital heart defects (CCHD). Analyses performed in hospital settings suggest that PO screening is cost-effective. We assessed the costs and cost-effectiveness of PO screening in the Dutch perinatal care setting, with home births and early postnatal discharge, compared to a situation without PO screening. Data from a prospective accuracy study with 23,959 infants in the Netherlands were combined with a time and motion study and supplemented data. Costs and effects of the situations with and without PO screening were compared for a cohort of 100,000 newborns. Mean screening time per newborn was 4.9 min per measurement and 3.8 min for informing parents. The additional costs of screening were in total €14.71 per screened newborn (€11.00 personnel, €3.71 equipment costs). Total additional costs of screening and referral were €1,670,000 per 100,000 infants. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €139,000 per additional newborn with CCHD detected with PO, when compared to a situation without PO screening. A willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per gained QALY for screening in the Netherlands makes the screening likely to be cost-effective.Conclusion: PO screening in the Dutch care setting is likely to be cost-effective. What is Known: • Pulse oximetry is increasingly implemented as a screening tool for critical congenital heart defects in newborns. • Previous studies suggest that the screening in cost-effective and in the USA a reduction in infant mortality from critical congenital heart defects was demonstrated. What is New: • This is the first cost-effectiveness analysis for pulse oximetry screening in a setting with screening after home births, with screening at two moments. • Costs of pulse oximetry screening in a setting with hospital and homebirth deliveries were €14.71 and is likely to be cost-effective accordint to Dutch standards.

Pulse Oximetry Screening Adapted to a System with Home Births: The Dutch Experience

Neonatal screening for critical congenital heart defects is proven to be safe, accurate, and cost-effective. The screening has been implemented in many countries across all continents in the world. However, screening for critical congenital heart defects after home births had not been studied widely yet. The Netherlands is known for its unique perinatal care system with a high rate of home births (18%) and early discharge after an uncomplicated delivery in hospital. We report a feasibility, accuracy, and acceptability study performed in the Dutch perinatal care system. Screening newborns for critical congenital heart defects using pulse oximetry is feasible after home births and early discharge, and acceptable to mothers. The accuracy of the test is comparable to other early-screening settings, with a moderate sensitivity and high specificity.