Seizure Rescue Medication Use among US Pediatric Epilepsy Providers: A Survey of the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium

Predictors for and use of rescue medication in adults with epilepsy: A multicentre cross-sectional study from Germany

BACKGROUND

Seizure clusters, prolonged seizures, and status epilepticus are life-threatening neurological emergencies leading to irreversible neuronal damage. Benzodiazepines are current evidence-based rescue therapy options; however, recent investigations indicated the prescription of mainly unsuitable benzodiazepines and inappropriate use of rescue medication.

OBJECTIVE

To examine current use, satisfaction, and adverse events concerning rescue medication in patients with epilepsy in Germany.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted at epilepsy centres in Frankfurt am Main, Greifswald, Marburg, and Münster between 10/2020 and 12/2020. Patients with an epilepsy diagnosis were assessed based on a questionnaire examining a 12-month period.

RESULTS

In total, 486 patients (mean age: 40.5, range 18-83, 58.2 % female) participated in this study, of which 125 (25.7 %) reported the use of rescue medication. The most frequently prescribed rescue medications were lorazepam tablets (56.8 %, n = 71 out of 125), buccal midazolam (19.2 %, n = 24), and rectal diazepam (10.4 %, n = 13). Seizures continuing for over several minutes (43.2 %, n = 54), seizure clusters (28.0 %, n = 35), and epileptic auras (28.0 %, n = 35) were named as indications, while 28.0 % (n = 35) stated they administered the rescue medication for every seizure. Of those continuing to have seizures, 46.0 % did not receive rescue medication. On average, rescue medication prescription occurred 7.1 years (SD 12.7, range 0-66) after an epilepsy diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsuitable oral benzodiazepines remain widely prescribed for epilepsy patients as rescue medication. Patients also reported inappropriate use of medication. A substantial proportion of patients who were not seizure-free did not receive rescue medication prescriptions. Offering each patient at risk for prolonged seizures or clusters of seizures an individual rescue treatment with instructions on using it may decrease mortality and morbidity and increase quality of life. .

Acute Abortive Therapies for Seizure Clusters in Long-Term Care

OBJECTIVES

To describe acute seizure treatment for the long-term care setting, emphasizing rescue (acute abortive) medications for on-site management of acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters.

DESIGN

Narrative review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

People with seizures in long-term care, including group residences.

METHODS

PubMed was searched using keywords that pertained to rescue medications, seizure emergencies/epilepsy, seizure action plans, and long-term care.

RESULTS

Seizure disorder, including epilepsy, is prevalent in long-term care residences, and rescue medications can be used for on-site treatment. Diazepam rectal gel, intranasal midazolam, and diazepam nasal spray are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved seizure-cluster rescue medications, and intravenous diazepam and lorazepam are approved for status epilepticus. Benzodiazepines differ by formulation, route of administration, absorption, and metabolism. Intranasal formulations are easy and ideal for public use and when rectal treatment is challenging (eg, wheelchair). Intranasal, intrabuccal, and rectal formulations do not require specialized training to administer and are easier for staff at all levels of training compared with intravenous treatment. Off-label rescue medications may have anecdotal support; however, potential disadvantages include variable absorption and onset of action as well as potential risks to patients and caregivers/care partners. Delivery of intravenous-administered rescue medications is delayed by the time needed to set up and deliver the medication and is subject to dosing errors. Seizure action plans that include management of acute seizures can optimize the quality and timing of treatment, which may reduce emergency service needs and prevent progression to status epilepticus.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Seizure disorder is prevalent across all ages but is increased in older adults and in those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Prompt intervention may reduce negative outcomes associated with acute unexpected seizures and seizure clusters. Seizure action plans that include acute seizures can improve the treatment response by detailing the necessary information for staff to provide immediate treatment.

Pediatric Status Epilepticus: Treat Early and Avoid Delays

Pediatric convulsive status epilepticus (cSE) is a neurologic emergency with potential for morbidity and mortality. Rapid treatment and escalation of therapies to achieve early seizure control is paramount in preventing complications and providing the best patient outcomes. Although guidelines recommend early treatment, cessation of out-of-hospital SE is undermined by treatment delay and inadequate dosing. Logistical challenges include prompt seizure recognition, first-line benzodiazepine (BZD) availability, comfort and expertise in administration of BZD, and timely arrival of emergency personnel. In-hospital, SE onset is additionally impacted by delays to first- and second-line treatment and availability of resources. This review presents an evidence-based, clinically oriented review of pediatric cSE, including its definitions and treatments. It provides evidence and rationale for timely treatment of first-line BZD treatment followed by prompt escalation to second-line antiseizure medication therapies for established SE. Treatment delays and barriers to care are discussed, with practical considerations for opportunities for areas of improvement in the initial treatment of cSE.

Seizure Rescue Therapies: Comparing Approved and Commonly Used Benzodiazepine Formulations

Acute seizure therapies given out of the hospital are important for interrupting acute repetitive and prolonged seizures and preventing hospitalization. These vary in their administration routes, indications for children and adults, pharmacologic profiles, and efficacy. We reviewed and compared the uses of current formulations available to treat acute seizures, including newly released intranasal (IN) benzodiazepines and older formulations which are widely used for interrupting seizures.

Economic aspects of treating seizure clusters

Seizure clusters may initiate a chain of events that have economic as well as clinical consequences. The potential economic consequences of seizure clusters must be weighed against the cost of medication to attenuate them. This is true both for individual patients and for society. Data needed for economic analyses include the chance that a cluster will progress to an adverse outcome, such as a need for emergency care, the costs of such an outcome, the cost of a rescue medication (RM), and the effectiveness of the RM. Indirect costs, such as lost employment for patients and caregivers, must also be considered. Several types of economic analyses can be used to determine costs and benefits of a medical intervention. There are studies comparing different RMs from an economic perspective, but there is little direct information on the costs of using an RM versus allowing clusters to run their course. However, the high expense of consequences of seizure clusters makes it likely that effective RMs will make economic as well as medical sense for many patients.

Rescue therapies for seizure emergencies: current and future landscape

INTRODUCTION

Seizure emergencies-status epilepticus and seizure clusters-require rapid evaluation and treatment. Several consensus-based guidelines support a prompt use of intravenous benzodiazepines as the first-line therapy in seizure emergencies. However, most seizure emergencies start outside the hospital settings. Until recently, approved prehospital rescue therapies were limited to rectal diazepam and buccal midazolam (Europe only).

METHODS

The author provides a narrative review of rescue therapies for seizure emergencies based on a comprehensive literature review (PubMed and OvidSP vendors with appropriate keywords to incorporate recent evidence) to highlight the changing landscape of seizure recue therapies.

RESULTS

A commercial version of intranasal midazolam was approved by the FDA in 2019 for 12 ≥ years old with seizure clusters. In 2020, the FDA also approved a proprietary vitamin E solution-based diazepam nose spray to abort seizure clusters in ≥ 6 years old subjects. Other than these two new options, the author discussed two previously approved therapies: rectal diazepam and buccal midazolam. The review also includes the use of intramuscular diazepam and midazolam, clonazepam wafer, sublingual and intranasal lorazepam in seizure emergencies. Besides the availability of new therapies from successful trials in controlled settings, the real-world challenges of using rescue medicines in community settings are slowly emerging.

DISCUSSION

With multiple options, a more robust and updated cost-effective analysis of different rescue medicines needs to be performed using effectiveness data from the literature and cost data from publicly available market prices. Further research is also ongoing to develop alternative non-intravenous treatment options for outpatient settings. Lastly, several other non-benzodiazepine drugs, such as allopregnanolone, propofol, and brivaracetam, are also currently under development for seizure emergencies.

Identification of seizure clusters using free text notes in an electronic seizure diary

SIGNIFICANCE

Online seizure diaries offer a wealth of information regarding real world experience of patients living with epilepsy. Free text notes (FTN) written by patients reflect concerns and priorities of patients and provide supplemental information to structured diary data.

OBJECTIVE

This project evaluated feasibility using an automated lexical analysis to identify FTN relevant to seizure clusters (SCs).

METHODS

Data were extracted from EpiDiary™, a free electronic epilepsy diary with 42,799 unique users, generating 1,096,168 entries and 247,232 FTN. Both structured data as well as FTN were analyzed for presence of SC. A pilot study was conducted to validate an automated lexical analysis algorithm to identify SC in FTN in a sample of 98 diaries. The lexical analysis was then applied to the entire dataset. Outcomes included cluster prevalence and frequency, as well as the types of triggers commonly reported.

RESULTS

At least one FTN was found among 13,987 (32.68%) individual diaries. An automated lexical analysis algorithm identified 5797 of FTN as SC. There were 2423 unique patients with SC that were not identified by structured data alone and were identified using lexical analysis of FTN only. Seizure clusters were identified in n = 10,331 (24.1%) of diary users through both structured data and FTN. The median number of SCs days per year was 13.7, (interquartile rank (IQR): 3.2-54.7). The median number of seizures in a cluster day was 3 (IQR 2-4). The most common missed medication linked to patients with SC was levetiracetam (n = 576, 29%) followed by lamotrigine (n = 495, 24%), topiramate (n = 208, 10.5%), carbamazepine (n = 190, 9.6%), and lacosamide (n = 170, 8.6%). These percentages generally reflected prevalence of medication use in this population. The use of rescue medications was documented in 3306 of structured entries and 4305 in FTN.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study demonstrates a novel approach applying lexical analysis to previously untapped FTN in a large electronic seizure diary database. Free text notes captured information about SC not available from the structured diary data. Diary FTN contain information of high importance to people with epilepsy, written in their own words.

Indications for epilepsy monitoring in pediatric and adolescent health care

Seizures present in childhood with infinite diversity. History alone may suffice for diagnosis in some cases; more often additional evidence is needed to clarify events of concern. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a primary methodology used for seizure identification and management. Pediatric and adolescent health care providers are increasingly asked to make decisions about when and how to refer patients for eventual monitoring and must then be able to confidently interpret any resulting report(s). Comprehensive literature review was undertaken to provide a succinct and up-to-date overview aimed at general and subspecialty non-neurologist pediatric and adolescent health care providers to not only convey a solid general understanding of EEG and what it entails for patients and their families, but also foster a deeper understanding of the indications for monitoring-and how to interpret documented findings. In plain language this resultant guide reviews EEG basics, provides a crash course in the various types of EEG available, discusses broad indications for epilepsy monitoring, guides counseling and management for patients and their families both before and after EEG, and ultimately aids in the interpretation of both findings and prognosis. This review should allow both primary and subspecialty non-neurologic pediatric and adolescent health care providers to better identify when and how to best utilize EEG as part of a larger comprehensive clinical approach, distinguishing and managing both epileptic and nonepileptic disorders of concern while fostering communication across providers to facilitate and coordinate better holistic long-term care of pediatric and adolescent patients.

The burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Treatments for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) have a wide range of effectiveness. The estimated effectiveness of non-intravenous benzodiazepines (non-IV BZDs) ranges from approximately 70% to 90% and the estimated effectiveness of non-benzodiazepine antiseizure medications (non-BZD ASMs) ranges from approximately 50% to 80%. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of SE.

METHODS

We performed a decision analysis that evaluates how decisional uncertainty on treatment choices for SE impacts hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and costs in the United States. We evaluated treatment effectiveness based on the available literature.

RESULTS

Use of a non-IV BZD with high estimated effectiveness, like intranasal midazolam, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like rectal diazepam, would result in a median (p₂₅ -p₇₅ ) reduction in hospital admissions from 6 (3.9-8.8) to 1.1 (0.7-1.8) per 100 cases and associated cost reductions of $638 ($289-$1064) per pediatric patient and $1107 ($972-$1281) per adult patient. For BZD-resistant SE, use of a non-BZD ASM with high estimated effectiveness, like phenobarbital, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like phenytoin/fosphenytoin, would result in a reduction in ICU admissions from 9.1 (7.3-11.2) to 3.9 (2.6-5.5) per 100 cases and associated cost reduction of $1261 ($445-$2223) per pediatric patient and $319 ($-93-$806) per adult patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that relatively minor improvements in effectiveness may lead to substantial reductions in downstream hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs.

SIGNIFICANCE

Decreasing decisional uncertainty and using the most effective treatments for SE may substantially decrease hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs.

Safety and tolerability associated with chronic intermittent use of diazepam buccal film in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with epilepsy

Objective

Diazepam buccal film (DBF) is in development for treatment of patients experiencing bouts of increased seizure activity. We assessed safety, tolerability, and usability of self‐ or caregiver‐administered DBF in the outpatient setting.

Methods

Patients aged 2‐65 years needing treatment with a rescue benzodiazepine at least once monthly were eligible for the study. DBF (5‐17.5 mg) was dispensed based on age and body weight. Patients/caregivers administered DBF for up to five seizure episodes per month. Adverse events (AEs) and usability assessments were recorded after the first dose, then every 3 months.

Results

Onehundred eighteen patients who used ≥1 DBF dose (adults, n = 82; adolescents, n = 19; children, n = 17) were enrolled. Eleven treatment‐related AEs (10 being mild or moderate in severity) occurred in nine (7.6%) patients over a mean of 243 days of follow‐up. No patient discontinued participation because of AEs. Mild local buccal discomfort, buccal swelling, and cheek skin sensitivity were reported by one patient each. Twenty‐two serious AEs were reported; one was treatment‐related. The three deaths reported, all unrelated to DBF, resulted from seizures or seizure with brain malignancy. Self‐administration by adults was attempted on 23.6% (188/795) of use occasions. Administration of DBF occurred under ictal or peri‐ictal conditions on 49.5% (538/1087) of use occasions, and DBF was successfully administered on a first or second attempt on 96.6% (1050/1087) of use occasions. Overall, patients received their dose of DBF on 99.2% (1078/1087) of use occasions. A second DBF dose was required within 24 hours after the first dose on 8.5% (92/1087) of use occasions.

Significance

In this observational study of chronic intermittent use, DBF was easy to administer, safe, and well tolerated in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with epilepsy experiencing seizure emergencies. DBF can be readily self‐administered by adults with epilepsy, as well as successfully administered by a caregiver in seizure emergencies.