Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a Pediatric Population: Implications for Clinical Probability Scores and Testing

Anticoagulant Medications: The Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference

OBJECTIVES

To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding the medications used for anticoagulation for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE).

DATA SOURCES

A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies assessed anticoagulation used in pediatric ECMO.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third reviewer adjudicating any conflicts. Eighteen references were used for data extraction as well as for creation of recommendations. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-informed recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements, or good practice statements for anticoagulation during pediatric ECMO. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research and Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was based on a modified Delphi process with agreement defined as greater than 80%. Two recommendations, two consensus statements, and one good practice statement were developed, and, in all, agreement greater than 80% was reached.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to formulate optimal anticoagulation therapy during pediatric ECMO. Additional high-quality research is needed to inform evidence-based practice for anticoagulation during pediatric ECMO.

Where have all the platelets gone? HIT, DIC, or something else?

Thrombocytopenia in ill children is common; accurately diagnosing the underlying etiology is challenging and essential for appropriate management. Triggers for accelerated consumption of platelets are numerous; common downstream mechanisms of clearance include platelet trapping in microvascular thrombi, phagocytosis, and platelet activation. Thrombocytopenia with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) is frequently due to disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a subgroup of MAHA. Specific TMA syndromes include thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, complement-mediated TMA (CM-TMA), and Shiga toxin-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Isolated thrombocytopenia is characteristic of immune thrombocytopenia; however, concomitant cytopenias are frequent in critically ill patients, making the diagnosis difficult. Immune thrombocytopenia with large vessel thrombosis is a feature of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. In addition, thrombocytopenia is common with macrophage activation, which is characteristic of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. While thrombocytopenia in ill patients can be driven by hypoproliferative processes such as myelosuppression and/or bone marrow failure, this review will focus on consumptive thrombocytopenia due to immune and nonimmune causes.

Application of a clinical decision rule and laboratory assays in pediatrics: Adult heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rare among pediatric patients. The diagnosis of HIT depends upon clinical decision tools to assess its pretest probability, supported by laboratory evidence of anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4)/heparin antibodies.

AIMS

To compare the use of the 4Ts score clinical decision tool, clinical characteristics, and laboratory findings between pediatric and adult patients with suspected HIT.

METHODS

We compiled all pediatric patients in our center for whom HIT testing was performed during the years 2015-2021. These were compared with a cohort of consecutive adult patients. Laboratory diagnosis of HIT was performed with particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA) as screening test and confirmed by an automated latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA) and/or by functional flow cytometry assay (FCA).

RESULTS

The cohort included 34 children (under 18 years) and 105 adults. Adults mostly received heparins for thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment (72.4%, n = 76), and were more frequently treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Children were mostly exposed during cardiopulmonary bypass and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO, 61.8%, n = 21), and were more frequently treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Compared with adults, children had significantly higher 4Ts scores. Nevertheless, adults had a slightly higher rate of a positive diagnosis of HIT. Six out of 16 adults with confirmed HIT presented with thrombosis (37.5%), whereas all three pediatric patients with HIT presented with thrombosis (p = .087).

CONCLUSIONS

4Ts scores are higher in children compared with adult patients for whom laboratory tests for HIT were obtained. A potentially higher incidence of thrombosis in children with HIT may be attributable to the severity of underlying illness.

Screening and diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the pediatric population: A tertiary centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening side effect of heparin necessitating immediate heparin discontinuation. A missed diagnosis of HIT carries significant morbidity and mortality, while overdiagnosis may result in unnecessary and potentially harmful use of alternative anticoagulants in the pediatric population. We aimed to determine the proportion of HIT screening tests at our pediatric tertiary care centre ultimately leading to a diagnosis of HIT by functional assay (either lumi-aggregometry or serotonin-release assay). We hypothesized that the frequency of HIT at our centre would be lower than that reported in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review including children aged 0 to 18 years who had HIT testing performed at our centre between 2010 and 2018 (N = 189; 51% female). A screening enzyme immunoassay, if positive, is followed by a functional assay which must be positive to establish the diagnosis of HIT. Data were analyzed to establish trends in demographic and clinical features of patients with a positive HIT screening test. Our primary outcome was the rate of HIT confirmed by functional testing amongst children screened for HIT from 2010 to 2018.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

There were 233 screening tests performed on 189 distinct patients. Only one patient (0.4%) received a diagnosis of HIT based on functional assay. This patient was a 16-year-old female later found to have a JAK2 mutation. The false positive rate of the enzyme immunoassay was 9.4% (N = 22). There were no positive enzyme immunoassay tests in the neonatal age group (N = 49). These results reinforce that HIT is rare in children.