Additional Value of 3-Month Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Infants with Neonatal Encephalopathy following Perinatal Asphyxia

Advances in Neuroimaging Biomarkers and Scoring

MRI of the brain is a critical tool in the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of neonatal encephalopathy (NE). More than simply a diagnostic and prognostic tool, MRI informs the biology, nature, and timing of the disease process resulting in NE, of which the largest single etiology is hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Historically, 2 major patterns of injury were seen in HIE: a basal ganglia/thalamus predominant pattern and a watershed pattern of injury. The advent of therapeutic hypothermia for NE/HIE, alongside improvements in the application of imaging technology in newborn infants, has resulted in progressively more advanced MRI scoring systems.

Adequacy of an In-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 1T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Management

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aims to assess the added diagnostic utility and clinical value of a 3-Tesla neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging after obtaining a 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging within the neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS

A cohort of 34 infants had an initial 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and repeat imaging within 14 days in a 3-Tesla scanner. All infants were admitted to the level III neonatal intensive care unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and all images were interpreted by pediatric neuroradiologists.

RESULTS

For 31 infants (91%), the 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging showed similar or expected evolution of known findings found on 1 Tesla. For infants with change between the 1-Tesla and 3-Tesla imaging results, there was no clinical impact.

CONCLUSION

Images from 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging were sufficient for characterizing a wide range of neonatal brain injuries and abnormalities and repeated 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging did not yield further clinical benefit.

Insights from serial magnetic resonance imaging in neonatal encephalopathy in term infants

BACKGROUND

Limited serial neuroimaging studies use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to define the evolution of hypoxic-ischemic insults to the brain of term infants and encompass both the primary injury and its secondary impact on cerebral development. The optimal timing of MRI to fully evaluate the impact of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy on brain development and associated neurodevelopmental sequelae remains unknown.

METHODS

Goals: (a) review literature related to serial neuroimaging in term infants with HIE; (b) describe pilot data in two infants with HIE treated with therapeutic hypothermia who had a brain injury at day 3-5 and underwent four additional MRIs over the next 12 weeks of life and developmental evaluation at 24 months of age.

RESULTS

Early MRI defines primary injury on diffusion-weighted imaging, yet the full impact may not be fully apparent until after 1 month of life.

CONCLUSION

The full impact of an ischemic injury on the neonatal brain may not be fully visible until several weeks after the initial insult. This suggests the benefit of obtaining later time points for MRI to fully define the extent of injury and its neurodevelopmental impact.

IMPACT

Few studies inform the nature of the evolution of brain injury with hypothermia in HIE, limiting understanding of potential neuroprotection. MRI is the standard of care for prognosis in infants with HIE, however timing for optimal prognostic prediction remains unclear. Insights from MRI after the first week of life may assist in defining the full extent of brain injury and prognostic significance. A pilot study using five MRI timepoints up to 3 months of age, is presented. More data is required with a systematic evaluation of the impact of early brain injury on brain development in term infants with HIE following TH.

Neuroimaging to guide neuroprognostication in the neonatal intensive care unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurological problems are common in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Various neuroimaging modalities are available for neonatal brain imaging and are selected based on presenting problem, timing and patient stability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuroimaging findings, taken together with clinical factors and serial neurological examination can be used to predict future neurodevelopmental outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss neonatal neuroimaging modalities, and how these can be optimally utilized to assess infants in the NICU. We will review common patterns of brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, perinatal arterial ischemic stroke and preterm brain injury.

SUMMARY

Timely and accurate neuroprognostication can identify infants at risk for neurodevelopmental impairment and allow for early intervention and targeted therapies to improve outcomes.

Cranial MRI beyond the Neonatal Period and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Neonatal Encephalopathy Due to Perinatal Asphyxia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging within seven days after birth is widely used to obtain prognostic information in neonatal encephalopathy (NE) following perinatal asphyxia. Later MRI could be useful for infants without a neonatal MRI or in the case of clinical concerns during follow-up. Therefore, this review evaluates the association between cranial MRI beyond the neonatal period and neurodevelopmental outcomes following NE.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase on cranial MRI between 2 and 24 months after birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes following NE due to perinatal asphyxia. Two independent researchers performed the study selection and risk of bias analysis. Results were separately described for MRI before and after 18 months.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included (high-quality n = 2, moderate-quality n = 6, low-quality n = 4). All reported on MRI at 2-18 months: seven studies demonstrated a significant association between the pattern and/or severity of injury and overall neurodevelopmental outcomes and three showed a significant association with motor outcome. There were insufficient data on non-motor outcomes and the association between MRI at 18-24 months and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranial MRI performed between 2 and 18 months after birth is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in NE following perinatal asphyxia. However, more data on the association with non-motor outcomes are needed.