Single-stage management of all pouch colon (anorectal malformation) in newborns

Anorectal malformations in low and middle-income countries- spectrum, burden and management

The clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of anorectal malformation has been well described in the literature, however the experience with these conditions in low-and middle-income countries is often shaped in unique ways due to the social, cultural and economic factors at work in these regions. This leads to adaptation of modifications in management options for these babies that usually present as delayed cases with added poor prognostic factors like sepsis leading to need for emergency resuscitation and overall increased morbidity and mortality. This article explores the anomaly from a global surgery lens and outlines the spectrum of the anomaly, burden faced in the resource constrained environment and the management options adopted for successful management under the available circumstances.

Congenital Pouch Colon: Case Series and Review of Evidences for Resection

Background:

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is a rare variant of anorectal malformations (ARM) with its highest reported incidence in India. We aimed to describe five patients affected by CPC, in which the tissue from the terminal dilated colon has been successfully used and to discuss our results on the light of an extended revision of the literature.

Materials and Methods:

The clinical details of five cases treated for CPC in two Italian Centers were retrospectively reviewed assessing the fate of the terminal dilated colon.

Results:

In all cases, the tissue from dilated colon has been used. The double vascular system of the dilated pouch allowed increasing bladder capacity (case 4), reconstruction of the vagina (case 3, 5), and lengthening of the colon (case 1, 2, 5).In our series, 3/5 have a good bowel control with daily bowel management after ARM correction. In literature, there are not differences in terms of dependence from bowel management in patients with pouch resected and in patients with pouch saved (P = 0.16).

Conclusions:

We acknowledge that the analysis of the available literature is limited by the absence of studies with high level of evidence and the removal or the preservation of the abnormal colon tissue seems to follow the surgeon preferences.

Congenital pouch colon: A comparative study between two modalities of management

BACKGROUND

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual anomaly with an unique geographical distribution. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of CPC among anorectal malformation (ARM) cases in our institute and to compare the outcome between conventional three-staged surgery versus two-staged management approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in the department of pediatric surgery over a period of 7 years from 1^st April 2013 to 31^st March 2020.

RESULTS

Out of 754 cases of ARMs, 43 cases of CPC were detected. The incidence of pouch colon among patients with high ARMs was found to be 7.6% with a male predominance (M:F = 4.4:1). The anomaly was diagnosed in 72% of our patients preoperatively and Type IV variety was the most common intra-operative finding. The survival after initial hospitalisation was 82% and 88% in three-stage and two-stage surgical procedures, respectively. However, the final clinical outcome after the completion of all stages of surgery and follow-up was better in two-staged approach (54% vs. 47%).

CONCLUSION

Although, CPC is a rare anomaly, the incidence in our institute is 7.6% among high ARM cases. As compared to conventional three-staged surgery, the two-staged management approach has the advantage of better survival and decreased morbidity.

Type IV Congenital Pouch Colon in Male Children: Anatomical Variations and a Proposed New Subclassification

Background:

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is a rare variant of anorectal malformation. In male patients, CPC communicates distally with the urogenital tract by a large fistula. The CPC cases which do not fulfill the criteria as mentioned in the classical description are reported along with the pertinent literature review.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective study from January 2004 to December 2017 of male children with Type IV CPC. We evaluated clinical presentation, primary management, anatomical relationship, previous surgical intervention, definitive management, result, and outcome in terms of continence status on Templeton score.

Results:

Fifty-one children were included in the study among whom 36 children (Group 1) had a colovesical fistula and 15 children (Group 2) had no communication of the pouch with the genitourinary tract. In Group 2 children, the clinical presentations and management were varied: 4 underwent primary pull-through procedure, whereas 11 underwent staged procedure. Group 2 included three children in whom a narrow and thin-walled anal canal or anal canal with lower rectum was present, which was incorporated during the pull-through procedure. On continence assessment, only one child in Group 1 had “good” continence score compared to four children (three having anal canal) in Group 2.

Conclusion:

CPC Type IV can present without genitourinary tract communication (fistula), contrary to its emblematic description. Awareness about anatomical variations and adaptation of surgical technique accordingly is vital. The identification of the anal canal with or without the lower part of the rectum (even though apparently narrow and thin walled) and incorporation of this in bowel continuity lead to better outcomes in terms of continence.

Congenital pouch colon: Our experience with coloplasty

BACKGROUND

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) or congenital short colon is an entity found mainly in Indian subcontinent. In CPC, colon is replaced with partially or completely abnormal pouch connected to the genitourinary tract by a fistula (colovesical). Management protocol is different in different institute. In this article, we are sharing our three stage standard management approach; principle and technique of coloplasty in cases in which colon length is not adequate for pull through and their follow-up. This study aims to show the result of coloplasty in complete CPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is retrospective observational study, of 5 years duration. The medical record of these patients was reviewed for demographic information, clinical features, investigations performed, operative notes, post-operative events and the outcome of surgery.

RESULTS

Total of 626 ARM cases were managed in 5 years duration in which 64 were of pouch colon. The age of presentation was 1-15 days. In fifty patients who completed their, all stage in that 34 patients were in which coloplasty were done in rest of 16 cases excision of CPC and colonic pull through done in view of adequate colonic length (type III and IV) for pull through. In 34 patient in which coloplasty were done showed satisfactory cosmetic and functional out came after stoma closer in follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Properly created coloplasty and three stage procedure for complete pouch colon give better result and less complications. Excision of pouch is not requiring in all cases of CPC.

Controversy of Single versus Staged Management of Anorectal Malformations

Anorectal malformations' (ARMs) management has taken strides over the past few decades. The advent of Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) and its acceptance by most people across the globe as standard procedure has given way to a debate of single vs. three-staged repair. After initial hesitancy and lot of skepticism, single-staged repair has very well established its role because of its advantages over the staged procedure. There is enough evidence which suggests that single-staged repair has got equally good outcome as that of staged repair (if not better). Further, one-staged repair offers advantages of lesser morbidity, lesser cost, and lesser burden to the family. The initially thought disadvantages of higher chances of injuries, wound infection and stress to neonates have been countered by growing evidences. The authors agree that staged procedure will continue to stay around for few specific indications like perforation peritonitis, extreme prematurity and special anatomical entities. Further, it can have more important role with advent of laparoscopy and better health infrastructure in future. But with new developments in imaging, scopes and neonatal care, single-staged repair is a feasible and safe modality for treatment of these anomalies.

Simultaneous Single-staged Repair of Anorectal Malformation with Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Lessons Learned

Introduction:

Anorectal malformation (ARM) associated esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) spawns special therapeutic propositions. The outcome of these patients banks on numerous factors. We performed this study with an aim to compare the outcome of single-staged simultaneous primary repair of both anomalies versus staged repair of these disorders.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective review of cases with ARM and associated EA with TEF managed over a period of 5 years from July 2010 to June 2015 after ethical approval was undertaken. Patients were split into two groups based on whether they underwent staged repair (Group A) or single-staged simultaneous primary repair of ARM with TEF (Group B). Patient's records were analyzed for demography, weight, gestational age, associated anomaly, preoperative and postoperative sepsis screen results, early and late postoperative complications (at least up to 1 year of age). Patient's Kelly score for continence at the age of 3 years or more was compared.

Observation:

A total of 28 were included in the study. Among these, 17 were managed with staged procedure for ARM (Group A), whereas 11 underwent simultaneous single-stage repair of ARM with TEF (Group B). No difference in continence score was observed in outcome between the two groups (P = 0.96). Overall mortality in Group A at 1-year follow-up was 52.9% and in Group B was 43.4%.

Conclusion:

The simultaneous single-staged primary repairs result in better long-term outcome in our setup.

Congenital Pouch Colon

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual abnormality in which a pouch-like dilatation of a shortened colon is associated with an anorectal malformation. It is categorized into four subtypes (Types I–IV) based on the length of normal colon proximal to the colonic pouch. In males, the pouch usually terminates in a colovesical fistula just proximal to the bladder neck. In girls, the terminal fistula opens either into the urethra or in the vestibule, close to the urethral opening. Girls usually have a double vagina with a wide inter-vaginal bridge, a monocornuate uterus on each side, and urinary incontinence due to a widely open bladder neck. Associated major malformations are uncommon with CPC but sometimes, especially in reports from outside India, major abnormalities are present suggesting an early, severe error in embryogenesis. The more severe Types I/II CPC can usually be diagnosed by a large gas shadow or air-fluid level on X-Ray abdomen. For all subtypes of CPC, it is preferable to preserve a segment of the pouch by fashioning a narrow colonic tube for pull-through, the technique known as coloplasty or tubular colorraphy. Girls need additional management of the genitourinary abnormalities. Postoperatively, fecal continence levels are usually poor, especially with Types I/II CPC.

Assessment and comparison of fecal continence in children following primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and abdominoperineal pull through for anorectal anomaly using clinical scoring and MRI

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare and contrast these main surgical procedures for ARM in terms of structural outcome through pelvic MRI & functional outcome through Kelly's scoring.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective study was conducted from August 2011 to July 2013 including all the cases of ARM managed in single stage (operated by one surgeon, first author) since 1995 that came for follow up at age of 3 years or more. Patients were divided in three groups: Group 8.A, PSARP (60 patients); Group B, Abdomino-PSARP (40 patients); and Group C, APPT (40 patients). The functional assessment of anal continence was carried out at the age of 3years or more using Kelly's method. Structural assessment was done by 1.5-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

In 24 patients with rectobulbar fistula, 71.5% of Group A patients had good continence. In 50 patients with rectoprostatic fistula, 73.7% of Group A, 70% of group B and only 36% of Group C had good outcomes. Better development of each muscle was associated with better outcomes in terms of anal continence (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is better outcome with PSARP and Abdomino-PSARP in patients with rectobulbar and rectoprostatic fistula. MRI is a valuable modality for postoperative structural analysis of patients with ARM and is also useful for predicting the long term functional outcome of these cases.

One-stage vs. three-stage repair in anorectal malformation with rectovestibular fistula

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) disease is one of the congenital anomalies with an incidence of about 1 in 5000 neonate births, and treatment requires surgical intervention. Selecting the one- or three-step surgical procedure to treat the disease, especially in female neonates with rectovestibular fistula, is a subject of debate. This study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty female neonates with ARM and rectovestibular fistula between March 2011 and March 2013 were included in the study, and they were divided into two equal groups. Allocation of the first case was random, and all cases were then allocated alternatively (every other subject was assigned to a treatment group) until each group received 20 cases equally patients of study group underwent a one-stage posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) and in control group patients underwent a three-stage operation (colostomy, PSARP, and closure of colostomy). The complications during and after the surgery were recorded in both groups, and the results were compared.

RESULTS

In the control group, only one case (5%) of wound infection and dehiscence was seen, whereas in the one-stage study group, six cases (30%) of wound infection and dehiscence were seen (P value = 0.046). However, regarding the incidence of other complications, such as iatrogenic vaginal injury as well as final recovery, no considerable differences were seen between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite more surgical site infections and dehiscence in the one-stage repair, but due to the numerous advantages compared to the three-stage method, which is more time-consuming, more costly, and causes more adverse effect on parents and children, performing the one-stage repair is recommended for this anomaly.

Management options of congenital pouch colon--a rare variant of anorectal malformation

PURPOSE

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) was analysed for anatomical variations and surgical options.

METHODS

Records of CPC patients managed between 1999 and 2014 were studied. CPC was classified as complete (CCPC) and incomplete (ICPC) pouch.

RESULTS

Of 400 cases of high anorectal malformations, 68 cases were CPC (17%). Male:female ratio was 2:1. Fistulous communication was colovesical, colocloacal, colovaginal and absent in 42, 15, 8 and 3 cases. ICPC and CCPC was 48 (70%) and 20 (30%). In neonatal period, proximal/end colostomy (31), ileostomy (6), pouch excision with abdominoperineal pull-through (18 cases) and coloplasty with end colostomy (7) were done. 6 presented as infants including 3 referred cases of CCPC with a window colostomy. Definitive surgery was completed in 56. Severe colonic dilatation after coloplasty was noted in 5, requiring excision of coloplasty segment in 2. Histopathology of excised pouch (45) showed muscle layer disorganization, widened sub mucosa, prominent vasculature and mature and immature ganglion cells, with no hypertrophy of nerve fibres. Diarrhoea and faecal incontinence (soiling) were more frequent in patients with CCPC versus ICPC. Six neonates with CCPC died. Six are awaiting definitive surgery.

CONCLUSION

CPC had 8.8% neonatal mortality. Pouch excision and definitive procedure are feasible in neonates with CPC. Coloplasty in CCPC may result in postoperative colonic dilatation.

Management of anorectal malformation without ligation of fistula: an approach preventing posterior urethral diverticula

OBJECTIVE

The posterior urethral diverticulum is a common urologic complication requiring reoperations in anorectal malformation cases (ARM). We present a series of 24 cases of male ARM managed without ligation of fistula.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012 including male neonates with ARM, where rectobladder neck and rectoprostatic fistula were approached by the abdominal route. The fistulous tract was dissected to the distal-most possible length and was excised flush with the urethra without its ligation. A per-urethral catheter was placed in situ. A record was made of any features of urinary leak and a micturating cystourethrogram was performed at the 1-year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-four cases of ARM, 16 with rectobladder neck fistula and eight cases with rectoprostatic fistula were included. Of these, 12 had single-stage primary abdominoperineal pull-through and 10 were managed by primary posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Two cases with colostomy during the neonatal period were managed by laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty at 6 months. None of the cases had a urinary leak during the postoperative period. All had a normal micturating cystourethrogram at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The approach of dividing fistula without ligation may prevent posterior urethral diverticula, but larger long-term follow-up studies are needed.

Anorectal atresia with gross terminal colonic distension in Africa

Anorectal malformation (ARM) is a group of significant birth defects with geographic variation in incidence, individual phenotypes and regional geographic subtypes occurring in approximately 1:5,000 live births. Anorectal atresia with gross terminal colonic distension in the presence of an absent anal canal has also been known as 'pouch colon' which is mainly associated with the Indian subcontinent. Its prevalence is unknown but it is rare, possibly representing a fraction of 1 % of ARM. The problem seems to revolve around the gross terminal distension of the distal pouch which remains a significant surgical challenge to surgeons resulting in poorer postoperative continence in many instances.

AIM

This study set out to collate data on ARM patients with gross terminal distension of the distal pouch from Africa to evaluate its epidemiology and outcome in African patients.

METHODS

Fifteen African paediatric surgical centres (7 South African and 8 African centres) were polled on the occurrence of anorectal atresia with gross terminal distension of the terminal bowel, an ARM variant. Data included ethnic group, age, gender as well as the anatomical pathology, classification and presence or absence of associated anomalies.

RESULTS

Of 12 respondents, 8 (67 %) responded and sufficient data to classify and analyse were obtained from six of the eight positive replies (7 new cases). Abdominal X-ray showed a grossly dilated terminal portion of the colon in the presence of an imperforate anus. A colovesical fistula was observed in four (three males and one female cloaca). Three were associated with a colonic atresia, of which two were in the transverse colon and one in the sigmoid colon. Surgical corrective procedures were carried out in six, but one patient, with a cloaca, died prior to surgical correction.

CONCLUSIONS

In this survey of 15 African centres, we have attempted to document the occurrence and presentation of anorectal atresia with gross terminal distension in Africa and report seven additional new cases. A possible association with associated conditions like colonic atresia requires further investigation.

Congenital pouch colon: antenatal diagnosis and video-assisted management

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual abnormality associating a pouch-like dilatation of a shortened colon with an anorectal malformation (ARM). There are few reports of CPC in Europe, a contrario it represents up to 15% of ARM in India. Coloplasty and excision are described in the surgical management. This report describes a new case of CPC. This is the first reported case with a prenatal clinical presentation as an hypoechogenic abdominal image at ultrasound and a video-assisted management.

A report of a rare congenital malformation in a Nepalese child with congenital pouch colon: a case report

Congenital pouch colon is one of rare congenital anomalies. We report a 3-day-old male child with congenital pouch colon who underwent a window colostomy but died because of overwhelming sepsis. Due to its rarity, many surgeons in our part of the world may not be aware of it, hence increasing the potential to its mismanagement. However, with simple keen observations, we can safely come to its diagnosis. The aim of this report is to bring attention to congenital pouch colon associated with anorectal malformation in our country, with a brief emphasis on an approach to its diagnosis and initial management.

Pouch colon associated with anorectal malformations fails to show spontaneous contractions but responds to acetylcholine and histamine in vitro

PURPOSE

Congenital pouch colon (CPC) associated with anorectal malformation (ARM) is most commonly reported from Northern India. So far, no physiologic study comparing the detailed contractile status of CPC with non-CPC conditions are available. The present article deals with the contractile study and histopathologic observations in CPC, which may be useful for better surgical management.

METHODS

Freshly excised 12 neonatal CPC and similar number of non-CPC (control) specimens were transferred to ice-cold (4 degrees C-6 degrees C) Krebs-Ringer solution bubbled with 100% oxygen. Longitudinally prepared 2 to 4 colonic strips were obtained from central part of each specimen and subjected to the contraction recording after exposure to cumulative concentrations of acetylcholine (ACh) and histamine. Acetylcholine-induced contractions were evaluated after application of atropine (muscarinic blocker), and histaminergic contractions were recorded after pheniramine (H(1) blocker), lignocaine (neuronal blocker), and atropine. Histopathologic observations were made by using H&E and Masson trichrome stains.

RESULTS

Control specimens showed spontaneous contractions, but CPC strips did not. Both control and CPC responded to ACh and histamine. The response to histamine was greater (P < .05) in CPC as compared to control, whereas the response to ACh was more (P < .05) in control. In CPC, response of histamine (100 micromol/L) was blocked by pheniramine (0.32 mmol/L) and lignocaine (4 mmol/L) by 97% and 80%, respectively, and enhanced by 57% after preapplication of atropine (10 micromol/L). Acetylcholine (100 micromol/L)-induced contractions were attenuated (86%) in presence of atropine. Histopathologic examination showed fewer mature ganglion cells with various changes in muscle layers including fibrosis, disruption, hypertrophy, atrophy, and constriction bands.

CONCLUSION

Congenital pouch colon associated with ARM lacks normal spontaneous contractions but retains ACh and histamine-induced contractility. In view of the functional and histologic abnormalities, we propose that CPC associated with ARM is an abnormally functional and developed tissue. Therefore, resection of the pouch should be considered for better functional outcome of the remaining bowel.

Management of congenital pouch colon based on the Saxena-Mathur classification

BACKGROUND

Management guidelines with regard to congenital pouch colon (CPC) are not clearly defined with regard to the type of pouch present. The aim of this study was to outline the management strategy and surgical approach to CPC using the Saxena-Mathur classification based on anatomical morphology of the pouch.

METHODS

During a 12-year period (1995-2007), 426 patients were surgically managed for anorectal malformations at the RNT Medical College, Udaipur. Congenital pouch colon was documented in 80 patients and categorized into 5 types according the anatomical morphology. The management strategy depended upon the location of the pouch and its condition at the time of the surgery.

RESULTS

In type 1 and type 2 CPC, a 1-stage (pouch excision and pull-through) or 3-stage procedure (ileostomy, pouch-coloplasty with pull-through, and ileostomy closure) was performed depending on the condition of the pouch (ischemic or healthy). In type 3 and type 4 CPC, a 3-stage procedure (pouch excision with colostomy, pull-through, and colostomy closure) was performed in all patients. In type 5 CPC, a 3-stage procedure (distal pouch excision with proximal pouch-coloplasty with ileostomy, pull-through, and colostomy closure) was successful.

CONCLUSION

Management of CPC patients according the Saxena-Mathur classification provides a well-defined algorithm in the surgical approach according to the anatomical morphology of the pouch.

A report of a rare congenital malformation in a Nepalese child with congenital pouch colon: a case report

Congenital pouch colon is one of rare congenital anomalies. We report a 3-day-old male child with congenital pouch colon who underwent a window colostomy but died because of overwhelming sepsis. Due to its rarity, many surgeons in our part of the world may not be aware of it, hence increasing the potential to its mismanagement. However, with simple keen observations, we can safely come to its diagnosis. The aim of this report is to bring attention to congenital pouch colon associated with anorectal malformation in our country, with a brief emphasis on an approach to its diagnosis and initial management.

Congenital pouch colon associated with anorectal malformation-histopathologic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Although enough literature is available on the descriptive and the management aspects of congenital pouch colon (CPC) associated with anorectal malformation (ARM), there is paucity of its detailed histopathologic studies. The present article details the histopathologic observations in the excised specimens of CPC in the neonates operated on for ARM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Formalin-fixed specimens of CPC were evaluated both grossly and microscopically. They were stained by H&E stain and Masson trichrome stain.

RESULTS

Haustrations and tenia coli were uniformly absent in all the CPC specimens. Mucosa showed focal erosion, hemorrhage, and disruption in the muscularis mucosae. Submucosa showed congested blood vessels, hemorrhage, and thrombosis. Both the circular and the longitudinal muscle layers showed hypertrophic and atrophic appearance. Both the muscle layers also showed disruption. There was presence of fibrosis in all the muscular layers on Masson trichrome stain. There was presence of unique constriction bands in the muscularis propria. These were seen as focal dipping and narrowing of the muscular layers at intermittent intervals. They were more prominent in the circular muscle layers.

CONCLUSION

Congenital pouch colon seen in association with ARM is an abnormally developed tissue and needs to be resected for better functional outcome of the remaining gut. However, further physiologic and immunohistochemical studies are warranted to observe the contractile and innervation pattern of CPC.

Neonatal surgery: a ten year audit from a university hospital

Neonatal surgery is the flagship and most challenging component of pediatric surgery, which is the youngest subspeciality of surgery. Neonatal surgery carried a survival rate of only 30% three decades ago. In the last decade there has been a significant change in the scenario. Earlier recognition and referral of these anomalies, availability of neonatal intensive care, better preoperative planning, decision, and techniques have lead to the change in the management. This is an audit into the outcome of neonatal surgery from one of the largest units in India over a ten year period. This audit reveals an across the board survival of 65-70% newborns after surgery on nearly two thousand case over a ten year period. It has an important message that while pediatric surgery units expand, risk stratification of surgical newborns and their treatment in suitable units is mandatory to maintain and improve these figures to match international standards over the next decade.

Single-stage repair for rectovestibular fistula without opening the fourchette

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malformations are one of the most common congenital defects. This study is conducted to demonstrate new technique for treatment of rectovaginal fistula without disturbing the fourchette through posterior sagittal approach.

METHOD

All the patients of rectovestibular fistula admitted after the neonatal age were treated with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty without opening the fourchette. The results were evaluated for cosmetic appearance and anal continence.

RESULT

A total of 40 patients were included in our study. All patients were more than 1 month old. Operative time ranges from 70 to 150 minutes. The cosmetic appearance was good. Anal continence was good in 72% cases and fair in 20% cases. Fifteen percent of patients had minimal constipation and 7.5% patients had mucosal prolapse.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage repair for vestibular anus through posterior sagittal anorectoplasty without opening fourchette has a good cosmetic appearance and good anal continence.

Congenital pouch colon associated with anorectal malformation: report of 2 cases

Congenital pouch colon associated with anorectal malformation is an unusual anomaly reported most frequently in Asian countries. Pediatric surgeons must be familiar with this anomaly and the pre- and postoperative problems of these patients. The aim of this report is to bring attention to congenital pouch colon associated with anorectal malformation by discussing experiences with 2 patients.

Single stage repair of anovestibular fistula in neonate

Anorectal malformations are one of the most common congenital defects. This study is conducted to evaluate the result of single stage anterior sagittal anorectovaginoplasty (ASARVP) in cases of vestibular anus (AVF) in neonatal age group without thorough gut preparation. All the patients of AVF admitted during 2003-2006 were included in this study. Single stage ASARVP was done in these patients without preparing the bowel in the lithotomy position, the fistula was freed and sufficient length of anorectum was dissected and vagina was separated. Midline incision at the proposed anal site was made, then a plane was dissected between the muscle complex going anteriorly. The mobilized anorectum was pulled to the proposed anal site and proper anoplasty was done. The results were evaluated for duration of surgery, need of bowel preparation, commencement of feed and hospital stay and follow-up (assessment of continence and anal dilatation). A total of 27 patients were included in our study. All patients were less than 1-month-old. Operative time ranges from 50 to 70 min. Bowel preparation was not needed. Per oral feed was started after 48 h in all patients and average duration of hospital stay was 3- 4 days. Postoperative regular anal dilatation was commenced after 1 week of operation. Continence results according to Kelly's method were good in 70%, fair in 21% and poor 9%. Single-stage anorectovaginoplasty in neonates has a good result in cases of AVF and avoids the need of bowel preparation.

Congenital pouch colon syndrome: a report of 17 cases

BACKGROUND

Congenital pouch syndrome (CPC) is a rare condition seen in association with anorectal malformation that occurs almost exclusively in northern India. We reviewed cases seen in our institution to study aspects of clinical presentation, diagnosis, embryogenesis and management and raise awareness of this relatively infrequent entity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 2002 to September 2004, 17 neonates/infants (11 males and 6 females) treated for CPC associated with anorectal malformations included 13 with type IV and 4 with type I CPC. Diagnosis was made by a single large air-fluid level on the infantogram occupying more than 50% of the entire abdominal dimension.

RESULTS

In all patients, the pouch had fistulous communication with the genitourinary system, and there were other associated anomalies as well. Of 13 patients with pouch colon type IV, 11 neonates underwent laparotomy, ligation of the fistula, excision of the colonic pouch and end colostomy as a stage 1 procedure. Subsequently, these patients underwent definitive surgery, i.e. abdominoperineal posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (AP-PSARP), with or without covering colostomy. Two of 4 patients with type 1 CPC underwent laparotomy, ligation of the fistula and colorrhaphy as a first-stage operation before AP-PSARP. In our series, 4 patients were diagnosed intraoperatively and were treated in accordance with their operative findings. Post-operatively, there were no major complications except wound infection in some patients. There was one death that was not related to surgery.

CONCLUSION

There are variants of the anomaly, but the possibility of CPC needs to be kept in mind as a possible association with anorectal malformations.