Esophageal replacement in the neonatal period in infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

Outcome of long gap esophageal atresia at 6 years: A prospective case control cohort study

BACKGROUND DATA

EA is the most frequent congenital esophageal malformation. Long gap EA remains a therapeutic challenge for pediatric surgeons. A case case-control prospective study from a multi-institutional national French data base was performed to assess the outcome, at age of 1 and 6 years, of long gap esophageal atresia (EA) compared with non-long gap EA/tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF). The secondary aim was to assess whether initial treatment (delayed primary anastomosis of native esophagus vs. esophageal replacement) influenced mortality and morbidity at ages 1 and 6 years.

METHODS

A multicentric population-based prospective study was performed and included all patients who underwent EA surgery in France from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. A comparative study was performed with non-long gap EA/TEF patients. Morbidity at birth, 1 year, and 6 years was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with long gap EA were compared with 62 non-long gap EA/TEF patients. At age 1 year, the long gap EA group had longer parenteral nutrition support and longer hospital stay and were significantly more likely to have complications both early post-operatively and before age 1 year compared with the non-long gap EA/TEF group. At 6 years, digestive complications were more frequent in long gap compared to non-long gap EA/TEF patients. Tracheomalacia was the only respiratory complication that differed between the groups. Spine deformation was less frequent in the long gap group. There were no differences between conservative and replacement groups at ages 1 and 6 years except feeding difficulties that were more common in the native esophagus group.

CONCLUSIONS

Long gap strongly influenced digestive morbidity at age 6 years.

Functional, nutritional, and developmental assessment of gastric transposition and colonic interposition: Long-term follow-up outcome analysis

PURPOSE

The choice of Esophageal replacement (ER) depends on surgeons' preference and patients' anatomical condition. A cross-sectional study was done to compare the long-term outcomes of two methods of ER, Gastric transposition (GT) and Colonic interposition (CI).

METHODS

Children who had undergone ER from January 1997 to December 2017 with a minimum of two-year post-ER follow-up were evaluated by anthropometry, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, gastroesophageal reflux study, gastric emptying test, pulmonary function test and blood tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (Male:female=17:9) children were recruited. The median age at ER was 13 months (interquartile range 9-40 months) and mean follow-up post-ER was 116.7 ± 76.4 months (range 24-247 months). GT:CI was done in 15(57.7%):11(42.3%) cases. A greater number of abnormal oral contrast studies (p = 0.02) and re-operations (p = 0.05) were documented as baseline characteristics with CI group. The presence of gastroesophageal reflux 9/23(39.1%), duodenogastric reflux 6/24(25%), delayed gastric emptying 6/25(24%), abnormal pulmonary function test 14/22(63.6%) were documented during the study period. However, there was no significant(p>0.05) difference in nutritional, developmental and functional outcomes of both operative methods of ER in the study.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of nutritional, developmental and functional parameters in children after ER reveals good long-term results. There was no significant difference in CI and GT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Comparative study; II.

Gastric pull-up by the retrosternal route for esophageal replacement: Feasibility in a limited-resource scenario

OBJECTIVES

The authors herein report the results of esophageal replacement by gastric pull-up technique through the retrosternal route as an option for esophageal replacement in a resource-constrained setup.

METHOD

Prospectively collected data upon twenty-two consecutive patients (male:female = 17:5) with mean age 24.9 months (7 months-12 years) and mean weight 7.9 kg (4.2-32 kg) who underwent retrosternal gastric pull-up for esophageal atresia (n = 18; 16 atresia with distal fistula & 2 pure atresia) and corrosive injuries to the esophagus (n = 4) over the past 8 years are presented. The management protocol and surgical technique have been described. Observations parameters included indication for esophageal replacement, age at surgery, sex of the child and other demographic details, clinical and operative findings, post-operative outcomes and follow-up details.

RESULTS

Retrosternal gastric pull-up could be performed in all cases with no mortality or graft loss. Of 22, 20 cases were extubated on-table and 2 cases were extubated within 48 hours of surgery. Mean operative duration was 265 min (range: 175 min to 310 min) and blood loss was 115.3 ml (range: 80-400 ml). Dense vascular adhesions in the region of the esophageal hiatus were encountered in patients with abdominal esophagostomy (n = 4) which were probably related to the local dissection at the time of previous surgery. Minor anastomotic leak was observed in 8 of 22 patients which settled spontaneously over 21 days mean period (range: 18 to 31 days). Antegrade dilatation was required in 3 of 8 cases with minor leak. None of them required revision of anastomosis. Mean follow-up duration is 63 months (range: 11 months - 94 months). Weight gain after surgery was close to or beyond the 25th centile. Symptoms of dumping syndrome or GER were not observed in our cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our data have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of esophageal replacement by gastric transposition through the retrosternal route in a resource-limited setup. No significant difference has been observed from the results and complications reported in literature for the same procedure.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective observational study / treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

14 Years’ experience of esophageal replacement surgeries

BACKGROUND

Esophageal replacement is a challenge to the therapeutic skills of surgeons and a technically demanding operation in the pediatric age group. Various conduits and routes have been described in the literature, each with their specific advantages and disadvantages. We carried out this retrospective study to share our experience of esophageal replacement.

METHODOLOGY

This study was conducted at the department of pediatric surgery The Children's Hospital and The Institute of Child Health, Lahore. The records of patients treated for esophageal replacement were reviewed. The patients under follow-up were called for clinical evaluation and assessed of long terms complications if any.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients with esophageal replacement were included in the study. Esophageal replacement was done with gastric transposition in 84 cases (90%), colon interposition in 7 cases (7.5%) including one case of redo colonic interposition, and jejunal interposition in 2 cases (2%). Routes of esophageal replacement were trans-hiatal in 71 (76%), retrosternal in 13 (14%), and trans-hiatal with thoracotomy in 9 (10%) patients. Postoperatively, all of the conduits maintained viability. Wound infection was seen in 10 (11%), wound dehiscence in 5 (5%), anastomotic leak in 9 (10%), anastomotic stenosis in 12 (13%), fistula formation in 4 (4%), aortic injury 1 (1%), dumping syndrome 8 (9%), reflux 18 (19%), dysphagia 15 (16%) and death occurred in 12 patients (13%).

CONCLUSION

There are problems with esophageal replacement in developing countries. In this context, gastric conduit appeared as the best conduit for esophageal replacement, using the trans-hiatal route for replacement, in the authors' experience.

Transhiatal isoperistaltic colon interposition without cervical oesophagostomy in long-gap oesophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal colonic interposition in oesophageal atresia (OA) patients is almost exclusively done as a staged operation with an initial oesophagostomy and gastrostomy followed by the definitive surgery months later. This study presents a series of patients in whom a cervical oesophagostomy was not performed before the substitution surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of EA patients were evaluated for those who underwent colon interposition without cervical oesophagostomy.

RESULTS

There were five patients: three with pure EA and two with proximal tracheo-oesophageal fistula. A delayed primary repair could not be performed because of intra-abdominally located distal pouch. The mean age at the time of definitive operation was 5.54 (±2.7) months and the mean weight was 6.24 (±1.3) kg. A right or a left colonic segment was used for interposition keeping the proximal anastomosis within the thorax. The post-operative results were quite satisfactory within a median follow-up period of 33.2 months.

CONCLUSION

Avoiding cervical oesophagostomy and its inherent complications and drawbacks is possible in a subset of patients with long-gap EA who underwent colonic substitution surgery. This approach may be seen as an extension of the consensus that the native oesophagus should be preserved whenever possible, because it uses the native oesophagus in its entirety.

Surgical treatment and major complications Within the first year of life in newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia gross type A and B - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The surgical repair of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a challenge and there is no consensus on the preferred method of reconstruction. We performed a systematic review of the surgical treatment of LGEA Gross type A and B with the primary aim to compare the postoperative complications related to the different methods within the first postoperative year.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on the surgical repair of LGEA Gross type A and B within the first year of life published from January 01, 1996 to November 01, 2016.

RESULTS

We included 57 articles involving a total of 326 patients of whom 289 had a Gross type A LGEA. Delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) was the most applied surgical method (68.4%) in both types, followed by gastric pull-up (GPU) (8.3%). Anastomotic stricture (53.7%), gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) (32.2%) and anastomotic leakage (22.7%) were the most common postoperative complications, with stricture and GER occurring more often after DPA (61.9% and 40.8% respectively) compared to other methods (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients in this review were managed by DPA and postoperative complications were common despite the surgical method, with anastomotic stricture and GER being most common after DPA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of case series and case reports with no comparison group (level IV).

Surgical repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: A retrospective study comparing the management of long-gap esophageal atresia in the Nordic countries

BACKGROUND

Several surgical procedures have been described in the reconstruction of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We reviewed the surgical methods used in children with LGEA in the Nordic countries over a 15-year period and the postoperative complications within the first postoperative year.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter medical record review of all children born with Gross type A or B esophageal atresia between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2014 reconstructed within their first year of life.

RESULTS

We included 71 children; 56 had Gross type A and 15 type B LGEA. Delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) was performed in 52.1% and an esophageal replacement procedure in 47.9%. Gastric pull-up (GPU) was the most frequent procedure (25.4%). The frequency of chromosomal abnormalities, congenital heart defects and other anomalies was significantly higher in patients who had a replacement procedure. The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was significantly higher after DPA compared to esophageal replacement (p = 0.013). At 1-year follow-up the mean body weight was higher after DPA than after organ interposition (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

DPA and esophageal replacement procedures were equally applied. Postoperative complications and follow-up were similar except for the development of GER and the body weight at 1-year follow-up. Long-term results should be investigated.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Oesophageal replacement with stomach: A personal series and review of published experience

AIM

To describe the outcomes of oesophageal replacement using stomach in children.

METHODS

All children undergoing oesophageal replacement in a regional centre were prospectively recorded in a customised database and subjected to continual follow up. Complications within 30 days were classified as early, and all other complications were classified as late. Outcomes were related to a comprehensive analysis of published experience where studies were classified as having long-term follow up if the median duration exceeded 5 years.

RESULTS

Ten children underwent oesophageal replacement using the stomach between 1998 and 2016. Indications were oesophageal atresia (6), caustic ingestion (2), foreign body ingestion (1) and oesophageal hamartoma (1). Two children died at 2 and 7 months after gastric transposition. All survivors are under review, with a median follow up of 8.5 years (range 3-14 years). Complications occurred in every case. Among survivors, three had early complications and eight had late complications. Early complications included anastomotic leak (2) and lung compression by stomach (1). Late complications were anaemia (8), anastomotic stricture (7), oesophagitis (5), dumping syndrome (2), perforation of a jejunostomy (1), para-gastric hiatal hernia (1), gastric outlet obstruction (1), Barrett's oesophagus (1), prolonged inability to swallow (1) and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (1). Among 57 publications, only three achieved complete long-term follow up. The incidence of reported complications was higher when follow up was complete.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal replacement by gastric transposition in children leads to serious chronic morbidity. Published experience masks this because of incomplete and short follow up.

Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus in pediatric patients: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

The indications of esophageal replacement (ER) in pediatric patients include long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), intractable post-corrosive esophageal strictures (PCES), and some rare esophageal diseases. Various conduits and procedures are currently used worldwide with a lack of consensus regarding the ideal substitute to replace the esophagus replacement. The short-term outcomes of these advanced procedures are well known; there are few data available describing long-term functional outcomes of these patients with long life expectancy.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to investigate the long-term functional outcomes of the most widely used techniques for ER in pediatric patients based on a comprehensive literature search covering the last 10years.

METHODS

Eligible were all clinical studies reporting outcomes after esophagectomy in pediatric patients, which contained information on at least 3years of follow-up after the operation. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic web-based search using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases was performed, reviewing all medical literature published between January 2006 and December 2015.

RESULTS

The scientific quality of the data was generally poor, converging toward only 14 full-text articles for the final analysis. The stomach was the preferred organ for esophageal replacement, where the tubulization of the stomach resulted in significant gastroesophageal reflux. Dysphagia symptoms were more seldom reported, but several authors presented growing figures with the length of follow-up. Dumping syndrome and delayed gastric emptying were only scarcely reported upon. Following colonic graft, chronic gastrocolic reflux affects these patients, in the range of 35-70.8%, while 4 studies reported any dysphagia from 2.7% to 50% of the children. Only one study reported the outcome of the use of a long jejunal segment, where presence of symptoms of functional obstruction was mentioned in 46% of cases. Very few if any data were available on a structured assessment of postprandial dumping and disturbed bowel functions.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data in pediatric patients, on the long-term functional outcomes after esophageal replacement with a gastric tube, colonic graft or a long jejunal segment, are of poor scientific quality. Although symptoms are frequently reported currently no conclusions can be drawn regarding potential advantages of one graft over another.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study, systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes of primary gastric transposition for long-gap esophageal atresia in neonates

BACKGROUND

Gastric transposition is a relatively novel method of esophageal replacement. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the outcomes of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) treated with esophageal replacement using primary gastric transposition in neonates.

METHODS

Between March 2008 and May 2015, 14 newborns with LGEA were treated in our hospital. They were all found to have gaps of over 3 cm at the time of the surgery and were diagnosed with LGEA. Primary gastric transposition was performed. They also underwent a gastric drainage procedure by pyloromyotomy. The nasogastric tube was removed if no anastomotic fistula was present and oral feeding was initiated. After initial recovery and discharge, the patients were evaluated with outpatient follow-ups or telephone follow-ups from 1 month after the surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of the neonates at the time of the surgery was 32 hours (range, 4-96 h). The mean birth weight was 2550 g (range, 2100-3500 g). There were 2 deaths in this series of patients due to respiratory failure or withdrawal of treatment by the parents, with a mortality rate of 14.3%. Seven of the neonates developed unilateral or bilateral severe pneumonia. Early anastomotic leak occurred in 3 cases and anastomotic strictures occurred in 4 cases. These 4 neonates were able to eat a fairly normal diet after esophageal balloon dilation. Gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 7 of 12 cases. Feeding multiple small meals and postural support for positioning and feeding were instructed for these 7 cases. Subsequently, the symptoms alleviated and they had no additional surgical therapy. None of the neonates had delayed gastric emptying or gastric retention.

CONCLUSION

Primary gastric transposition may be a rewarding reconstructive option in the treatment of LGEA.

Surgical techniques for esophageal replacement in children

PURPOSE

Surgical techniques for esophageal replacement (ER) in children include colon interposition, gastric tube, gastric transposition, and jejunal interposition. This review evaluates the merits and demerits of each.

METHOD

Surgical techniques, complications, and outcome of ER are reviewed over last seven decades.

RESULTS

Colon interposition is the time-tested procedure with minimal and less serious complications. Long-term complications include reflux, halitosis, colonic segment dilatation, and anastomotic stricture, sometimes requiring surgical interventions especially for dilatation and reflux. Gastric tube is technically more risky, and associated with early serious complications like prolonged leak in neck or mediastinum, graft necrosis, and ischemia leading to stricture of the tube. Long-term results are good. Gastric transposition is much simpler, can be performed in emergency and in newborns. It involves a single anastomosis in the neck. Post-operative complications include gastric stasis, bile reflux, restricted growth, and decreased pulmonary functional capacity. Jejunal interposition has not been used extensively due to short mesentery but long-term results are good in expert hands.

CONCLUSION

Colon is the most preferred and safest organ for ER. Stomach is a vascular and muscular organ with lower risk of ischemia. Gastric tube is a demanding technique. Jejunum or ileum is alternative for redo cases.

Surgical outcomes of different approaches to esophageal replacement in long-gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Esophageal replacement (ER) surgery has been widely used in long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) over the past few decades. The most commonly used surgical approaches in many pediatric surgical centers include colon interposition (CI), gastric pull-up (GPU), jejunal interposition (JI), and gastric tube reconstruction (GTR). However, there is no systematic evidence on which is the optimal conduit for the native esophagus. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes among these 4 replacement approaches in LGEA cases based on current evidence.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for relevant literature on November 18 2016. Studies on ER in LGEA were reviewed and selected according to eligibility criteria. We focused on surgical outcomes regarding to different replacement approaches, including postoperative complications and long-term follow-up. Both detailed descriptions of single studies and pooled data analysis were conducted. Data were computed by Reviewer Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included (4 comparative retrospective, 3 prospective, and 16 retrospective) with a total of 593 patients (393 LGEA, 66.3%). The number of patients with available data for analysis was 534 (90.1%), including 127 patients (98 LGEA) of GPU, 335 (223 LGEA) of CI, 45 (all LGEA) of JI, and 27 (all LGEA) of GTR. Follow-up information was provided in 15 studies. Anastomotic leak and stricture, respiratory problems, and gastroesophageal reflux were analyzed as major postoperative complications. Long-term follow-ups were concentrated on growth and feeding conditions.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence on short- and long-term outcomes of ER in LGEA patients was limited, and proper prospective comparative studies were lacking. This present systematic review indicates CI and GPU as comparable and favorable approaches, especially CI in the long-term outcomes. Studies on JI and GTR were limited, which need larger sample size to assess their validity and outcomes.

Role of feeding jejunostomy in major anastomotic disruptions in esophageal atresia: A pilot study

Aims:

To investigate the role of feeding jejunostomy (FJ) in patients of esophageal atresia with anastomotic leak (AL) to decrease the degree of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and its effect on anastomotic healing.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty neonates, with major AL and severe GER after primary repair were managed with decompressing gastrostomy and transgastric FJ and analyzed prospectively.

Results:

Male to female ratio was 1.7:1. Mean birth weight was 2.2 kg. Anastomotic gap ranged from 0 to 4 cm. The amount of leak was more than 20% of nasogastric feeds. Gastrostomy and FJ was done on an average of the 12^th postoperative day, after observing the general condition, chest tube output, lung expansion, and ventilatory requirement. There was a drastic reduction in chest tube output and lung expanded in all patients. Average hospital stay was 36 days (8-80 days). Sixty percentage patients were discharged successfully on FJ. Esophagogram demonstrated healing and leak free patency after an average of 1.5 months. GER was noted in seven patients, four developed stricture, and one had pseudodiverticulum in follow-up.

Conclusion:

Decompressing gastrostomy and FJ can be an alternative to managing major ALs. It helps in healing of anastomotic dehiscence and in preserving the native esophagus.

Partial gastric pull-up in the treatment of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

This study was to analyze outcomes of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) treated with partial gastric pull-up (PGP) into the thorax.

METHODS

The medical records of all children who had undergone PGP for LGEA from 1999 to 2012 were reviewed. Preoperative data, initial postoperative course, complications, time to full oral nutrition, follow-up diagnostics and nutritional status were assessed.

RESULTS

Nine children who had undergone PGP were followed up for a mean period of 6.2 ± 3.1 years. Their median gestational age was 37 ± 2 weeks, and mean birth weight 2462 ± 658 g. Eight children were primarily treated with a gastrostomy, their mean age at PGP was 11.4 ± 10.9 weeks and mean weight was 4484 ± 1966 g. Their mean operation time was 199 ± 51 minutes. Leakage was an early postoperative complication in three children, one of whom had a consecutive stricture resection. Late complications were stenosis (n=7) and gastro-esophageal reflux (n=5). The general status of the children was judged as "good" or "very good" on the last presentation. The median percentile of the body-mass-index was 25. Gastroscopy at 3.7 ± 3.2 years after the operation revealed a grade I esophagitis in two children. There was no death in this group of children.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of its high complication rate, partial gastric pull-up cannot be recommended as an alternative for the treatment of LGEA at present. A final judgment could be made on the basis of a comparative study.

Dilated ureter for esophageal substitution: a preliminary experimental study in the rat

BACKGROUND

Esophageal replacement using digestive organs such as the colon, stomach, or jejunum has been used to treat long-gap esophageal atresia and caustic esophageal strictures. Nevertheless, it presents a major challenge. Here, we report a preliminary experimental study that examined the use of a free dilated ureter as an option for esophageal substitution in a transplantation rat model.

METHODS

Ten 28-week-old male donor rats underwent distal ureteral ligation for 4 weeks, and the total dilated ureters were recovered. In each of the ten recipient 20-week-old male rats, a ureter was transplanted through the mediastinum into the esophageal bed, without vascular anastomosis. All rats received cyclosporine and cotrimoxazole for 10 days. On postoperative day 10, the rats were sacrificed, and the transplanted ureters were evaluated macroscopically and histopathologically.

RESULTS

All procedures were achieved. In the early postoperative period, three transplanted rats died. Upon macroscopic evaluation, no evidence of complications was observed, and all transplanted ureters exhibited apparently good firm tissue. Histopathological examination showed a viable ureteral structure with good vascularity, low inflammation, and regenerated epithelium in all rats.

CONCLUSION

As an option for esophageal substitution, heterotopic ureteral transplantation can be performed directly into the mediastinal location of the esophagus, without vascular anastomosis in a rat model. In the future, free dilated ureters might be useful for esophageal grafting or patching in humans; however, this procedure must be validated in additional large animal models before being attempted in humans.

Esophageal transplantation in the rat

PURPOSE

Esophageal replacement surgery has been used to treat long-gap esophageal atresia, caustic esophageal stricture, and esophageal avulsion. Here, we report total esophageal transplantation in rats without vascular anastomosis as an option for esophageal replacement surgery.

METHODS

Fourteen total segments of esophageal transplants were harvested from 24-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats using a harvesting procedure. The segments were transplanted through the mediastinum in the esophageal bed of 15-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats without adjacent vascular anastomosis using the transhiatal pull-up technique. The ends of the transplanted esophagus were ostomized using cervical and abdominal esophagostomies. An immunosuppressive-treated (IT) group (n = 7) received cyclosporine and cotrimoxazole for 10 days, while an untreated (UT) group (n = 7) received only cotrimoxazole for 10 days. On post-operative day 10, the rats were sacrificed, and the transplant and recipient esophagi were evaluated macroscopically and histopathologically.

RESULTS

All transplantations were successful and all transplanted rats survived. Upon macroscopic evaluation, no evidence of complications was observed and all transplanted esophagi in the two groups appeared to exhibit excellent firm tissue; however, mild necrosis was observed in the cervical end of the transplant in one rat in the IT group. Histopathologic examination showed a viable esophageal structure in all rats. Inflammation and muscular atrophy were lower in the IT group than in the UT group, whereas vascularity was higher in the IT group than in the UT group.

CONCLUSION

Total esophageal transplantation was performed directly without vascular anastomosis into recipients in a rat model. This procedure should be done in larger animal models before being attempted in humans.

Primary gastric pull-up in pure esophageal atresia: technique, feasibility and outcome. A prospective observational study

AIM

To perform a definitive procedure in pure esophageal atresia by gastric pull-up in the newborn.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A primary gastric pull-up was performed in six newborns with pure esophageal atresia that presented between 1998 and 2009. The cervical esophagus was mobilized through the neck, the stomach was mobilized through laparotomy, the left gastric artery was ligated, and Pyloromyotomy was done. The stomach was brought into the neck via the trans hiatal route. A single-layer esophageo-gastric anastomosis was done in the neck in all.

RESULTS

The mean birth weight was 2.1 kg (range 1.9-2.7) and the age at surgery varied from 3 to 7 days (mean 4.5 days). The mean operative time was 146 min. All six neonates received postoperative elective ventilation for a period of 2-7 days (mean 5.3). Epidural morphine was given for postoperative pain relief. Four received TPN for 5-13 days. Three had minor leaks from the neck wound that healed spontaneously. Mean hospital stay was 14.6 with a range 13-20 days. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to perform the gastric pull-up for long gap esophageal atresia in the newborn period, as a definitive procedure with no added risks to life in experienced hands.

Should patients with esophageal atresia be submitted to esophageal substitution before they start walking?

Esophagocoloplasty and gastric transposition are two major methods for esophageal substitution in children with esophageal atresia, and there is broad agreement that these operations should not be performed before the children start walking. However, there are some reported advantages of performing such operations in the first months of life or in the neonatal period. In this study, we compared our experience with esophageal substitution procedures performed in walking children with esophageal atresia, with the outcomes of children who had the operation before the third month of life reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to establish if we have to wait until the children start walking before indicating the esophageal replacement procedure. From February 1978 to October 2009, 129 children with esophageal atresia underwent esophageal replacement in our hospital (99 colonic interpositions and 30 gastric transpositions). The records of these patients were reviewed for data regarding demographics, complications (leaks, graft failures, strictures, and graft torsion), and mortality and compared with those reported in the two main articles on esophageal replacement in the neonatal period or in patients less than 3 months of age. The main complication of our casuistic was cervical anastomosis leakage, which sealed spontaneously in all except in four patients. One patient of the esophagocoloplasty group developed graft necrosis and three patients in the gastric transposition group had gastric outlet obstruction, secondary to axial torsion of the stomach placed in the retrosternal space. The long-term outcome of the patients in both groups was considered good to excellent in terms of normal weight gain, absence of dysphagia, and other gastrointestinal symptoms. The comparisons of the main complications and mortality rates in walking children with esophageal substitutions performed in the first months of life showed that the incidences of cervical anastomotic leaks and graft failures were similar, but mortality rate in the first few months of life was significantly greater than that observed in our group of patients (P= 0.001). Based on the comparison of our results with those of published series, we conclude that the recommendation of performing esophagocoloplasty or total gastric transposition in children with esophageal atresia after they start walking is still valid.

Experience in treating congenital esophageal atresia in China

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate our recent experience in treating esophageal atresia (EA) and the outcomes observed at a single center for pediatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of infants with EA from 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Birth weight, associated anomalies, details of management, complications, and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Forty-eight consecutive infants with EA were identified from 2006 to 2009, of which 33 (69%) were boys. Mean birth weight was 2668 g (range, 1700-3800 g). Common associated malformations (35%) were cardiac anomalies, imperforate anus, limb anomalies, and chromosomal anomalies. Forty-seven were Gross type C, and one was Gross type A. Forty-five infants underwent ligation of the tracheoesophageal fistula and end-to-side primary anastomosis, and one received a colonic interposition. Six patients died (12.5% mortality). Three died before or during operation because of severe pneumonia and complex cardiac anomalies, and 3 died during recovery (within 1 month after repair) because of aspiration and severe pneumonia (early postoperative mortality was 6.67%). Complications included pneumonia, anastomotic leakage (16%, all recovered after conservative treatment), wound sepsis (11%), recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (9%) (3/4 recovered after conservative treatment), anastomotic stricture (10%), and gastroesophageal reflux in about 2 of 3 patients. Preoperative computed tomographic imaging and 3-dimensional graphic reconstruction used in 15 patients were useful.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with EA have excellent short- to midterm surgical outcomes. The main factors for mortality are complex cardiac anomalies, aspiration, and pneumonia. Computed tomographic imaging and 3-dimensional graphic reconstruction can provide surgeons with excellent preoperative reference about the anatomy of the defect. Most anastomotic related complications resolve with conservative treatment. Patients of low-risk prognosis group with type A and long gap EA can be managed with a primary colonic interposition with good results. The main midterm complications are gastroesophageal reflux and stricture.

Gastric transposition in children

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcome in 192 children (116 males, 76 females) undergoing transposition since 1981.

METHODS

The most common indications for esophageal replacement included failed repair of different varieties of esophageal atresia (138), caustic injury (29), and peptic strictures (9). A total of 81% of the patients were referred from other hospitals (50% from other countries). Age at operation ranged from 7 days to 17 years. The gastric transposition was performed by using blunt mediastinal dissection in 98 patients, with an additional 90 patients undergoing lateral thoracotomy. The retrosternal position was used in 4 patients.

RESULTS

There were no graft failures, including those who had previously had failed gastric tube or Scharli operations. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 12% (all but one resolved spontaneously). Anastomotic stricture, requiring dilation developed in 20%. Half of these patients had previously sustained caustic esophageal injury. There were 9 deaths in the group (4.6%). One death occurred intraoperatively, 5 in the early postoperative period, and there were 3 late deaths. In over 90% of our patients, the outcome was considered good to excellent in terms of absence of swallowing difficulties or other gastrointestinal symptoms. Many children preferred to eat small frequent meals. Poor outcome was particularly associated with multiple previous attempts at esophageal salvage. There was no deterioration in the function of the gastric transposition in those patients followed for more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric transposition for esophageal substitution is an acceptable procedure. It is attended by 4.6% mortality and a 12% leak rate. A total of 20% of the patients needed anastomotic dilation for stricture. In the long term, good function has been maintained. Gastric transposition compares favorably with other methods of esophageal replacement.

Esophageal atresia: the total care in a high-risk population

The outcome of cases of esophageal atresia depends on many factors that affect the prognosis. These factors have been identified since Waterston aimed to classify the anomaly according to the risk factors. There are other factors that affect the outcome, and these differ in different parts of the globe. This comprehensive review attempts to incorporate all the factors--preoperative, operative, and postoperative--that can pose risks to the ultimate survival of the baby. Early detection for proper management of these cases is essential. Feasibility to perform early esophageal replacement has come as a boom for these high-risk cases. Total care in a high-risk population of esophageal atresia depends on the investigative modalities adopted, available neonatal ICU care, and the surgeon's experience. An attempt continues to decrease the associated morbidity and mortality in high-risk babies born with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula.