Minimally-invasive pediatric surgery in 2004: a survey including 50 German institutions

Laparoscopy for Abdominal Testes: Nationwide Analysis of German Routine Data

Introduction: Laparoscopy has been used for the evaluation of impalpable testes for more than 30 years. However, its use for intra-abdominal testes has never been evaluated in a population-based approach. Neither has the share of timely orchiopexies of intra-abdominal testes according to published guidelines. We aimed to provide this information by using nationwide administrative data for hospital reimbursements. Materials and Methods: We obtained data for procedures for exploration and orchiopexy of intra-abdominal testes in Germany from 2005 through 2018 and analyzed them with linear regression for the use of laparoscopy and timely repair. Results: In 2005, laparoscopy was already used in more than 60% of explorations, which composed 76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72 to 79) of children operated before their first birthday and 68% (95% CI: 65 to 70) of children up to 4 years of age. Throughout the study period, laparoscopy became increasingly popular for orchiopexy of intra-abdominal testes with a yearly increase of 1.8% (95% CI: 1.2 to 2.5, P < .001) in the first year of life and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.2 to 3.4, P < .001) until the age of 4. The share of patients treated before their first birthday increased yearly by 1.9% for explorations and 1.6% for orchiopexies (P < .001 for both) but did not exceed 30% in 2018. Conclusion: Laparoscopy is the method of choice for exploration of intra-abdominal testes and orchiopexy. In this study, more than 70% of boys were treated after their first birthday, thus not meeting the time limit set by guidelines.

Umbilical access in laparoscopic surgery in infants less than 3 months of age: A survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association

PURPOSE

Laparoscopy is commonplace in pediatric surgery. Abdominal access via the umbilicus may present a unique challenge in neonates and young infants predisposing them to complications. We hypothesized that these complications may occur more than described in the literature.

METHODS

Members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) were anonymously surveyed in February of 2018 via REDCap™ regarding technique of umbilical access in infants less than 3 months of age and complications experienced during umbilical access. Approval was obtained from the IRB and the APSA Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee.

RESULTS

The response rate was 31.3% (329/1050). 62.3% of respondents performed 21 or greater neonatal laparoscopic procedures annually. 34 of 322 respondents reported a direct complication from umbilical access for laparoscopy in this age group (10.6%). Surgeons described 37 specific cases with complications related to umbilical access, with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy making up 47.2% (17/36). CO₂ embolism was the most common complication; 15.4% of surgeons reported not knowing about the possibility of CO₂ embolism. 41% of surgeons confirm intraabdominal placement of the umbilical trocar prior to insufflation. There was no association between any complication and where the umbilical trocar was placed (above/below/through umbilicus) or placement technique in patients with no umbilical cord stump. There may be an association between complication and where the umbilicus is entered in patients with an umbilical cord stump still in place (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Umbilical access for laparoscopy in neonates and infants less than 3 months of age can present a unique challenge and result in significant complications. All techniques and methods had complications. Surgeons should be aware of these risks and be prepared to manage them emergently if they arise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, expert opinion.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Although the use of diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology is accepted in paediatric surgical oncology, there is limited evidence to support the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies. This review is the second update of a previously published Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain differences in outcome between the minimally invasive and open surgical approaches for the treatment of solid intra-abdominal or intra-thoracic neoplasms in children. The primary outcomes of interest are OS, EFS, port-site metastases and recurrence rate; the secondary outcome of interest is surgical morbidity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1966 to February 2014) and EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to February 2014) to identify relevant studies. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and the conference proceedings of the International Society for Paediatric Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology from 2003 to 2013. On 1 May 2014 we scanned the ISRCTN Register (on www.controlled-trials.com), the National Institutes of Health register (on www.controlled-trials.com and www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (on www.apps.who.int/trialsearch) for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing MIS to open surgery for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children (aged 0 to 18 years) were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors performed the study selection independently.

MAIN RESULTS

The literature search retrieved 542 references. After screening the titles and abstracts we excluded 534 references which clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria. We assessed eight full text studies for eligibility and all of these studies were excluded from the review because they were not RCTs or CCTs. These excluded studies included case series, retrospective chart reviews and retrospective cohort studies. The scanning of reference lists and conference proceedings did not identify any additional studies and no (ongoing trials) were identified by the searches of trial registries. No studies that met the inclusion criteria of this review were identified

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs or CCTs evaluating MIS for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children could be identified. The current evidence base informing the use of MIS in children with solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms is based on other study designs like case reports, retrospective chart reviews and cohort studies and should be interpreted with caution. Thus there is insufficient evidence to allow any definitive conclusions regarding the use of MIS in these patients. High quality RCTs comparing MIS to open surgery are required. To accomplish this, centres specialising in MIS in children should collaborate.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology has been accepted as a technique in paediatric surgical oncology, but there is limited experience with the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the differences in outcome between the minimally invasive and open approach in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal neoplasms in children, regarding overall survival, event-free survival, port-site metastases, recurrence rate and surgical morbidity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1966 to February 2011), EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to February 2011) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1) with pre-specified terms. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conference proceedings and ongoing trial databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing MIS and open surgery for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children (aged 0 to 18 years).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors performed the study selection independently.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies that met the inclusion criteria of this review were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs or CCTs evaluating MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children could be identified, therefore no definitive conclusions could be made about the effects of MIS in these patients. Based on the currently available evidence we are not able to give recommendations for the use of MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children. More high quality studies (RCTs and/or CCTs) are needed. To accomplish this, centres specialising in MIS in children should collaborate.

Laparoscopic excision of choledochal cysts with total intracorporeal reconstruction

PURPOSE

There are numerous published reports of laparoscopic resection of choledochal cysts (CDCs), but almost all involve extracorporeal reconstruction of a biliary drainage system. We describe and evaluate the technique of laparoscopic CDC resection with total intracorporeal reconstruction.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent a laparoscopic CDC resection from March 2005 to January 2010 at Rocky Mountain Children's Hospital and Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian. We obtained data on operative time, characteristics of reconstruction, time to initiation of diet, length of stay, complications, and outcome.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (median age 5 years, range 1-16) underwent a laparoscopic CDC excision with total intracorporeal reconstruction. Four ports were used in all cases and no patients required conversion to an open procedure. Operative time ranged from 130 to 325 minutes (median 240 minutes). Median time to initiation of diet was 1 day (range 1-4 days). Median length of stay was 5 days (range 4-8 days). There were no cases of cholangitis; however, 1 patient developed a small bowel obstruction requiring re-operation.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection of CDCs with total intracorporeal reconstruction is a safe and effective technique. The minimal handling of the bowel appears to minimize postoperative ileus, allows for early postoperative feeding and discharge.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology has been accepted as a technique in paediatric surgical oncology, but there is limited experience with the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the differences in outcome between the minimally invasive and open approach in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal neoplasms in children, regarding overall survival, event-free survival, port-site metastases, recurrence rate and surgical morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1966 to March 2008), EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to March 2008) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 1) with pre-specified terms. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, conference proceedings and ongoing trial databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing MIS and open surgery for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children (aged 0 to 18 years).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors performed the study selection independently.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies that met the inclusion criteria of this review were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs or CCTs evaluating MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children could be identified, therefore no definitive conclusions could be made about the effects of MIS in these patients. Based on the currently available evidence we are not able to give recommendations for the use of MIS in the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children. More high quality studies (RCTs and/or CCTs) are needed. To accomplish this, centres specialising in MIS in children should collaborate.

Impact of laparoscopic anterior 270 degrees fundoplication on the quality of life and symptoms profile of neurodevelopmentally delayed versus neurologically unimpaired children and their parents

BACKGROUND

This prospective study investigated the therapy-induced changes in the quality of life (QoL) experienced by neurologically healthy and neurodevelopmentally delayed children and their parents after laparoscopic anterior 270 degrees fundoplication (LAF).

METHODS

In this study, 40 patients (21 impaired) with a mean age of 7.8 years underwent LAF for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and were evaluated before surgery and then 3 and 6 months afterward using the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index (GIQLI) supplemented by conventional symptom markers.

RESULTS

Growth, proton pump inhibitor use, and frequency of supraesophageal/respiratory symptoms improved significantly (p < 0.001) as did feeding parameters (p < 0.05). The global GIQLI score improved by 49 +/- 21% (p < 0.001). The greatest improvement occurred in the symptoms domain (p < 0.001). However, positive alterations also were found in the dimensions of emotions (58%), social functions (37%) and physical functions (27%) (p < 0.001). Comparison of the overall benefit did not show any differences between the subgroups of neurologically fit and impaired children. However, for the child-centered symptoms domain, the benefit increased stepwise with the degree of impairment. This was counterbalanced by an inverse relationship for the parent-centered emotions domain (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the known improvement in symptoms, LAF achieves a significant improvement in QoL for children and their parents. There is no overall difference in the benefit experienced by neurologically impaired and healthy children.

Minimally invasive pediatric surgery: Our experience

Aim:

Departmental survey of the pediatric laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures.

Materials and Methods:

It is a retrospective study from January 1999 to December 2007. The various types of surgeries, number of patients, complications and conversions of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures were analyzed.

Results:

The number of minimally invasive procedures that had been performed over the past 9 years is 734, out of which thoracoscopic procedures alone were 48. The majority of the surgeries were appendicectomy (31%), orchiopexy (19%) and diagnostic laparoscopy (16%). The other advanced procedures include laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty, surgery for Hirschprung’s disease, thoracosocpic decortication, congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair, nephrectomy, fundoplication, etc. Our complications are postoperative fever, bleeding, bile leak following choledochal cyst excision and pneumothorax following bronchogenic cyst excision. A case of empyema thorax following thoracoscopic decortication succumbed due to disseminated tuberculosis. Our conversion rate was around 5% in the years 1999 to 2001, which has come down to 3% over the past few years. Conversions were for sliding hiatus hernia, nephrectomy, perforated adherent appendicitis, Meckel’s diverticulum, thoracoscopic decortication and ileal perforation.

Conclusion:

The minimally invasive pediatric surgical technique is increasingly accepted world wide and the need for laparoscopic training has become essential in every teaching hospital. It has a lot of advantages, such as less pain, early return to school and scarlessness. Our conversion rate has come down from 5% to 3% with experience and now we do more advanced procedures with a lower complication rate.