Use of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in a pediatric burn patient

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Cost-effectiveness of a Novel, Simple Modification to the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System

Background:

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has shown remarkable adaptation in wound management worldwide. Numerous studies have provided evidence that demonstrates both the medical and financial advantages of NPWT. In this study, the VAC Therapy System, one of the leading commercially used NPWT systems, has been utilized to treat patients with either acute or chronic wounds requiring surgical intervention, with the aim of demonstrating the efficacy of using a modified version of the VAC system while reducing the total associated cost.

Method:

The patients were divided into two randomly selected groups using randomization generator software. A modification was made by replacing the disposable canister provided by Kinetic Concepts Inc., with an alternative reusable canister (Baxter, Inc.); one group was assigned to use the conventional VAC Therapy System, and the other was assigned to use the modified version. Our study aimed to investigate whether this modification would lower the cost of the VAC Therapy System while still achieving the desired outcome.

Results:

The VAC Therapy System contributed to improving the wound bed score in both groups, which supports previous findings on the effectiveness of NPWT while reflecting that the modification did not negatively impact the functionality and the integrity of the VAC Therapy System. Furthermore, the average daily consumables cost was markedly reduced in the modified group compared with the standard group, which reduced the overall cost of treatment.

Conclusion:

It is possible to use the VAC Therapy System to its full advantage, while minimizing the financial burden of using it.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Pediatric Burn Patients: A Systematic Review

Significance: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) requires the placement of a dressing over a wound, covered with an adhesive film, and applying to these dressing a negative pressure in a controlled fashion. This therapy is a powerful complement to surgical care of wounds. Data are however poor on its use in pediatric burns. Recent Advances: This systematic review, including a total of 466 patients, shows that NPWT as the initial treatment for burned children and after skin grafting has been shown to produce promising results. In the majority of studies, skin graft take rate is close to 100%. This therapy is particularly beneficial in the pediatric population because of less frequent dressing changes and early mobilization. NPWT devices accurately quantify burns water losses and allow tailoring liquid resuscitation. Critical Issues: NPWT is not in the subject of controlled clinical trials in pediatric; most publications are case reports or retrospective reviews. The sporadic complications include bleeding, local infections, and mechanical device issues. Future Directions: NPWT has been used in 2-month up to 18-year-old children with deep second- to third-degree burn of multiple etiologies, from a few days up to several months, on small to 40% total body surface area (%), and in difficult areas. Data gathered provide empirical guidelines on NPWT use in pediatric burns using continuous mode with a pressure of -50 to -75 mmHg for children younger than 2 years, and -75 to -125 mmHg in children over 2 years of age. Prospective randomized studies are needed to provide validated rules.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in children: A 25 cases series

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy is a device applied to a wound that causes local depression. There are a few series showing the effectiveness of this treatment in Pediatric. The objective of this work is to try to clarify the indications in children. This is a retrospective series of 25 children between 2004 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were all children with a wound treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. The characteristics retained were their age, the context of occurrence, the treatment time, the depression applied, the technique of skin covering wound and the average healing time. We included 25 patients. The average age was 8.8 years. The context of the wound occurrence was mainly a road (44%) or a domestic (36%) accident. Substance losses were mainly located in the lower limb (84%). The depression applied was -90mmHg. The healing time was 18.4 days. Thin skin grafting was the main method chosen (88%). No complications related to Negative Pressure Wound Therapy equipment have been identified. Despite the weakness of the literature and the lack of consensus regarding its use, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy is an essential therapy in pediatric. It is a simple and effective technique in children. It can reduce the need for flaps coverage, even in the event of exposure of noble elements. The flaps should not, however, be excluded from the decision-making algorithm, on pain of complications or sequelae.

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Infants and Children: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Although the safety and benefits of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) have been clearly demonstrated in the adult population, studies evaluating the safety and describing the use of NPWT in the pediatric population have been limited. Given this paucity, the goals of this study were to (1) evaluate the literature dedicated to NPWT use in infants and children and (2) leverage a population-level analysis to describe the experience of NPWT use in the pediatric population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature review and analyzed the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims Databases from 2006 to 2014 to identify infants and children treated with NPWT. We evaluated patient characteristics, indications, complications before and after NPWT placement, and health care utilization within 30 d of NPWT placement.

RESULTS

We identified 457 articles, 11 of which fit our inclusion criteria. Most studies (65.2%) were case reports or series with less than 10 patients. In addition, we identified 3184 patients aged younger than of 18 y who were treated with NPWT between 2006 and 2014. Serious incident complications within 30 d after NPWT placement were rare (bleeding 0.6%, septicemia 0.5%, and sepsis 0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of robust studies, NPWT is widely used for many indications and across different ages and providers. Given the low incidence of serious complications, we conclude that NPWT use in infants and children is safe and can be effectively used by different providers spanning surgical and nonsurgical disciplines.

Burn injury: Challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring

Severe burn injuries are the most traumatic and physically debilitating injuries affecting nearly every organ system and leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Early burn wound excision and skin grafting are common clinical practices that have significantly improved the outcomes for severe burn injured patients by reducing mortality rate and days of hospital stay. However, slow wound healing, infection, pain, and hypertrophic scarring continue to remain a major challenge in burn research and management. In the present article, we review and discuss issues in the current treatment of burn injuries; the advances and novel strategies developed in the past decade that have improved burn management; and also, pioneer ideas and studies in burn research which aims to enhance burn wound care with a focus on burn wound infection, pain management, treatments for scarring and skin tissue engineering.

Current concepts in negative pressure wound therapy

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is becoming recognized in veterinary medicine as a viable option for the management of complex wounds. NPWT has many advantages over traditional wound care and results in quicker and improved wound healing in many instances. This article discusses the art and science of NPWT, as well as the many current indications, complications, advantages and disadvantages, and future directions of NPWT in small animal veterinary medicine. This therapy will likely have a growing role in veterinary medical practice for complicated wound management and other usages in coming years.

Clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in challenging wounds

The aim of this randomised clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients with challenging wounds. A total of 50 consecutive patients who had wound drainage for more than 5 days, required open wound management and had existence of culture positive infection were included the study. In this study, gauze-based NPWT was compared with conventional dressing therapy in the treatment of patients with difficult-to-heal wounds. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group I (n = 25) was followed by conventional antiseptic (polyhexanide solution) dressings, and group II (n = 25) was treated with saline-soaked antibacterial gauze-based NPWT. The wounds' sizes, number of debridement, bacteriology and recurrence were compared between group I and group II. The mean age of the patients was 59·50 years (range 23-97). In group I, average wound sizes of pre- and post-treatment periods were 50·60 ± 55·35 and 42·50 ± 47·92 cm(2), respectively (P < 0·001). Average duration of treatment was 25·52 ± 16·99 days, and average wound size reduction following the treatment was 19·99% in this group. In group II, the wounds displayed considerable shrinkage, accelerated granulation tissue formation, decreased and cleared away exudate. The average wound sizes in the pre- and post-treatment periods were 98·44 ± 100·88 and 72·08 ± 75·78 cm(2) , respectively (P < 0·001). Average duration of treatment was 11·96 ± 2·48 days, and average wound size reduction following the treatment was 32·34%. The patients treated with antibacterial gauze-based NPWT had a significantly reduced recurrence (2 wounds versus 14 wounds, P = 0·001), and increased number of the culture-negative cases (22 wounds versus 16 wounds, P < 0·047) in a follow-up period of 12 months. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups in all measurements. As a result, we can say that the gauze-based NPWT is a safe and effective method in the treatment of challenging infective wounds when compared with conventional wound management.

Evidence-based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: steps towards an international consensus

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become widely adopted over the last 15 years and over 1000 peer reviewed publications are available describing its use. Despite this, there remains uncertainty regarding several aspects of usage. In order to respond to this gap a global expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations describing the use of NPWT. In this paper the results of the study of evidence in traumatic wounds (including soft tissue defects, open fractures and burns) and reconstructive procedures (including flaps and grafts) are reported. Evidence-based recommendations were obtained by a systematic review of the literature, grading of evidence, drafting of the recommendations by a global expert panel, followed by a formal consultative consensus development program in which 422 independent healthcare professionals were able to agree or disagree with the recommendations. The criteria for agreement were set at 80% approval. Evidence and recommendations were graded according to the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) classification system. Twelve recommendations were developed in total; 4 for soft tissue trauma and open fracture injuries, 1 for burn injuries, 3 for flaps and 4 for skin grafts. The present evidence base is strongest for the use of NPWT on skin grafts and weakest as a primary treatment for burns. In the consultative process, 11/12 of the proposed recommendations reached the 80% agreement threshold. The development of evidence-based recommendations for NPWT with direct validation from a large group of practicing clinicians offers a broader basis for consensus than work by an expert panel alone.