Inguinal hernia repair in children using single-incision laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous extraperitoneal closure

Prolonged Umbilical Port Insertion Time Increases the Incidence of Umbilical Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure for Inguinal Hernia in Children

Introduction: Umbilical surgical site infection (U-SSI) is the most common complication of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) for the treatment of inguinal hernia in children. Prolonged operative time is known to increase the risk of SSI in general pediatric surgery; however, the association between prolonged operative time and post-LPEC U-SSI is unclear. The present study aimed to elucidate the association between umbilical port insertion time and the incidence of U-SSI. Materials and Methods: The present study included all patients <16 years of age who underwent LPEC for the treatment of inguinal hernia between June 2018 and May 2023 at our institution. Those who underwent umbilical hernia repair or other procedures were excluded. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the following: patient demographics; operative data; and U-SSI data. The cutoff value for the umbilical port insertion time was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the incidence of U-SSI was compared based on the cutoff value, determined to be 8 minutes. Results: A total of 232 patients (133 boys; mean age, 4.6 ± 3.3 years) were eligible for the present study, 7 (3.0%) of which developed superficial incisional post-LPEC U-SSI within a median of 7.5 [4-19] days. The incidence of U-SSI was 20.0% in the long (≥8 minutes) versus 2.3% in the short (<8 minutes) umbilical port insertion time group (P = .03). Conclusion: Prolonged umbilical port insertion time (≥8 minutes) increases the incidence of post-LPEC U-SSI during the treatment of inguinal hernia in children.

Laparoscopic Sac Excision as a Definitive Technique for Inguinal Hernia Management in Pediatric Females: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The utilization of laparoscopic techniques in the management of inguinal hernias among pediatric patients has seen a rising trend. We aimed to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic excision of the hernial sac as a suitable approach for managing inguinal hernias specifically in female patients and conducted a prospective study to investigate this hypothesis.

METHODS

Over a comprehensive four-year period, a total of 99 hernias in 69 female patients were surgically addressed using laparoscopic methods. The surgical procedure primarily involved the laparoscopic inversion and excision of the hernial sac without subsequent distal suturing.

RESULTS

During the initial phase of the study, two cases encountered recurrences within 48 hours post-operation, potentially attributed to incomplete excision. However, in the subsequent period, no further recurrences were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Our study findings support the contention that laparoscopic excision of the sac, without adjunctive closure of the peritoneum, suffices as an effective approach for managing inguinal hernias in female pediatric patients.

Efficacy of a modified needle grasper for single-port laparoscopic hernia repair in children: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

The advantage of using the single-port technique over the conventional two-port approach is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) using a modified needle grasper in children and compare the results to those of two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (TLPEC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of SLPEC and TLPEC surgery from February 2016 to June 2021 was conducted at our institution. Pediatric patients underwent SLPEC using the modified needle grasper to complete the high ligation of the hernia sac, while operations in the conventional two-port group only used regular laparoscopic instruments. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

Of 1320 patients, 1169 were included in the single-port/two-port crude evaluation, with 930 in the PSM cohort (465 patients/arm). Among 1:1 matched patients, the operation time for single-port patients vs. two-port patients were 11.28 ± 3.98 vs. 15.47 ± 4.54 min for unilateral repair and 16.86 ± 4.59 vs. 20.40 ± 4.29 min for bilateral repair (p < .05). Cosmetic results did not differ between the SLPEC and TLPEC groups (0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.249). The recurrence rates were comparable between the two groups (0.6% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.725). Moreover, the differences in surgical site infection (SSI), testicular atrophy, open conversion and postoperative hydrocele occurrence were insignificant between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort study, the modified needle grasper is a safe and feasible instrument for SLPEC, and SLPEC using the needle grasper has a shorter operation time than TLPEC.

Laparoscopic hernia repair in children: does recreating the open operation improve outcomes? A systematic review

PURPOSE

The use of laparoscopy for paediatric inguinal hernia repairs has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. However, there is significant variation in the reported recurrence rates in the literature, with many studies reporting higher rates than the open operation. This may be explained by the range of different techniques currently included under the term laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study is to determine whether dividing the hernia sac before ligation improves surgical outcomes following a paediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair compared to ligation alone.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed following PRISMA guidelines of all studies reporting the outcomes following paediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair where the technique was recorded as laparoscopic suture ligation alone (LS) or laparoscopic sac division and suture ligation (LSDS). Studies were assessed for risk of bias and exclusion criteria included reported follow-up of less than 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 8518 LS repairs and 6272 LSDS repairs were included in the final analysis. LSDS repair was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate (odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.71, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rates of testicular ascent or atrophy.

CONCLUSION

Recreating the open operation by hernia sac division followed by suture ligation significantly reduces the risk of hernia recurrence.

The Ropivacaine Concentration Required for Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Single-Incision Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Sequential Allocation Dose-Finding Study

BACKGROUND

The local anesthetic concentration required for ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) in children remains unknown. Knowledge of appropriate ropivacaine concentration can help clinicians reduce local anesthetic toxicity risk when performing ultrasound-guided RSB in children. This study aimed to determine the appropriate ropivacaine concentration for ultrasound-guided RSB in children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

In this single-arm prospective study with an up-down sequential allocation design of binary response variables, 18 consecutive children aged 11 months to 7 years undergoing single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure were assessed. Orotracheal intubation was performed without intravenous anesthesia or a neuromuscular relaxant. After intubation, ultrasound-guided RSB was performed with a ropivacaine dose of 0.30 ml/kg (0.15 ml/kg per side). Dixon's up-and-down method was used to determine the concentration, starting from 0.25% in 0.05% increments. Surgery commenced ≥15 min following RSB. Body movement or a 20% increase in heart rate or systolic blood pressure within 1 min of surgery initiation determined an unsuccessful RSB. The 95% effective concentration of ropivacaine needed for successful RSB was calculated using the probit test.

RESULTS

The 95% effective concentration of ropivacaine needed for successful ultrasound-guided RSB was 0.31% (95% confidence interval, 0.25-7.29). The highest concentration of ropivacaine required for successful ultrasound-guided RSB in the group of patients in this study was 0.3%.

CONCLUSION

The 95% effective concentration of ropivacaine (0.30 ml/kg total, 0.15 ml/kg per side) for ultrasound-guided RSB was 0.31% in children undergoing single-incision laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.

Single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) for inguinal hernia with prolapsed ovary

BACKGROUND

Most studies reporting the outcomes of laparoscopic ovarian prolapsed hernia operations with large sample sizes are based on intracorporeal closure, while studies on extraperitoneal closure have limited sample sizes. We proactively used the single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) technique and obtained favorable outcomes, which we report in this paper.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia at our institution. They were retrospectively classified into two groups based on the pre- or intraoperative diagnosis of hernia with a prolapsed ovary, namely the prolapse group and the non-prolapse group, respectively. The data were statistically analyzed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 771 subjects underwent SILPEC during the study period, including 400 girls. Among them, 63 girls were diagnosed with an ovarian prolapsed hernia. SILPEC was successfully performed through a single port in all cases, with a single exception, in whom the forceps was inserted directly through the right lower quadrant to pull up the ovary. The duration of surgery in the prolapse group was not higher than that in the non-prolapse group. During the SILPEC surgery, the ovaries were successfully reverted into the abdominal cavity by external compression of the inguinal area alone in 38 of the 63 patients. In the remaining 25 cases, the ovaries were reverted into the abdominal cavity by external compression of the inguinal area and traction of the round ligament with forceps. None of these cases failed to return to the ovaries.

CONCLUSION

Our study results indicate that SILPEC may be performed safely for the treatment of ovarian prolapsed inguinal hernia. Since the ovary and fallopian tube are close to the internal inguinal ring due to the short round ligament, the procedure requires careful suturing with traction of the round ligament.

Comparison study of three laparoscopic ligation procedures for pediatric inguinal hernia: a multicenter cohort of 5523 cases

PURPOSE

Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation (SLPEL) for pediatric inguinal hernia has gained popularity worldwide. However, complications associated with extraperitoneal knotting are not rare. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a modified SLPEL (M-SLPEL) to decrease adverse events associated with ligation knotting by comparing it with two other methods: classical SLPEL (C-SLPEL) and intracorporeal purse-string suturing (IPS).

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective comparative study was conducted among 5523 pediatric inguinal hernia patients. Cases were divided into three groups according to the surgical procedure: the M-SLPEL, C-SLPEL, and IPS groups. Data describing the clinical characteristics, operative time, and complications were collected.

RESULTS

All procedures were performed uneventfully. There were no significant differences in the age at operation (mean 2.62 ± 1.38 years). The operative time was shorter in the M-SLPEL group both for unilateral hernias (12.5 ± 1.8 min in C-SLPEL, 11.7 ± 1.3 min in M-SLPEL, and 17.6 ± 2.9 min in IPS) and for bilateral hernias (15.1 ± 2.1 min, 14.6 ± 1.7 min, and 23.9 ± 2.3 min, respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events in the inguinal region was 0% for M-SLPEL, 2.2% for C-SLPEL, and 0.5% for IPS. All patients were followed up for 12-93 months (mean 54 months). Recurrence occurred in 8 cases in the C-SLPEL group, 1 case in the M-SLPEL group, and 8 cases in the IPS group, with no significance between groups. No scrotal hematoma, testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic cryptorchidism occurred in any group.

CONCLUSION

The M-SLPEL procedure has time-consumption efficiency equivalent to that of C-SLPEL and even fewer adverse events in the inguinal region than IPS and C-SLPEL.

Comparison of intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic hernia repair in children: A systematic review and pooled data-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly used to repair paediatric inguinal hernias and can be divided into intra- or extra-corporeal closing techniques. No statement regarding the superiority of one of the two techniques can be made. This study aims to provide evidence supporting the superiority of intra- or extra-corporeal suturing technique.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomised controlled trials and prospective studies comparing different laparoscopic techniques were eligible for inclusion. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, comparing single-port extra-peritoneal closure to intra-peritoneal purse string suture closing. Primary outcome was recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery (min), peri‑ and post-operative complications (i.e. injury of spermatic vessels or spermatic cord, tuba lesions, bleeding and apnoea, haematoma/scrotal oedema, hydrocele, wound infection, iatrogenic ascent of the testis and testicular atrophy), contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV) rate, post-operative pain, length of hospital stay and cosmetic appearance of the wound.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 3680 patients, age range 0.5-12 years, follow-up range 3-10 months) were included is this systematic review. Intra-corporeal hernia repair was performed in 738 children and extra-corporeal repair was performed in 2942 children. A pooled data analysis could only be performed for the single port extra-corporeal closing technique and the three port intra-corporeal closing technique. We found that recurrence rate was lower in the single-port extra-corporeal closing technique compared to the intra-corporeal purse suture closing technique (0.6% vs 5.5%, 95% CI 0.107 (0.024-0.477); p < 0.001). Operation time was shorter for extra-corporeal unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia repair compared with intra-corporeal approach, but no pooled data analysis could be performed. Due to the presence of substantial heterogeneity, it was not possible to assess other outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Single-port extra-corporeal closure seems to result in less recurrent hernias and a shorter operative time compared to intra-corporeal purse suture closing technique. No difference regarding peri‑ and post-operative complications could be found and no statements regarding the length of hospital admission, post-operative pain and cosmetics could be made due to substantial heterogeneity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Single-incision laparoscopic full-thickness anterior abdominal wall repair of a Morgagni hernia using a suture-assisting needle in a child: A case report

Single-incision laparoscopic repair of a congenital Morgagni diaphragmatic hernia using a suture-assisting needle was performed in a 1-year-old boy. Three ports were inserted through a single umbilical incision to repair the 2.5 × 2.3-cm defect. The full-thickness muscle layer of the anterior abdominal wall and the posterior rim of the defect were penetrated with the suture-assisting needle holding a thread, which was then released. The needle tip was pulled back over the muscle layer, shifted laterally, and again passed through the muscle layer and the posterior rim. The thread was then captured by the needle and pulled out through the anterior abdominal wall. Five mattress sutures were placed in this way and tied subcutaneously. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the cosmetic outcome was favorable. A suture-assisting needle is useful for completing full-thickness anterior abdominal wall repair, which is important for preventing the recurrence of a congenital Morgagni diaphragmatic hernia.

Comparison of Ferguson and Gross herniotomy with Mitchell Banks' herniotomy in boys older than two years

Background & Objective

In children younger than two years, most surgeons perform the inguinal herniotomy superficially through the external ring, a technique known as Mitchell-Banks' Herniotomy (MBH) while in older children, commonly Ferguson and Gross Herniotomy (FGH) is performed which involves opening of inguinal canal. Our aim was to compare the FGH and MBH in terms of recurrence in boys with inguinal hernia.

Methods

Boys with inguinal hernia presenting to Pediatric Surgery, Mayo Hospital Lahore from Dec 2016 to January 2018 were included in the study, if older than two years and younger than 14 years and without palpable deep ring (2 cm or more in width) or strangulation of inguinal hernia or malnutrition. They were randomly allocated in 2 groups after obtaining informed consent from parents, and underwent MBH (Group-A) and FGH (Group-B). Children were called for follow up after 1 week and at 6 months to assess for recurrence.

Results

Total 260 patients with inguinal hernia were enrolled (NCT: 03392636). The mean age of boys in Group-A was 5.2±3.0 years and in Group-B was 5.9±3.1 years. Mean operating time in Group-A (26.65±3.22 minutes) was longer than Group-B (15.92±4.22 minutes), and scrotal oedema was noted in 38 (29.2%) cases in Group-A, while 7 (5.4%) cases in Group-B. Testicular atrophy was noted in one patient of Group-B. Recurrence occurred in 1(0.8%) patient in Group-A, and in 8(6.2%) patients in Group-B (p-value 0.018).

Conclusion

Mitchell-Banks' herniotomy has lower recurrence rate than Ferguson and Gross Herniotomy in boys older than two years.

Optimal Viewing Direction of the Oblique Laparoscope in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure for Inguinal Hernia

Background: It is difficult for novice surgeons to manipulate the oblique laparoscope in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) for inguinal hernia because of collisions between the instruments. To standardize manipulation of the laparoscope, we studied the viewing direction of the oblique laparoscope, and assessed the optimal manipulation of the laparoscope to avoid collisions. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent SILPEC between April 2016 and April 2017. The viewing direction of the 30° oblique laparoscope was measured according to the location of the field stop pointer. Patients were divided into three groups according to the viewing direction at the beginning of the procedure: the inside viewing direction was from -90° to -11°, upward viewing direction was from -10° to 10°, and outside viewing direction was from 11° to 90°. The length of the procedure, viewing direction at the end, and the percentage of cases in which there was a change in viewing direction during the procedure were compared. Results: Ninety-eight cases of SILPEC were performed during the study period. The percentage of patients with a change in category of viewing direction in the inside, upward, and outside groups was 35%, 21%, and 11%, respectively, showing a significant difference among the three groups. Conclusions: Setting the initial viewing direction to the outside can reduce correction of the viewing direction during SILPEC. Because the intersection angle between the outside-viewing laparoscope and forceps is close to a right angle, this might reduce collisions.

Reoperation After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children: A Retrospective Review

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) is increasingly widely accepted in pediatric surgery. However, reoperation risks remain unknown. We summarized our single-center experience with reoperations after laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and single-incision LPEC (SILPEC). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed reoperation cases of hernia repair greater than or equal to two times between 2000 and 2018, wherein the first hernia repair was performed laparoscopically. Primary outcomes were recurrence type and screening sufficiency for contralateral patent processus vaginalis (cPPV). Secondary outcomes were associated with details of recurrences. Results: Of the 2112 patients who underwent LPEC/SILPEC, 14 (recurrence rate = 0.7%) showed recurrences after treatment and 8 (incidence rate = 0.4%) showed contralateral metachronous inguinal hernia (CMIH). Concerning the primary outcome of recurrence type, the orifice was inside the previous ligation (Inside group), suggesting loosened first ligation, in 6 (42.9%) patients and outside the previous ligation (Outside group) in 7 (50.0%); and 1 (7.1%) patient showed no orifice. Regarding CMIH, 3 (37.5%) patients were suspected of insufficient screening for cPPV, 1 (12.5%) underwent sufficient screening, and 1 (12.5%) had cPPV but treatment was deemed unnecessary. Concerning secondary outcomes, 4 (66.7%) and 6 (85.7%) patients from the Inside and Outside groups were treated with single ligation, respectively. One patient from the Outside group (14.3%) had a massive peritoneum injury during the first operation. Conclusions: Some preventable factors, such as loosened ligation, torn peritoneum, and use of single ligation in recurrences and insufficient screening for cPPV in CMIH, were observed. These should be taken care to prevent reoperations in LIHR.

Single-Site Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure of the Internal Ring Using an Epidural Needle for Children with Inguinal Hernia

Backgroud

This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of the internal ring using an epidural needle for children with inguinal hernia.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 542 children with inguinal hernia who underwent single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of the internal ring using an epidural needle at our hospital from June 2014 to June 2017.

Results

All patients successfully underwent surgery and none were converted to conventional surgery. Abdominal vascular injury, vasectomy injury, testicular vascular injury, umbilical hernia, iatrogenic cryptorchidism, testicular atrophy, hydrocele, hernia recurrence, and scrotal edema were not reported during the perioperative period. A follow-up of these patients was performed for 12–24 months. During the follow-up period, umbilical hernia, iatrogenic cryptorchidism, testicular atrophy, and hydrocele were not noted, but 3 cases of hernia recurrence were found.

Conclusions

The single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of the internal ring using an epidural needle for children with inguinal hernia is safe and effective, and this procedure has the advantages of minimal trauma, no scarring, and good cosmetic effect.

Evidence supporting laparoscopic hernia repair in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pediatric inguinal hernias are a commonly performed surgical procedure. Currently, they can be approached via open or laparoscopic surgery. We summarize the current evidence for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in children are associated with similar operative times for unilateral hernia, as well as similar cosmesis, complication rates and recurrence rates. Bilateral hernia repair has been shown to be faster through a laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic approach is associated with decreased pain scores and earlier recovery, although only in the initial postoperative period. Laparoscopy allows for easy evaluation of the patency of contralateral processus vaginalis, although the clinical significance of and need for repair of an identified defect is unclear.

SUMMARY

Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric inguinal hernias offers some advantages over open repair with most outcomes being equal. It should be considered a safe alternative to open repair to children and their caregivers.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in inguinal hernia repair

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR) offers the potential for excellent cosmetic outcomes and maximization of the inherent advantages of minimally invasive surgery. LESS IHR is associated with a steep learning curve, which is attributable to both the IHR technique itself and the single-site technique. The technical obstacles in the single-site technique may be mitigated by employing certain maneuvers and strategies that minimize clashing between instruments and improve freedom of movement. The current literature consistently points out the inherent challenges in LESS IHR, with its longer operative time compared to that of conventional laparoscopic IHR. LESS IHR performed by capable operators has comparable complication rates, duration of hospital stay, and incidence of recurrence as conventional laparoscopic IHR. LESS IHR is both feasible and safe. Given its excellent cosmetic outcome, it is likely to be sought by younger patients who are concerned with scar formation. The use of robotics may bypass the technical challenges in LESS, but cost considerations in their usage will likely persist.

Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia: a single-center retrospective cohort study of 2028 cases

BACKGROUD

Recently, laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) has gained increased popularity for pediatric inguinal hernia repair. To improve cosmesis, we developed single incision LPEC (SILPEC). The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of SILPEC compared with traditional open repair (OR).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of 2028 children who underwent inguinal hernia repair between April 2005 and August 2014. Nine hundred and ninety-five patients underwent OR and 1033 patients underwent SILPEC. Medical records were reviewed with respect to operative time, recurrence, incidence of contralateral metachronous inguinal hernia (CMIH), and complications. Patient satisfaction with cosmetic result was also investigated using questionnaires sent by mail.

RESULTS

All SILPEC procedures were completed without conversion. Operative time was longer in the SILPEC group than in the OR group for both unilateral and bilateral surgery regardless of sex (unilateral male: p = 0.0006, unilateral female: p < 0.0001, bilateral male: p < 0.0001, bilateral female: p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate (p = 0.43). The incidence of CMIH was significantly higher in the OR than in the SILPEC group (p < 0.0001). No postoperative testicular atrophy was found in either group. There was no statistically significant difference in ascending testis (p = 0.09), but the frequency of surgical site infection was higher in the SILPEC than in the OR group (p = 0.0013). According to the questionnaire, operative scar was more invisible in the SILPEC than in the OR group (p < 0.0001), but both procedures had equally high levels of satisfaction for cosmetic results (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

SILPEC proved to be a safe and feasible procedure compared with OR with an equally low recurrence rate, more effectiveness for preventing CMIH, and more invisible scar.

A systematic review and meta-analysis concerning single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele

BACKGROUND

Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) of hernia sac/processus vaginalis has been widely performed for repair of inguinal hernia/hydrocele in children. However, a variety of surgical instruments and techniques were used, and significant differences existed among the SLPEC reports.

METHODS

A literature search was performed for all available studies concerning SLPEC for pediatric inguinal hernia/hydrocele in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. The surgical details and operative outcomes were pooled and analyzed with software StataSE 12.0.

RESULTS

49 studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria of this review and 37 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. The mean incidence of CPPV was 29.1% (range 5.73-43.0%). The average of mean operative time was 19.56 min (range 8.30-41.19 min) for unilateral SLPEC and 27.23 min (range 12.80-48.19 min) for bilateral SLPEC. The total incidence of injury, conversion, recurrence, hydrocele formation, knot reaction, severe pain, and scrotal swelling was 0.32% (range 0-3.24%), 0.05% (range 0-0.89%), 0.70% (range 0-15.5%), 0.23% (range 0-3.57%), 0.33% (range 0-3.33%), 0.05% (range 0-4.55%), and 0.03% (range 0-1.52%), respectively. There was no development of testicular atrophy. Subgroup analyses showed an inverse correlation between the injury incidence and adoption of assisted forceps, hydrodissection, and blunt puncture device, between the conversion rate and adoption of hydrodissection, between the recurrence/hydrocele incidence and adoption of assisted forceps, hydrodissection, nonabsorbable suture and the preventive measures to avoid ligating the unnecessary subcutaneous tissues, and between the rate of knot reaction and adoption of assisted forceps, hydrodissection, and the preventive measures.

CONCLUSIONS

SLPEC was a well-developed procedure for repair of pediatric inguinal hernia/hydrocele. Adoption of assisted forceps, hydrodissection, nonabsorbable suture, and the preventive measures to avoid ligating the unnecessary subcutaneous tissues could significantly reduce the intra- and postoperative complications.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty

PURPOSE

Additional studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty (SILH) and conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty (CLH) have been published, and this study updates the meta-analysis of this subject.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to locate original articles that compared SILH and CLH for inguinal hernia that were published until October 2015. Operative time, conversions, complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence, postoperative pain at 24 hours, and postoperative pain at 7 days were compared using Stata software, version 12.0.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were selected for this analysis, which included a total of 1672 patients (907 in SILH and 765 in CLH). SILH showed a longer operative time; however, conversions, complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence, postoperative pain at 24 hours, and postoperative pain at 7 days were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis has shown that inguinal hernia repair using SILH is as safe as CLH. However, based on our evidence, we currently believe that SILH is not an efficacious surgical alternative to CLH for inguinal hernias due to the fact that it does not provide significant benefit in postoperative pain and cosmetic outcomes. However, large-scale, well-designed, and multicenter studies will be needed to further confirm the results of this study.

A Modified Technique with a New Device of Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) in boys is more complex than in girls, because the vas deferens and testicular vessels must be separated from the peritoneum. We therefore developed a needle-shaped surgical instrument that enables blunt separation. Here, we report the effectiveness of this new device.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The new device is a ligature carrier consisting of (1) an inner tube (19-G blunt needle) through which slides a rod with a loop wire at its tip that can catch and release suture materials and (2) an outer tube (17-G needle) with a cutting edge. The blunt-structured inner tube enables blunt separation. All actions (stabbing, separation, and catching) in the LPEC procedure that are required to close the hernia orifice using a thread are facilitated through a simple small incision by switching between the inner and outer tubes.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

From January 2013 to September 2015, 73 boys with inguinal hernia or hydrocele underwent LPEC, and the new device was used in 45 of these cases. We compared surgical results between cases wherein the new (group A) and conventional devices (LPEC needle; group B) were used.

RESULTS

The mean surgery duration was 33.4 and 34.8 min for groups A and B, respectively. Neither group experienced complications during or after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the newly developed needle device may improve the safety of the LPEC procedure for boys, although further investigation involving more cases and long-term follow-up is needed in the future.

Minimally-invasive liver resection in pediatric patients: initial experience and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Minimally Invasive Liver Resection (MILR) is an evolving procedure in the adult population for benign and malignant lesions, offering less morbidity while maintaining acceptable outcomes. However, there lacks a published MILR experience in the pediatric population besides case reports. This report describes a pediatric MILR experience in terms of pathology, clinical specifics, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 36 pediatric patients undergoing MILR for benign and malignant conditions. MILR was performed by pure laparoscopy, hand-assisted laparoscopy, and a hybrid laparoscopic assisted method. Data points reviewed include patient demographics, pathology, operative technique, complications, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients with benign (15) and malignant (21) conditions underwent segmentectomy, sectionectomy, or hemihepatectomy by MILR. Thirty-one were completed with pure laparoscopy and 20 underwent hemihepatectomy. Operative time and blood loss correlated with magnitude of resection with five patients requiring a blood transfusion. Complications were minor and included a seroma, port infection, port dehiscence, line infection, and hypertrophic scar. At median follow-up of 12 months (range 6-36 months), there were no mortalities, re-operations, or recurrences.

DISCUSSION

MILR can be performed in pediatric patients for benign and malignant conditions with good technical and oncologic outcomes and low morbidity.

A systematic review comparing single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair with mesh

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to evaluate whether the surgical outcomes differ between single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus multi-incision laparoscopic surgery (MILS) for the repair of inguinal hernia.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on published studies reporting the surgical outcomes following SILS versus MILS for inguinal hernia repair was undertaken using the principles of meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen comparative studies on 1651 patients evaluating the surgical outcomes in patients undergoing SILS versus MILS for inguinal hernia repair were systematically analysed. The post-operative recovery time was significantly quicker [odds ratio, -0.35 (CI, -0.57 - 0.14), p = 0.001] following SILS compared to MILS procedure. However, the statistical equivalence was seen in outcomes of length of hospital stay, operative time both for unilateral and bilateral hernias, post-operative pain score, one-week pain score, hernia recurrence [odds ratio, 1.24 (CI, 0.47-3.23), p = 0.66], conversion [odds ratio, 1.07 (CI, 0.37-3.12), p = 0.90], and post-operative complications [odds ratio, 0.95 (CI, 0.66-1.36, p = 0.78] between two approaches. The sub-group analysis of four included randomized, controlled trials showed similarities between outcomes following SILS and MILS except slightly higher postoperative pain score in MILS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SILS and MILS approaches of inguinal hernia repair are feasible, safe and can be offered to patients depending upon the availability of expertise and resources.

Feasibility of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure for Inguinal Hernia by Inexperienced Pediatric Surgeons: Single-Incision Versus Multi-Incision Randomized Trial for 2 Years

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the stability and risk of single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) for pediatric inguinal hernia performed by inexperienced pediatric surgeons versus conventional LPEC procedure.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2012, a randomized prospective study was performed comparing SILPEC (n = 37, 16 uni- and 21 bilateral patent processus vaginalis [PPV]) to LPEC (n = 72, 39 uni- and 33 bilateral PPV). The procedures were performed in girls with inguinal hernia by inexperienced pediatric surgeons with the assistance of an expert pediatric surgeon. In SILPEC, a laparoscope was placed through a transumbilical incision. A 2-mm trocar for the grasper was inserted through the same incision and introduced into the extraperitoneal cavity. The tip of the trocar was inserted in the abdominal cavity distant from the umbilical incision by the expert surgeon to avoid any complications caused by the in-line view. Using a special needle, the hernial sac was closed extraperitoneally by the inexperienced surgeon. A statistical survey of the mean age at operation, mean operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrence in the SILPEC and LPEC groups was performed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the mean age or operative time. There were fewer total number of postoperative complications in the SILPEC group compared with the LPEC group (P = .0707). No intraoperative complications or recurrence occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the risks and need to improve endoscopic surgical skills with useful instruments specialized for SILPEC, inexperienced surgeons can successfully perform SILPEC safely under expert pediatric surgeons.

The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure for Inguinal Hernia in Neonates and Infants Younger Than 1 Year of Age in Comparison to Older Patients

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) has been performed in Japan for the repair of the pediatric inguinal hernias for over a decade. However, the safety and efficacy of LPEC in neonates and infants under 1 year of age remain unknown. The aim of the present study is to elucidate the safety and efficacy of LPEC in the treatment of inguinal hernia in patients who are younger than 1 year of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of the patients who underwent LPEC at Saga-Ken Medical Center Koseikan (Saga, Japan) between August 2007 and November 2012 were collected. The intraoperative findings and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively investigated. The data of the patients who were younger than 1 year of age (Group A) were compared with the data of patients who were older than 1 year of age (Group B).

RESULTS

During the study period, 150 LPEC procedures were performed in 112 Group A patients, whereas 607 LPEC procedures were performed in 456 Group B patients. There were no serious complications in either group. After a mean follow-up period of 50.4 ± 15.6 months (range, 28-91 months), there were no significant differences between the two groups in the operating time or the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Postoperative testicular ascent and recurrence were observed in some cases of each group.

CONCLUSIONS

LPEC is a safe and effective procedure for the repair of an inguinal hernia, even in neonatal and infant patients who are younger than 1 year of age.

Ten year experience of laparoscopic repair of pediatric hydrocele and the long-term follow-up results

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair for pediatric hydroceles and its long-term follow-up results.

METHODS

We performed this procedure to 284 patients from 2002 to 2011 using our specially designed curved awl. The patent internal ring was enclosed and fixed under laparoscopy and fluid within the patent processus vaginalis was emptied by percutaneous needle aspiration.

RESULTS

The median operation time was 16minutes. Fifty-seven contralateral open internal rings were diagnosed during laparoscopic exploration and closed at the same time. During our 10-year follow-up only four kids had recurrence of moderate amount of fluid accumulation 1-3months after the surgery and 3 of them spontaneously resolved during the outpatient follow-ups. Only one of them was treated by percutaneous needle aspiration successfully. No abdominal viscera injury happened.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic hydrocele repair proved to be applicable and effective with satisfactory long-term results according to our experience.

Laparoscopic percutaneous inguinal hernia repair in children: review of technique and comparison with open surgery

INTRODUCTION

Minimally-invasive approaches for inguinal hernia repair have evolved from conventional laparoscopy requiring placement of three ports and intracorporeal suturing to simple, one and two port extraperitoneal closure techniques. We utilize a single port laparoscopic percutaneous repair (LPHR) technique for selected children requiring operative intervention for inguinal hernia. We suspect that compared to open surgery, LPHR offers shorter operative duration with comparable safety and efficacy. Our objectives are to (1) illustrate this technique and (2) compare operative times and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing LPHR versus traditional open repair.

METHODS

We reviewed operative times, complications, and recurrence rates in 38 patients (49 hernias) who underwent LPHR at our institution between January 2010 and September 2013. These data were compared with an age-, gender-, weight-, and laterality-matched cohort undergoing open repair during the same 3 year period. All cases were performed by a pediatric urologist or pediatric surgeon.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 21.5 months underwent LPHR, and 38 patients with a median age of 23 months underwent open repair. In both groups, 27/38 patients (71%) had unilateral repairs, and 11/38 patients (29%) had bilateral repairs. For unilateral procedures, average operative duration was 25 min for LPHR and 59 min for OHR (p < 0.001). For bilateral procedures, average operative duration was 31 min for LPHR and 79 min for OHR (p < 0.001). There were no intraabdominal injuries in either group. In the LPHR group, there were no vascular or cord structure injuries and no conversions to open technique. Median follow-up was 51 days for the LPHR group and 47 days for the OHR group (p = 0.346). No hernia recurrence was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

In select patients, LPHR is an efficient, safe, and effective minimally invasive alternative to OHR, with reduced operative times but without increased rates of complications or recurrences. The technique has a short learning curve and is a practical alternative to OHR for pediatric urologists who infrequently utilize pure laparoscopic technique.

A novel technique for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure assisted by an optical forceps

AIM

The aim of this study was to describe and report the results of our new pediatric inguinal hernia repair technique, in which single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SPEC) technique was modified by using optical foreign-body forceps (OFF) of the rigid bronchoscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2012 and January 2014, a total of 79 children who were operated using SPEC assisted with OFF (SPEC-OFF) were included in this study. Demographic and clinical features of the children were obtained and reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine hernia repairs were performed on a total of 79 children (51 boys, 28 girls). All of the patients were operated by SPEC-OFF without the need of introducing extra forceps, with or without an additional trocar. The mean operating time was 17.6 ± 5.5 min. The mean follow-up period was 17.5 ± 7.1 months. There were six recurrences (two boys, four girls). No wound infection, hydroceles or testicular atrophy occurred in any patients during post-surgery follow-up. The technique left a very small scar with excellent cosmesis in the umbilicus and groin area.

CONCLUSIONS

SPEC-OFF is a simple, safe and effective technique for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, and for determining contralateral hernia. There is no need to use additional working forceps for the technique and the surgeon can perform the procedure without any assistance for laparoscope.

Does percutaneous internal ring suturing contain risk of ilioinguinal nerve entrapment?

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to assess the alteration of IIN functions in children with inguinal hernias operated on using open or 'percutaneous internal ring suturing' (PIRS).

METHODS

This study was based on a prospective clinical trial of 60 pediatric patients. They were operated on using PIRS or conventional open hernia repair technique. Group 1 included 35 patients who were treated with PIRS technique. Group 2 included 22 patients who underwent a conventional open hernia repair. The ilioinguinal nerve stimuli in both the operational and non-operational areas were evaluated in patients with peripheral EMG for possible ilioinguinal nerve damage on the hernia side before the operation and to reevaluate ilioinguinal nerve function in the third postoperative week.

RESULT

In Group 1, 19 cases underwent a preoperative EMG examination and in 35 cases, EMG examination was obtained postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative EMG results were normal in all cases in Group 1 on both the operational and non-operational sides. In Group 2, 15 preoperative and 25 postoperative EMG examinations were obtained. In Group 2, only one case with a right inguinal hernia who had normal preoperative EMG results showed no IIN response in a postoperative EMG evaluation obtained in the third postoperative week, with a normal left-side response. The EMG was repeated at the three-month postoperative third mark and revealed the same result. In a six-year-old female case, there was a negative EMG response on the non-operative side both pre- and postoperatively.

Open inguinal herniotomy: Analysis of variations

BACKGROUND

Repair of congenital groin hernia/hydrocele is the most common surgical procedure performed by paediatric surgeons. There is dearth of literature comparing the outcomes of open herniotomy in children using various surgical approaches. This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of open herniotomy by comparing external ring incision, hernial sac twisting and whether or not double ligation has benefit over a single suture application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-centre prospective randomised clinical trial was conducted with a total of 428 patients having congenital inguinal hernia and/or hydrocele. Patients were randomly assigned into four groups: RO (had external ring opened, hernial sac twisted and doubly ligated), ST (had hernial sac twisted and doubly ligated without opening the ring), DL (had double ligation of hernial sac without ring opening nor twisted) while SL (had single ligation of hernial sac with neither ring opening nor sac twisting).

RESULTS

A total of 458 repairs were done. Patients' age ranged from 0.25 years (3 months) to 21 years in group RO with mean of 4.87 × 4.07 (median, 4), 0.069 years (24 days) to 17 years in group ST with mean of 4.23 × 4.03 (median, 3), 0.5 years (6 months) to 16 years in group DL with mean of 4.59 × 3.87 (median, 4) and 1 year to 19 years in group SL with mean of 5.00 × 4.19 (median, 4). Operation time per repair was 26.50 × 5.46 min, range 16-40 min (median, 27 min) in group RO, 22.18 × 5.34 min, range 12-39 min (median, 21 min) in group ST while 17.98 × 3.40 min with range of 12-39 min (median, 17 min) in group DL and 15.27 × 4.18 min, range 7-40 min (median, 15 min) in group SL P < 0.0001. The mean paracetamol dose/patient was 3.96 × 1.43, 2.94 × 0.81, 2.18 × 0.69, 1.87 × 0.78 in group RO, ST, DL and SL, respectively, P < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Congenital inguinal hernia repair with opening of the external ring, hernia sac twisting and double ligation of the processus vaginalis confers no advantage.

Herniotomy in resource-scarce environment: Comparison of incisions and techniques

BACKGROUND

There are various methods for surgical treatment of hernia and hydrocele in children with variable cost-effectiveness, recovery and cosmetic outcomes. This study analyses our experience with mini-incision/invasive herniotomy in children in resource-limited centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven hundred and eighty-four n = 784 patients underwent herniotomy via conventional and mini-invasive methods were assigned into Group A and Group B. Three hundred and seventy-six n = 376 (47.95%) in Group A while four hundred and eight n = 408 (52.04%) in Group B. Eight hundred and seventeen (817) herniotomy was performed. Demographic data, hernia/hydrocele sides, volume of surgical suture used, surgery duration, and complications analysed.

RESULTS

Right side hernia and/or hydrocele were 464 (59.18%). 287 (36.60%) had left sided while 33 (4.21%) had bilateral hernia and/or hydrocele. There were 14 bilateral hernia repair in Group A and 19 in Group B. The lengths of operation time for unilateral repair ranged from 14 to 54 min in Group A (median, 23 min) and 7-44 min in Group B (median, 15 min) with a mean surgical duration of 15.48 ± 4.16 min in Group B versus 23.41 ± 5.94 min in Group A (P < 0.001) while the range of the lengths of operation time for bilateral repair in Group A was 20-54 min (median, 36) and 12-30 min (median, 21) in Group B with a mean duration of 36.35 ± 9.89 min in Group A versus 20.42 ± 4.83 min in Group B P = 0.00563. 376 sachets of 45 cm suture material were used in Group A versus 137 in Group B. There were total of 87 (23.13%) complications in Group A versus 3 (1.47%) in Group B P = 0.000513. Superficial wound infection and abscess were 9 (2.36%) and 16 (4.25%) in Group A versus none (0) in Group B.

CONCLUSION

Mini-incision/invasive herniotomy in children and adolescents is fast, cost-effective with satisfactory cosmetic outcome and limited complications.

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure using an innovative apparatus for pediatric inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic procedures for pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) have numerous techniques and continue to evolve, with a trend toward increasing use of extracorporeal knotting and decreasing use of working ports and endoscopic instruments. Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SPLPEC) with variable devices seems to be one of the most simple and reliable methods. Here the authors describe and evaluate the applicable effects of SPLPEC using an innovative two-hooked core hernia apparatus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2008 and October 2011, 72 children with indirect inguinal hernia underwent SPLPEC with an innovative two-hooked core hernia apparatus. A 5-mm laparoscope was placed through a transumbilical port. Without an assistant working port, the two-hooked core hernia apparatus with a 2-0 nonabsorbable suture was inserted at the point of the internal inguinal ring. It could be readily kept in an identical subcutaneous path for introducing and withdrawing the suture. The extraperitoneal knot-tying could tautly enclose the hernia defect without peritoneal gaps and upper subcutaneous tissues. During the same period, 63 cases with PIH underwent SPLPEC with a single-hooked hernia device. Technical essentials, mean operation time, and intra- and postoperative complications were compared.

RESULTS

The internal orifice was closed faster by SPLPEC with the innovative two-hooked core apparatus than with a single-hooked device (unilateral, 13.21±3.86 versus 17.92±4.37 minutes [P<.05]; bilateral, 17.18±4.69 versus 25.36±7.38 minutes [P<.01]). There were no postoperative complications or evidence of early recurrence in the two-hooked group. However, one recurrence and one subcutaneous knot granuloma were postoperatively observed in the single-hooked group.

CONCLUSIONS

SPLPEC with the two-hooked core apparatus was proved to be a successful procedure without leaving a peritoneal gap and ligating subcutaneous tissues. It is safe, feasible, and reliable for PIH.

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernias and hydroceles in children: a comparison with traditional open repair

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic procedures for inguinal hernias and hydroceles in children have become widespread in the past few decades. The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective analysis of our experience in order to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and to compare the findings with those of conventional open repair (OR).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the medical records of 488 patients who underwent LPEC or OR for inguinal hernia or hydrocele at our institute between April 2008 and December 2012. The indications for the operation, length of the operation, complications, day surgery, contralateral patent processus vaginalis, and incidence of metachronous contralateral hernia were investigated. The chi-squared test, unpaired t test, and Steel-Dwass test were used to analyze the significance of the data.

RESULTS

Among a total of 488 patients, 326 patients underwent LPEC (125 males and 201 females), and 162 underwent OR (140 males and 22 females). There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrence (three in the LPEC and none in the OR group, P=.55) or in the success rates of day surgery (97.8% in LPEC versus 97.6% in OR). The incidence of metachronous contralateral hernias in the LPEC group was lower than that in the OR group (LPEC 0%; OR 2.2%, P=.03). Seventeen subjects with hydroceles were treated by LPEC without any complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LPEC is safe and effective for inguinal hernias and hydroceles in children, regardless of age, sex, and incarceration and could reduce the incidence of metachronous contralateral hernias.

Single-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty versus multi-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hernioplasty is the gold standard treatment for inguinal hernias. Recently, single-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty (SILH) has been suggested as an alternative technique. It is not evident whether the benefits of this procedure overcome the potential increased risk.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of SILH with conventional multi-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty (MILH) using a meta-analysis of available controlled clinical trials.

METHODS

Eligible articles were identified by searching several databases including Embase, Cochrane, PubMed and Google Scholar databases, up until May 2013. Evaluated outcomes were operative time, post-operative hospital stay, complications, conversion and recurrence.

RESULTS

Eight controlled clinical trials on 926 patients were randomized to either SILH (495 patients) or MILH (431 patients) for meta-analysis. Overall, there was no significant difference between SILH and MILH in complications, operative time for bilateral inguinal hernia repair, hospital stay, short-term recurrence or conversions. However, the operative time for unilateral inguinal hernia repair was significantly longer for SILH than for MILH (standardized mean difference 0.23 (95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.38); P = 0.00, I(2) = 73.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that SILH is feasible and safe in certain patients when compared to MILH, and carries a similar outcome, with the exception of longer operative times for unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Additional high-powered randomized trials are needed to determine whether SILH truly offers any advantages; these future studies should focus particularly on failure of technique, pain score, analgesia requirements, cosmesis and quality of life.

Comparative mid-term results between inguinal herniotomy and single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for pediatric inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND

Some recent papers have advocated single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and obtained satisfactory results. The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term outcomes of conventional inguinal herniotomy and single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

METHODS

Between April 2007 and March 2009, 202 records of infants and children with inguinal hernia treated were retrospectively reviewed. Of them, 86 patients were treated by conventional inguinal herniotomy (IH group), and 116 patients by single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with preperitoneal hydrodissection, a totally extraperitoneal enclosing suture and extracorporeal knot tying (LH group). Follow-up data were collected using a telephone questionnaire and last outpatient follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 35.7±7.2 months. Both procedures could achieve compete repair without recurrence. Operation time of unilateral repair was significantly longer in the LH group than in the IH group (40.1 vs. 20.0 min; P<0.001); however, operation time of bilateral repairs was comparable in both groups (46.0 vs. 37.5 min; P=0.291). Metachronous hernia developed in 6 of 80 patients (7.5%) initially presenting with unilateral hernia in the IH group and in no patient in the LH group (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Accompanied by the method of preperitoneal hydrodissection and a totally extraperitoneal enclosing suture, single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy would be an effective procedure as conventional inguinal herniotomy. Single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy was associated with long operation time and a reduction in contralateral hernia development. However, every 4 patent processus vaginalis would require intervention to prevent 1 metachronous hernia.

Single-incision pediatric endosurgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) is defined as minimally invasive surgery performed through a unique incision in the abdomen, chest, or retroperitoneum. Several publications exist, but no previous systematic review has been made to evaluate the real benefits of this approach in terms of feasibility and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an electronic search in PubMed up to March 2012 with the terms "single AND incision OR site OR port OR trocar AND children" including related articles and obtained 197 articles. After applying our inclusion criteria, 78 articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

We identified prospective controlled trials (n=1), case-control studies (n=12), case series (n=49), and case reports (n=16). In total, 4212 patients had been operated on by SIPES and were separated by systems: gastrointestinal (n=2888), urologic (n=390), gynecologic (n=27), other abdominal (n=874), and thoracic (n=33) procedures. The most common procedure was SIPES appendectomy, and a unique prospective controlled trial supports its safety and effectiveness. Technically demanding surgeries such as hepatojejunostomy and colonic surgeries were described. Multichannel ports and multiple ports, standard and articulated instruments, transparietal instruments, retraction sutures, and magnets were used. Operative times, length of stay, and complications similar to standard laparoscopic surgery were described. A low conversion rate (to a reduced port, standard laparoscopy and open procedures) was also mentioned. No comparable measure for pain and cosmesis assessment was used.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide experience in SIPES and feasibility has already been described with good clinical outcomes and low rate of conversion. Appendectomy is the unique procedure in which SIPES has been demonstrated to be safe and effective. It is pending the execution of prospective controlled trials for other operations to demonstrate, with objective evidence, the real benefits of this less invasive approach.

Laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia in children: resection without suture

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernia in children presents a higher frequency of relapse when suture technique procedures are used. Here, we present an alternative technique consisting of laparoscopic resection of the hernia sac without suture according to the physiopathology of pediatric inguinal hernia.

METHODS

In prospective studies from June 2006 to January 2011, pediatric patients with a diagnosis of inguinal hernia were subjected to surgery as follows: resection of the hernia sac without suture was performed with a 3-port laparoscopic approach. Age, surgical time, recurrence, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 285 patients, who ranged from 1 month to 15 years old. They included 233 males, and 52 females. A percentage of 31.92 were bilateral (375 inguinal canals). The surgery time ranged from approximately 5 to 12 minutes. They were followed up 6 to 55 months, with an optimal evolution in 99.2%. Recurrence was observed in only 2 patients (0.53%), both of whom underwent incomplete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrate that resection of the hernia sac without sutures allows for the treatment of inguinal hernia with a low recurrence rate.

Surgical techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in childhood: a critical appraisal

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair started over two decades ago. It has been gaining ground as a mode of treatment for inguinal hernia in children. Several surgical techniques have emerged since its inception. The aim of this article is to review the role of laparoscopy in inguinal hernia repair in children, the various emerging laparoscopic surgical techniques, and their current trend in pediatric surgical practice. In this study, extensive review and analysis of recent articles on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children revealed that laparoscopy plays a great role in the treatment of inguinal hernia in children. There were several emerging laparoscopic techniques, with trends toward extracorporeal suturing and knotting technique and single-port access technique as well. The recent advance is toward the use of tissue adhesives in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children.