Value of laparoscopy in children with a suspected rotation abnormality on imaging

High risk and low incidence diseases: Pediatric digestive volvulus

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric digestive volvulus is a serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of pediatric digestive volvulus, including the presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric digestive volvulus is a deadly condition most commonly associated with malrotation. It occurs when the stomach or small intestine twists on itself, resulting in ischemia and potentially strangulation with necrosis and perforation. Presentation differs based on the gastrointestinal (GI) segment affected, degree of twisting, and acuity of the volvulus. Gastric volvulus most commonly presents with retching with or without nonbilious emesis and epigastric distension with pain, while midgut volvulus typically presents with bilious emesis in infants. Patients with GI necrosis and perforation may present with hemodynamic compromise and peritonitis. If suspected, emergent consultation with the pediatric surgery specialist is necessary, and if this is not available, transfer to a center with a pediatric surgeon is recommended. Imaging includes plain radiography, ultrasound, or upper GI series, while treatment includes resuscitation, administration of antibiotics, and emergent surgical decompression and detorsion of the involved segments.

CONCLUSION

An understanding of pediatric digestive volvulus and its many potential mimics can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this deadly disease.

A Rare Case of Delayed Presentation of Acute Midgut Volvulus in an Adolescent

Intestinal malrotation is primarily diagnosed in the neonatal period, when symptoms typically first appear. In contrast, occurrences in adults are quite uncommon. Adult cases are less frequently reported, often because the condition remains asymptomatic or presents with nonspecific symptoms that can delay diagnosis. Intestinal malrotation in adults can show a range of symptoms, from acute bowel obstruction to vague and chronic symptoms, often leading to a delay in the diagnosis compared to children. Patients with this condition present a distinctive challenge for surgeons regarding diagnosis and treatment, especially in acute situations. This study presents a rare case of a 16-year-old boy who came with chief complaints of acute abdominal pain and multiple episodes of bilious vomiting. The patient underwent an emergency laparoscopy converted to an open Ladd's procedure. During surgery, the duodenum, small intestine, cecum, and appendix were discovered to be abnormally positioned, and the transverse colon and mesentery were twisted along with the superior mesenteric artery and superior mesenteric vein, with the presence of classical Ladd's bands confirming preoperative CT findings of midgut volvulus. The patient tolerated the procedure well, with no intraoperative complications. Acute midgut volvulus is rare in adults and older children. Still, the differential diagnosis should be kept in mind in patients with pain in the abdomen and multiple episodes of bilious vomiting in cases with an uncertain diagnosis to plan proper management and avoid intraoperative surprises. Early detection, accurate imaging methods, and prompt intervention can mitigate complications that could increase morbidity and mortality.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Vomiting in Infants

Vomiting in infants under the age of 3 months is one of the most common reasons for parents to seek care from their doctor or present to an emergency room. The imaging workup that ensues is dependent on several factors: age at onset, days versus weeks after birth, quality of emesis, bilious or nonbilious vomiting, and the initial findings on plain radiograph, suspected proximal versus distal bowel obstruction. The purpose of these guidelines is to inform the clinician, based on current evidence, what is the next highest yield and most appropriate imaging study to pursue a diagnosis. The goal is rapid and accurate arrival at a plan for treatment, whether surgical or nonsurgical. The following modalities are discussed for each variant of the symptom: plain radiography, fluoroscopic upper gastrointestinal series, fluoroscopic contrast enema, ultrasound of the abdomen, nuclear medicine gastroesophageal reflux scan. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Diagnostic laparoscopy to exclude malrotation following inconclusive upper gastrointestinal contrast study in infants

PURPOSE

We report the use of diagnostic laparoscopy as an alternative to laparotomy in the investigation of infants with clinical features concerning for malrotation and inconclusive upper gastrointestinal contrast study.

METHOD

Case note review of all infants in whom laparoscopy was performed during 2016-2020 to investigate for possible malrotation.

RESULTS

Eight infants were identified. All presented with acute clinical features of malrotation (bilious vomit) without evidence of an alternate explanatory diagnosis. All underwent upper gastrointestinal contrast study, with three also undergoing abdominal ultrasound. The radiological examinations could not exclude malrotation and all proceeded to laparoscopy. At laparoscopy, the small intestine was run to exclude the presence of midgut volvulus. In six cases, normal rotation was confirmed and no abnormal pathology was found. Two proceeded to laparotomy and underwent correction of malrotation. All infants recovered without complication.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy is an excellent modality for further investigation of infants presenting acutely in whom intestinal malrotation cannot be formally excluded radiologically. The positive identification of the DJ flexure and cecum in correct anatomical sites, both fixed to the posterior abdominal wall, provides adequate reassurance of low risk of volvulus and avoids a full laparotomy. We recommend diagnostic laparoscopy in cases of inconclusive upper gastrointestinal contrast study.

Laparoscopic Ladd Procedure for Malrotation in Newborns and Infants

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic approach for malrotation has become more popular for neonates and in cases with volvulus, but its safety and efficacy remains controversial. This study reviewed laparoscopy outcomes in neonate/infant malrotation.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed and Lilacs databases were reviewed. Data from studies published in English/Spanish between 1995 and 2019 were collected. Results are presented as percentages and means/medians; logistic regression was used to study possible associations.

RESULTS

Nineteen papers offered 99 neonates/infants with median age and weight of 10.5 days and 3.5 kg, respectively. Ladd's procedure was performed in 95 (96%) patients and bands' division in 4 (4%); appendectomy was not included in 16 (16.2%) patients, and cecopexy was not performed in all cases. Volvulus was reported in 39 (39.4%) patients. There were 11 conversions (11.1%) and 10 recurrences of symptoms (10.1%) that required reintervention. An association was found between volvulus and recurrence (P = .05) and the need for conversion (P < .01). There were 10 (10.1%) minor complications and no mortality. The median follow-up was 10 months.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic approach to malrotation is feasible and safe in hemodynamically stable neonates/infants without intestinal necrosis and is associated with 11% conversion rate and 10% reinterventions. The presence of volvulus is associated with recurrence and conversion. Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure with appendectomy and without cecopexy is the commonly practiced approach that is associated with minor complications.

Laparoscopic Ladd Procedure for the Management of Malrotation and Volvulus

Introduction: While laparoscopic Ladd procedure is commonly performed in patients with asymptomatic malrotation, a paucity of data exists on children with volvulus or with low weight (≤3 kg). Our purpose was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic Ladd procedure in these complex patient populations. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing operation for malrotation from 2008 to 2018 was performed. Specific subgroup analysis was performed comparing outcomes after open and laparoscopic approaches in patients presenting with acute volvulus or in low-weight (<3 kg) patients. Results: Out of 110 patients, 38 (35%) presented with volvulus and 72 (65%) without volvulus. In patients with volvulus, 16 (42%) underwent laparoscopy and 22 (58%) had an open procedure. More patients in the open group had a preoperative diagnosis of volvulus (63.6% vs. 12.5%, P = .002). Operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (87 vs. 61 minutes, P = .029), with 7 patients being converted to an open procedure (44%). Days to regular diet, hospital length of stay, and recurrent volvulus were similar between groups. In patients weighting <3 kg, 10 patients underwent laparoscopy and 10 patients had an open procedure. Demographics, operative time, postoperative outcomes, and complications were similar between groups. One person in the laparoscopic group was converted to open. Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of malrotation, even in the presence of volvulus and low patient weight, is safe and effective, with low rates of recurrent volvulus. If exposure is suboptimal, conversion to open in patients with volvulus should be considered.

Laparoscopic 'steering wheel' derotation technique for midgut volvulus in children with intestinal malrotation

Introduction:

Since the first description by William Ladd, the Ladd's procedure has been the surgery of choice for the correction of malrotation. The laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is becoming popular with the advent of minimal access surgery and is described in the literature. Various techniques of the Ladd's procedure have been described but none of them describes the stepwise technique for derotation of volvulus which is the most difficult and confusing part of the surgery. We describe ‘steering wheel’ technique for easy derotation of volvulus associated with malrotation.

Method:

A total of 62 patients were diagnosed to have an intestinal malrotation between 2010 and 2017. All cases which had complete non-rotation with a midgut volvulus were reviewed. Out of these, 48 patients were operated with open technique and 14 patients were subjected to the laparoscopic correction.

Technique:

Using three-port technique, stepwise derotation of volvulus is done which simulates the rotation of steering of car at an acute turn and has been described in four simple steps. This technique also stresses the importance of the release of Ladd's band before derotation.

Results:

Of 62 patients diagnosed with malrotation, 14 (22.6%) patients underwent the laparoscopic Ladd's procedure. The mean age was 26 + 8 months, mean weight was 10 + 2 kg and included eight males (57%) and six females (43%). There was only one (7.14%) conversion to open technique, due to a huge dilatation of duodenum causing difficulty in dissection in a patient with malrotation without volvulus. The laparoscopic Ladd's procedure took an average time of 70 ± 15 min.

Conclusion:

The laparoscopic ‘steering wheel’ derotation technique is easy and provides a stepwise description of the laparoscopic derotation of volvulus associated with malrotation in children.

Laparoscopic diagnostic finding in atypical intestinal malrotation in children with equivocal imaging studies

BACKGROUND

Atypical presentation of intestinal malrotation provide a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for the surgeon to answer the question is it wisdom to operate or not? Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast study is essential for diagnosis; however, 'soft' radiologic findings place the responsibility of excluding malrotation directly on the surgeon. Recently, minimally invasive surgical techniques would be able to accomplish the identical evaluation and treatment of this group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 40 patients (25 male, 15 female), age of 2-14 years, presented with symptoms of chronic abdominal pain, intermittent upper intestinal obstruction, recurrent bilious vomiting and failure to thrive. On clinical examination, none of the patients had signs of acute abdominal emergency. UGI contrast study was done and it was equivocal. All patients underwent laparoscopic evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients (90%) were found on laparoscopy to have a discrepant finding of chronic intestinal malrotation. With narrow mesenteric base which put them at significant risk of midgut volvulus. Two patients (5%) were found to have chronic appendicitis with extensive adhesion at the right iliac fossa, one patient (2.5%) has annular pancreas and one patient has negative laparoscopic exploration. Laparoscopic findings of chronic intestinal malrotation includes, huge dilated stomach and the first part of duodenum, ectopic site of caecum central in the abdomen or under the liver, medial and low position of duodenojejunal junction, congested mesenteric veins with lymphatic oedema, generalised mesenteric lymphadenopathy, reversed relation of superior mesenteric artery and vein, right-sided small bowel.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic diagnostic finding permits direct evaluation and treatment of undocumented malrotation in children, with equivocal UGI contrast study. Furthermore, laparoscopy provides an excellent opportunity to assess the base of the mesentery. Those children with a narrow base should undergo laparoscopic Ladd procedure to avoid catastrophic midgut volvulus.

Open versus laparoscopic approach for intestinal malrotation in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Although the principles of the Ladd's procedure for intestinal malrotation in children have remained unchanged since its first description, in the era of minimally invasive surgery it is controversial whether laparoscopy is advantageous over open surgery. The aim of our study was to determine whether the surgical approach for the treatment of malrotation had an impact on patient outcome.

METHODS

Using a defined strategy (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science MeSH headings), two investigators independently searched for studies comparing open versus laparoscopic Ladd's procedure in children. Case reports and opinion articles were excluded. Outcome measures included age at operation, time to full enteral feeding, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications. Maneuvers were compared using Fisher's exact test and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Of 308 abstracts screened, 49 full-text articles were analyzed and nine (all retrospective) met our search criteria. Selected articles included 1003 patients, of whom 744 (74 %) underwent open surgery and 259 (26 %) laparoscopy. Patients who had open surgery were younger (0.9 ± 1.2 years) than those who underwent laparoscopy (2.6 ± 3 years; p < 0.0001). Laparoscopy was converted to open Ladd's in 25.3 % patients. Laparoscopy was associated with faster full enteral feeding (1.5 ± 0.3 days) in comparison to open surgery (4.6 ± 0.1 days, p < 0.0001). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (5.9 ± 4.3 days) than in the open group (11.2 ± 6.7 days; p < 0.0001). Open surgery was associated with higher overall post-operative complication rate (21 %) than laparoscopy (8 %; p < 0.0001). Although there was no difference in the prevalence of post-operative bowel obstruction (open, n = 10 %; laparoscopy, n = 0 % p = 0.07), post-operative volvulus was more frequent in the laparoscopy group (3.5 %) than in the open group (1.4 %, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Comparative but non-randomized studies indicate that laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is not commonly performed in young children. Although one third of laparoscopic procedures is converted to open surgery, laparoscopy is associated with shorter time to full enteral feeds and length of hospital stay. However, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure seems to have higher incidence of post-operative volvulus. Prospective randomized studies with long follow-up are needed to confirm present outcome data and determine the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic approach.

[Endoscopic treatment of intestinal malrotation in newborns and infants]

AIM

To compare treatment of intestinal malrotation in newborns and infants using laparoscopy and laparotomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For the period from January 2004 to December 2013 34 Ladd's procedures were performed. Children were divided into 2 groups by 17 patients: laparoscopic (group I) and open treatment (group II).

RESULTS

Both groups had similar demographic and other preoperative parameters. There were significant differences in duration of operation between both groups (61 vs. 70 minutes). Nutrition was initiated earlier after mini-invasive treatment (1.5 days vs. 3 days) and the time need for full enteral nutrition was also less (4.2 days vs. 6.9 days). Hospital-stay was shorter in group I (7.7 vs. 10.2 days). Number of early postoperative complications was similar in groups. Incidence of remote complications was higher in laparotomy group but the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that endoscopic correction of congenital anomalies of intestinal rotation provides better postoperative results than open surgery and can be widely used in young children.

Current surgical management of intestinal rotational abnormalities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

At present, there is a debate as to the management of malrotation in pediatric patients. This review highlights recent literature including the role of laparoscopy, and the management of asymptomatic patients with and without congenital cardiac disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Symptomatic patients are still recommended to undergo open Ladd's procedure. Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure in asymptomatic patients confers a shorter time to tolerating feeds, shorter length of stay, and a decreased rate of bowel obstruction and other complications. It may, however, carry a higher risk of postoperative volvulus. Diagnostic laparoscopy is recommended in asymptomatic patients in whom the diagnosis is uncertain on upper gastrointestinal imaging. Asymptomatic patients with congenital heart disease may be managed with initial observation or operation, based upon individualized risk benefit assessment. If an elective Ladd's procedure is performed, it should take place after palliative cardiac operations have resulted in stable cardiac function. Screening upper gastrointestinal studies in heterotaxy patients may be unnecessary as the reported rates of volvulus in recent studies are low.

SUMMARY

Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure may be an acceptable alternative to an open procedure for asymptomatic patients. Observation of asymptomatic patients with congenital cardiac disease is a reasonable alternative in selected patients.

Esophageal atresia and malrotation: what association?

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) has an incidence of approximately 1:3,500. The incidence of malrotation is thought to be 1:200-500. We attempted to define the incidence of a combination and discuss the implications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a single institution with a diagnosis of EA or EA/TEF or TEF between April 1981 and January 2013. Patients were included if the position of the duodeno-jejunal flexure (DJF) was determined by upper GI contrast study (UGIS), surgery or post-mortem.

RESULTS

Case notes were reviewed for 235 patients. In the EA type A group, 3/28 (11 %; 95 % CI 3.7-27.2 %) had malrotation, significantly higher than the reported incidence of malrotation in the general population (p = 0.0008). All three patients in this group were symptomatic with one patient found to have a volvulus at emergency surgery. In the type C group, 6/196 (3 %, 95 % CI 1.4-6.5 %) had malrotation, significantly higher than the incidence reported for the general population (p = 0.0033) but not significantly different to that of the type A group (p = 0.0878). There were no patients with malrotation identified in any other EA/TEF type. In total, 9/235 (3.8 %; 95 % CI 2.0-7.2 %) patients with EA had malrotation, significantly higher than the 5/1,050 (0.48 %) reported for the general population (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

There is a high incidence of malrotation in patients with pure EA. In the type A group an attempt to identify the DJF position at gastrostomy siting and/or performance of UGIS in the neonatal period should be undertaken. There should also be a low threshold for UGIS in all EA/TEF patients.

Are paediatric operations evidence based? A prospective analysis of general surgery practice in a teaching paediatric hospital

BACKGROUND/AIM

Paediatric surgical practice should be based upon solid scientific evidence. A study in 1998 (Baraldini et al., Pediatr Surg Int) indicated that only a quarter of paediatric operations were supported by the then gold standard of evidence based medicine (EBM) which was defined by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of the current study was to re-evaluate paediatric surgical practice 16 years after the previous study in a larger cohort of patients.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed in a tertiary level teaching hospital for children. The study was approved by the local research ethics board. All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring a general anaesthetic carried out over a 4-week period (24 Feb 2014-22 Mar 2014) under the general surgery service or involving a general paediatric surgeon were included in the study. Pubmed and EMBASE were used to search in the literature for the highest level of evidence supporting the recorded procedures. Evidence was classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2009 system as well as according to the classification used by Baraldini et al. Results was compared using Χ (2) test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 126 operations (36 different types) were performed on 118 patients. According to the OCEBM classification, 62 procedures (49 %) were supported by systematic reviews of multiple homogeneous RCTs (level 1a), 13 (10 %) by individual RCTs (level 1b), 5 (4 %) by systematic reviews of cohort studies (level 2a), 11 (9 %) by individual cohort studies, 1 (1 %) by systematic review of case-control studies (level 3a), 14 (11 %) by case-control studies (level 3b), 9 (7 %) by case series (type 4) and 11 procedures (9 %) were based on expert opinion or deemed self-evident interventions (type 5). High level of evidence (OCEBM level 1a or 1b or level I according to Baraldini et al. PSI 1998) supported 75 (60 %) operations in the current study compared to 18 (26 %) in the study of 1998 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that nowadays a remarkable number of paediatric surgical procedures are supported by high level of evidence. Despite this improvement in evidence-based paediatric surgical practice, more than a third of the procedures still lack sufficient evidence-based literature support. More RCTs are warranted to support and direct paediatric surgery practice according to the principals of EBM.

Contemporary management of abdominal surgical emergencies in infants and children

BACKGROUND

Acute abdominal complaints in children are common presentations in the emergency department. The aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management often differ from those in adults.

METHODS

This review was based on expert paediatric surgical experience confirmed by evidence from the literature obtained by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Keywords used were the combinations of 'abdominal emergencies', 'acute abdomen' and the disorders 'acute appendicitis', 'intussusception', 'volvulus', 'Meckel's diverticulum', 'incarcerated inguinal hernia', 'testicular torsion' and 'ovarian torsion' with 'children'. Information was included from reviews, randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies.

RESULTS

Presentation and symptoms of abdominal emergencies, especially in young children, vary widely, which renders recognition of the underlying disorder and treatment challenging. Critically targeted imaging techniques are becoming increasingly important in obtaining the correct diagnosis without unnecessary delay. Minimally invasive techniques have become the method of choice for the diagnosis and treatment of many abdominal emergencies in children.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of abdominal disorders in childhood, their specific presentation, diagnosis and treatment facilitates management of children with acute abdomen in emergency departments. Imaging and minimally invasive techniques are becoming increasingly important in the diagnosis of acute abdomen in children. Urgent operation remains the cornerstone of therapy for most acute abdominal disorders.