Single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children: initial single-center experience

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Multiport Approach for Gallbladder Disease in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aim: To evaluate comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) in the management of children with various hematological or biliary disorders. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of literature studies with subsequent meta-analysis of outcomes was conducted in line with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement standards. Operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperation complications were extracted. Results: Seven researches reporting a total number of 479 patients who underwent SILC (n = 235) or SLC (n = 244) were included. There was no difference between SILC and SLC groups in operative time (mean difference (MD) 15.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] [10.50-19.79], P = .07) and length of hospital stay (MD 0.83, 95% CI [-2.41 to 4.06], P = .62). Postoperation complications and the cost also seemed similar. Conclusions: SILC and SLC seem to have comparable effect and safety in children. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials with adequate sample sizes and long-term follow-up are required to provide stronger evidence in favor of the intervention.

Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary Surgery

Comparative studies and large-scale case series that confirm the advantages of laparoscopy in children with hepatobiliary diseases are scarce, and the use of laparoscopy remains a matter of debate. This article reviews the current literature on the role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in pediatric patients with choledochal cyst, biliary atresia, gallbladder diseases, and hepatobiliary malignancies. Studies were identified through a search of the MEDLINE database. Laparoscopy may be beneficial for resection of choledochal cyst and cholecystectomy. However, more data are required before recommendations on the use of minimally invasive techniques for other hepatobiliary conditions can be published.

Evolution and Standardisation of Techniques in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric surgery has proven benefits for morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities. Laparoscopic approach is well established for bariatric surgery. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers even more minimally invasive approach for the same with the added advantage of better cosmesis. We have developed and standardised the SILS approach at our institute. We share our experience and technical "tips" and modifications which we have learnt over the years. Technical details of performing sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with special attention to liver retraction, techniques of dissection in difficult areas, creation of anastomoses and suturing have all been described. In our experience and in experience of others, single-incision bariatric surgery is feasible. Use of conventional laparoscopic instruments makes single-incision approach practical for day-to-day practice. Supervised training is essential to learn these techniques.

Success of Minimally Invasive Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (T-SILS) Plus Double-Balloon Endoscopy (DBE) for Pediatric Intestinal Angiodysplasia: A Case Report

We describe here a child with angiodysplasia of the small intestine, diagnosed by double-balloon endoscopy (DBE), who was treated with transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery (T-SILS). A 9-year-old boy presented to another hospital with intermittent fresh melena of a duration of 5 months and 4 days. Anoscopy and gastric mucosal membrane scintigraphy were unsuccessful diagnostically, and he was referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. Under general anesthesia, we performed DBE by an anal route, with the ileum assessed for a distance of about 150 cm from the ileocecal valve. Although no bleeding lesion was found in the colon, a flat elevated venous lake approximately 20 mm in size was observed 20 cm from the ileocecal valve, suggesting angiodysplasia of the small intestine. A tattoo was made under DBE, and wedge resection by T-SILS was performed 1 month later under general anesthesia. The excised specimen appeared as a flat, elevated venous lake approximately 20 mm in size. Histopathologic analysis revealed several dilated and distorted veins within the submucosa of the small intestine. The patient was diagnosed with angiodysplasia of the small intestine. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he remained free of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding 18 months after the operation. This is the first case report showing the diagnosis, localization, and tattooing of an obscure gastrointestinal bleeding lesion of the small intestine by preoperative DBE and removal of the lesion by subsequent T-SILS in children.

Minimally-invasive liver resection in pediatric patients: initial experience and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Minimally Invasive Liver Resection (MILR) is an evolving procedure in the adult population for benign and malignant lesions, offering less morbidity while maintaining acceptable outcomes. However, there lacks a published MILR experience in the pediatric population besides case reports. This report describes a pediatric MILR experience in terms of pathology, clinical specifics, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 36 pediatric patients undergoing MILR for benign and malignant conditions. MILR was performed by pure laparoscopy, hand-assisted laparoscopy, and a hybrid laparoscopic assisted method. Data points reviewed include patient demographics, pathology, operative technique, complications, and recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients with benign (15) and malignant (21) conditions underwent segmentectomy, sectionectomy, or hemihepatectomy by MILR. Thirty-one were completed with pure laparoscopy and 20 underwent hemihepatectomy. Operative time and blood loss correlated with magnitude of resection with five patients requiring a blood transfusion. Complications were minor and included a seroma, port infection, port dehiscence, line infection, and hypertrophic scar. At median follow-up of 12 months (range 6-36 months), there were no mortalities, re-operations, or recurrences.

DISCUSSION

MILR can be performed in pediatric patients for benign and malignant conditions with good technical and oncologic outcomes and low morbidity.

Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy

Background and Objectives:

The single-incision approach in laparoscopic surgery is a relatively new concept. This systematic review of the literature was performed to appraise the existing clinical evidence concerning the use of the single-incision technique for spleen resection.

Methods:

We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Scopus databases, and the studies retrieved were included in our review. The references of the included studies were also hand searched.

Results:

Thirty-one relevant studies were found in the field including 81 patients with an age range from 0.6 to 90 years and a body mass index range from 18 to 36.7 kg/m². Splenomegaly (44.6%), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (31%), and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (6.8%) were the most common indications for the procedure. Concerning the applied port system, multiple single ports (5 to 12 mm) were used in 54.4% of patients, the SILS port (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts) was used in 26.6%, the TriPort (Advanced Surgical Concepts, Wicklow, Ireland) was used in 7.6%, glove ports were used in 6.3%, and the GelPort (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California) was used in 5.1%. The median operative time was 125 minutes (range, 45–420 minutes), and the median quantity of blood loss was 50 mL (range, 10–450 mL). No conversion to open surgery and no transfusion were needed. The length of hospital stay was between 1 and 9 days. Low rates of complications and no patient deaths were found. The existing evidence on cosmesis is limited.

Conclusion:

Single-site/single-port laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure that seems to be a challenging alternative in the management of spleen resection.

Advances in laparoscopy for acute care surgery and trauma

The greatest advantages of laparoscopy when compared to open surgery include the faster recovery times, shorter hospital stays, decreased postoperative pain, earlier return to work and resumption of normal daily activity as well as cosmetic benefits. Laparoscopy today is considered the gold standard of care in the treatment of cholecystitis and appendicitis worldwide. Laparoscopy has even been adopted in colorectal surgery with good results. The technological improvements in this surgical field along with the development of modern techniques and the acquisition of specific laparoscopic skills have allowed for its utilization in operations with fully intracorporeal anastomoses. Further progress in laparoscopy has included single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice trans-luminal endoscopic surgery. Nevertheless, laparoscopy for emergency surgery is still considered challenging and is usually not recommended due to the lack of adequate experience in this area. The technical difficulties of operating in the presence of diffuse peritonitis or large purulent collections and diffuse adhesions are also given as reasons. However, the potential advantages of laparoscopy, both in terms of diagnosis and therapy, are clear. Major advantages may be observed in cases with diffuse peritonitis secondary to perforated peptic ulcers, for example, where laparoscopy allows the confirmation of the diagnosis, the identification of the position of the ulcer and a laparoscopic repair with effective peritoneal washout. Laparoscopy has also revolutionized the approach to complicated diverticulitis even when intestinal perforation is present. Many other emergency conditions can be effectively managed laparoscopically, including trauma in select hemodynamically-stable patients. We have therefore reviewed the most recent scientific literature on advances in laparoscopy for acute care surgery and trauma in order to demonstrate the current indications and outcomes associated with a laparoscopic approach to the treatment of the most common emergency surgical conditions.

Single-site multiport combined splenectomy and cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments: Case series and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Conventional laparoscopic procedures have been used for splenic diseases and concomitant gallbladder stones, frequently in patients with hereditary spherocytosis since 1990's. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of single-site surgery with conventional instruments in combined procedures.

PRESENTATION OF CASE SERIES

Six consecutive patients who scheduled for combined cholecystectomy and splenectomy because of hereditary spherocytosis or autoimmune hemolytic anemia were included this study. Both procedures were performed via trans-umbilical single-site multiport approach using conventional instruments. All procedures completed successfully without conversion to open surgery or conventional laparoscopic surgery. An additional trocar was required for only one patient. The mean operation time was 190min (150-275min). The mean blood loss was 185ml (70-300ml). Median postoperative hospital stay was two days. No perioperative mortality or major complications occurred in our series. Recurrent anemia, hernia formation or wound infection was not observed during the follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

Nowadays, publications are arising about laparoscopic or single site surgery for combined diseases. Surgery for combined diseases has some difficulties owing to the placement of organs and position of the patient during laparoscopic surgery. Single site laparoscopic surgery has been proposed to have better cosmetic outcome, less postoperative pain, greater patient satisfaction and faster recovery compared to standard laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION

We consider that single-site multiport laparoscopic approach for combined splenectomy and cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible technique, after gaining enough experience on single site surgery.

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) has been considered as an alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children.

METHODS

An electronic search of EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE was performed. Operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications including wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, ileus in SILA and CLA were pooled and compared by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 1 prospective study and 7 retrospective studies) that included 2,109 pediatric patients were studied. Of these patients, 933 and 1,176 patients had undergone SILA and CLA, respectively. There was significant shorter length of hospital stay for SILA compared with CLA in children; however, pooling the results for SILA and CLA revealed no significant difference in operative time and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CLA, SILA has the advantage of shorter hospital stay. However, SILA failed to show any obvious advantages over CLA in operative time and postoperative complications including wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, and ileus.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery in children: A new alternative in developing countries

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a technique in laparoscopic surgery, which is based on the idea that all the laparoscopic trocars are inserted through a single umbilical incision. This paper documents a single-centre experience, which performed the single-port surgery in children using an improvised trans-umbilical glove-port with conventional rigid instruments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively studied the outcomes of SILS procedures between January 2013 and June 2014. Materials required making our homemade trans-umbilical port consisted on: A flexible ring, a rigid larger ring, one powder-free surgical glove, a wire-to-skin and standard standards laparoscopic trocars.

RESULTS

A total of 90 consecutive procedures had been done in our institution: 15 girls and 75 boys (mean age: 7.5 years). We used SILS on 59 appendectomies with an average operative time of 48 minutes. We needed conversion to conventional surgery in three cases (two with perforated appendicitis and one for difficulty to mobilize the appendix). SIL cholecystectomy was performed for four patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis; mean operative time was 60 min. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 2. Eighteen boys with non-palpable testis were explored and treated. Other procedures included: Varicocelectomy (n = 2), intra-abdominal lymph node biopsies (n = 2), ovarian cystectomy (n = 1), ovarian transposition (n = 1), aspiration of renal hydatid cyst (n = 1), explorative laparoscopy in research to Meckel's diverticulum (n = 1) and intestinal intussusceptions (n = 1). No post-operative complications were seen in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

SILS in the paediatric population using conventional rigid instruments is feasible, safe and effective. It may be an alternative to the costly commercially available single-port systems especially in a developing country like Tunisia.

Single-site laparoscopic appendectomy in children using conventional instruments: a prospective, randomized, control trial

PURPOSE

Single-site laparoscopic surgery (SSLS) is still only used in limited situations to treat children with appendicitis. Using conventional laparoscopic (CL) equipment to perform SSLS appendectomy is considered a valuable application in China. This prospective randomized trial aims to evaluate the surgical outcome of SSLS and CL appendectomy using CL equipment.

METHODS

Sixty patients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive SSLS or 3-port CL appendectomy between February 2011 and June 2013. Each case of SSLS appendectomy was performed using CL instruments. Surgery outcomes, including operative time, conversion rates, postoperative complications, hospital stays, and hospital costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The SSLS using CL instruments was successful in all the 30 patients and no conversions occurred. Mean operative time was longer in the SSLS group than the CL group (64.3 ± 3.1 vs 53.0 ± 2.9 min, respectively; p = 0.000). Complication rates, lengths of hospital stay, and hospital costs were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate that using conventional instruments to perform SSLS is technically feasible and safe in children. Although SSLS appendectomy does increase the operative time, it does not increase the complication rate and hospital cost.

Effectiveness and safety of single-incision vs conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA).

METHODS: We electronically searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2014), EMbase, PubMed, China Academic Journal, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP and Wanfang Data until June 1, 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) describing SILA and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTLA) were included. The quality of included studies was assessed and analyzed using RevMan 5 software (version 5.2).

RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs involving 1577 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated that compared with CTLA, there were significant differences in cosmetic result score (SMD = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.21-0.83, P = 0.001) and operative time (MD = 7.10, 95%CI: 4.31-9.89, P < 0.00001) in the SILA group. However, no differences were found in postoperative pain score (VAS), postoperative complications, postoperative abdominal abscess and hospital stay between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: SILA is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of uncomplicated benign appendix disease, and it has certain advantages over the CTLA.

Laparoscopic excision of Meckel's diverticulum in children: What is the current evidence?

Complications aroused from Meckel’s diverticulum tend to developed in children. Children presented with abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, intussusception or gastrointestinal bleeding may actually suffered from complicated Meckel’s diverticulum. With the advancement of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in children, the use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and subsequent laparoscopic excision of Meckel’s diverticulum has gained popularity. Recently, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as a new technique in minimally invasive surgery. This review offers the overview in the development of MIS in the management of children suffered from Meckel’s diverticulum. The current evidence in different laparoscopic techniques, including conventional laparoscopy, SILS, the use of special laparoscopic instruments, intracorporeal diverticulectomy and extracorporeal diverticulectomy in the management of Meckel’s diverticulum in children were revealed.

Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic appendectomy: a case-matched comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

The multiport technique is the gold standard for laparoscopic appendectomy, but the use of single-incision laparoscopy is on the increase. The aim of the present study was to compare case-matched cohorts of patients who had undergone single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) with those who had undergone conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy (MLA).

METHODS

In a case-matched analysis, all single-incision laparoscopic appendectomies performed between July 2009 and December 2013 at one institution were reviewed and compared to multiport laparoscopic appendectomies performed during the same period. Patients who had undergone SILA were matched in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores with the same number of patients who had undergone MLA. Statistical evaluation included the description and comparison of demographic factors, details of surgery, and histological data. A univariate analysis was performed to assess potential risk factors for morbidity after SILA.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-six patients who had undergone SILA were reviewed, matched, and compared to the same number of patients who had undergone MLA. No significant difference was noted in mean operating times (50.83 vs. 50.61 min for SILA and MLA, respectively; p = 0.924) and the length of hospital stay (3.60 vs. 3.66 days; p = 0.704). No patient in either group required conversion to the open procedure while 6 (3.8 %) SILA patients were converted to multiport laparoscopy. SILA was not associated with significantly higher postoperative morbidity compared to MLA (9.6 % vs. 5.8 %; p = 0.288). Postoperative wound infection rates were higher after SILA (3.2 % vs. 0.6 %), but did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.214). Statistical analysis revealed no risk factors for developing postoperative complications after the single-incision procedure.

CONCLUSION

SILA is a technically feasible and safe alternative to conventional MLA. The two procedures did not differ in terms of operating times, length of hospital stay, and postoperative outcomes.

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) developed rapidly in recent years. This report describes our initial experience on SILS combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy (SILSC&A) with a unique method of umbilical reconstruction. In addition, a retrospective comparison with conventional combined laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy (LC&A) was analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 2009 and December 2013, 62 patients with benign gallbladder and appendix disease underwent laparoscopic combined cholecystectomy and appendectomy at our institution. Of these, 34 (54.8%) underwent SILSC&A (Group 1), and 28 (45.2%) underwent LC&A (Group 2). Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed retrospectively and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were identified in the preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups. SILSC&A was associated with a shorter operative time (62.2 ± 19.7 versus 77.5 ± 21.4 minutes, respectively; P = .005) and better cosmetic results (4.6 ± 0.7 versus 4.1 ± 0.6, respectively; P = .004). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to other postoperative variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that SILSC&A is as safe and efficacious as conventional LC&A in experienced hands. A uniform method of umbilical reconstruction is helpful in improving cosmesis and decreasing hernia rate. Long-term follow-up and further prospective randomized trials are anticipated.

Single-incision laparoscopic ileocecectomy in children with Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

We previously reported our experience with standard laparoscopic ileocecectomy, but we have recently used a single-incision laparoscopic approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience from 2009 to 2013.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight children 11-18 years of age (mean, 15.5 years) with a mean body mass index of 18.9±3 kg/m(2) underwent single-incision laparoscopic ileocecectomy for Crohn's disease. Mean operative time was 86.5±25.9 minutes (range, 56-166 minutes). There were no extra ports placed or conversions to open surgery. Five children (18%) were on parenteral nutrition at time of surgery, 14 (50%) were on steroids, and 9 (32%) were on tumor necrotic factor inhibitors. A stapled extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in all children. Complications included abscess (n=4), small bowel obstruction (n=3), superficial wound infection (n=3), and small bowel perforation (n=1). Some patients had more than one complication. Of those with complications, 5 (56%) were on steroids, 5 (56%) were on tumor necrotic factor inhibitors, and 1 patient was on both. The perforation occurred at a point of adhesiolysis also involved with Crohn's disease. There were no anastomotic leaks. Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 1-47 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic ileocecectomy is safe and feasible in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease.

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) has gained enormous popularity worldwide. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess feasibility, safety, and benefits of SILA as compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA).

METHODS

A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Primary outcome measures were total postoperative complications, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, and ileus. Secondary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay, pain scores, conversion rate, reoperation rate, and time to return to normal activity.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs, totaling 1,211 patients (604 for SILA and 607 for CLA), met the inclusion criteria. The incidences of total postoperative complications, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, and ileus were statistically similar between the SILA and CLA groups. Compared with CLA, SILA was associated with a significantly longer operative time (weighted mean difference = 5.28 min; 95 % confidence interval = 3.61 to 6.94). Time to return to normal activity was shorter in the SILA group (by 0.69 days). Length of hospital stay, pain scores, conversion rate, and reoperation rate were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

SILA is feasible and safe with no obvious advantages over CLA. Therefore, it may be considered as an alternative to CLA.

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study

Background:

Three-port laparoscopic appendectomy is considered standard in many countries for the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. Single-incision laparoscopic technique has been recently introduced and is supposed to minimize the aggression induced by surgery. Regarding appendectomy, comparison with standard laparoscopy, benefits and drawbacks of this novel technique remain to be evaluated. The goal of this study was to assess single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and postoperative antibiotherapy rate.

Methods:

From February 2011 to December 2011, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy was proposed to patients admitted to the emergency room of the University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland), diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Preoperative patients’ information, technical difficulties during the operation, and postoperative follow-ups were recorded. Every patient who underwent single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 20) was matched 1:3 conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 60), controlling for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and histopathological findings.

Results:

No statistically significant differences for median operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rate, and need for postoperative antibiotherapy were found. In 5 out of 20 single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy patients the Endoloop^® Ligature was judged difficult to put in place.

Conclusion:

This study suggests that single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and effective operative technique for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

An update on common gastrointestinal emergencies

The evaluation of the child with acute abdominal pain often poses as a diagnostic challenge due to the wide range of diagnoses. Surgical emergencies need to be rapidly identified and managed appropriately to minimize morbidity and mortality. Presenting symptoms, clinical examination, and laboratory findings can guide selection of diagnostic imaging. This article reviews common surgical causes of abdominal pain in children.

The international experience of single-incision pediatric endosurgery: current state of the art

PURPOSE

As application and awareness of single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) are increasing, various techniques and indications have been independently described by select centers around the world. In order to facilitate a cooperative approach toward advancing and investigating the practice of SIPES, we conducted a survey among members of the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG), asking them about their experience and attitudes toward single-incision endosurgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After institutional review board approval, an invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all IPEG members. Questions focused on demographic information, practice patterns, indications, and equipment used regarding SIPES.

RESULTS

Of the 560 contacted active IPEG members, 115 completed the survey (recall 21%). The respondents represented pediatric surgeons from 32 countries on six continents. Of respondents, 97% had heard of, while 71% had performed, SIPES. Reasons for not having performed SIPES included disbelief in benefit (59%), lack of proficiency (34%), and inadequate resources (28%). The most commonly performed SIPES procedures were appendectomy (85%), cholecystectomy (66%), splenectomy (42%), pyloromyotomy (35%), and intestinal surgery (13%), as well as Nissen fundoplication and gynecologic adnexal pathology (7%). The equipment and techniques utilized showed large variation and included some self-devised, innovative, low-resource approaches. Complications with SIPES reported by the survey participants included technical difficulties, wound infection, and prolonged operating time.

CONCLUSIONS

SIPES is being performed worldwide for a large spectrum of common indications in pediatric surgery. The equipment and techniques used vary with geographic location and resources. Some encountered complications are common to those seen with conventional minimally invasive surgery, whereas others may be SIPES-specific. Different respondents reported diverging views on pain, operating time, and cost.

Patient scar assessment after single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The single-incision laparoscopic approach for cholecystectomy has been reported to be cosmetically superior in the traditional four-port technique in several case series; however, prospective comparative data are lacking. We conducted a 60-patient, prospective, randomized trial comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard four-port cholecystectomy, including validated scar assessment evaluation around 6 weeks and 18 months after the operation in an effort to determine if a cosmetic advantage existed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients over 12 years of age and parents of patients under 12 years of age enrolled in the trial were asked to complete the validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ). The PSAQ consists of four subscales: Appearance, Consciousness, Satisfaction with Appearance, and Satisfaction with Symptoms. The Symptoms subscale is omitted from analysis per PSAQ instructions because of insufficient reliability. Each subscale is a set of items with 4-point categorical responses (from 1=most favorable to 4=least favorable). The sum of the questions quantifies each subscale. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation values.

RESULTS

Eighteen single-site patients and 8 four-port patients completed early questionnaires, in which there was no difference in overall scar assessment (P=.17). Telephone follow-up was accomplished for 17 single-site patients and 24 four-port patients and revealed that the overall scar assessment significantly favored the single-site approach (P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients or parents of patients do not identify an overall superior scar assessment at early follow-up after single-site laparoscopic versus four-port cholecystectomy. However, they do perceive a superior scar assessment at long-term follow-up, suggesting that there is a cosmetic benefit favoring the single-site approach.

Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy (SILS-Sp).

METHODS

We conducted a systemic review of literature between 2009 and 2012 to retrieve all relevant articles.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with 105 patients undergoing SILS-Sp were reviewed. Fifteen studies used a commercially available single-port device. The range of body mass index was 14.7-41.4 kg/m(2). Six studies described combined operations including cholecystectomy (n = 8), mesh-pexy (n = 1), and pericardial devascularizaion (n = 1). The ranges of operative times and estimated blood losses were 28-420 min and 0-350 mL, respectively. Of 105 patients, three patients (2.9%) required additional ports, two patients (1.9%) were converted to open, and three patients (2.9%) to conventional multiport laparoscopic splenectomy (overall conversion rate, 4.8%). Postoperative bleeding occurred in two patients (1.9%) who both required reoperation. Overall mortality was 0% (0/105). The length of postoperative stay varied across reports (1-11 d). Among four comparative studies, one showed greater estimated blood loss and lower numeric pain rating scale score in the SILS-Sp group than in the multiport laparoscopic splenectomy group (206.25 ± 142.45 versus 111.11 ± 99.58 mL) and (3.81 ± 0.91 versus 4.56 ± 1.29), respectively. Another comparative study showed that SILS-Sp was associated with a shorter operative time (92.5 versus 172 min; P = 0.003), lower conversion rate, equivalent length of hospital stay, reduced mortality, similar morbidity, and comparable postoperative narcotic requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

In early series of highly selected patients, SILS-Sp appears to be feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. However, as an emerging operation, publication bias is a factor that should be considered before we can draw an objective conclusion.

First experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery in Slovakia: concomitant cholecystectomy and splenectomy in an 11-year-old girl with hereditary spherocytosis

AIMS

Hereditary spherocytosis is an autosomal dominant inheritance disorder of the red blood cell membrane characterized by the presence of spherical-shaped erythrocytes (spherocytes) in the peripheral blood. The main clinical features include haemolytic anemia, variable jaundice, splenomegaly and cholelithiasis caused by hyperbilirubinemia from erythrocyte hemolysis. Splenectomy does not solve the congenital genetic defect but it stops pathological hemolysis in the enlarged spleen. If gallstones are present, it is appropriate to perform cholecystectomy at the time of splenectomy, although the patient has symptoms of gall bladder disease. We present the case of single incision laparoscopic surgical (SILS) concomitant splenectomy and cholecystectomy performed with conventional laparoscopic instruments in an 11-year-old girl with the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis.

METHODS

A 2-3 cm umbilical incision was used for the placement of two 5 mm trocars and one 10 mm flexible videoscope. Conventional laparoscopic dissector, grasper, Ligasure, Harmonic Ace and hemoclips were the main tools during surgical procedure. We prefer Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Foam Port (Covidien) as the single umbilical device for introduction into the abdominal cavity. First, we performed cholecystectomy, then the gallbladder was put aside over the liver and after that we peformed splenectomy. To remove the detached spleen and gallbladder, a nylon extraction bag is introduced through one of the port sites. The spleen is than morcellated in the bag with forceps and removed in fragments. After that we removed them and the umbilical fascial incision was closed.

RESULT

Splenectomy is the only effective therapy for this disorder and often it is performed in combination with cholecystectomy. Conventional surgery requires a wide upper abdominal incision for correct exposure of the gallbladder and spleen. Our experience shows that SILS splenectomy and cholecystectomy is feasible even in young children and despite the small number of cases in the world, we consider the combined laparoscopic approach safe and effective for the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis.

CONCLUSION

According to actually published guidelines, the laparoscopic approach to concomitant splenectomy and cholecystectomy is recommended, but it depends on the availability of appropriately trained surgeons and suitable equipment.

Is single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery feasible in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis?

Purpose

Since laparoscopic appendectomy was first described, various modifications, such as single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery (SPICES), have been described for reducing pain and improving cosmetic results. In the retrocecal and retrocolic positions, attachments to the lateral peritoneum and cecum may lead to difficulties during SPICES, which is performed with only one port. Here, we present the effects of variations in the position of the vermiform appendix in treating acute appendicitis with SPICES.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 52 children who underwent SPICES for acute appendicitis between March 2010 and November 2011 in our institution. One group (group A) consisted of 30 patients (mean age, 10.5 ± 2.5 years) with retrocecal appendix, while the other group (group B) included 22 patients (mean age, 10.9 ± 2.3 years) with the appendix lying free in the peritoneal cavity.

Results

There were no significant differences between groups in terms of patient age, gender, success rate of SPICES, mean operating time, mean follow-up period, overall complication rates or mean postoperative hospitalization period.

Conclusion

These results suggest that SPICES is a safe and feasible approach even in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis.

Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy and heminephroureterectomy in children using standard laparoscopic setup versus conventional laparoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) using standard laparoscopic setup in pediatric nephrectomy/heminephroureterectomy (HN) by comparing with conventional laparoscopy (CL).

METHODS

Twelve consecutive children who underwent LESS (nephrectomy = 8, HN = 4) from 2009 to 2012 were compared with a matched cohort of 18 children who underwent CL (nephrectomy = 12, HN = 6) at the same institution. Data were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the 2 groups in the age of patients, body weight, gender distribution, laterality of pathology, postoperative analgesic requirement, and hospital stay. Eleven of the 12 children in the LESS group underwent the procedure successfully without additional trocar placement. The only open conversion happened in the case of LESS of the lower moiety HN. LESS nephrectomy took longer operative time than CL (mean 156 +/- 45 vs 99 +/- 35 minutes, median 155 vs 90 minutes, P <.01). Wound infection occurred in 1 patient after CL nephrectomy. No postoperative complication or access site hernia was noted in the children in the LESS group at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LESS nephrectomy and HN in the pediatric population is safe and effective with a minimally invasive nature comparable to CL. Learning curve factors may contribute to the reported longer operative time in LESS. Further studies are required to investigate the implication of patient selection and the cosmetic benefits of LESS, which may potentially require longer operative time.

Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy (SILA) and three-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy (TILA) in the treatment of appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies published since 1992 that compared SILA versus TILA in laparoscopic appendicectomy were collected. Data on operative parameters, postoperative recovery, postoperative pain and complications, and hospitalization costs for SILA and TILA were meta-analyzed using fixed-effect and random-effect models.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 16 retrospective studies) that included 1809 patients were studied. Of these patients, 793 and 1016 had undergone SILA and TILA, respectively. There was significantly shorter length of hospital stay; however, there were evidently higher conversion rate, and perhaps higher surgical difficulty and hospitalization costs for SILA compared with TILA. Other outcome variables such as operative time, blood loss, time to first oral intake, postoperative pain and complications were not found to be statistically significant for either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TILA, SILA has the advantage of shorter hospital stay, and it can achieve comparable operative time, blood loss, postoperative recovery, postoperative pain and complications with TILA. The drawback is that SILA is associated with higher conversion rate, and perhaps higher surgical difficulty and hospitalization costs. Whether it can achieve improvement in cosmesis remains to be confirmed.

Single-incision pediatric endosurgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) is defined as minimally invasive surgery performed through a unique incision in the abdomen, chest, or retroperitoneum. Several publications exist, but no previous systematic review has been made to evaluate the real benefits of this approach in terms of feasibility and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an electronic search in PubMed up to March 2012 with the terms "single AND incision OR site OR port OR trocar AND children" including related articles and obtained 197 articles. After applying our inclusion criteria, 78 articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

We identified prospective controlled trials (n=1), case-control studies (n=12), case series (n=49), and case reports (n=16). In total, 4212 patients had been operated on by SIPES and were separated by systems: gastrointestinal (n=2888), urologic (n=390), gynecologic (n=27), other abdominal (n=874), and thoracic (n=33) procedures. The most common procedure was SIPES appendectomy, and a unique prospective controlled trial supports its safety and effectiveness. Technically demanding surgeries such as hepatojejunostomy and colonic surgeries were described. Multichannel ports and multiple ports, standard and articulated instruments, transparietal instruments, retraction sutures, and magnets were used. Operative times, length of stay, and complications similar to standard laparoscopic surgery were described. A low conversion rate (to a reduced port, standard laparoscopy and open procedures) was also mentioned. No comparable measure for pain and cosmesis assessment was used.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide experience in SIPES and feasibility has already been described with good clinical outcomes and low rate of conversion. Appendectomy is the unique procedure in which SIPES has been demonstrated to be safe and effective. It is pending the execution of prospective controlled trials for other operations to demonstrate, with objective evidence, the real benefits of this less invasive approach.

Comparative study between single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is a new procedure used to treat a variety of diseases requiring surgical intervention. The aim of this prospective comparative study is to compare the technical feasibility and safety of single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Between February 2009 and April 2010, 102 patients with appendicitis were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: single-incision or three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with perforated appendicitis were not excluded. We analyzed the patients' clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative patient demographics between the two groups with respect to body mass index (22.03±4.07 kg/m(2) in the single-incision group versus 21.97±3.49 kg/m(2) in the three-port group, P=.930). The pain score on the visual analog scale on postoperative Day 1 was significantly lower in the single-incision group than in the three-port group (3.22±1.22 versus 3.90±1.46, P=.012). Additionally, recovery time to daily life was significantly shorter in the single-incision group than in the three-port group (3.22±1.04 versus 3.94±1.43 days, P=.005). In patients with perforated appendicitis, the single-incision procedure took approximately 10 minutes less than the three-port procedure (44.11±7.75 versus 54.14±32.21 minutes, P=.449), and the postoperative hospital stay (P=.033) and recovery time to daily life (P=.001) were significantly shorter in the single-incision group.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, even in patients with perforated appendicitis, and this procedure is even less invasive than three-port laparoscopic surgical techniques.

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical outcomes and quality of life between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in patients with acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND

A prospective randomized single center study was performed to compare the outcome of SPLA and CLA in patients with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A total of 248 patients were randomized, but because of 18 withdrawals, the outcome of 224 is analyzed, 116 in CLA and 114 in SPLA.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate (P = 0.470). There were no significant differences in infectious complications between the SPLA group and the CLA group (10.2% and 12.4%, respectively). The wound complication rate between the 2 groups was not significant (5.1% and 10.6%, respectively; P = 0.207). Cosmetic satisfaction score, 36-item short-form health survey, and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different between 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SPLA failed to show any advantages over CLA relative to pain and cosmesis. However, SPLA is as safe as CLA (RCT number 01348464).

Single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) splenectomy: a case-control series

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) is gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with SIPES splenectomy and compare it with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

After institutional review board approval, data on SIPES splenectomy in children were collected prospectively. The study group was compared with a control group of patients who were retrospectively identified as having undergone conventional laparoscopic splenectomy during the same time period.

RESULTS

Sixteen children underwent SIPES splenectomy. Ages ranged from 1 to 15 years, with a median of 7 years, and weights were between 10 and 70 kg, with a median of 24 kg. The control group was similar in age and weight characteristics. The most common diagnoses were hereditary spherocytosis, sickle cell disease, and immune thrombocytopenic purpura. There were two conversions to open splenectomy in the SIPES group and one in the laparoscopic group. Operative times were 40-190 minutes (median, 84 minutes) in the SIPES group and 51-154 minutes (median, 99 minutes) in the conventional laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The SIPES technique is well suited for splenectomy. Despite instruments and camera being in-line, working angles are not compromised, and visualization is adequate. Operating time and hospital stay are comparable to those with standard laparoscopic splenectomy, but the cosmetic result may be superior.

Hybrid single-port cholecystectomy in children

Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a 10-mm telescope and inbuilt working channel has been found to be safe, effective, economical, and capable of producing virtually scarless results.

Background and Objectives:

Multiple single-port or single-incision techniques have been successfully implemented for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children. These techniques require either a large multichannel port or a larger skin incision to accommodate multiple ports or instruments. Inspired by a first generation single-port instrument, we developed a safe and effective technique for a single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with virtually scarless results.

Methods:

Over a 14-mo period, 20 patients (19 females, 1 male) underwent the hybrid single-port cholecystectomy. A straight 10-mm Storz telescope with inbuilt 6-mm working channel in combination with 2 portless 2.3-mm percutaneous graspers was used. The dissection is carried out with 43-cm bariatric length instruments. The cystic artery and duct are sealed with WECK Hem-o-lok clips or the Harmonic scalpel.

Results:

Range (mean) age: 7.7 y to 19.5 y (15.5), BMI: 11.6kg/m² to 42.3kg/m² (27), operative duration 48 min to 120 min (79), postoperative length of stay: 5 h to 78 h (24). Diagnosis: 13 patients cholecystolithiasis, 7 patients biliary dyskinesia. Conversion to conventional 4-port cholecystectomy was required in 2 patients. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred.

Conclusion:

The hybrid single-port technique is easy to master. It provides traditional anatomical exposure and allows application of conventional laparoscopic principles.

Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy through a single umbilical incision is an emerging technique supported by case series, but prospective comparative data are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing single site umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy to 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

After IRB approval, patients were randomized to laparoscopic cholecystectomy via a single umbilical incision or standard 4-port access. The primary outcome variable was operative time. Utilizing a power of 0.8 and an alpha of 0.05, 30 patients were calculated for each arm. Patients with complicated disease or weight over 100 kg were excluded. Post-operative management was controlled. Surgeons subjectively scored degree of technical difficulty from 1=easy to 5=difficult.

RESULTS

From 8/2009 through 7/2011, 60 patients were enrolled. There were no differences in patient characteristics. Operative time and degree of difficulty were greater with the single site approach. There were more doses of analgesics used and greater hospital charges in the single site group that trended toward significance.

CONCLUSION

Single site laparoscopic cholecystectomy produces longer operative times with a greater degree of difficulty as assessed by the surgeon. There was a trend toward more doses of post-operative analgesics and greater hospital charges with the single site approach.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for small bowel resection with an intraumbilical arcuate incision in children

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been performed on children for various procedures. However, few reports are available about SILS for small bowel resection, particularly involving conventional instruments in the pediatric population. Herein, we report four cases of small bowel resection with single umbilical incision and a three-trocar approach. From October 2010 to September 2011, we performed small bowel resection with SILS on four cases, including a boy with an intestinal duplication cyst and three children with Meckel's diverticulum. An intraumbilical arcuate incision was made to expose the abdominal wall fascia, and one 5-mm and two 3.5-mm trocars were inserted. It was not necessary to extend the initial incision to exteriorize the lesion except in one case in which we applied the so-called Y-V closure plasty. All procedures were successful and did not require conversion, and all patients recovered smoothly without any complications. Small bowel resection using the SILS approach is suitable for these diseases.

Gallstone disease in children

Gallstone disease in children is evolving, and for the previous 3 decades, the frequency for surgery has increased greatly. This is in part because of improved diagnostic modalities, but also changing pathology, an increased awareness of emerging comorbidities, such as childhood obesity, and other associated risk factors. This article outlines the pathophysiology, genetics, and predisposing factors for developing gallstones and includes a review of the literature on the current and more novel medical and surgical techniques to treat this interesting disease.

Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy in children

PURPOSE

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is being incorporated into the practices of many pediatric surgeons. Its superior cosmetic outcomes have resulted in increased patient- and parent-driven demand for the approach. This article describes a series of single-incision laparoscopic splenectomies (SSs) in children and compares outcomes with a historical series of standard laparoscopic splenectomies (LS).

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent standard splenectomy and SS at our institution between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. Perioperative data were recorded. Descriptive comparisons were made between the SS and LS groups.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent SS, and 4 underwent LS during the study period. Operative times for the SS group decreased as experience with the procedure accumulated and ultimately approached LS operative times. No conversions to a standard laparoscopic or open approach were required. No complications occurred. Length of stay and postoperative pain were similar in both groups. single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy provided excellent cosmetic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy is feasible in children. Its main benefit is improved cosmesis. It can be performed without detrimental increases in operative times or patient discomfort. Given an increased demand for the approach, it remains a viable option in children.

Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy through a single umbilical incision is an emerging approach supported by several case series. However, to date, prospective comparative data are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing single site umbilical laparoscopic appendectomy to 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

METHODS

After Internal Review Board approval, patients were randomized to laparoscopic appendectomy via a single umbilical incision or standard 3-port access. The primary outcome variable was postoperative wound infection. Using a power of 0.9 and an alpha of 0.05, 180 patients were calculated for each arm. Patients with perforated appendicitis were excluded. The technique of ligation/division of the appendix and mesoappendix was left to the surgeon's discretion. There were 7 participating surgeons dictated by the call schedule. All patients received the same preoperative antibiotics and postoperative management was controlled.

RESULTS

There were 360 patients were enrolled between August 2009 and November 2010. There were no differences in patient characteristics at presentation. There was no difference in wound infection rate, time to regular diet, length of hospitalization, or time to return to full activity. Operative time, doses of narcotics, surgical difficultly and hospital charges were greater with the single site approach. Also, the mean operative time was 5 minutes longer for the single site group.

CONCLUSION

The single site umbilical laparoscopic approach to appendectomy produces longer operative times resulting in greater charges. However, these small differences are likely of marginal clinical relevance. The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov at the inception of enrollment (NCT00981136).

Single-site umbilical laparoscopic segmental small bowel resection

The single-site umbilical laparoscopic approach to abdominal surgery has become an evolving trend over the past few years. These operations have some technical limitations attributable to the loss of instrument triangulation, crowding of instruments, loss of ergonomic movements, and the fact that the view of the telescope/camera is in-line with the working instruments. However, because the size of the umbilical incision is determined by the size of the lesion or segment of bowel being resected during a traditional laparoscopic bowel resection, these operations are perhaps the most suited procedures for this approach. In this review, the techniques and applications for single-site umbilical laparoscopic bowel resection in children will be discussed.

Single-site umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Until the mid-1980s, cholecystectomy was performed through a generous right upper abdominal incision. After the early reports from Europe and the United States on the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the minimally invasive revolution began. This revolution has continued to the current time, where surgeons are attempting to perform minimally invasive procedures with less or no visible scarring. Cholecystectomy is ideally suited for the single-site umbilical laparoscopic approach to obviate the need for epigastric and supraumbilical incisions. This article will describe the single-site umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which has been performed at Children's Mercy Hospital since 2009. Also, the literature concerning this approach in adults and in children will be discussed. Finally, a prospective randomized trial comparing the single-site cholecystectomy with the traditional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy will also be described.

Laparoscopic splenectomy: comparison between anterior and lateral approaches

AIM

Splenectomy, except for a traumatic purpose, is now performed through a laparoscopic approach. There are mainly two ways for laparoscopic total or partial splenectomies. For the classic anterior dissection of the splenic vessels, patient is placed in supine position and five ports are required to elevate the spleen and proceed to vessel divisions. With a lateral approach of the pedicle, patient is placed in lateral decubitus position and three ports are sufficient, because gravity help to provide traction on the splenic ligaments and to present hilar vessels and pancreas tail. The aim of our study was to compare surgical complications of those two approaches of laparoscopic splenectomy in children.

METHODS

We reviewed 84 medical records of patient operated on for hematological disease between January 1993 and December 2009.

RESULTS

There were 47 anterior and 37 lateral approaches. Sex, disease, median age, operative time, blood lost or hospital stay, and associated laparotomy were not different between the two groups. Operative complications included hemorrhage (5), bowel injury (1), diaphragmatic wound (1), pancreas tail section (1), and parietal hematoma (1) in the anterior group (9 cases) versus 1 hemorrhage in the lateral group (P<.02). There were five laparotomies owing to surgical complications in the anterior group, and none in the lateral group.

CONCLUSION

Splenectomy through laparoscopic approach is an effective technique. Lateral dissection of the vessels provides less operative complications in children.