Thoracoscopic repair of oesophageal atresia: experience of 33 patients from two tertiary referral centres

Thoracoscopic repair for esophageal pulmonary fistula after esophageal atresia repair

BACKGROUND

Esophageal pulmonary fistula is a special type of acquired tracheoesophageal fistula that occurs after esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair. Thoracotomy is the surgical repair method currently in use, but postoperative outcomes are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore the preliminary safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of thoracoscopic surgical repair of esophageal pulmonary fistula.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from all patients with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula at Beijing Children's Hospital from January 2017 to October 2021, and the clinical characteristics of patients with esophageal pulmonary fistula were analyzed. Clinical information was recorded, and follow-up was performed.

RESULTS

Seven patients (five boys and two girls) were diagnosed as esophageal pulmonary fistula. All patients underwent multiple esophageal surgeries and had esophageal strictures before surgical repair. Clinical manifestations included cough, expectoration, and recurrent pneumonia. Esophagography indicated the location of the fistula with a 100% positive rate, while the positive rate of flexible bronchoscopy and chest computed tomography was 57% (4/7) and 43% (3/7), respectively. Surgical repair was achieved using thoracoscopy with an average operation time of 172 min. All patients developed esophageal strictures, four of which had refractory esophageal strictures and underwent esophageal dilations ranged from 5 to 56 times before this surgery, but anastomotic leakage or acquired esophageal pulmonary fistulas were absent post-surgery. After a median follow-up of 22 months, all patients survived, and the symptoms were well controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal pulmonary fistula is a rare complication of atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair. Thoracoscopic surgery is still possible even after previous multiple surgeries in the chest with significant complications and satisfactory results can be achieved in the short term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

BCAR1 plays critical roles in the formation and immunoevasion of invasive circulating tumor cells in lung adenocarcinoma

Background: We investigated the roles of breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 1 (BCAR1/p130Cas) in the formation and immunoevasion of invasive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods: Biomarkers of CTCs including BCAR1 and CD274, were evaluated by the CanPatrol method. Proteomics analysis of LUAD cells and exosomes after BCAR1 overexpression (BCAR1-OE) was performed by mass spectrometry. Cell functions and relevant signaling pathways were investigated after BCAR1 knockdown (BCAR1-KO) or BCAR1-OE in LUAD cells. Lastly, in vitro and in vivo experiments were performed to confirm the roles of BCAR1 in the formation and immunoevasion of CTCs. Results: High expression of BCAR1 by CTCs correlated with CD274 expression and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). RAC1, together with BCAR1, was found to play an important role in the carcinogenesis of LUAD. RAC1 functioned with BCAR1 to induce EMT and to enhance cell proliferation, colony formation, cell invasion and migration, and anoikis resistance in LUAD cells. BCAR1 up-regulated CD274 expression probably by shuttling the short isoform of BRD4 (BRD4-S) into the nucleus. CTCs, as well as tumor formation, were prohibited in nude mice xenografted with BCAR1-KO cells. The co-expression of BCAR1/RAC1 and BCAR1/CD274 was confirmed in LUAD. BCAR1 expression in LUAD is an indicator of poor prognosis, and it associates with immunoevasion. Conclusion: BCAR1, as a new target for the treatment of LUAD, plays roles in the formation and immunoevasion of invasive CTCs. The mechanism includes triggering EMT via RAC1 signaling and up-regulating CD274 expression by shuttling BRD4-S into the nucleus.

Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia Repair: Outcomes Analysis Between Primary and Staged Procedures

PURPOSE

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA) is analyzed in this systematic review that compares outcomes between primary and staged repairs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed/Embase databases were reviewed for articles on thoracoscopic repair of EA, and articles were selected for primary and staged repairs. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative parts of the study.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles identified between 1999 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria and offered 776 patients for this analysis. Primary repairs were performed in n=703 and staged repairs in n=73. Comparative analysis showed that esophageal anastomosis was performed using absorbable suture in 88% primary and 78% staged repairs. Anastomotic leak rates were comparable between primary n=65/696 (9%) and staged repairs n=8/73 (11%). The re-fistulation rate was 2% in primary and 1% in staged repairs. There was no difference between suture material and re-fistulation (P>0.05; NS). In primary repairs, nonabsorbable sutures were found to be associated with more leaks than absorbable sutures (P<0.05*). The conversion rate was similar between 2 approaches; primary n=49/680 (7%) and staged n=6/73 (8%); P>0.05. No significant differences were found in the rate of anastomosis strictures between primary n=135/703 (19%) and staged repair n=21/73 (29%); P>0.05. The overall mortality was n=20/703 (3%) in primary and n=1/73 (1%) in staged repairs; P>0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful thoracoscopic primary- and staged-EA repairs have been reported with low rate of complications. Outcomes between primary and staged repairs do not show significant differences with regards to re-fistulation, anastomotic leaks, conversion rates, and mortality.

Is thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair safe in the presence of cardiac anomalies?

BACKGROUND

Esophageal atresia (EA) is often associated with congenital heart disease (CHD). Repair of EA by the thoracoscopic approach places physiological stress on a newborn with CHD. This paper reviews the outcomes of infants with CHD who had undergone thoracoscopic EA repair, comparing their outcomes to those without CHD.

METHODS

This was a review of infants who underwent thoracoscopic EA repair from 2009 to 2017 at one institution. Operative time and outcomes were analyzed in relation to CHD status.

RESULTS

Twenty five infants underwent thoracoscopic EA repair during the study period. Seventeen (68%) had associated anomalies of whom 9 (36%) had cardiac anomalies. The mean operative time was 217 min. There was no difference in operative time between CHD and non-CHD cases (estimate 20 min longer operative time in the presence of a cardiac anomaly [95% CI -20 to 57]). Two cases were converted to open thoracotomy; both were non-CHD. There was no difference in the time to feeding, time in intensive care unit or time in hospital between CHD and non-CHD cases. Five patients developed an anastomotic leak (two CHD and three non-CHD) of which two were clinical; all were managed conservatively. There was no case of recurrent fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study did not find evidence that thoracoscopic EA repair compromised outcomes in children with congenital heart disease. A prospective multicenter study with long-term follow-up is recommended to confirm whether thoracoscopic repair in CHD is truly equivalent to the open operation.

TYPE OF STUDY

Therapeutic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy for the repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) require emergency surgery in the neonatal period to prevent aspiration and respiratory compromise. Surgery was once exclusively performed via thoracotomy; however, there has been a push to correct this anomaly thoracoscopically. In this study, we compare intra- and post-operative outcomes of both techniques. A systematic review and meta-analyses was performed. A search strategy was developed in consultation with a librarian which was executed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception until January 2017. Two independent researchers screened eligible articles at title and abstract level. Full texts of potentially relevant articles were then screened again. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. 48 articles were included. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in our primary outcome of total complication rate (OR 0.98, [0.29, 3.24], p = 0.97). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.55, [0.72, 3.34], p = 0.26), formation of esophageal strictures following anastomoses that required one or more dilations (OR 1.92, [0.93, 3.98], p = 0.08), need for fundoplication following EA repair (OR 1.22, [0.39, 3.75], p = 0.73)-with the exception of operative time (MD 30.68, [4.35, 57.01], p = 0.02). Considering results from thoracoscopy alone, overall mortality in patients was low at 3.2% and in most cases was due to an associated anomaly rather than EA repair. Repair of EA/TEF is safe, with no statistically significant differences in morbidity when compared with an open approach.Level of evidence 3a systematic review of case-control studies.

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia

Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10-20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between open and thoracoscopic repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was performed for a comparison of outcomes between open repair (OR) and thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA with TEF).

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Medline, were searched systematically for the literatures aimed mainly at comparing the therapeutic effects for EA with TEF administrated by OR and TR. Corresponding data sets were extracted and two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

Ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included, involving 447 subjects in total. It was observed that OR entailed a shorter operative time with significant statistical differences (SMD 0.604; 95% CI 0.344-0.864, P = 0). While TR was superior in two aspects: shorter length of hospital stay (SMD 0.584; 95% CI 0.214-0.953; P = 0.002) and shorter first oral feeding time (SMD 0.652; 95% CI 0.27-1.035; P = 0.001). However, meta-analyses of occurrence rate of leaks (OR, 1.747; 95% CI 0.817-3.737; P = 0.15), strictures (OR, 0.937; 95% CI 0.5-1.757; P = 0.839), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.08; 95% CI 0.21-5.44; P = 0.897), fundoplication rate of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (OR, 1.642; 95% CI 0.855-3.153; P = 0.601), and blood loss (SMD 0.048; 95% CI -1.292 to 1.388; P = 0.944) showed no significant differences between OR and TR. Meta-analysis of ventilation time showed similar outcome between OR and TR (SMD 0.474; 95% CI 0.02-0.968; P = 0.06), but the result remained controversial due to estimated result changing after sensitivity analysis (SMD 0.61; 95% CI 0.16-1.07; P = 0).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with OR, a longer operative time was associated within TR group, although the TR procedure could possibly reduce the length of hospital stay and first oral feeding time. Meanwhile, the occurrence rate for leaks, strictures, pulmonary complications, and the fundoplication rate of GERD, and blood loss were similar between the OR and TR groups. Estimated result of ventilation time between the two groups remained ambiguous.

Comparison of outcomes of thoracoscopic primary repair of gross type C esophageal atresia performed by qualified and non-qualified surgeons

PURPOSE

Although thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia has become widespread, most studies are based on operations performed by expert surgeons. Therefore, the outcomes of operations performed by non-expert surgeons are not well known. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes based on operator skill level.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the demographics and outcomes of patients with Gross type C esophageal atresia, who underwent primary thoracoscopic repair at our hospital between January 2014 and August 2016. Outcomes of surgeries performed by qualified surgeons, as determined by the Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery were compared with those of non-qualified surgeons. All operations were performed by or under the supervision of one qualified surgeon.

RESULTS

Nine operations were performed by qualified surgeons and six operations by non-qualified surgeons with >10 years of experience in surgery. None of the patients developed anastomotic leakage or recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula. However, the operative time and rate of stricture formation at the beginning of the weaning period were significantly higher in the latter group (P = 0.008 and 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Although supervision of experts would improve results in thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia, the results indicate that good skill is necessary to avoid anastomotic stricture.

The Surgical Correction of Congenital Deformities: The Treatment of Diaphragmatic Hernia, Esophageal Atresia and Small Bowel Atresia

BACKGROUND

More than half of all congenital deformities can be detected in utero. The initial surgical correction is of paramount importance for the achievement of good long-term results with low surgical morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Selective literature review and expert opinion.

RESULTS

Congenital deformities are rare, and no controlled trials have been performed to determine their optimal treatment. In this article, we present the prenatal assessment, treatment, and long-term results of selected types of congenital deformity. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) affects one in 3500 live-born infants, while esophageal atresia affects one in 3000 and small-bowel atresia one in 5000 to 10,000. If a congenital deformity is detected and its prognosis can be reliably inferred from a prenatal assessment, the child should be delivered at a specialized center (level 1 perinatal center). The associated survival rates are 60-80% after treatment for CDH and well over 90% after treatment for esophageal or small-bowel atresia. Despite improvements in surgical correction over the years, complications and comorbidities still affect 20-40% of the treated children. These are not limited to surgical complications in the narrow sense, such as recurrence, postoperative adhesions and obstruction, stenoses, strictures, and recurrent fistulae, but also include pulmonary problems (chronic lung disease, obstructive and restrictive pulmonary dysfunction), gastrointestinal problems (dysphagia, gastro-esophageal reflux, impaired intestinal motility), and failure to thrive. Moreover, the affected children can develop emotional and behavioral disturbances. Minimally invasive surgery in experienced hands yields results as good as those of conventional surgery, as long as proper selection criteria are observed.

CONCLUSION

Congenital deformities should be treated in recognized centers with highly experienced interdisciplinary teams. As no randomized trials of surgery for congenital deformities are available, longitudinal studies and registries will be very important in the future.

Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair: The First Iranian Group Report, Passing the Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic treatment of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA+TEF) is accepted as a superior technique at least in cosmetic point of view but it is considered as an advance endoscopic procedure that needs a learning curve to be performed perfectly. This is the first report of Iranian group pediatric surgeons in thoracoscopic approach to EA.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Since 2010, twenty four cases with EA+TEF underwent thoracoscopic approach in Sarvar Children Hospital (Mashhad -Iran). During the first 6 months, thoracoscopic approach to 6 cases of EA+TEF was converted to open procedure because of technical and instrumental problems. The first case of successful thoracoscopic EA repair was accomplished in 2010 and since then, 10 cases of EA+ TEF among 18 patients were treated successfully with thoracoscopic approach

RESULTS

Overall conversion rate was 58.3% but conversion rate after the primary learning curve period, was 35.7%. The main conversion causes include difficulties in esophageal anastomosis, limited exposure and deteriorating the patient's condition. Anastomotic leak and stenosis were observed in 20% and 40% respectively. Overall mortality rate was 4.2%.

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia seems feasible and safe with considerable superiorities to the conventional method although acceptable results needs a prolonged learning curve and advanced endoscopic surgical skill. Clear judgment about the best surgical intervention for EA according to all cosmetic and functional outcomes needs further studies.

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: Basics of technique and its nuances

Aim:

To review the technique of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (TREAT) and results reported in literature and with authors’ experience.

Patients and Methods:

The technique of TREAT was reviewed in detail with evaluation in patients treated at authors’ institution. The patients were selected based on selection criteria and were followed postoperatively. The results available in literature were also reviewed.

Results:

A total of 29 patients (8 females) were operated by TREAT. Mean age was 2.8 days (range 2-6 days). Mean weight was 2.6 kg (range 1.8-3.2 kg). There was a leak in four patients, and two patients had to be diverted. They are now awaiting definitive repair. Twenty-one patients have completed a mean follow-up of 1.5 years and are doing well except for two patients who had a stricture and underwent serial esophageal dilatations. The results from current literature are provided in tabulated form.

Conclusions:

TREAT is now a well-established procedure and currently is the preferred approach wherever feasible. The avoidance of thoracotomy is a major advantage to the newborn and is proven to benefit the recovery in the postoperative patient. The technique demonstrated, and the tweaks reported make the procedure easy and is helpful to beginners. The outcome is very much comparable to the open repair as proven by various series. Various parameters like leak rate, anastomotic stricture are the same. The outcome is comparable if you TREAT these babies well.

Thoracoscopic versus open repair of tracheoesophageal fistulas and rates of vocal cord paresis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the rates of vocal cord paresis/paralysis (VCP) in patients treated for esophageal atresia (EA) with and without fistula performed thoracoscopically versus open.

METHODS

A retrospective review of EA cases performed from 2008 to 2014 in an integrated health care system was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 cases of EA were performed by 6 surgeons at 4 different institutions. Seventeen cases were performed thoracoscopically, whereas 14 cases were performed open. In the thoracoscopic group, the average gestational age (weeks) of the patient was significantly higher 38.3 vs. 35.2 (p=0.016) as well as the average birth weight (grams) 2843 vs. 2079 (p=0.005). There was no difference in the postoperative length of stay, rates of anastomotic stricture, leak, or tracheomalacia. There were 10 cases of vocal cord paresis, 9 from the thoracoscopic group and one from the open group (p=0.007). Of the 10 cases of VCP, 6 were unilateral (left sided) and 4 were bilateral. Of the 10 cases, 6 resolved, 2 resulted in permanent paralysis, and 2 are currently still being evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic repair of EA appears to have higher rates of VCP. The results are thought to be from thoracoscopic dissection of the esophagus high into the thoracic inlet.

Initial Experience with Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair: Lessons Learned and Technical Considerations to Achieve Success

The minimally invasive surgical (MIS) repair of esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/ TEF) is challenging and requires advanced endoscopic skills. The purpose of this study was to provide insight in successfully introducing the MIS repair based on the initial cases performed by a single pediatric surgeon and review of the experience of others. A retrospective review of all MIS TEF repairs performed by a single surgeon was conducted. Data gathered included patient demographics, technical details of repair including operative time, short- and long-term postoperative morbidity, length of stay, and follow-up. Eight cases (seven Type C, one Type D) were selected for MIS repair based on the judgment of the surgeon with consideration of adequate patient size, stability, type of associated anomalies, and expected length of esophageal gap. Operative time was an average of 207 minutes and there was one conversion to open for successful repair. There were no leaks and only one patient required a single anastomotic dilation at 19 months of age. There were two postoperative pneumothoraces of which one required bronchoscopic laser fistula ablation. Length of stay was an average of 16 days and length of follow-up is a median of 219 days. MIS repair of EA/TEF can be done successfully but requires careful patient selection, advanced MIS skills and meticulous attention to operative technique.

The great debate: open or thoracoscopic repair for oesophageal atresia or diaphragmatic hernia

Controversy exists over the best method and technique of repair of oesophageal atresia and diaphragmatic hernia. Open surgical repairs have a long established history of over 60 years of experience. Set against this has been a series of successful thoracoscopic repairs of both congenital anomalies reported over the past decade. This review was based upon a four-handed debate on the merits and weaknesses of the two contrasting surgical philosophies and reviews existing literature, techniques, complications, and importantly outcome and results.

Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: two centres' experience with 60 patients

INTRODUCTION

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is a potentially life-threatening neonatal condition which required surgical intervention. With the advances in endosurgical instruments and techniques, thoracoscopic approach is gaining popularity as a standard procedure in the treatment of this condition. In this study, we reviewed our two centres' experience with thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in recent years.

METHODS

All patients who underwent thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia between 2010 and 2013 at the two tertiary referral centres were identified. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Data including patients' demographics, peri-operative outcomes, length of hospitalisation and post-operative complications were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

60 patients were identified over the study period, with 46 males and 14 females. 48 patients received operation within the first 7 days of life. There were seven patients with delayed presentation and were operated after 1 month old. The average body weight was 3.03 kg. Left-sided hernia was more prevalent (n = 50). The mean operative time was 88.5 min (range 31-194 min). No conversion to open thoracotomy or laparotomy was required in any of the patients. All patients except one were intubated and paralysed in neonatal intensive care units for at least 3 days after operation. Average hospital stay was 14.6 days. There was no mortality in this series. There were five recurrences, one being the patient without post-operative paralysis, and the others with deficient posterior muscle rim. No musculoskeletal deformity was noted on follow-up examination.

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia can be performed safely in specialised centres. The post-operative recovery and cosmesis are excellent. Diaphragmatic hernia with large defect remains a challenge for surgeons.

Current Practice and Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair: A Multi-institutional Analysis in Japan

BACKGROUND

In order to better understand the current practice and outcomes of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA)/tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), a multi-institutional analysis was conducted among seven Japanese institutes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was sent to the seven institutes regarding the surgical technique, postoperative management, and outcomes of thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF.

RESULTS

The operation was uniformly performed via an intrapleural approach in the 0-45° prone position. The TEF was occluded with suture ligature in four (57.1%) institutes and clips in the remaining three (42.9%) institutes. Anastomosis was performed using the extracorporeal knot-tying technique in four institutes and the intracorporeal technique in three institutes. Patients were routinely left intubated and paralyzed for 3-7 days postoperatively in four institutes. In total, 58 patients underwent thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF. Fifty-two (89.7%) of the patients underwent successful thoracoscopic repair. Six (10.3%) operations were converted to open thoracotomy because of a long gap (n=4), right aortic arch (n=1), and intraoperative instability (n=1). The body weight at operation ranged from 1.2 to 4.6 kg, and the operative time ranged from 115 to 428 minutes. There were no major intraoperative complications. Eleven patients (19.0%) suffered from anastomotic leakage. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) developed anastomotic stricture. One patient died during the postoperative period because of an unrelated disease. Recurrent TEF developed in three patients (5.2%). Thirteen patients (22.4%) later required fundoplication.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF was comparable to that of the open procedure. As considerable variability was observed among the seven institutes with respect to the surgical technique and management, standardizing the surgical management may improve the outcome.

Oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula

Oesophageal atresia with tracheo-oesophageal fistula is a relatively common congenital anomaly occurring in around 1:2500 births. The aetiology and embryology of the condition remain unclear, whilst associations with other significant anomalies are common. Studies in rodent models are contributing to our understanding of the condition. Advances in surgical care and neonatal management have improved survival considerably to around 90%. Long-gap and isolated oesophageal atresia present significant management challenges. Post-operative and long-term complications including oesophageal stricture, gastro-oesophageal reflux and respiratory compromise however remain relatively common and continue to pose a challenge for the ongoing management of patients.