Morbidity and mortality in total esophagogastric dissociation: a systematic review

Pediatric nutritional surgery and its implications: results from a unicentric retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Existing guidelines provide weak recommendations on the surgical management of nutritional problems in children. The objective was to design a management pathway to address the best nutritional surgery (NS) procedure in a given patient.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of children treated at our department from January 2015 to December 2019. The sample was divided into two groups according to presence or absence of neurological impairment (NI). Patients with NI (Group 1) were classified in three subgroups based on presenting symptoms: A-Dysphagia without gastroesophageal reflux (GER); B-GER with or without dysphagia; C-Symptoms associated with a delayed gastric emptying.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were included, 111 with NI. One-hundred-twenty-eight patients underwent only one procedure. Complications and mortality were superior in Group 1. In subgroup A, isolated gastrostomy was the first NS in all patients. In subgroup B most of patients were subjected to a Nissen fundoplication, while in 5 cases total esophagogastric dissociation (TEGD) was the first intervention. Considering the entire sample, 92.3% patients who underwent a TEGD did not require further procedures.

CONCLUSION

NS encompasses various procedures depending on presenting symptoms and neurological status. A management flowchart for these patients is proposed.

Robotically Assisted Surgery in Children—A Perspective

The introduction of robotically assisted surgery was a milestone for minimally invasive surgery in the 21st century. Currently, there are two CE-approved robotically assisted surgery systems for use and development in pediatrics. Specifically, tremor filtration and optimal visualization are approaches which can have enormous benefits for procedures in small bodies. Robotically assisted surgery in children might have advantages compared to laparoscopic or open approaches. This review focuses on the research literature regarding robotically assisted surgery that has been published within the past decade. A literature search was conducted to identify studies comparing robotically assisted surgery with laparoscopic and open approaches. While reported applications in urology were the most cited, three other fields (gynecology, general surgery, and “others”) were also identified. In total, 36 of the publications reviewed suggested that robotically assisted surgery was a good alternative for pediatric procedures. After several years of experience of this surgery, a strong learning curve was evident in the literature. However, some authors have highlighted limitations, such as high cost and a limited spectrum of small-sized instruments. The recent introduction of reusable 3 mm instruments to the market might help to overcome these limitations. In the future, it can be anticipated that there will be a broader range of applications for robotically assisted surgery in selected pediatric surgeries, especially as surgical skills continue to improve and further system innovations emerge.

Is Roux-en-Y Feeding Jejunostomy a Safe and Effective Operation in Children? A Systematic Review Exploring Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Roux-en-Y jejunostomy (REYJ) may establish feeding in children with foregut dysmotility or severe gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Nevertheless, concerns have been raised about safety and efficacy. We, therefore, evaluated outcomes of REYJ by systematic review to determine if this was a satisfactory option for achieving enteral autonomy in children with complex nutritional needs.

METHODS

A PRISMA-adherent systematic review was conducted of studies reporting children undergoing feeding REYJ. Two authors performed processes independently; the senior author resolved disagreements. Embase, CINAHL and Medline were searched (inception-01/21). Additional databases, references, and 'grey' literature were searched. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) and a bespoke system assessed methodological quality.

RESULTS

Of 362 articles, 10 met eligibility criteria (9 retrospective series; 1 conference proceeding). Unpublished data were also attained. Interobserver agreement for MINORS (kappa = 0.47) and bespoke scoring (kappa = 0.58) were moderate. After consensus, median MINORS score was 37.5% (IQR 6.3%) and bespoke 50% (IQR 20.8%), indicating poor methodological quality. One hundred sixty-four patients were reported (age range: 2 months to 19 years). Time to full feeds and length of stay were inadequately reported but most achieved enteral autonomy. No studies reported patient/caregiver-questionnaires. Seventy-six complications were documented (Clavien-Dindo grading was infeasible). Morbidity included peristomal leakage (N = 26), internal hernia/volvulus (N = 8), and SSI (N = 7). Thirty-eight patients died (2 procedure-attributable) during follow-up (range: 1 month to 15 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 50% patients experience complications after REYJ (often minor) with 23% patients dying during follow-up, often comorbidity-attributable. REYJ can achieve enteral autonomy although parents/caregivers of children should be counselled accordingly.

Short and long-term outcomes after pediatric redo fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Redo fundoplication (RF) is the most common surgical treatment for recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children, but outcomes after RF are rarely reported. The aim of this study was to assess short- and long-term outcomes after RF in childhood.

METHODS

The study is a follow-up study of patients undergoing RF from 2002 to 2020 at a teriary care center. Patients/parents were sent questionnaires recording symptoms of recurrent GERD, troublesome side-effects and satisfaction. Retrospective chart review was also performed.

RESULTS

24/28 (86%) patients were included median 9 (1.6 months-17.7 years) years after RF. 16 (67%) had neurologic impairment. Indications for RF was recurrence of GERD (n = 18), discomfort or dysphagia from a herniated wrap (n = 5) and dysphagia from a slipped fundoplication (n = 1). Median operating time was 128 (95-250) min. Six (25%) patients experienced early major complications, of which two were gastrostomy related. Five (21%) patients experienced recurrence after RF. Three of these were symptom free at follow-up with medical treatment or re-RF. The most common symptom at follow-up was stomach pain (37%) and excessive flatulence (38%). 18/22 (95%) patients/parents would choose RF again, and 21/22 would recommend RF to someone in a similar situation.

CONCLUSIONS

RF is successful in treating recurrent GERD after primary fundoplication, and patient/parental satisfaction is high.

Optimal management of gastrojejunal tube in the ENFit era - Interventions that changed practice

BACKGROUND

We experienced a high incidence of jejunal tube (JEJ) displacement in children who underwent percutaneous endoscopic transgastric jejunostomy (PEGJ), ever since the introduction of ENFit connector (2017).

METHODS

Two interventions were introduced in 2018 - fixative suture to PEGJ ENFit connector, and conversion to balloon transgastric-jejunal feeding device (Balloon GJ) whenever possible. Children receiving PEGJ and Balloon GJ in 2.8 years were categorized into 3 eras: 2016 (pre-ENFit), 2017 (ENFit) and 2018 (interventional), for comparison of complications and sequelae. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank test (P < 0.05) were applied.

RESULTS

100 children underwent 323 JEJ insertions - PEGJ (n = 237), Balloon GJ (n = 86). Complications occurred in 188 JEJs (58%), more frequently with PEGJ than Balloon GJ (69% vs. 29%, P < 0.0005). PEGJ had higher complication/1000-tube-days (6 vs. 0, P < 0.0005). In 2018, complication rate reduced from 76% to 30% (P < 0.0005) owing to effectiveness of PEGJ connector suture application (P = 0.019), and increased utilization of Balloon GJ (16% to 44%, P = 0.005). Balloon GJ showed better JEJ survival (P = 0.019), less morbidity (emergency attendance, X-ray) and greater cost-effectiveness than PEGJ.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon GJ had better overall outcomes than PEGJ. Suture application to connector successfully reduced JEJ internal displacement in PEGJ; however, conversion to Balloon GJ should be strongly considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Long-Term Analysis of Respiratory-Related Complications Following Gastrostomy Placement with or without Fundoplication in Neurologically Impaired Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Gastrostomy placement is crucial in neurologically impaired (NI) children to ensure an adequate food intake and a safe route for drugs administration and to reduce the risk of primary aspiration. NI patents are more prone to gastroesophageal reflux. The association with fundoplication is deemed to reduce reflux-related respiratory complications. However, long-term benefits of this approach are not clear. We therefore aimed to compare long-term reflux-related respiratory complications of gastrostomy only (GO) to gastrostomy with fundoplication (GF). We retrospectively reviewed 145 consecutive NI children managed from 2008 to 2018. As long-term outcomes, we analyzed number and length of hospital admissions (Reflux-Related-Hospitalization, RRH) and emergency department accesses (Reflux-Related-Accesses, RRA) due to respiratory problems. Results were analyzed with appropriate statistical method. Median age at referral and at gastrostomy placement were 2.2 and 3.4 years (SD 5.6), respectively. Median follow-up was four years (range 1-12). Anti-reflux procedures were performed in 26/145 patients (18%); tracheotomy in 23/145 (16%). RRH following surgery showed lower number of admissions/year (0.32 vs. 1 for GO vs. GF, p < 0.005) and days hospitalization/year (3 vs. 13, p = 0.08) in GO compared to GF; RRA was similar (0.60 vs. 0.65, p = 0.43). Gastrostomy placement alone appeared not to be inferior to gastrostomy plus fundoplication with respect to long-term respiratory-related outcomes for NI children in our center.

Total Oesophagogastric Dissociation in Neurologically Impaired Children: 18 Years' Experience and Long-term Follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Total oesophagogastric dissociation (TOGD) is an alternative antireflux surgery for neurologically impaired children because of a 16% to 38% fundoplication failure rate. This study evaluates TOGD's feasibility and its long-term efficacy both as a Primary and as a "Rescue" procedure after failed fundoplication.

METHODS

Thirty patients (18 boys) who underwent TOGD between 2000 and 2018 in 2 Italian Centres were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three were Primary procedures and 7 were "Rescue" ones. Inclusion criteria were severe neurodisability, intractable gastroesophageal reflux, and dysphagia.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, all children had regurgitation, vomiting or retching, and 93% had unsafe swallowing and aspiration, with recurrent chest infections/aspiration pneumonia. Median relative weight was 77% (48%--118%). All patients were taking antireflux medication before surgery. Median age at TOGD was 6.48 years (0.69--22.18). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (0.6-17.7). No recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and vomiting was recorded. The number of chest infections and length of hospital stay showed a significative decrease (P value <0.0001 for both), whereas median relative weight reached 101% (P value 0.002). Parents'/caregivers' perception of outcome showed a significative improvement. Six patients (20%) experienced early complications and 3 required surgical intervention. Three late complications (10%) also required surgery. There was no surgery-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

TOGD is an effective procedure with an acceptably low complication rate for children with severe neurological impairment and is followed by a major improvement in general health and quality of life for children and families. There was no substantial difference in outcome between Primary and "Rescue" procedures.

Total oesophago-gastric dissociation in neurologically impaired children: Laparoscopic vs robotic approach

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the feasibility and short-term results of laparoscopic and robotic total oesophago-gastric dissociation (TOGD) with a Roux-en-Y oesophago-jejunostomy. Minimal invasive surgery has multiple advantages in neurologically impaired patients. Robotic approach has overcome disadvantages linked to laparoscopy, in particular, referring to the surgeon fatigue.

METHODS

A retrospective study comparing five laparoscopic and five robotic TOGD was conducted between February and October 2016 in Giannina Gaslini Children's Hospital and Section of Pediatric Surgery of Siena. Neurologically impaired children scheduled for TOGD were included. Age, sex, weight, symptomatology, presence of epilepsy, and preoperative X-ray contrast were considered. Operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, redo surgery, nutrition rehabilitation, and X-ray contrast study after 5 days and after 1 month from the intervention were recorded.

RESULTS

In our series, there were no intraoperative complications, no conversions to open surgery, and no vagal lesions. In two of five robotic cases, a pyloroplasty was necessary. The median operative time was statistically longer in the robotic group. One dehiscence in the robotic group was recorded, and no dumping episodes occurred. No statistical differences in terms of complications were detected.

CONCLUSION

TOGD is feasible both with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery with similar results. Robotic approach is considered feasible. At the same time, high laparoscopic skills allow to reach the same results as robotic approach with shorter operative time.

Total esophagogastric dissociation (TEGD): Lessons from two decades of experience

BACKGROUND

Total esophagogastric dissociation (TEGD) has been performed in our institution since 1994, predating its published description by Bianchi in 1997. Originally it was considered a rescue procedure when conventional antireflux surgery failed. Recently TEGD has been considered a viable primary option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in severely neurological impaired (NI) patients. We describe our institution's experience of TEGD in this selected cohort of patients.

METHODS

An institutional retrospective review was performed detailing our total experience of open TEGD between 1994 and 2015 in severely neurologically impaired (NI) patients. Demographic, complications, and outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-six NI patients underwent TEGD between 1994 and 2015 (39 female). Primary TEGD was performed in forty-nine patients (74.2%), while the remainder were rescue procedures following the failure of previous antireflux surgery. In 98% of cases no recurrence of clinically significant reflux was reported. The mean hospital length of stay was 10.2 days. There were sixteen reported complications in twelve patients representing 18.2% of the cohort. One death was attributable to the procedure (1.5%). Median follow-up was 31.6 months (range, 1.3-137.9 months).

CONCLUSION

TEGD appears to be a valid surgical option to treat severe GERD in severely neurologically impaired children, both as a primary procedure and as a rescue procedure following failure of anti-reflux surgery. Further studies comparing TEGD versus laparoscopic fundoplication are desirable to understand which of these procedures can be the most effective in this compromised group of patients.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective study Level of evidence: IV.

Gastroesophageal reflux in children with neurological impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neurologically impaired children (NIC) suffer severe gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with poor fundoplication outcome. Aims of the study were: (1) to determine the recurrence of GER after fundoplication in NIC; (2) to compare fundoplication versus gastro-jejunal tube feeding insertion (GJ) and fundoplication versus total esophagogastric dissociation (TEGD) in primarily treating GER in NIC. Using defined search strategy, two investigators identified all comparative studies reporting the mentioned procedures to primarily treat GER in NIC. The study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Data are mean ± SD. Of 3840 titles/abstracts screened, 14 studies on fundoplication (2716 pts.) reported a recurrence/persistence of GER higher in NIC (14.2 ± 8.3%) than in neurologically normal (9.4 ± 5.2%; p = 0.0001), with an increased incidence of re-do fundoplication (12.6 ± 7.0% versus 9.1 ± 4.5%; p < 0.01). Three studies revealed a similar risk of undergoing subsequent fundoplication after GJ (4.9 ± 2.1%) or initial fundoplication (12.0 ± 0.6%; p = ns). Four studies showed a lower recurrence of GER following TEGD (1.4 ± 1.1%) than fundoplication (24.8 ± 1.4%; p = 0.002). NIC are at risk of recurrence/persistence of GER after fundoplication or GJ. TEGD seems more effective to primarily treat GER in NIC. Prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish which is the ideal treatment of GER in NIC.

Chronic Pulmonary Aspiration in Children: Diagnosis and Management

Chronic pulmonary aspiration (CPA) is a common cause of morbidity in children with complex aerodigestive disorders. CPA can be caused by swallowing dysfunction, anatomic, or dynamic abnormalities of the airways, and/or other circumstances that overcome the child's natural capacity to protect the airway. Diagnostic evaluation for suspected aspiration aims to characterize the swallowing function, identify the etiology of aspiration, including anatomic and/or dynamic abnormalities causing aspiration, and evaluate for the development of aspiration sequelae (e.g., bronchiectasis). CPA management approach should be guided by the recognized risk factors and co-morbidities, and directed to decrease the events of aspiration, improve clearance of aspirated material, and limit the development of aspiration sequelae (e.g., chronic inflammation and recurrent infections). This article presents a practical approach for the diagnosis and management of chronic pulmonary aspiration (CPA) in children.

Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition

This document serves as an update of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2009 clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children and is intended to be applied in daily practice and as a basis for clinical trials. Eight clinical questions addressing diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic topics were formulated. A systematic literature search was performed from October 1, 2008 (if the question was addressed by 2009 guidelines) or from inception to June 1, 2015 using Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was applied to define and prioritize outcomes. For therapeutic questions, the quality of evidence was also assessed using GRADE. Grading the quality of evidence for other questions was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS) and Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tools. During a 3-day consensus meeting, all recommendations were discussed and finalized. In cases where no randomized controlled trials (RCT; therapeutic questions) or diagnostic accuracy studies were available to support the recommendations, expert opinion was used. The group members voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique. With this approach, recommendations regarding evaluation and management of infants and children with GERD to standardize and improve quality of care were formulated. Additionally, 2 algorithms were developed, 1 for infants <12 months of age and the other for older infants and children.

Indications for total esophagogastric dissociation in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Total esophagogastric dissociation (TED) is used to treat gastroesophageal reflux (GER) after failed fundoplication in neurologically impaired patients. It is now performed for some otherwise healthy patients with severe GER. In this procedure, the gastrointestinal tract is reconstructed in a non-physiological way with a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunal anastomosis and jejuno-jejunostomy. Although TED eliminates almost all GER, some patients experience late complications. In this review, we investigated the long-term outcomes after TED to determine the best indications. In total, 147 neurologically impaired patients and 28 neurologically normal patients were identified. The total rate of complications requiring re-operation was 17.2% in neurologically impaired patients and 32.1% in normal patients, both higher than the rates associated with fundoplication. Although most authors added pyloroplasty when there was a concern of gastric emptying, this sometimes caused bile reflux. Nutritional and metabolic complications, including dumping syndrome and chronic digestive malabsorption, were also reported to occur after TED. TED is an option for the treatment of neurologically impaired patients with recurrent GER after fundoplication or who are at a high risk of recurrence of GER with fundoplication. However, neurologically normal patients who have the ability to obtain nutrition orally should consider options other than TED, as postoperative complications are frequent.

Laparoscopic gastroesophageal dissociation in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE

Neurologically impaired children with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are a challenging group of patients. We theorized that a laparoscopic gastroesophageal dissociation (LGED) may decrease reflux-related readmissions and healthcare visits, and improve quality of life (QOL) for them and their caregivers.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on our pediatric patients that underwent an LGED along with a caregiver survey from 2013 to 2017.

RESULTS

Twenty-two neurologically impaired patients (14months-17years) with severe GERD underwent an LGED. Patients weighed 7.9-57kg (avg=23.8kg), length of stay ranged from 5 to 20days (avg=12days), estimated blood loss ranged from <5cm3 to 450cm3 (avg=66cm3, median=25cm3), and duration of operation ranged from 299 to 641min (avg=462min). One death occurred on postoperative day 19 from gram negative sepsis (30-day perioperative mortality of 4.5%). There were a modest number of minor and major complications (follow-up avg.=13.7months, range=2-40months). There was a decrease in healthcare visits for respiratory illnesses (rated 5/5 from all 13/19 survey respondents) as well as improvements in perceived QOL of the patient (avg=4.3/5) and caregiver (avg=4.6/5).

CONCLUSIONS

Our cohort of patients had a reduction in readmissions and healthcare visits, and improved QOL after undergoing an LGED based on the perceptions of their caregivers. In neurologically impaired patients with severe GERD, an LGED may be a viable alternative to traditional treatments.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective case series review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV evidence: case series without comparison.

A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate quality of conduct and reporting of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. We also aimed to identify characteristics predictive of review quality.

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews summarise evidence by combining sources, but are potentially prone to bias. To counter this, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was published to aid in reporting. Similarly, the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) measurement tool was designed to appraise methodology. The paediatric surgical literature has seen an increasing number of reviews over the past decade, but quality has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review with a priori design to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions in paediatric surgery. From 01/2010 to 06/2016, we searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Web of Science, Google Scholar, reference lists and journals. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. We assessed conduct and reporting using AMSTAR and PRISMA. Scores were calculated as the sum of reported items. We also extracted author, journal and article characteristics, and used them in exploratory analysis to determine which variables predict quality.

RESULTS

112 articles fulfilled eligibility criteria (53 systematic reviews; 59 meta-analyses). Overall, 68% AMSTAR and 56.8% PRISMA items were reported adequately. Poorest scores were identified with regards a priori design, inclusion of structured summaries, including the grey literature, citing excluded articles and evaluating bias. 13 reviews were pre-registered and 6 in PRISMA-endorsing journals. The following predicted quality in univariate analysis:, word count, Cochrane review, journal h-index, impact factor, journal endorses PRISMA, PRISMA adherence suggested in author guidance, article mentions PRISMA, review includes comparison of interventions and review registration. The latter three variables were significant in multivariate regression.

CONCLUSIONS

There are gaps in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews in paediatric surgery. More endorsement by journals of the PRISMA guideline may improve review quality, and the dissemination of reliable evidence to paediatric clinicians.

Total esophagogastric dissociation: single center experience

AIM

Fundoplication fails in approximately 20% of children with severe neurodisability. We aimed to evaluate total esophagogastric dissociation (TOGD) as a primary procedure and as a ‘rescue’ procedure for severely neurologically impaired children with significant swallowing discoordination and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

Casenotes of 40 children with severe neurodisability who underwent TOGD between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 33 were primary procedures and 7 were ‘rescue’ procedures following failed fundoplication.

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was 3 years 7 months (range 1 month to 13 years 11 months). Preoperatively, all children had symptoms of regurgitation, retching or vomiting and 70% of children had an unsafe swallow. There were 5 early complications related to surgery in 4 children requiring surgical intervention. One child died following relaparotomy for esophagojejunal anastomotic breakdown because of multiorgan failure. Gastrostomy feeding was established by a median of 6 days (range 2 to 25 days) and median hospital stay was 10 days (range 4 to 280 days). There were 5 late complications. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 1 month to 8 years 4 months). All children have had resolution of gastroesophageal reflux. Thirteen percent of children experience bloating or pain on feeding and 26% of children experience retching unrelated to gastroesophageal reflux. There were 8 late deaths unrelated to surgery.

CONCLUSION

TOGD should be considered as a primary and definitive procedure in selected severely neurodisabled children who are at higher risk of failure of fundoplication, recurrent aspiration and a reduced quality of life.

Construct validation: simulation of thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We sought to develop a simulation model that accurately replicates the challenges of the thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis. This model is intended to serve as a teaching tool during the introduction to, and development of, the skills required to perform a thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis during an Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy.

METHODS

The simulation model uses porcine tissue placed within an artificial hemithorax and covered with a synthetic skin. The model is draped to simulate a realistic operative setting, and ports are placed in standard surgical fashion. Dissection of the esophagus from the mediastinum is then performed, followed by the creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis. The effectiveness of the training model was evaluated using volunteer general and thoracic surgery residents at varying stages of surgical training. The quality of the anastomoses created were evaluated using both objective and subjective criteria, and successful anastomoses were tested for leaks using hydrostatic pressure.

RESULTS

Objective evaluation showed that successful completion of the anastomosis task increased with the number of attempts, with 100% of participants successfully completing an anastomosis by the final attempt. The time to completion of a successful anastomosis also improved across successive attempts. Moreover, objective measures also showed improvement over time based on the graded quality of the completed anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

As surgical techniques continue to evolve, so must the means by which they are taught. This simulation model shows effectiveness in the training of general and thoracic surgery residents performing thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis during the Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Long-term and 'patient-reported' outcomes of total esophagogastric dissociation versus laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the severely neurodisabled child

AIM

Fundoplication has high failure rates in neurodisability: esophagogastric dissociation (TOGD) has been proposed as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the long-term and 'patient-reported' outcomes of TOGD and laparoscopic fundoplication (LapFundo).

METHODS

Matched cohort comparison comprises (i) retrospective analysis from a prospective database and (ii) carer questionnaire survey of symptoms and quality of life (CP-QoL-Child). Children were included if they had severe neurodisability (Gross Motor Function Classification System five) and spasticity.

RESULTS

Groups were similar in terms of previous surgery and comorbidities. The TOGD group was younger (22 vs. 31.5months, p=0.038) with more females (18/23 vs. 11/24, p=0.036). TOGD was more likely to require intensive care: operative time, length of stay and time to full feeds were all longer (p<0.0001). Median follow-up was 6.3 and 5.8years. Rates of complications were comparable. Symptom recurrence (5/24 vs. 1/23, p=0.34) and use of acid-reducing medication (13/24 vs. 4/23, p=0.035) were higher for LapFundo. Carer-reported symptoms and QoL were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

TOGD had similar efficacy to LapFundo (with suggestion of lower failure), with comparable morbidity and carer-reported outcomes. However, TOGD was more 'invasive,' requiring longer periods of rehabilitation. Families should be offered both procedures as part of comprehensive preoperative counseling.

Complications of gastrojejunal feeding tubes in children

BACKGROUND

Long-term gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding is an increasingly popular alternative to gastric fundoplication for children with pathologic reflux, particularly those with neurologic impairment. We sought to evaluate morbidity associated with GJ feeding tubes in a large population of children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of all children who underwent placement of a GJ feeding tube in a large children's hospital between January 2005 and September 2013 were reviewed. Indications for GJ feedings were noted. Events including a requirement for tube replacement and intestinal complications attributable to a GJ tube that required a laparotomy were evaluated. Risk factors for morbidity were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 124 children underwent GJ tube placement at an average age of 5.0 y (2 mo-16 y). Of the total, 83 (66%) subjects were neurologically impaired and 108 (87%) had gastroesophageal reflux. Of those, 55 (44%) had undergone prior laparoscopic fundoplication. Persistent reflux symptoms occurred in 22 (17.6%). Subjects underwent an average of 2.75 tube replacements per year and those under 2 y old had almost four. Four children (3.2%) required emergent laparotomy for intestinal perforation due to a GJ tube. These subjects were significantly younger (12 mo) than those without perforations (60.6 mo, P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

GJ feeding tubes were associated with notable morbidity ranging from persistent reflux to dislodgement and intestinal perforation. Together with issues of inconvenience with continuous feedings, these complications should be taken into account in children and particularly infants, in whom GJ feedings are being considered as an alternative to fundoplication.

Esophagogastric dissociation reduces the re-operation rate for persistent gastroesophageal reflux in severely neurologically impaired children

PURPOSE

In this study we want to demonstrate the effectiveness of the esophagogastric dissociation as a first level operation in treatment of the gastroesophageal reflux in severe neurologically impaired children, in term of a reduction of reoperation rate.

METHODS

We divided patients operated from 1998 to 2005 in a group A, composed by children treated with fundoplication, and in a group AR, composed by the patients of group A who had a recurrence of reflux and that was treated with esophagogastric dissociation. Patients operated from 2005 to 2013 were selected on the basis of the severity of the neurological impairment and were divided in a group B, treated with fundoplication, and in a group C of more severe impaired children, treated with esophagogastric dissociation. Data regarding the complications of the A and C groups were analyzed with Fisher's test.

RESULTS

We evaluated 63 patients: 34 (54%) in group A, 11 in group AR, 15 (23.6%) in group B, 14 (22.4%) in group C. The Fisher's test showed a non significant difference with a p value of 0.2.

CONCLUSION

Despite of statistic result we believe that TOGD is a useful procedure as the first choice of surgical management in severe neurological impaired children affected by gastroesophageal reflux.