Tracheotomy after laryngotracheoplasty: risk factors over 10 years. [Corrected]

Therapeutic effectiveness of costal cartilage grafting into both anterior and posterior walls for laryngotracheal reconstruction in acquired subglottic stenosis

BACKGROUND

We have reviewed the surgical procedures performed and outcomes for low-birth-weight infants with acquired subglottic stenosis.

METHODS

The gestational age at birth, birth weight, age at Laryngotracheal reconstruction, and therapeutic outcome over the past 26 years were reviewed. Laryngotracheal reconstruction was initially performed by costochondral grafting involving only the anterior wall for the first operation, but since 2010 a costal cartilage was also inserted into the posterior wall of the cricoid cartilage using the BENSON pylorus spreader to split the cartilage.

RESULTS

There were 21 patients. The mean gestational age was 29.6 weeks, the mean birth weight was 1127 g, and the first surgery was performed at a mean age of 37.0 ± 21.8 months. Extubation was possible in 11 of 21 patients (52.3%) after the first surgery and in 7 of 7 patients after re-operation. The total extubation rate reached 100% (18/18) excluding three patients (one who suffered sudden death, and two who were lost to follow-up).

CONCLUSION

Sufficient dilatation of the subglottic space could not be achieved by costochondral grafting involving the anterior wall alone. The extubation rate was improved by dilatation of the posterior wall and the insertion of costal cartilage into both the anterior and posterior walls.

Systematic review/meta-analysis comparing successful outcomes after single vs. double-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To compare operation-specific decannulation rates between single-stage (SSLTR) and double-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction (DSLTR) when controlling for grade of airway stenosis.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from 1970 to 2015 to examine primary SSLTR and DSLTR for subglottic stenosis in patients 18 years or younger. Primary outcome was decannulation or extubation after LTR. Failures included patients not decannulated or requiring additional open airway procedures prior to decannulation. Only studies providing outcomes delineated by airway stenosis grade were included. Non-English language studies and case reports were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 712 abstracts reviewed and 16 studies with 663 pooled patients included in the systematic review analysis. The metaanalysis included 5 studies. Overall, the operation-specific decannulation success was statistically significantly different between SSLTR [93.2% (N = 221)] and DSLTR [83.7% (N = 442)] (P<0.001). When controlling for stenosis severity, however, no difference was found in decannulation success between SS- or DSLTR except in the grade 3 group: Grade 1-100% (N = 6) vs. 100% (N = 6), (P = 1); Grade 2 - 84.9% (N = 106) vs. 83.3% (N = 138), (P = 0.72); Grade 3-80.2% (N = 101) vs. 69.7% (N = 238), (P = 0.03); Grade 4-33.3% (N = 6) vs. 50% (N = 58), (P = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

No difference in decannulation rates was seen between SSLTR and DSLTR when comparing similar grades of stenosis except in grade 3 stenosis. With worsening stenosis, the success rate declines with both methods. Prospective studies with standardized enrollment criteria and reported outcomes are needed to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: Challenges to Nurses and Outcome in Extremely Preterm Babies

Worldwide, about 15 million infants are born prematurely each year. Technological advances, including invasive mechanical ventilation, play a major role in the survival of extremely preterm babies. Those who survive may have prolonged morbid conditions that result in long-term sequelae. Nurses face several challenges during the hospitalization of these infants. Vigilant care, monitoring, and careful handling of the infants can prevent infections and long-term complications. Newer, less invasive technologies are promising for improved outcomes in extremely preterm infants.