Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in children

Single-incision compared with conventional laparoscopy for appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis of the relevant literature evaluated the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) relative to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA).

METHODS

The major biomedical databases, including ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched up to January 2022 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SILA and CLA were compared regarding patient body mass index, operative time, and perioperative complications. The Cochrane Handbook and RevMan 5.3 were used to judge trial quality and perform the meta-analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

The 17 included RCTs comprised 2068 patients, of whom 1039 and 1029 patients underwent SILA and CLA, respectively. The operative time for SILA was longer than that for CLA (MD = 8.35 min, 95% CI = 6.58 to 10.11, P < 0.00001), but the cosmetic results from SILA were superior (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.58 to 1.03, P < 0.00001). However, the incidence rates were similar in terms of patient body mass index; postoperative pain scores; and rates of abdominal abscess, conversion to open surgery, ileus, surgical site infection, and overall perioperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

SILA is a safe technique for acute appendicitis, and its cosmetic outcomes are superior to those of CLA.

Intra-/Extracorporeal Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There are two approaches to single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA): intracorporeal (Intra) and extracorporeal (Extra). However, the differences in the efficacy between these procedures remain unclear. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and usefulness of these techniques with those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in children. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases. Studies comparing outcomes of "Intra-SILA and CLA" or "Extra-SILA and CLA" in children aged <18 years were included. Operative time, hospitalization duration, wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, conversion to open, additional ports, and narcotic doses were evaluated. Results: Overall, 20 studies (six randomized controlled trials [RCTs], one prospective non-RCT, and 13 retrospective cohort studies) (Intra-SILA: 322, CLA: 791 cases; Extra-SILA: 1318, CLA: 1313 cases) were included. Compared with CLA, Extra-SILA was associated with a shorter operative time (mean difference, -9.79 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], -18.34 to -1.24) and lower incidence of intra-abdominal infection (3.3% versus 4.6%, odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82) and a higher rate of additional port (13.6% versus 0%, OR, 43.93; 95% CI, 14.79 to 130.50). Meanwhile, the outcomes of Intra-SILA were comparable with those of CLA. However, the participants in the Intra-SILA group received significantly lower doses of narcotics than those in the CLA group. Conclusion: Although the evidence was insufficient, both Intra- and Extra-SILA were comparable to CLA with respect to safety. Extra-SILA seems to have an advantage of a shorter operative time, but additional ports may be required.

Does the morphology of the umbilicus influence the incidence of surgical site infections in transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy?

Background:

Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy (TULA) may be a feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. However, a transumbilical incision may increase incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the morphology of the umbilicus and the incidence of SSIs in patients who underwent TULA.

Patients and Methods:

This retrospective study analysed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis at our institution from June 2016 to October 2020. The patients were assigned to the SSI group (those with an SSI) or the non-SSI group. The morphology of the umbilicus was calculated by measuring its width and depth on preoperative computed tomography images and was compared between the SSI and non-SSI groups.

Results:

The SSI group included 23 patients, while the non-SSI group included 252 patients. The width of the umbilicus was significantly shorter in the SSI group than in the non-SSI group (29 ± 10 mm vs. 34 ± 9 mm, P = 0.027). The umbilicus was slightly deeper in the SSI group than in the non-SSI group; however, the difference was not significant (16 mm vs. 15 mm, P = 0.384).

Conclusions:

This was the first study investigating the correlation between the morphology of the umbilicus and SSI development in TULA. SSIs tended to occur more commonly in a narrow and deep umbilicus. An extension of the umbilical incision may help prevent SSI in patients with this umbilical morphology.

Management of Postoperative Complications Following Common Pediatric Operations

This review discusses complications unique to pediatric surgical populations. Here the authors focus primarily on five of the most common procedures performed in children: appendectomy, central venous catheterization, pyloromyotomy, gastrostomy, and inguinal/umbilical hernia repair.

Techniques of Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Pediatric Appendicitis: How I Do It

Background: Appendicitis is the most common operative emergency in children. As a result of accumulating evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, database work, and meta-analyses, the management of appendicitis in children has been shifting the past 15 years with many new debates emerging. In this article, we review our current management schemes. Methods: We reviewed the current and critical literature relevant to the rationale for our current management. Results: Clinical pathways appear to reduce variation and cost while improving the ability to diagnose and treat the disease. Minimally invasive approaches can be used to treat all forms of appendicitis. Conclusions: The future role of non-operative management deserves ongoing exploration. Refining diagnostic treatment algorithms and enhancing antibiotic stewardship are important moving forward.

Neuropathic inguinal pain due to nerve injury after a laparoscopic appendectomy: first pediatric case described in the literature

OBJECTIVE

To describe the first pediatric case in the literature of neuropathic inguinal pain secondary to iatrogenic nerve injury that occurred during a laparoscopic appendectomy, detailing clinical and morphological findings before and after surgery. The literature on adult patients is reviewed and pathophysiological, therapeutic, and prognostic factors are discussed.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 14-year-old female patient presented with a history of a laparoscopic appendectomy 3 years previously. Three months post-operatively, she developed progressively worsening neuropathic inguinal pain refractory to neuromodulators and several nerve blocks. Given her deterioration, poor response to conservative therapy, and clearly meeting the criteria for chronic post-operative inguinal pain (CPIP), surgical management was undertaken.

RESULTS

Open surgery was performed through the previous incision, during which injury to a branch of the iliohypogastric nerve (IH) was confirmed. Neurolysis of the affected branch was performed, after which the patient experienced significant pain relief, resolution of allodynia, and reversal of skin hyperpigmentation. After discharge, analgesic therapy was gradually withdrawn and, ultimately, discontinued altogether.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the neuroanatomy of the inguinal region is an indispensable requirement for all surgeons operating in this region, to avoid complications including CPIP and optimize patient outcomes. Surgical management of CPIP can be effective for controlling severe pain in patients in whom conservative management has failed. Studies are needed in the pediatric population to identify specific characteristics of this entity in youth.

Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute appendicitis (AA) is among the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Diagnosis of AA is still challenging and some controversies on its management are still present among different settings and practice patterns worldwide. In July 2015, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) organized in Jerusalem the first consensus conference on the diagnosis and treatment of AA in adult patients with the intention of producing evidence-based guidelines. An updated consensus conference took place in Nijemegen in June 2019 and the guidelines have now been updated in order to provide evidence-based statements and recommendations in keeping with varying clinical practice: use of clinical scores and imaging in diagnosing AA, indications and timing for surgery, use of non-operative management and antibiotics, laparoscopy and surgical techniques, intra-operative scoring, and peri-operative antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

This executive manuscript summarizes the WSES guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AA. Literature search has been updated up to 2019 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. The statements were voted, eventually modified, and finally approved by the participants to the consensus conference and by the board of co-authors, using a Delphi methodology for voting whenever there was controversy on a statement or a recommendation. Several tables highlighting the research topics and questions, search syntaxes, and the statements and the WSES evidence-based recommendations are provided. Finally, two different practical clinical algorithms are provided in the form of a flow chart for both adults and pediatric (< 16 years old) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2020 WSES guidelines on AA aim to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) non-operative management for uncomplicated AA, (3) timing of appendectomy and in-hospital delay, (4) surgical treatment, (5) intra-operative grading of AA, (6) ,management of perforated AA with phlegmon or abscess, and (7) peri-operative antibiotic therapy.

Single Incision Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery: From Myth to Reality a Case Series

Laparoscopic surgery has continued to evolve to minimize access sites and scars in both the adult and pediatric populations. In children, single-incision pediatric endoscopic surgery (SIPES) has been shown to be effective, feasible, and safe with comparative results to multiport equivalents. Thus, the use of SIPES continues over increasingly complex cases, however, conceptions of its efficacy continue to vary greatly. In the present case series and discussion, we review the history of SIPES techniques and its current application today. We present this in the setting of five common myths about SIPES techniques: limitations against complex cases, restrictions to specialized training, increased morbidity outcomes, increased operative lengths, and increased operative costs. Regarding the myth of SIPES being limited in application to simple cases, examples were highlighted throughout the literature in addition to the authors’ own experience with three complex cases including resection of a lymphatic malformation, splenectomy with cholecystectomy, and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. A review of SIPES learning curves shows equivalent operative outcomes to multiport learning curves and advancements towards practical workshops to increase trainee familiarity can help assuage these aptitudes. In assessing comorbidities, adult literature reveals a slight increase in incisional hernia rates, but this does not correlate with single-incision pediatric data. In experienced hands, operative SIPES times average approximate multiport laparoscopic equivalents. Finally, regarding expenses, SIPES represents an equivalent alternative to laparoscopic techniques.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Single-Port and Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children

Background: This study aimed to evaluate single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) in comparison with three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (3PLA) in children about the extent of surgical trauma after SPLA and 3PLA measured by serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients with a median age of 11.5 were randomized to two groups. Experts in both methods performed the surgeries. The decision on the type of planned surgery was randomly determined. Serum IL-6 and CRP levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before, and at 12 and 36 hours after surgery. Furthermore, we compared operating time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and complication rates. Results: The operative time in the 3PLA group was shorter than that in the SPLA group (P < .05). Preoperative IL-6 levels were not different between the two groups, but the rise (pre- versus postoperative) of IL-6 in the SPLA group was remarkably higher when compared with the 3PLA group (P < .05). Similar results were obtained for CRP; basal serum CRP levels were not different between the two groups, but the rise of CRP in the 3PLA group was significantly lower compared with that in the SPLA group. During the first 12 hours postoperative, the SPLA patients reported more severe postoperative pain and longer inpatient opiate usage was noted that after 3-PLA. Only one SPLA case was converted to 3PLA. There were no conversions to open surgery. The length of hospital stay and complication rate were not different between the two groups. Conclusions: SPLA in children is associated with longer operative times, increased pain level, and more severe surgical trauma as measured by postoperative CRP and IL-6 levels in comparison with a 3PLA. The two approaches were comparable regarding the length of hospital stay and complication rate.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children And Conversion to Multiport Appendectomy

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) in the pediatric population has been well described. Our children's hospital has adopted this modality for nearly all appendectomies. From our center's experience, we hoped to identify factors that portend conversion from SILA to multiport appendectomy. We compared our cohort of conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for outcomes including operative time, postop length of stay (LOS), complications, and readmission.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent appendectomy from 2012 to 2017 at our children's hospital was performed. The type of appendectomy performed, if the case required conversion to multiple ports, and perforation status were recorded. Demographic data identified included age, sex, and body mass index. Outcomes analyzed were operative time, LOS, and postoperative complication/readmission rate.

RESULTS

Of 1001 appendectomies performed, 959 (95.9%) were initiated with plan for SILA, and 35 (3.5%) were initiated CLA. Of those initiated SILA, 884/959 (92.2%) were completed without additional port placement. Cases which were not able to be completed SILA were statistically significantly more likely to be male patients, have increased body mass index, or perforated appendicitis. When compared to cases initiated CLA, SILA remained statistically similar for readmission and LOS but had significantly faster operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

SILA appears to be a safe and efficient modality for the treatment of appendicitis in pediatric populations with no increased morbidity. Parents of children who are obese, males, or present with perforation should be counseled regarding the possibility of additional port placement or considered for initiating conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

Outcomes of Transumbilical Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Pediatric Appendicitis in a Single Institution

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is a potentially safe and feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy using three ports (CLA). However, the safety and efficacy of SILA for complicated appendicitis (gangrenous and perforated) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) not only for simple appendicitis but also for complicated appendicitis, and to compare them with the outcomes of CLA. Methods: All cases of acute pediatric appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomies in our hospital from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. CLA was performed between January 2007 and October 2011, and TULAA was performed between November 2011 and December 2016. In this study, patients' demographics and operative outcomes for simple appendicitis (catarrhal and phlegmonous) and complicated appendicitis were analyzed, comparing the results of TULAA and CLA. Results: In total, 262 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy: CLA in 103 patients and TULAA in 159 patients. All appendectomies were performed in the acute phase. Complicated appendicitis accounted for 60 CLA cases and 81 TULAA cases. There were no significant differences in patients' demographics. Mean operative time in simple appendicitis was significantly shorter in TULAA than in CLA. In addition, complication rates in complicated appendicitis were significantly lower in TULAA than in CLA. Moreover, in each comparison, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in TULAA than in CLA. Conclusion: In our institution, TULAA has shown to be a safe and effective alternative for both simple and complicated appendicitis in children compared with CLA.

Publication status of completed registered studies in paediatric appendicitis: a cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVE

Appendicitis is considered the most frequent surgical emergency in children. While the management of paediatric appendicitis is evolving, the precise amount of unpublished completed trials, potentially introducing bias into meta-analyses, is unknown. Controversial issues include the appropriate choice of surgical procedures, criteria for diagnosis of appendicitis, the role of antibiotic treatment and pain management. Selective reporting may introduce bias into evidence-based clinical decision-making, and the current, precise extent of unpublished results in paediatric appendicitis is unknown. We therefore assessed the publication status of completed clinical studies involving children registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

DESIGN

Cross sectional analysis. STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology criteria were applied for design and analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for completed studies which were matched to publications on ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed or Google Scholar. If no publication could be identified, principal investigators were contacted.

INTERVENTIONS/EXPOSURE

Observational analysis.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of published and unpublished studies was calculated. Subgroup analysis included studies on surgical procedures, diagnosis, antibiotic treatment and pain management.

RESULTS

Out of n=52 completed clinical studies involving children with appendicitis, n=33 (63%) were published and n=19 (37%) were unpublished. Eighty-three per cent (n=43/52) of clinical trials assessed the above-listed controversial issues. Diagnostic studies were most rigorously published (91% of trials reported), data on surgical procedures, antibiotic and pain management were less transparent. Sixty-six per cent of interventional studies and 60% of randomised studies were published. Median time-to-publication, for example, the delay between completion of the trial until public availability of the results was 24 (IQR 12-36), range 2-92 months.

CONCLUSION

Despite the importance of appendicitis in clinical practice for the paediatric surgeon, there remains scientific uncertainty due to unpublished clinical trial results with room for improvement in the future. These data are helpful in framing the shifting paradigms in paediatric appendicitis because it adds transparency to the debate.

Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and infectious complications in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy

PURPOSE

Antibiotic administration within one hour prior to incision is a common quality metric; however, antibiotics are typically started at the time of diagnosis in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis. The purpose was to determine if antibiotic administration within one hour prior to incision reduces the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis started on parenteral antibiotics upon diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 478 patients aged 0-18years who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 7/2013 to 4/2015. Patients were categorized based on timing of antibiotic administration; there were 198 patients in Group A (<60min before) and 280 in Group B (>60min before).

RESULTS

Demographics and operative time (A: 30.5±9.9 vs B: 30.8±12.2min, p=0.51) were similar. Procedures were performed laparoscopically and the groups had similar proportions of single-incision operations (A: 53% vs B: 55%, p=0.64). There was no difference in the incidence of superficial SSI (A: 2.0% vs B: 2.1%, p=1.0) or intraabdominal abscess (A: 4.0% vs B: 3.6%, p=0.81) and this remained true when stratified by intraoperative classification.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic administration within one hour of appendectomy in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis who receive antibiotics at diagnosis did not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Antibiotic Powder Reduces Surgical Site Infections in Children After Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) has a higher rate of wound infection than the multiport technique. The purpose of this project was to determine whether the use of topical antibiotic powder reduces surgical site infections (SSIs) in pediatric patients who undergo SILA.

METHODS

Patients aged 0-21 years who underwent SILA for acute appendicitis from April 2015 to November 2016 were included in this quality improvement initiative. Cefoxitin powder was placed in the umbilical wound before skin closure. Data were prospectively collected and outcome measures were compared with a historical cohort who underwent SILA before the implementation of antibiotic powder.

RESULTS

There were 108 patients in the historical group (HIST) and 126 in the powder group (POWD). The groups were similar in age (HIST: 11.5 ± 3.6 versus POWD: 12.2 ± 3.7 years, P = .15) and body mass index percentile (HIST: 57.6 ± 30.7 versus POWD: 58.8 ± 27.8, P = .84). Operative time was longer in the powder group (HIST: 26.5 ± 7.5 versus POWD: 29.7 ± 8.9 minutes, P = .004). Length of stay (HIST: 0.2 ± 0.4 versus POWD: 0.1 ± 0.4 days, P = .06), 30-day return to emergency department (HIST: 7% versus POWD: 8%, P = 1.0), and hospital readmissions (HIST: 5% versus POWD: 2%, P = .8) were similar. There was a significantly lower rate of superficial SSIs in the powder group (HIST: 4.6% versus POWD: 0%, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients undergoing SILA for acute appendicitis, the use of cefoxitin powder in the umbilical wound is a simple intervention to reduce the incidence of superficial SSIs.

Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review

Appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain in children. The diagnosis and treatment of the disease have undergone major changes in the past two decades, primarily as a result of the application of an evidence-based approach. Data from several randomized controlled trials, large database studies, and meta-analyses have fundamentally affected patient care. The best diagnostic approach is a standardized clinical pathway with a scoring system and selective imaging. Non-operative management of simple appendicitis is a reasonable option in selected cases, with the caveat that data in children remain limited. A minimally invasive (laparoscopic) appendectomy is the current standard in US and European children's hospitals. This article reviews the current 'state of the art' in the evaluation and management of pediatric appendicitis.

Pediatric Appendicitis

Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical pathologies in children. It can present with right lower quadrant pain. Scoring systems in combination with selective imaging and surgical examination will diagnose most children with appendicitis. Clinical pathways should be used. Most surgical interventions for appendicitis are now almost exclusively laparoscopic, with trials demonstrating better outcomes for children who undergo index hospitalization appendectomies when perforated. Nonoperative management has a role in the treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. This article discusses the workup and management, modes of treatment, and continued areas of controversy in pediatric appendicitis.

Complications in common general pediatric surgery procedures

Complications related to general pediatric surgery procedures are a major concern for pediatric surgeons and their patients. Although infrequent, when they occur the consequences can lead to significant morbidity and psychosocial stress. The purpose of this article is to discuss the common complications encountered during several common pediatric general surgery procedures including inguinal hernia repair (open and laparoscopic), umbilical hernia repair, laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy.

Fungal Appendicitis in Immunocompromised Children. Indications and Contraindications for Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Report on 2 Successful Cases

In leukemic patients, appendectomy must be approached with caution because of the increased risk of complications. Fungal appendicitis is rare and only a few cases have been described in the literature, particularly in immunocompromised individuals in whom this infection can be fatal. We present 2 pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia, who developed appendicitis during the postchemotherapy neutropenic phase, while receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Fever was the first sign of infection. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed without postoperative complications. The histologic examination and the culture analysis showed the presence of fungal elements; systemic fungal infection was also excluded. The risk is increased in immunocompromised children with fungal appendicitis and the signs of peritoneal irritation are not always obvious. The histopathologic demonstration of fungal elements and tissue reaction is mandatory for a definitive diagnosis. Laparoscopic appendectomy should be considered as the gold standard procedure to avoid fungal dissemination. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery and its inherent mini-invasive surgical advantages may improve the overall survival without incurring significant complications.

Operative management of appendicitis

Appendectomy has been the standard of care for appendicitis since the late 1800s, and remains one of the most common operations performed in children. The advent of data-driven medicine has led to questions about every aspect of the operation-whether appendectomy is even necessary, when it should be performed (timing), how the procedure is done (laparoscopic variants versus open and irrigation versus no irrigation), length of hospital stay, and antibiotic duration. The goal of this analysis is to review the current status of, and available data regarding, the surgical management of appendicitis in children.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for major urological procedures in the pediatric population: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Improvements in laparoscopic surgery have led to the introduction of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy conferring a number of possible advantages. In this review, we aim to elucidate the aspects of LESS for major urological procedures in the pediatric population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An in-depth search of the literature was performed in the databases of PubMed and Scopus, for studies investigating the technical aspects and clinical outcomes of partial nephrectomies, nephrectomies, nephroureterectomies, varicocelectomies and pyeloplasties in children. Data on parameters such as operation time, instrumentation, perioperative complications, hospital stay and follow up period were collected and further analyzed cumulatively.

RESULTS

Twenty nine studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 386 patients who underwent 401 procedures. There were no major intraoperative complications, with only 19 patients (4.73%) facing postoperative complications. No perioperative deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In the hands of experienced surgeons LESS seems a feasible, efficient and less invasive alternative to standard laparoscopy in the field of pediatric urology. There is an eminent need of well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques.