Treatment outcomes in pediatric melanoma-Are there benefits to specialized care?

A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-relevant outcomes in comprehensive cancer centers versus noncomprehensive cancer centers

This systematic review describes difference in patient-relevant outcomes between comprehensive cancers (CCCs) versus non-CCCs. Studies were identified in PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Epistemonikos, and gray literature from January 2002 to May 2024. Data were extracted and appraised by two authors. Results were narratively synthesized, and meta-analyzed where appropriate. Of 2272 records screened, 36 observational studies were included, predominantly from the United States, and focused on adults with solid cancers. Compared to non-CCCs, studies consistently or predominantly reported superior outcomes at CCCs relating to mortality and survival, quality of peri- and postoperative care, rates of cancer recurrence or progression, and impact on symptoms and health-related quality of life. Meta-analysis showed a significantly lower overall mortality risk of 23% in CCCs compared to non-CCCs (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.81, p < .001), with medium heterogeneity (I2 = 64.61%; Q-test = 36.29, p < .01) observed between the studies. Studies reporting on health equity and costs outcomes consistently or predominantly favored non-CCCs over CCCs. Mixed results were reported for outcomes relating to time to care, palliative and end-of-life care, and health care utilization. The literature reports CCCs are associated with superior outcomes in many areas, especially around mortality and survival. Greater focus is needed to explore outcomes that are important to people with cancer including health-related quality of life, symptoms, and treatment experience, and economic evaluation. Rather than aiming for superior outcomes, CCCs should be striving to enable equitable, high value, patient-centered outcomes for all people affected by cancer.

Melanoma in children: A systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis

The current evidence on paediatric melanoma is heterogeneous, especially regarding the prognosis of different histological subtypes. We sought to systematically review the evidence on paediatric melanoma, highlighting the major sources of heterogeneity and focusing on available data on single patients. A systematic search was performed from 1948 to 25 January 2021. Only studies reporting at least one case of cutaneous melanoma in patients aged ≤18 years were included. Unknown primary and uncertain malignant melanomas were excluded. Three couples of authors independently performed title/abstract screening and two different authors reviewed all the relevant full texts. The selected articles were manually cross-checked for overlapping data for qualitative synthesis. Subsequently data on single patients were extracted to perform a patient-level meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021233248. The main outcomes were melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes. Separate analyses were done of cases with complete information on histologic subtype, focusing on superficial spreading (SSM), nodular (NM) and spitzoid melanomas, as well as of those classified as de-novo (DNM) and acquired or congenital nevus-associated melanomas (NAM). The qualitative synthesis covered 266 studies; however, data on single patients were available from 213 studies including 1002 patients. Among histologic subtypes, NM had a lower MSS than both SSM and spitzoid melanoma, and a lower PFS than SSM. Spitzoid melanoma had a significantly higher progression risk than SSM and trended toward lower mortality. Focusing on nevus-associated status, DNM demonstrated better MSS after progression than congenital NAM, and no differences were highlighted in PFS. Our findings describe the existence of different biological patterns in paediatric melanoma. Specifically, spitzoid melanomas demonstrated intermediate behaviour between SSM and NM and showed a high risk of nodal progression but low mortality. This raises the question of whether spitzoid lesions are being over-diagnosed as melanoma in childhood.

Higher rates of regional disease but improved outcomes in pediatric versus adult melanoma

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is rare in the pediatric population and management is largely extrapolated from adult guidelines. Adult data have shown that immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) does not improve overall survival in selected patients with clinically node negative, sentinel lymph node-positive disease. Current nodal management in children is unknown.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with melanoma from 2012-2017 and patients categorized as pediatric (≤18 years, n=962) or adult (n=327,987). Factors associated with CLND in children with positive SLNB were evaluated in multivariable analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Compared to adults, children present with thicker primary tumors (T3 or T4 26.5% vs 15.5%, p<0.001), resulting in higher rates of nodal assessment with SLN biopsy or LND (60.2% vs 36.6%, p<0.001) and higher rates of regional nodal disease (35.1% vs 23.4%, p<0.001). Children underwent higher rates of CLND after SLN biopsy (10.4% vs 4.1%) and upfront lymph node dissection (15.2% vs 8.7%). A decreased rate of CLND was noted in 2017 compared to 2012 (odds ratio (OR) 0.16 (p=0.005). CLND was performed more often on multivariable analysis for older pediatric age (>12 years, OR=1.6, p=0.037) and lower extremity primary (OR=0.29, p<0.001). Children with regional nodal disease have improved 3-year overall survival compared to adults (96.5% vs 71.0%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with melanoma have higher rates of nodal disease but better survival than adults. As in adults, there has been a recent increase in close nodal observation rather than CLND for patients with positive SLN. Further study of nodal surveillance for pediatric patients is warranted.

Paediatric malignant melanoma in Ireland: A population study and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Malignant melanoma is increasing in frequency worldwide; however, this disease is rare in children. As large-scale studies on paediatric melanoma are lacking, management is currently often based upon the understanding of the disease process in adults. The aim of this study was to characterise cases of paediatric melanoma diagnosed in the Republic of Ireland over a 21-year period.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicentre study using national data provided by the National Cancer Registry of Ireland and individual practitioners.

RESULTS

Twenty-four cases of melanoma treated in 11 different centres were included in the study. The median patient age at diagnosis was 15 years. The majority of cases arose on the limbs. The median Breslow thickness in patients of the pre-pubertal age group was 8.25 mm, while in children more than 13 years, it was 1.65 mm. Eight patients had disease recurrence and five patients died.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of melanoma remains rare in children. This study contributes to our current understanding of malignant melanoma in paediatric patients; however, further investigation of the disease characteristics in this group is necessary to achieve optimal management of these cases and therefore improve outcomes.