The surgical management of malrotation: A Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons survey

Laparoscopic Versus Open Ladd Procedure for Midgut Malrotation

INTRODUCTION

Intestinal malrotation is an uncommon developmental anomaly that can lead to duodenal obstruction and midgut volvulus. The standard correctional operation, Ladd's operation, is traditionally performed using an open approach, but providers are increasingly performing the procedure laparoscopically. However, there remains concern that the reduced adhesive burden associated with laparoscopy could predispose to recurrent volvulus.

METHODS

We queried our institutional database from 2012 to 2022 for patients <18 years who underwent Ladd's operation for malrotation. We analyzed baseline characteristics and outcomes including post-operative volvulus, adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO), duodenal obstruction, and overall abdominal re-operation.

RESULTS

We identified 226 patients, of whom 90 (40%) underwent a laparoscopic operation. Those undergoing open surgery were younger and had a higher rate of volvulus compared to laparoscopic patients. There were no differences in surgical history or underlying comorbidities. Laparoscopic patients were less likely to develop a post-operative adhesive SBO [1/90 (1%) vs 14/136 (10.0%); OR 9.4 (1.7-176.4), p = 0.036] with no increased rate of volvulus [1/90 (1%) vs 1/136 (0.7%), p = 0.778]. However, there were four laparoscopic patients that required re-operation for a duodenal stricture or kink, which led the overall rate of abdominal re-operation to not be different [7/90 (8%) vs 16/136 (12%); OR 1.6 (0.6-4.8), p = 0.371]. Median follow up was 2.3 years [IQR 1.0-5.0].

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic correction of midgut malrotation demonstrates no increased risk of post-operative volvulus and may reduce the rate of adhesive SBO. These benefits must be weighed against the potential increased risk of duodenal stricture or obstruction secondary to an incomplete Ladd's procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure for intestinal malrotation in small infants with midterm follow-up

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic Ladd's procedure (LL) for intestinal malrotation (IM) in small infants.

METHODS

All patients aged < 6 months with IM who underwent Ladd's procedures between January 2012 and December 2019 were enrolled. The perioperative demographics and midterm follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed and compared between patients who underwent LL and open Ladd's operation (OL).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled for analysis. The baseline characteristics were well matched in the two groups. The rate of volvulus was similar in the two groups (76.2% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.81). Two cases in the LL group were converted to OL due to intraoperative bleeding and intestinal swelling. The operative time (ORT) was not significantly different between the two groups (73.8 ± 18.7 vs. 66.8 ± 11.6 min, P = 0.76). Compared to the OL group, the LL group had a shorter time full feed (TFF) (3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 7.3 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.03) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (PHS) than the OL group (5.5 ± 1.6 vs. 11.3 ± 2.7 days, P = 0.02). The rate of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups (9.5% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.47). The LL group had a lower rate of adhesive obstruction than the OL group, but the difference was not significant (0.0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.09). One patient suffered recurrence in the LL group, while 0 patients suffered recurrence in the OL group (4.8% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.07). The rate of reoperation in the two groups was similar (4.8% vs. 8.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The LL procedure for IM in small infants was a safe and reliable method that had a satisfactory cosmetic appearance and shorter TFF and PHS than OL.

Appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure: a systematic review and survey analysis

BACKGROUND

Ladd's Procedure has been the surgical intervention of choice in the management of congenital intestinal malrotation for the past century. Historically, the procedure included performing an appendectomy to prevent future misdiagnosis of appendicitis, since the location of the appendix will be shifted to the left side of the abdomen. This study consists of two parts. A review of the available literature on appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure and then a survey sent to pediatric surgeons about their approach (to remove the appendix or not) while performing a Ladd's procedure and the clinical reasoning behind their approach.

METHODS

The study consists of 2 parts: (1) a systematic review was performed to extract articles that fulfill the inclusion criteria; (2) a short online survey was designed and sent by email to 168 pediatric surgeons. The questions in the survey were centered on whether a surgeon performs an appendectomy as part of the Ladd's procedure or not, as well as their reasoning behind either choice.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded five articles, the data from the available literature are inconsistent with performing appendectomy as part of Ladd's procedure. The challenge of leaving the appendix in place has been briefly described with minimal to no focus on the clinical reasoning. The survey demonstrated that 102 responses were received (60% response rate). Ninety pediatric surgeons stated performing an appendectomy as part of the procedure (88%). Only 12% of pediatric surgeons are not performing appendectomy during Ladd's procedure.

CONCLUSION

It is difficult to implement a modification in a successful procedure like Ladd's procedure. The majority of pediatric surgeons perform an appendectomy as part of its original description. This study has identified gaps in the literature pertaining to analyze the outcomes of performing Ladd's procedure without an appendectomy which should be explored in future research.

Diagnosis and management of intestinal rotational abnormalities with or without volvulus in the pediatric population

Intestinal malrotation is a congenital anomaly that can be associated with midgut volvulus, requiring an emergent operation in order to maintain blood supply to the compromised intestine. It results from an abnormal rotation of the intestines, leading to three types of malrotation. Non-rotation is complete failure of the intestines to rotate, while the most common configuration is associated with the cecum in the mid-upper abdomen, close to a malpositioned duodenal-jejunal (DJ) flexure. This configuration has a narrow mesentery that has a high risk of volvulus. The final form of malrotation is incomplete rotation, where the DJ flexure and cecum are malpositioned, but the mesentery is not narrowed. The benefits of performing a Ladd's procedure for these individuals is controversial. Workup for malrotation should be considered in all patients who present with abdominal pain/distention and bilious emesis. An upper gastrointestinal contrast study is 93-100% sensitive and will show a corkscrew appearance when a volvulus is present. While the basic tenets of the Ladd's procedure have not changed and include detorsion of a volvulus, adhesiolysis of Ladd's bands and broadening of the mesentery, how this is accomplished and in whom are controversial. Laparoscopic Ladd's is associated with shorter hospital stays but also has a higher incidence of recurrent volvulus compared to an open approach. Patients with heterotaxy syndrome also represent a controversial group with some studies showing no difference in post-operative complications despite a higher mortality due to underlying cardiac disease, while other studies show a low incidence of volvulus and question the need for Ladd's in those who are asymptomatic. This review highlights the major aspects of diagnosing and treating malrotation, including the pathophysiology, workup, surgical options and areas of controversy.

Laparoscopic vs open Ladd's procedure for malrotation in neonates and infants: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure for malrotation in children is still a controversial approach. Although some retrospective studies have compared the outcomes of the two types of procedure with inconsistency outcomes. Currently, there are few large-scale studies on laparoscopic treatment in malrotation with neonates and infants. We did a study based on propensity score matching to compare the effects of the two kinds of approach in neonates and infants. To investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopy and open Ladd’s procedure by the propensity score-matching (PSM) to enhance the validity of the comparison.

Methods

A total series of 143 cases of intestinal malrotation without intestinal necrosis was included in the study during the 8 years from January 2012 to January 2020, including 68 cases of open Ladd’s procedure and 75 cases of laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure including five cases of transfer laparotomy. By a propensity score 1:1 matching, 62 patients were stratified for each group.

Results and conclusion

There was no significant difference in volvulus degree, weight and gender between the two groups (p > 0.05). Laparoscopic surgery took more time than open surgery (105.9 min vs 70.6 min, p < 0.05), but it had less hospital stay (12.4 days vs 14.6 days, p < 0.05) or less incision infection (0 vs 6, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at the time of first defecation, blood loss, time of full feeding and reoperation (p > 0.05). The cosmetic effect of laparoscopic surgery is better than that of open surgery. Laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure is a safe approach. It can reduce the length of hospital stay and incision infection, but the operation time was extended, the other complications are similar compared with open procedure for intestinal malrotation in neonates and infants.

Outcomes for Ladd's procedure: Does approach matter?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure has been proven safe and effective for the treatment of malrotation. However, the nationwide utilization and outcomes of elective Ladd's procedure are largely unknown.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014 was used to identify patients 0-18 years (excluding newborns) with malrotation who underwent elective Ladd's procedure. Demographics, hospital factors, and outcomes were compared by approach (laparoscopic vs. open) using standard statistical tests and propensity score (PS) matched analysis. Results were weighted for national estimates.

RESULTS

1343 patients (44% male) underwent elective Ladd's procedure via laparoscopic (22%) or open (78%) approach. Laparoscopic approach was more common in large hospitals (26% vs. 16%), patients >13 years (30% vs. 20%), and those with higher income (29% vs. 16%), all p < 0.001. Following PS matching, compared to the laparoscopic approach, open Ladd's was associated with index hospital length of stay > 7 days (20% vs. 8%), more post-operative gastrointestinal dysfunction (12% vs. < 1%), and more nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea (16% vs. 6%), all p < 0.001. The overall readmission rates within 30 days and the year of index operation were 8% and 15%, respectively. In the matched cohort, those undergoing laparoscopic Ladd's were less likely to be readmitted than those with the open approach (7% vs. 16%, p < 0.001) and experienced less gastrointestinal issues on readmission (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.002). There were similar rates of post-operative small bowel obstruction (< 3% vs. < 3%, p = 0.840) and volvulus (0% vs. < 1%, p = 0.136). Redo Ladd's procedure was performed in less than 4% of readmissions and all occurred within 5 days of initial hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

The majority of Ladd's procedures in the U.S. are being performed open, despite comparable outcomes following a laparoscopic approach. Readmission rates are similar with either approach, and the rate of redo Ladd's procedure is lower than previously reported.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Five Hundred Patients With Gut Malrotation: Thirty Years of Experience With the Introduction of a New Surgical Procedure

OBJECTIVES

Define clinical spectrum and long-term outcomes of gut malrotation. With new insights, an innovative procedure was introduced and predictive models were established.

METHODS

Over 30-years, 500 patients were managed at 2 institutions. Of these, 274 (55%) were children at time of diagnosis. At referral, 204 (41%) patients suffered midgut-loss and the remaining 296 (59%) had intact gut with a wide range of digestive symptoms. With midgut-loss, 189 (93%) patients underwent surgery with gut transplantation in 174 (92%) including 16 of 31 (16%) who had autologous gut reconstruction. Ladd's procedure was documented in 192 (38%) patients with recurrent or de novo volvulus in 41 (21%). For 80 patients with disabling gastrointestinal symptoms, gut malrotation correction (GMC) surgery "Kareem's procedure" was offered with completion of the 270° embryonic counterclockwise-rotation, reversal of vascular-inversion, and fixation of mesenteric-attachments. Concomitant colonic dysmotility was observed in 25 (31%) patients.

RESULTS

The cumulative risk of midgut-loss increased with volvulus, prematurity, gastroschisis, and intestinal atresia whereas reduced with Ladd's and increasing age. Transplant cumulative survival was 63% at 10-years and 54% at 20-years with best outcome among infants and liver-containing allografts. Autologous gut reconstruction achieved 78% and GMC had 100% 10-year survival. Ladd's was associated with 21% recurrent/de novo volvulus and worsening (P > 0.05) of the preoperative National Institute of Health patient-reported outcomes measurement information system gastrointestinal symptom scales. GMC significantly (P ≤ 0.001) improved all of the symptomatology domains with no technical complications or development of volvulus. GMC improved quality of life with restored nutritional autonomy (P < 0.0001) and daily activities (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gut malrotation is a clinicopathologic syndrome affecting all ages. The introduced herein definitive correction procedure is safe, effective, and easy to perform. Accordingly, the current standard of care practice should be redefined in this orphan population.

Outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of intestinal malrotation in children

BACKGROUND

The safety of the laparoscopic treatment of intestinal malrotation remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of intestinal malrotation.

METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study included pediatric cases of intestinal malrotation operated on between 2005 and 2016.

RESULTS

This study included 227 children with a median age of 17 days (0-17.2 years), including 161 with a midgut volvulus. Forty-six(20.3%) procedures were started by laparoscopy and 181(79.7%) by laparotomy. Laparoscopy was more frequent for elective surgery (45.9%) than for emergency procedures (10.8%, p < 0.001). Conversions were significantly more frequent during emergency procedures (66.7% vs 17.9%)(p = 0.001). Considering only 61 elective surgeries, the mean hospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopy (5.3 days +/-5.2 vs 10.1 days +/-13, p = 0.01), the overall complication rate was comparable (15.8% vs 21.7%, p = 0.7) but post-operative volvulus was significantly more frequent after laparoscopy (13% vs 0%, p = 0.04). Outcomes of the two approaches were not significantly different after 166 emergency procedures.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy can be performed by experienced team for the treatment of selected cases of intestinal malrotation. Conversion to open surgery should be done with a low threshold, as the rate of volvulus recurrence is concerning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Laparoscopic Ladd Procedure for the Management of Malrotation and Volvulus

Introduction: While laparoscopic Ladd procedure is commonly performed in patients with asymptomatic malrotation, a paucity of data exists on children with volvulus or with low weight (≤3 kg). Our purpose was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic Ladd procedure in these complex patient populations. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing operation for malrotation from 2008 to 2018 was performed. Specific subgroup analysis was performed comparing outcomes after open and laparoscopic approaches in patients presenting with acute volvulus or in low-weight (<3 kg) patients. Results: Out of 110 patients, 38 (35%) presented with volvulus and 72 (65%) without volvulus. In patients with volvulus, 16 (42%) underwent laparoscopy and 22 (58%) had an open procedure. More patients in the open group had a preoperative diagnosis of volvulus (63.6% vs. 12.5%, P = .002). Operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (87 vs. 61 minutes, P = .029), with 7 patients being converted to an open procedure (44%). Days to regular diet, hospital length of stay, and recurrent volvulus were similar between groups. In patients weighting <3 kg, 10 patients underwent laparoscopy and 10 patients had an open procedure. Demographics, operative time, postoperative outcomes, and complications were similar between groups. One person in the laparoscopic group was converted to open. Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of malrotation, even in the presence of volvulus and low patient weight, is safe and effective, with low rates of recurrent volvulus. If exposure is suboptimal, conversion to open in patients with volvulus should be considered.

The recurrence of colonic volvulus due to nonrotation after intestinal resection in adulthood: a case report

Background

Intestinal nonrotation is a rare congenital condition that causes fatal colonic volvulus at any age. Once volvulus attack occurs, radical surgical therapy is required for treatment and the prevention of recurrence. This report describes the case of an adult female patient with a recurrence of cecum volvulus due to intestinal nonrotation after transverse colon resection for colonic volvulus.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old female visited our emergency room (ER) with intermittent abdominal pain and nausea. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed enlargement of the level of the ascending and transverse colon and an obstruction with a whirlpool sign at the transverse colon. The small intestine was distributed on the right side of the abdominal cavity, and the large intestine occupied the left side. She was diagnosed with volvulus with intestinal nonrotation, and emergency surgery was performed. Surgical examination indicated that the ascending colon to the transverse colon was not fixed to the retroperitoneum, and the transverse colon was rotated 180° clockwise. The axis of the volvulus was a mesenteric adhesion of the transverse colon. The involved transverse colon was resected, and the intestine was reconstructed by functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA). Six years after the initial surgery, the patient presented to the ER with abdominal fullness and lower abdominal pain. Enhanced CT revealed that the cecum, ascending colon, and remaining transverse colon were dilated with an obstruction. The appendix was located in the left upper abdominal cavity. The clinical diagnosis was cecal volvulus with intestinal nonrotation. An emergency laparotomy revealed that the cecum was rotated 180° clockwise. The terminal ileum to the remaining transverse colon was resected, and FEEA was performed. Seven months later, she suffered obstruction of the intestine caused by an operative adhesion, and conservative treatment was successful. The patient has had no abdominal symptoms for one and a half years so far.

Conclusions

Surgeons should realize that nonrotation of the intestines induces volvulus in adulthood and should familiarize themselves with its clinical findings, appropriate treatment, and prognosis. Even after surgical treatment, awareness of the recurrence of volvulus should be maintained to avoid a late diagnosis.

Incidentally discovered intestinal nonrotation at time of bariatric surgery: Which operation to perform?

BACKGROUND

An incidental finding of intestinal nonrotation at the time of bariatric surgery poses the following 2 dilemmas: (1) which operation to perform, and (2) whether an appendectomy should be performed concurrently.

OBJECTIVES

To review the experience of 2 Bariatric Centers of Excellence with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with intestinal nonrotation, and to perform a systematic review of the literature on this topic.

SETTING

Two Bariatric Centers of Excellence as designated by the Ontario Bariatric Network.

METHODS

A chart review of all LSG cases performed in patients with intestinal nonrotation at 2 centers was performed. A systematic review on performing bariatric surgery in patients with intestinal nonrotation/malrotation was conducted using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases.

RESULTS

Four patients (.4% of all cases) underwent LSG in the setting of intestinal nonrotation. Two patients underwent a concurrent appendectomy. Three patients developed postoperative gastrointestinal reflux disease and 1 patient required conversion to a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A total of 12 retrospective studies with 23 patients were included in the systematic review. Nineteen patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 3 patients underwent a duodenal switch, and 1 patient underwent LSG. Nine patients (41%) underwent a concurrent appendectomy. Reasons cited for not performing an appendectomy include not completely understanding the anatomic defect, being surprised by the discovery of nonrotation, no consent for the procedure, and suboptimal trocar placement for an appendectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG is a reasonable alternative to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with intestinal nonrotation. A concurrent appendectomy may not be necessary in the era of modern cross-sectional imaging for diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Reoperation after Ladd's procedure in the neonatal period

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate (1) the indications for reoperation after neonatal Ladd's procedure, (2) the type of reoperation and (3) its outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed all neonatal Ladd's procedures in our hospital from 2003 to 2017 and the outcomes of reoperation in these patients.

MAIN RESULTS

252 neonates had Ladd's procedure: 59 were laparoscopic (23.4%) and 193 open (76.6%). 15 (6.0%) required reoperation with no difference between laparoscopic and open (p = 0.12). Overall, the indications for reoperation were: adhesive intestinal obstruction (n = 10, 4.0%), recurrent midgut volvulus (n = 4, 1.6%), and missed diagnosis of associated anomaly (n = 1, 0.4%). The incidence of recurrent midgut volvulus was higher after laparoscopic Ladd's procedure (3/59; 5.1%) compared to open Ladd's procedure (1/193; 0.5%) (p = 0.04). Adhesive intestinal obstruction developed after both open (8/193, 4.1%) or laparoscopic Ladd's procedure (2/59, 3.3%). The duration of reoperation and the length of post-operative hospital stay were 63.4 ± 27.1 min and 10.1 ± 5.2 days, respectively. After reoperation, there were no post-operative complications. All children were well at follow-up (6 months-14 years).

CONCLUSIONS

In neonates, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure compared to the open Ladd's procedure is associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrent volvulus. The risk of developing this potentially dangerous complication after laparoscopic Ladd's procedure raises doubts about the effectiveness and safety of the laparoscopic approach in neonates.

Is less more? Laparoscopic versus open Ladd's procedure in children with malrotation

BACKGROUND

With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic Ladd's procedure is increasingly used to treat children with malrotation, yet evidence regarding its safety and efficacy is lacking. We hypothesize that operative and postoperative outcomes with the open technique are superior to the laparoscopic Ladd's procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a 5-y retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent Ladd's procedure at our institution from 2010-2015. Exclusion of patients included those with concomitant conditions, such as poor gut perfusion, significant reflux, tracheoesophageal fistula, failure to thrive requiring concomitant gastrostomy, and biliary atresia. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used where appropriate.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2015, of 130 patients who underwent Ladd's procedure, 77 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-two patients underwent initial open surgery, 15 patients underwent laparoscopy, seven of which were converted to open. Patients undergoing open surgery were younger compared to the laparoscopic groups. Thirty-three of the 77 malrotation patients (43%) presented with volvulus, 27 underwent open surgery, four had laparoscopic converted to open procedures, and two patients underwent laparoscopic Ladd's without incident. Laparoscopy resulted in increased operative time and clinic visits. Patients undergoing laparoscopic to open surgery had longer operative times, time to resume diet, and length of hospital stay. No difference was noted in complications among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although minimally invasive approaches are becoming increasingly used, no evidence supports laparoscopic superiority over open Ladd's procedure. We found that open surgery was associated with shorter operating times and fewer clinic visits. Furthermore, laparotomy remains the favored procedure for patients presenting with volvulus.