Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted approach for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children

Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted endoscopic treatment of primary intermediate and high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children in a long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is an important minimally invasive surgical approach in patients undergoing surgical treatment of VUR. In our past experience, we observed that a bulking agent mound sagittal diameter of 10 mm is the main predictor of effectiveness of the procedure. Moreover we noticed that the use of intraoperative ultrasound, allows the surgeon to better identify the site, volume and shape of the bulking agent injected, finally reducing operative time.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate if the intraoperative ultrasound assistance could definitively improve effectiveness of the endoscopic procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared two series treated with endoscopic procedures for intermediate and high grade primary VUR, respectively without (series A) and with (series B) intraoperative ultrasound (IO-US). In all patients VCUG was performed to assess VUR grade and to verify resolution or VUR downgrading during the follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 177 ureteric units were treated. Endoscopic procedures globally were effective in 68/96 ureters (70.8 %) in series A and in 68/81 ureters (83.9 %) in series B. No significant differences in effectiveness were observed comparing the series with regard to VUR grades, but a significant difference is shown (p < 0.05) when grouping grades III-V VUR. No significance in differences of volume injected were detected, but operative time was significantly lower in series B (27.5 min vs 19.6 min, p < 0.05). Mean sagittal mound diameter measured during cystoscopy in series B was 10.45 mm (range 8.5-14.2 mm).

DISCUSSION

The intraoperative ultrasound assistance during endoscopic treatment of VUR could represent a valid tool for surgeons to better identify location, volume and shape of the bulking agent. Furthermore, the use of an objective parameter of evaluation of the implant can overcome the subjective intraoperative evaluation of the implant itself, improving results for experienced surgeons and reducing the learning-curve for inexperienced ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of endoscopic injection of bulking-agent can be improved with intraoperative ultrasound, allowing at the same time a significant reduction of operative time.

Modified unilateral periureteral injection technique in the treatment of patients with high-grade vesicoureteral reflux: A study of primary findings

Objective

Although endoscopic treatment has been used by many pediatric urologists for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), it has no considerable success in high-grade VUR. We aimed to describe the primary outcomes of unilateral periureteral injection technique (PIT), as well as bilateral PIT in high-grade VUR.

Methods

In this prospective study, we examined 92 ureters in 45 boys and 40 girls from February 2010 to May 2018. Bilateral PIT and unilateral PIT were applied in 67 and 25 refluxing units, respectively. In the unilateral PIT, the subureteral injection site was only at the 5- or 7-o'clock position. However, in the bilateral PIT, the subureteral injection sites were at 5- and 7-o'clock position. Pre- and post-operative reflux grades were evaluated by voiding cystourethrography 6 months after surgery.

Results

Seven patients had bilateral reflux. Overall, 75 (81.5%) ureters showed Grade IV VUR, while 17 (18.5%) had primary Grade V VUR. The mean age of the subjects was 39.2 months. In unilateral PIT ureters, VUR was resolved in 23 (92.0%) refluxing units. It was downgraded to Grade III in one ureter (4.0%) and to Grade II in another ureter (4.0%). In addition, in bilateral PIT cases, VUR was resolved in 60 (89.6%) ureters; it downgraded to Grades II and III in 3 (4.5%) and 4 (6.0%) refluxing units, respectively.

Conclusion

Unilateral PIT can be highly effective in the treatment of selected ureters of high-grade VUR. However, further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Endoscopic Injection Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Meeting with the Factors Involved in the Success Rate

The challenges and controversies in vesicoureteral reflux intervention guidelines resulted in a more individualized treatment planning. Endoscopic injection therapy is now widely used and is considered preferable, but still remains less successful than ureteral reimplantation. Τhe endoscopic vesicoureteral reflux approach should be risk-adapted to current knowledge, so more experience and longer-term follow-up are needed. The precise of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors that affecting endoscopic injection therapy success rates and outcome have not yet been clearly determined. The aim of this study was to investigate these associated factors. Although the reflux grade is the most well-known factor that can affect the success of the procedure, there is no agreement on which factors are the most influential for the efficacy of endoscopic reflux treatment. So, we carried out a broad review of published papers on this topic, and we presented all the potential predictive variables of endoscopic reflux resolution in children.

The fate of implant after endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid in vesicoureteral reflux: time to partial reabsorption and stabilization

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) potentially leads to renal damage, scarring, and eventually end-stage renal disease. Endoscopic treatment is well tolerated in children, it has reduced costs, and it effectively prevents urinary tract infections (UTIs), while avoiding long term antibiotics use.

OBJECTIVE

With the aim to investigate the time needed to reach the stabilization of the dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) implants and to identify cut-off heights to ensure the success of the procedure, the authors analyzed ultrasonographic (US) intra-operative appearance of the mounds following endoscopic treatment for VUR and repeated the measurements during serial postoperative evaluations. The final clinical goal would be to obtain an alternative parameter that might reduce the need for postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG).

STUDY DESIGN

The authors selected all children treated for moderate-high grade VUR with renal scarring or repeated UTI under antibiotic prophylaxis and followed with regular time points for at least 1 year (time points 1, 3, 6, and 9 months). Endoscopic injection performed with double-HIT/STING technique was combined with US to determine the intra-operative mound height and to calculate reabsorption rate. Mound height was measured as the maximal vertical diameter of the mound visualized at the ureteral orifice. Based on postoperative VCUG findings, patients were divided in group A (success of the endoscopic treatment) and group B (persistence of reflux).

RESULTS

Thirty patients aged 1-7 years, counting for 47 ureters, completed the protocol and were included in the analysis. Mounds height had a significant difference between A and B at all time points (P < 0.005). However, height did not differ between 6 and 9 months in both groups. Percentage of reduction in A was significant from 1 to 6 months (P < 0.005) but not onward, while in B, it was never significant. Ultimately, both groups had a comparable trend of reabsorption, with a complete stabilization achieved in 6 months and an overall reduction of approximately 22%.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Following the endoscopic injection of Dx/HA, US mounds height was found to strongly correlate with VCUG, both intra-operatively and for months following the procedure. Compared with the available literature, the authors first report a fixed reabsorption rate, consistent with the results in animal models and a timeframe to achieve stabilization. The possibility to measure those parameters with US renders this approach useful in the clinical setting, and it justifies the reduced use of VCUG in the follow-up of endoscopic injection for VUR.

Avoiding routine postoperative voiding cystourethrogram: Predicting radiologic success for endoscopically treated vesicoureteral reflux

INTRODUCTION

Variability in the success rates for the endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has prompted a debate regarding the use of routine postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). This study examines the predictive performance of intraoperative mound morphology (IMM) and the presence of a postoperative ultrasound mound (PUM) on radiologic success, as well as investigates the role of using these two predictive factors as a composite tool to predict VUR resolution after endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children with primary VUR who underwent endoscopic correction with a double hydrodistension-implantation technique (HIT) and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer. IMM was assessed intraoperatively. The presence of a PUM and VUR resolution were assessed by postoperative ultrasound (US) and VCUG, respectively. Radiologic success was defined as VUR resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 70 children (97 ureters) were included in the study. The overall radiologic success rate was 83.5%. There was no statistically significant association between radiologic success and IMM (85.2% with excellent and 87.5% with "other" morphology; p=0.81). The sensitivity and specificity of PUM for radiologic success in this study was 98% and 71%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the combined prediction model were 81.9% and 85.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We objectively demonstrated that IMM was a poor predictor of radiologic success and should be used with caution. In addition, the performance of a combined prediction model was inferior to the presence of a PUM alone. As such, selective use of postoperative VCUG may be guided solely by the presence of a PUM.