Nonoperative management of giant omphalocele leading to early fascial closure

Managing giant omphalocele: A systematic review of surgical techniques and outcomes

AIM

We analysed closure techniques in the treatment of giant omphalocele. A challenging pathology where there lacks consensus.

METHODS

Cochrane, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 2022 using terms and variations: omphalocele, exomphalos, giant, closure and outcome. Papers were selected using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses 2020 criteria. Data collected included demographics, timing and technique of surgical repair, morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 342 papers; 34 met inclusion criteria with a total 356 neonates. Initial non-operative management was described in 26 papers (14 dressings, eight silo, four serial sac-ligation). Operative techniques by paper were as follows: Early closure: nine primary suture closure without patch, two primary closure with patch and four mixed methods. Delayed closure: five simple, four-component separation technique, four tissue expanders, one Botox/pneumoperitoneum and two with patch. Median number of procedures was two (1-6) in the early group versus three (1-4) in the delayed. The most favourable was early primary closure with biological patch. The most unfavourable was delayed closure with patch. Cumulative reported mortality remained high, mostly due to non-surgical causes.

CONCLUSION

Definitions of giant omphalocele in the literature were heterogeneous with a variety of management approaches described.

Giant omphalocele: A novel approach for primary repair in the neonatal period using botulinum toxin

INTRODUCTION

Giant omphalocele (GO) is a complex condition for which many surgical treatments have been developed; however, no consensus on its treatment has been reached. The benefits and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTA) in the repair of large abdominal wall defects in adults has been proven, and its reported use in children has recently grown. The goal of this study is to describe a novel technique for primary repair of GO using BTA during the neonatal period and report our initial experience.

METHODS

patients were followed from August 2020 to July 2022. BTA was applied to the lateral abdominal wall in the first days of life followed by surgical repair of the abdominal defect.

RESULTS

while awaiting surgery, patients had minimal manipulation, without requiring mechanical ventilation, were on full enteral feeding, and in contact with their parents. The midline was approximated without tension and without the need for additional techniques or the use of a prosthesis. Patients were discharged with repaired defects.

CONCLUSION

this approach represents a middle ground between staged and the nonoperative delayed repairs. It does not require aggressive interventions early in life, allowing maintenance of mother-child bonding and discharge of the patient with a repaired defect without the need for additional techniques or the use of a prosthesis. We believe that this technique should be considered as a new possible asset when managing this complex condition.

Vacuum-assisted staged omphalocele reduction: A preliminary report

INTRODUCTION

Omphalocele represents a rare congenital abdominal wall defect. In giant omphalocele, due to the viscero-abdominal disproportion, gradual reintegration of eviscerated organs is often associated with medical challenges. We report our preliminary experience combining staged gravitational reduction with vacuum (VAC) therapy as a novel approach for treatment of giant omphalocele.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of six patients (five females) born between September 2018 and May 2022 who underwent staged reduction of giant omphalocele in conjunction with VAC therapy was conducted. Treatment was performed at two German third-level Pediatric Surgery Departments. Biometric and periprocedural data were assessed. Main outcome measure was the feasibility of VAC therapy for giant omphalocele. Data are reported as median and interquartile range (Q1-Q3).

RESULTS

Gestational age was 37 (37-38) weeks, and birth weight was 2700 (2500-3000) g. VAC dressing was changed every 3 (3-4) days until abdominal fascia closure at the age of 9 (3-13) days. Time to first/full oral feeds was 3 (1-5)/20 (12-24) days with a hospital stay of 22 (17-30) days. Follow-up was 8 (5-22) months and complications were of minor extent (none: n = 2; Clavien-Dindo I: n = 3; Clavien-Dindo II: n = 1), comprising a delayed neo-umbilical cord rest separation (n = 2) and/or concomitant neo-umbilical site infection (n = 2) with no repeat surgery.

CONCLUSION

In neonates with giant omphalocele, VAC constitutes a promising and technically feasible enhancement of the staged gravitational reduction method. This study shows evidence that VAC may accelerate restoration of the abdominal wall integrity in giant omphalocele, thus minimizing associated comorbidities inherent to a prolonged hospitalization.

Abdominal Wall Defects

The 2 most common congenital abdominal wall defects are gastroschisis and omphalocele. Both are usually diagnosed prenatally with fetal ultrasonography, and affected patients are treated at a center with access to high-risk obstetric services, neonatology, and pediatric surgery. The main distinguishing features between the 2 are that gastroschisis has no sac and the defect is to the right of the umbilicus, whereas an omphalocele typically has a sac and the defect is at the umbilicus. In addition, patients with an omphalocele have a high prevalence of associated anomalies, whereas those with gastroschisis have a higher likelihood of abnormalities related to the gastrointestinal tract, with the most common being intestinal atresia. As such, the prognosis in patients with omphalocele is primarily affected by the severity and number of other anomalies and the prognosis for gastroschisis is correlated with the amount and function of the bowel. Because of these distinctions, these defects have different management strategies and outcomes. The goal of surgical treatment for both conditions consists of reduction of the abdominal viscera and closure of the abdominal wall defect; primary closure or a variety of staged approaches can be used without injury to the intra-abdominal contents through direct injury or increased intra-abdominal pressure, or abdominal compartment syndrome. Overall, the long-term outcome is generally good. The ability to stratify patients, particularly those with gastroschisis, based on risk factors for higher morbidity would potentially improve counseling and outcomes.

Systematic review of mortality associated with neonatal primary staged closure of giant omphalocele

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management of giant omphalocele has evolved at a slow pace, but evidence on the survival of patients who underwent primary staged closure is scattered and atomized.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the studies about of mortality associated with neonatal primary staged closure of giant omphalocele.

METHODS

Systematic review in three databases using ex-ante search protocol and selection of studies following the phases suggested by PRISMA and MOOSE criteria. Reproducibility and evaluation of methodological quality were guaranteed by using CARE and STROBE.

RESULTS

Seven studies of clinical cases with nine patients, and six cross-sectional studies with 85 individuals were analyzed. These were conducted in the USA mainly, between 1985 and 2018. In the case studies, the death was 11.1% owing to hepatic necrosis and portal system angiomatosis. On the cross-sectional studies, mortality was registered in 18.8% of patients owing to coarctation of the aorta, heart, kidney, intestinal, respiratory or multiple organ failure, an anomaly of venous return, prematurity, ruptured omphalocele, pulmonary hypoplasia, trisomy 13, ARDS, sepsis, and septic shock. The main complication was wound infection with subsequent confection of the silo, found in 5.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Only a few studies on staged closure of giant omphalocele were found on a low number of patients. The high survival rate and the low percentage of complications on the 94 analyzed patients suggest the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

According to the Journal of Pediatric Surgery this research corresponds to type of study level II for retrospective studies, and level IV for case series with no comparison group.

Ventral hernia secondary to giant omphalocele in a child: combined approach of botulinum toxin and preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum

Omphalocele is a congenital abdominal wall defect that occurs approximately 1 in 4000-6000 live births. The abdominal-visceral disproportion, large diameter of the defect, volume of liver in the sac along with high incidence of associated anomalies make the surgical management a real challenge. Currently, there are two strategies for managing giant omphaloceles, staged surgical closure and nonoperative delayed closure. The combined treatment with PPP and BoNT/A injection has recently been described in adults. There is strong evidence on safety and efficacy of the use of BoNT/As in other areas of pediatrics and no recent reports of PPP use in children. Also, there are no data available about the combination of both techniques in pediatric population. The purpose of this manuscript is to report a case of a 7-year-old female child that was referred to our institution with a large ventral hernia secondary to omphalocele. We opted for a combined approach with BoNT/A injection and PPP before the definitive surgery. The surgical result was great with midline closure with no tension and no need for prosthetic substitution or component separation needed. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of BoNT/A injection and PPP for large ventral hernias in children. BoNT/A application was safe and the PPP technique was also proved to be applicable on children. We believe that the combination of BoNT/A and PPP presented to be a safe approach with an excellent result, particularly for not needing abdominal wall prosthetic substitution.