Successful outcomes in adolescent varicocele treatment with high-level laparoscopic varicocelectomy

Assessing safety and efficacy of microscopic and laparoscopic varicocoelectomy for varicocoele treatment: A comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical is appropriate for 35-40% of varicocoele-induced infertility. This comparative observational study presents a comparative assessment of microscopic or laparoscopic varicocoelectomy (grade II varicocoele; n = 132 cases).

METHODS

Sperm count, density, total motility, and forward motility rate (preoperative and postoperative 6 months), operation duration, pain at 1 month, testicular atrophy (by scrotal ultrasound at 3 months), recurrence (angiography at 6 months), and scrotal edema (at 12 months) were measured.

RESULTS

The preoperative semen parameters were comparable between groups (P > 0.05), as were certain postoperative results (total sperm count [median 162 (range 100-242) compared with median 182 (range 84-253)]; sperm density [median 47 (range 38-83) compared with median 42 (range 27-88)]; forward motility (37.18 ± 4.14 compared with 34.13 ± 7.79); P > 0.05). However, sperm motility was higher in the microscope group (52.79 ± 8.21 compared with 46.64 ± 10.04; t = 2.304, P = 0.040). Within the microscope group, postoperative sperm density [median 47 (range 38-83)], total sperm motility (53.79 ± 8.25), and forward motility sperm rate (37.19 ± 4.14) demonstrated significant improvements compared with preoperative values (Z = -2.679, P = 0.005; t = -4.548, P < 0.001; t = -5.029, P < 0.001). In contrast, the postoperative forward motility sperm rate (34.13 ± 7.78) displayed substantial improvements compared with preoperative values (27.74 ± 14.42) within the laparoscopic group (t = -3.895, P = 0.001). Testicular atrophy occurred in neither group.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic varicocoelectomy may be safer and more effective.

Effect of Varicocelectomy on Serum Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Testosterone; The Interrelationship Between Hormonal Variables

Purpose

The present study was conducted to analyze the effect of varicocelectomy on serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and testosterone. The interrelationship between seminal and hormonal variables is also investigated.

Patients and Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients of the urology clinic from 2012 to 2017. The study was conducted in the Security Forces Hospital, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Infertile patients who had already undergone the FSH examination and testosterone twice were included in the study. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 was used to analyze the data.

Results

A total of 186 patients were studied which reveals that the age group of 21-30 years was higher than other age groups 80 (43%), micro varicocelectomy was performed in 138 (74%) of patients and 79 (47%) patients had one-year infertility. The study assessed the effect of varicocelectomy on sperm count and motility serum FSH, testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and prolactin, and it was found that none of the variables showed significant association after varicocelectomy, except for luteinizing hormone (P-value = 0.014). Testosterone levels in patients who had FSH ≤10 were also evaluated and it was found that the level of testosterone was increased with a decreased level of FSH (P-value = 0.005).

Conclusion

It was concluded from our results that after varicocelectomy, those patients who had FSH levels ≤10 were found to have increased testosterone levels. LH was also found to be significant; however, other hormones were not found to be significant. This may occur due to the reason that we have the majority of the participants in the age group 21-30. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the association with ample sample size.

Outcome following the surgical management of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The ideal surgical approach for the management of varicocele in children and adolescents remains controversial. Several techniques are available including artery- or lymphatic-sparing with optical magnification (via open inguinal or sub-inguinal approach), laparoscopic, antegrade and retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy.

Objectives

We aimed to appraise the clinical outcomes of these techniques in children and adolescents.

Data Sources and Methods

A systematic review was conducted (1997-2023). Meta-analysis or proportional meta-analysis for non-comparative studies (Freeman-Tukey transformation) using the random effects model was conducted. Results are expressed as overall proportion % and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

We identified 1910 studies; 632 duplicates were removed, 1278 were screened, 203 were reviewed and 56 were included, with 12 reporting on 2 different techniques (total of 68 data sets). Optical magnification via inguinal approach (498 cases): recurrence 2.5% (0.6-5.6), hydrocele 1.6% (0.47-3.4), testicular atrophy 1% (0.3-2.0), complications 1.1% (0.2-2.6); optical magnification via sub-inguinal approach (592 cases): recurrence 2.1% (0.7-4.4), hydrocele 1.26% (0.5-2.3), testicular atrophy 0.5% (0.1-1.3), complications 4% (1.0-8.8). Laparoscopic with mass-ligation/division (1943 cases): recurrence 2.9% (1.5-4.6), hydrocele 11.4% (8.3-14.9); complications 1.5% (0.6-2.9); laparoscopic with lymphatic-sparing (974 cases): recurrence 2.4% (1.5-3.5), hydrocele 1.2% (0.45-3.36), complications 1.2% (0.05-3.9); laparoscopic with artery-sparing (228 cases): recurrence 6.6% (2.3-12.9), hydrocele 6.5% (2.6-12.0). Antegrade embolization/sclerotherapy (403 cases): recurrence 7.6% (5.2-10.4), hydrocele 0.8% (0.17-1.9), technical failure 0.6% (0.1-1.6), complications 4.0% (2.3-6.1); retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy (509 cases): recurrence 6.9% (4.6-9.5), hydrocele 0.8% (0.05-2.5), technical failure 10.2% (4.6-17.6), and complications 4.8% (1.0-11.2).

Conclusion

The recurrence rate varies between 2.1% and 7.6% and is higher with the embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. Post-operative hydrocele rate varies between 0.8% and 11.4% and is higher with the laparoscopic mass-ligation/division technique. Testicular atrophy has not been reported with the laparoscopic and embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. The retrograde embolization technique is associated with 10% technical failure (inability to complete the procedure). The laparoscopic lymphatic-sparing technique is characterized by the lowest recurrence rate, incidence of hydrocele and other complications, and no reports of testicular atrophy.

An Analysis of Major Causes of Surgical Failure Using Bähren System in Intraoperative Venography During Varicocelectomy

PURPOSE

In young patients with varicocele, preservation of the internal spermatic artery may be advantageous for catch-up growth, but it may also increase the likelihood of treatment failure. Intraoperative venography reduces the likelihood that unsealed veins will remain after varicocelectomy. We analyzed the characteristics of remnant veins visualized through intraoperative venography to investigate the cause of surgical failure in artery-sparing varicocelectomy (ASV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients aged 18 years or younger who underwent varicocelectomy with intraoperative venography from January 2005 to December 2017. During varicocelectomy, intraoperative venography was performed to distinguish veins from other structures. Any unsealed veins that were discovered were ligated and classified using the Bahren system.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-two patients underwent intraoperative venography: 153 cases (94.4%) were for primary varicocelectomy, and 9 cases (5.6%) were for repeat varicocelectomy. Open varicocelectomy was performed in 105 cases (64.8%), and laparoscopic varicocelectomy was performed in 57 cases (35.2%). Venography revealed remnant veins after the first ligation in 51 cases (31.2%), 46 (90.2%) and 5 (9.8%) of which were Bähren types 3 and 4, respectively. Five patients (3.1%) experienced varicocele recurrence, classified as persistence in 1 patient (0.6%) and relapse in 4 patients (2.5%).

CONCLUSION

Remnant collateral veins of the internal spermatic vein (ISV) (Bahren type 3) are the most common cause of failure in ASV. In a few patients, an external spermatic vein merges with the ISV at a higher level (Bahren type 4) and is unidentifiable without venography.