Clinical and Economic Value of Routine Pathological Examination of Hernia Sacs and Scheduled Clinic Follow-Ups After Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele Repair in a Canadian Tertiary Care Children's Hospital

Histopathological Findings in Hernia Sacs: A Clinical and Pathological Review

Routine histopathological examination of hernia sac in adults remains a controversial topic. We undertook a retrospective study to assess possible clinical benefits of pathological examination of hernia sac specimens. Our pathology database between 1992 and 2020 was searched for adult specimens submitted as hernia sac. The clinical and pathological data of patients with abnormal histopathological findings were reviewed. There were 5424 hernia sac specimens (3722 inguinal, 1625 umbilical, and 77 femoral), 32/5424 (0.59%) with malignancies (28 epithelial and 4 lymphoid) and 25/32 were located in the umbilical region. Twelve out of twenty-five malignancies (48%) presented as primary clinical manifestations of the diseases (5 GI tract carcinomas, 5 gynecological tract carcinomas, and 2 lymphoid neoplasms); and 13/25 (52%) specimens were involved by previously known tumors (8 gynecological carcinomas, 3 colon carcinomas, 1 breast carcinoma, and 1 lymphoma). Among the 7 inguinal hernia sacs with malignancies, 3 (42.9%) were primary presentations of the tumors (2 prostatic carcinomas, 1 pancreatic carcinoma), and 4 (57.1%) were previously known tumors (2 ovarian carcinomas, 1 colon carcinoma, 1 lymphoid). Benign lesions were 12/5424 (0.22%), including 7 adrenal rests, 4 endometriosis, and 1 inguinal sarcoidosis. The incidence of hernia sacs with malignancies was 32/5424 (0.59%), most commonly from nearby organs in gynecological tract. However distant metastases from breast were also present. Near half of the hernia sac with malignancies (15/32, 47%) presented as the first clinical manifestation. Routine histopathological examination of hernia sac in adults is recommended, since it may provide important clinical information.

Spectrum of Histologic Findings in Orchiectomy Specimens of Patients Seeking Male to Female Physical Adaptation

Context. Hormonal therapy followed by orchiectomy is of the standard of care in management of gender identity disorder in patients seeking male to female transition. The orchiectomy specimens from these patients are routinely subjected to histopathologic evaluation. We discuss the spectrum of histopathologic findings, incidental findings, and cost analysis of processing these specimens. Design. Orchiectomy specimens from patients seeking male to female transition received at our institution from January 2019 to June 2021 were included in the study. Data including patient age, history of hormonal therapy, testicular weight, histopathologic findings, number of tissue sections, and processing cost were collected. Results. A total of 79 specimens were identified. Mean patient age was 36.7 ± 14.5 years. Mean testicular weight was 28.0 ± 8.3 g (right) and 27.8 ± 9.1 g (left). Histologic evaluation showed diminished or absent spermatogenesis in 100% and fibrosis of seminiferous tubules in 96% of specimens. Benign, incidental findings, none of which altered patient management were present in 6 specimens (8%). For most specimens, 3 sections per testis were submitted. This resulted in a mean of 5.8 ± 1.1 tissue sections submitted per specimen. Conclusions. Orchiectomy specimens from patients with gender dysphoria always demonstrate hormone-therapy effects albeit with varying degree. The chances of discovering any incidental finding of clinical significance are negligible. Diligent gross inspection and minimal tissue sampling with additional sampling reserved for gross abnormalities can adequately document the histologic findings in a cost-effective manner.

A Canadian national survey: Perspectives on routine pathological examination of hernia sacs after inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair among pediatric urologists, surgeons, and pathologists

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand perspectives on routine pathological examination of hernia sacs following pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair among Canadian pediatric urologists, surgeons, and pathologists.

STUDY DESIGN

All active members of Pediatric Urologists of Canada (PUC), Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (CAPS), and the divisional heads of anatomical pathology at the Canadian children's hospitals (AP) were invited to participate between June 2019 and January 2021 in an anonymous multiple-choice-based questionnaire.

RESULTS

The response rates were 71% from PUC (24/34), 20% from CAPS (25/130), and 64% from AP (7/11). The majority of the surgeons (PUC:54%, CAPS:68%) did not routinely send hernia sacs for pathological examination after inguinal hernia repair. Most felt there was a little value in such examination (PUC:96%, CAPS:72%). Among those who submit hernia sacs, the majority did not receive reports that were clinically significant impacting patient management (PUC:82%, CAPS:50%). On the other hand, the pathologists had mixed opinion on the value of examining hernia sacs. Most of them only did gross examination (86%), unless requested by surgeons or concerning features were noted on gross examination. The majority have found clinically meaningful abnormal findings (71%), including vas deferens and portions of the spermatic cord.

DISCUSSION

Currently, there are no evidence-based clinical guidelines on pathological assessment of hernia sacs after pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair. Instead of making it mandatory, future guidelines should highlight specimens that should be submitted for further investigations (e.g., challenging cases where inadvertent surgical injuries might have occurred). Future studies should also address whether patients who may be at higher risk of having clinically significant pathology can be identified pre- or perioperatively to more efficiently triage specimens that would benefit from pathological examination. Limitation of the study includes low response rate from the CAPS members during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

While most of the pediatric urologists and surgeons felt there is a little value of pathological examination of hernia sacs following inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair, half of the anatomical pathologists felt there is value. Future studies should aim to establish evidence-based clinical guidelines taking stakeholders perspectives into consideration.

Modified Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Using a Sledge-Shaped Needle for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele in 1199 Pediatric Patients

Background: The objective of the study is to determine the safety and efficiency of the modified laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) to treat pediatric patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele. Methods: From January 2014 to July 2018, the patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele who were operated on using modified LPEC were included. We modified LPEC with a sledge-shaped needle and reinforcement flag. By means of medial umbilical fold, the reinforcement surgery should be performed on the patients with huge internal rings (diameter >1.5 cm). Operative time, complication rate, incidence of reinforcement, and contralateral patent processus vaginalis were described between inguinal hernia and hydrocele. Results: In this study, 764 patients with inguinal hernia and 435 patients with hydrocele were successfully performed by the modified LPEC. The 383 (50.1%) patients with inguinal hernia and 266 (61.1%) patients with hydrocele were identified with a contralateral patency of internal ring and underwent simultaneous prophylactic surgery. During surgical procedures, the medial umbilical fold reinforcement (inguinal hernia/hydrocele = 50/1) was performed on 51 patients. Hernia recurrence occurred in 2 cases. All patients had a good cosmetic appearance without additional dissection. Conclusion: Modified LPEC using a sledge-shaped needle and applying the medial umbilical fold reinforcement is a safe and effective surgical procedure.