Qualities and characteristics of applicants associated with successful matriculation to pediatric surgery fellowship training

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Burnout in Pediatric General Surgery Fellows

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric surgeons are experiencing burnout at similar rates to other subspecialists; however, little is known about the prevalence of burnout in pediatric general surgery fellows. This study aims to determine the prevalence of burnout in pediatric general surgery trainees.

METHODS

The Maslach Burnout Inventory and a survey of personal and training characteristics were distributed to current and recently graduated pediatric surgery fellows. Higher Maslach Burnout Inventory subscores of emotional exhaustion (EE) and depersonalization (DP) indicate higher levels of burnout. Descriptive statistics were used to describe respondent characteristics. Burnout, as a dichotomous variable, was compared by chi-square test, and subscale scores werecompared by nonparametric tests for a variety of factors.

RESULTS

The response rate was 41% (52/126); 15% were first-year fellows, 54% were second-year fellows, and 31% were recent graduates. The majority were 30-39 y old (83%) and female (71%). The median [IQR] scores for EE, DP, and personal accomplishment were 23 [17-36], 8 [2-12.3], and 38 [34-41], respectively, with no significant differences by training year. Eighteen percent of respondents met burnout criteria based on high-risk EE subscores in combination with high-risk DP subscores, and 44% and 23.1% of respondents had high-risk EE and DP subscores, respectively. Factors associated with higher EE subscores were fewer hours of sleep and taking home call.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric surgery fellows experience high levels of burnout along with a high frequency of high-risk EE and DP scores. Lack of sleep and home call may be contributory, and efforts to combat burnout should specifically address these factors.

Examining the Influence of a General Surgery Resident's Transplant Experience on Their Pursuit of Transplant Surgery Fellowship

BACKGROUND

Transplant surgery has historically been a less desirable fellowship among general surgery graduates. Limited work has been done to understand factors associated with residents' interest in transplantation. Using a multi-institutional cohort, we examined how the resident experience on transplant surgery may influence their decision to pursue transplant fellowship.

METHODS

Individual demographics, program characteristics, and transplant-specific case logs were collected for graduates from 2010 to 2020 at 20 general surgery residency programs within the US Resident OPerative Experience (ROPE) Consortium. Residents who pursued transplant surgery fellowship were compared to those who went directly into practice or pursued a non-transplant fellowship.

RESULTS

Among 1342 general surgery graduates, 52 (3.9%) pursued abdominal transplant fellowship. These residents completed more transplant (22 vs. 9), liver (14 vs. 9), pancreas (15 vs. 11), and vascular access operations (38 vs. 30) compared to residents who did not pursue transplant fellowship (all p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression found that residents underrepresented in medicine were three times more likely (95% CI 1.54-6.58, p < 0.01) and residents at a program co-located with a transplant fellowship six times more likely (95% CI 1.95-18.18, p < 0.01) to pursue transplant fellowship. Additionally, a resident's increasing total transplant operative volume was associated with an increased likelihood of pursuing a transplant fellowship (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.14, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The findings from this multi-institutional study demonstrate that increased exposure to transplant operations and interaction within a transplant training program is associated with a resident's pursuit of transplant surgery fellowship. Efforts to increase operative exposure, case participation, and mentorship may optimize the resident experience and promote the transplant surgery pipeline.

Language Differences by Race on Letters of Recommendation for the Pediatric Surgery Match

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate if there is any significant linguistic difference in LoR based on applicant's race/ethnicity.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of applications to pediatric surgery fellowship at a single institution (2016-2020). Race was self-reported by applicants. LoR were analyzed via the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software program.

SETTING

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida USA. A free-standing tertiary pediatric hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric surgery fellowship applicants from 2016 to 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 1086 LoR from 280 applicants (52% female) were analyzed. Racial distribution was Caucasians 62.1%, Asian 12.1%, Hispanics 7.1%, multiracial 6.4% African Americans 5%, and other/unknown 7.1%. Letter writers were largely male (84%), pediatric surgeons (63%) and professors (57%). There was no difference in LoR word count across races. LoR for female multiracial candidates contained higher use of affiliation and negative emotion terms compared to Hispanic females (p = 0.002 and 0.048, respectively), and past focus terms when compared to Caucasian and Asian female applicants (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Religion terms were more common in LoR for Asian females when compared to Caucasian females (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates linguistic differences in LoR for pediatric surgery training programs based on applicant race/ethnicity. While differences are present, these do not suggest overt bias based on applicants race or ethnicity.

Financial Barriers to Surgical Conferences: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Registration Fees

BACKGROUND

Scientific meetings provide much educational value to participants of all career stages. There is a paucity of literature surrounding the costs of attending scientific meetings and how this may affect participation, especially among trainees. The objective of this study is to assess the accessibility of surgical conferences for attendees by analyzing costs related to surgical society membership and conference registration.

METHODS

Societal membership and conference registration fee data were collected according to career stage (i.e., student, resident, fellow, and staff) for the fourteen surgical specialties recognized by the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Fees for participants from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and for virtual-only attendance options were also collected when available.

RESULTS

Overall, we included data from 46 surgical societies (32 North American, 14 European or global). The median conference fees for students in the member and non-member categories were 191.55 USD (IQR 42.22-320.99) and 452.40 USD (IQR 294.06-555.00), respectively, representing a 136.2% price increase if not a member. Median conference fees for residents, fellows, and staff in the member category were 65.5%, 66.9%, and 230.9% greater than that for students, respectively. Median prices for residents, fellows, and staff in the non-member category were 49.9%, 54.9%, and 49.9% greater than that for member trainees of the same category, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the substantial costs associated with attending surgical conferences, especially for trainees, representing a significant barrier to already financially burdened trainees, especially those from LMICs, smaller institutions, or less well-off backgrounds.

Assessing Trends in Supply and Demand for Pediatric Surgery Training

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the supply and demand for Pediatric Surgery training in the U.S. from 2008 to 2022. We hypothesized that in the Pediatric Surgery Match: match rates would increase over time; U.S. MD Graduates would have higher match rates than non-U.S. MD Graduates; and fewer applicants would match at one of their top fellowship choices.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of Pediatric Surgery Match applicants (2008-2022). Cochran-Armitage tests elucidated temporal trends and chi square tests compared outcomes by applicant archetype.

SETTING

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited Pediatric Surgery training programs in the United States and non-ACGME-accredited programs in Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1,133 applicants for Pediatric Surgery training.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2012, growth in the annual number of fellowship positions (34-43, 27% increase) exceeded growth in number of applicants (62-69, 11% increase) (p < 0.001). Over the study period, the applicant-to-training ratio peaked at 2.1 to 2.2 in 2017 to 2018 and decreased to 1.4 to 1.6 in 2021 to 2022. The annual match rate for U.S. MD Graduates increased from 60% to 68% (p < 0.05), but decreased from 40% to 22% (p < 0.05) for non-U.S. MD Graduates. In 2022, there was a 3.1-fold difference in match rates between U.S. MD and non-U.S. MD Graduates (68% vs 22%, p < 0.001). The percentage of applicants that matched at their first choice (25%-20%, p < 0.001), second choice (11%-4%, p < 0.001), and third choice (7%-4%, p < 0.001) fellowships decreased over the study period. The percentage of applicants that matched at their fourth choice to least desirable fellowship increased from 23% to 33% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The demand for Pediatric Surgery training peaked in 2017 to 2018 and has decreased since. However, the Pediatric Surgery Match remains competitive especially for non-U.S. MD Graduates. More research is needed to understand barriers to matching into Pediatric Surgery for non-U.S. MD Graduates.

Are pediatric surgery fellowship websites ready for the changing paradigms in the virtual interview era?

Purpose

With the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person fellowship interviews were curtailed, leading candidates to seek information from other resources. Our main purposes were (1) to determine what information recent participants in the match needed to evaluate programs and (2) to assess which of these were available online.

Methods

A focus group of ten recent graduates/applicants identified information that was important in choosing a fellowship program. In August 2020 and December 2021, websites belonging to the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) and individual programs were assessed.

Results

Recent applicants identified 55 pieces of information considered important to their decision making. Of 57 pediatric surgery fellowships, 98% were listed on APSA's website. Program descriptions on APSA's website listed on average 60% of program information desired by applicants. All listed fellowship director, accreditation status, faculty list, and current fellow(s). Other descriptors frequently noted were alumni (95%), graduate's board performance (83%), ECMO exposure (77%), and curriculum (70%). Information desired but less frequently available were fellow case logs (63%), trauma center designation (53%), burn center designation (40%), research opportunities (30%), candidate interview assistance (25%), and supplemental fellowships (12%). There were 7% of program descriptions that were not updated for at least a year.

Conclusions

APSA and individual program websites were complimentary. Websites often lacked data that applicants sought to inform their rank list. To best adapt to the evolving virtual interview paradigm, we suggest reporting key information on a central APSA website with more nuanced information available via links to program specific websites.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-023-00104-w.

Fellowship Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Opportunities and Outcomes

The pursuit of fellowship training stems from one's desire to master a focused area of surgery. Successful applicants tend to have published articles and participated in other scholarly activities. They commonly have a mentor within the subspecialty of their interest. Selection of the program is generally based on the breadth of experience available followed by faculty reputation and location. Advantages to the successful fellowship graduate include the experience and confidence to provide specialized and efficient care to patients. Enhancements to an academic department with a fellowship program include mentorship for residents and guidance toward fellowship, as well as an increased level of scholarly activity.

The pediatric surgery match from the applicant perspective

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have examined characteristics critical to make a successful applicant in the pediatric surgery match. No previous study has focused on what applicants consider important as they interview pediatric surgery training programs.

STUDY DESIGN

Successfully matched applicants to our training program from 2018 to 2020 were identified and a 49-question survey sent electronically. In addition to a descriptive analysis of responses, comparisons between those who matched into one of their top three programs and those who matched outside of their top three programs were made. A Likert scale was used and data are reported as mean (95% confidence intervals).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty individuals were surveyed. Sixty-three (48%) responded. The most important characteristics identified were total index case volume 1.94 (1.87, 2.00), interactions with faculty on the interview day 1.84 (1.74, 1.94), neonatal case volume 1.75 (1.61, 1.88) and degree of autonomy 1.63 (1.50, 1.77). Respondents also placed a high importance on the in-person interview experience 1.63 (1.49, 1.77). The least important training program characteristics were quantity of vacation time -0.24 (-0.52, 0.05), opportunity to participate in medical mission trips -0.25 (-0.54, 0.06), paid accommodation at the interview -0.29 (-0.57, 0.00), and access to a simulation laboratory -0.51 (-0.78, -0.24).

CONCLUSION

Clinical volume, neonatal volume, faulty interactions and the experience on the interview day are the most important characteristics to applicants. There were few, if any, characteristics applicants felt were truly unimportant as they weighed their rank lists. Applicants also placed a high level of importance on an in-person interview LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Success in pediatric surgery: An updated survey of Program Directors 2020

BACKGROUND

One of the most competitive surgical sub-specialty fellowships remains Pediatric Surgery (PS), which requires candidates to develop a strong and research-oriented curriculum vitae. Although some objective factors of matriculation are known, factors for the interview selection and ranking per the program directors (PDs) have not been reviewed in over a decade.

METHODS

A web-based survey of US and Canadian PS program directors (PDs) (n = 58) was used to evaluate a comprehensive list of factors in the selection criteria for PS fellowships. A mix of dichotomous, ranking, five-point Likert scale, and open-ended questions evaluated applicant characteristics, ABSITE scores, research productivity, interview day, and rank order criteria.

RESULTS

Fifty-five programs responded to the survey for a 95% participation rate. PDs desired an average of two years in dedicated research and weighted first authorship and total number of publications heavily. Only 38% of programs used an ABSITE score cutoff for offering interviews; however, the majority agreed that an overall upward trend was important. Quality letters of recommendation, especially from known colleagues, carried weight when deciding to offer interviews. Interview performance, being a team player, observed interpersonal interactions, perceived operative skills and patient care, and leadership were some of the notable factors when finalizing rank lists.

CONCLUSIONS

A multitude of factors define a successful matriculant, including quality of letters of recommendation, quality and quantity of publications, supportive phone calls, observed interactions, interview performance, perceptions of being team player with leadership skills as well as perceptions of good operative skills and patient care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Type II.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognostic (retrospective).

Bridging the Gap: How to Get Osteopathic Residents Into Fellowships

Introduction

The fellowship match process is convoluted, with each specialty having its match on its timeline- with some programs having a Post Graduate Year (PGY) 4^th-year or 5^th-year match.

This study aims to identify tangible recommendations for osteopathic surgery residents to use to improve their applications and, ultimately, the success rate for matching into post-graduate fellowship training.

Methods

In October 2021, as a part of the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons (ACOS) Strategic Planning efforts, the ACOS Resident Student Section sent a questionnaire to the listed email contact for each surgical fellowship program. Fellowship coordinators and program directors were included in the survey. The programs that were included in the study were vascular, thoracic (which included cardiothoracic), surgical critical care, endocrine, hepatobiliary, transplant, pediatric, surgical oncology, breast, minimally invasive, and colorectal surgery.

Results

Of the 108 programs that answered the survey, 36% of them reported they currently had an osteopathic fellow, and another 29% said they had an osteopathic fellow in the past. 35% of the programs listed that they had never had an osteopathic fellow in their program.

In regards to how residents can improve their application for fellowship matches the most common answer was research in the field, they were trying to match into. They wanted to see high scores on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) exams. They also noted that they wanted candidates from more well know residency programs, where they knew the residents would have gotten good training.

Conclusion

We recommend that any potential fellowship applicant focus on the following three areas increase competitiveness for matching into fellowship training: publication in the desired field, increased overall scholarly activity, and increased ABSITE scores.

Recent Changes in Characteristics of Applicants and Matriculants to Thoracic Surgery Fellowships

The match rate for traditional thoracic surgery fellowships decreased from 97.5% in 2012 to 59.1% in 2021, reflecting an increase in applications. We queried whether characteristics of applicants and matriculants to traditional thoracic surgery fellowships changed during this time period. Applicant data from the 2008 through 2018 application cycles were extracted from the Electronic Residency Application System (ERAS) and Graduate Medical Education (GME) Track Resident Survey and stratified by period of application (2008-2014 vs 2015-2018). Characteristics of applicants and matriculants were analyzed. There were 697 applicant records in the early period and 530 in the recent period (application rate 99.6/year vs 132.5/year; P = 0.0005), and 607 matriculant records in the early period and 383 in the recent period (matriculation rate 87% vs 72%; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in representation of university-affiliated versus community-based general surgery residency programs among applicants comparing the periods. Higher proportions of applicants and matriculants in the early period trained in general surgery programs affiliated with a comprehensive cancer center or a thoracic surgery fellowship. Applicants and matriculants of the recent period had higher median numbers of journal publications and had higher impact factor journal publications. The increase in applicants for thoracic surgery training is primarily from general surgery trainees in residency programs not affiliated with a comprehensive cancer center or a thoracic surgery fellowship. The increased interest in thoracic surgery training was accompanied by overall enhanced scholarship production among the applicants and matriculants regardless of their residency characteristics.

Objective Personality Determination: A Useful Addition to the Traditional Process of Pediatric Surgical Fellow Selection

BACKGROUND

Selection of pediatric surgical trainees is a multifaceted process heavily influenced by in-person interviews to determine personality makeup and institutional compatibility. We present our experience in utilizing a validated personality inventory in the selection of our candidates.

METHODS

All applicants selected for an in-person interview for the 2020 Pediatric Surgery Match were offered the Big Five Inventory (BFI) questionnaire. An initial rank order list (ROL) was formulated employing application information and in-person interview score. A reformulated ROL was created after incorporating BFI data. Correlation of specific personality characteristics vs position on the ROL was assessed for both the initial ROL and the reformulated ROL.

RESULTS

Thirty-four applicants were interviewed and 24 (70.6%) were ranked. Linear regression analysis identified a lower neuroticism score directly related to a higher position on the initial ROL {R = .4626, P = .023}. The reformulated ROL identified a higher conscientiousness score {R = .5331; P = .007} and a lower neuroticism score {R = -.4383; P = .032} correlated with ascending the final ROL.

CONCLUSIONS

The self-administered BFI adds objectivity to personality determination gleamed from the standard face-to-face interview. Conscientiousness and neuroticism had a significant impact on the final ROL position. Adding objective personality data appears to provide additional aid in this difficult process.

Characteristics of Matriculants to Thoracic Surgery Residency Training Programs

BACKGROUND

Thoracic surgery (TS) residency positions are in high demand. There is no study describing the nationwide attributes of successful matriculants in this specialty. We examined the characteristics of TS resident applicants and identified factors associated with acceptance.

METHODS

Applicant data from 2014 to 2017 application cycles was extracted from the Electronic Residency Application System and stratified by matriculation status. Medical education, type of general surgery residency, and research achievements were analyzed. The number of peer-reviewed publications and the corresponding impact factor for the journals where they were published were quantified.

RESULTS

There were 492 applicants and 358 matriculants. The overall population was primarily male (79.5%), white (55.1%), educated at United States allopathic medical schools (66.5%), and trained at university-based general surgery residencies (59.6%). Education at United States allopathic schools (odds ratio [OR], 2.54; P < .0001), being a member of the American Osteopathic Association (OR, 3.27; P = .021), general surgery residency affiliation with a TS residency (OR, 2.41; P = .0003) or National Cancer Institute designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (OR, 1.76; P = .0172), and being a first-time applicant (OR, 4.71, P < .0001) were independently associated with matriculation. Matriculants published a higher number of manuscripts than nonmatriculants (median of 3 vs 2, P < .0001) and more frequently published in higher impact journals (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study includes objective and quantifiable data from recent application cycles and represents an in-depth examination of applicants to TS residency. The type of medical school and residency, as well as academic productivity, correlate with successful matriculation.

Making the Match: Three Program Directors' Thoughts on Successfully Matching into Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship

Successfully matching into a pediatric cardiology fellowship program is difficult, and there is currently a paucity of helpful material for prospective applicants. To address this gap and to guide pediatric cardiology fellowship applicants in navigating this process, three fellowship program directors have compiled a list of recommendations on how residents can improve their chances for a successful match. Detailed descriptions of the following recommendations are provided: become a great pediatrician, show consistent interest in pediatric cardiology, complete a research project, ensure great letters of recommendation, don't botch the personal statement, and apply wisely and interview effectively.