Standardized pathway for feeding tube placement reduces unnecessary surgery and improves value of care

Quality improvement dissemination in pediatric surgery: The APSA quality and safety toolkit

Shared experiential learning is critical in the field of pediatric surgery to support the translation of evidence into practice. Surgeons who develop QI interventions in their own institutions based on the best available evidence create work products that can accelerate similar projects in other institutions, rather than continuously reinventing the wheel. The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Quality and Safety Committee (QSC) toolkit was created to facilitate knowledge-sharing and thereby hasten the development and implementation of QI. The toolkit is an expanding open-access web-based repository of curated QI projects that includes evidence-based pathways and protocols, stakeholder presentations, parent/patient educational materials, clinical decision support (CDS) tools, and other components of successful QI interventions in addition to contact information for the surgeons who developed and implemented them. This resource catalyzes local QI endeavors by showcasing a range of projects that can be adapted to fit the needs of a given institution, and it also serves as a network to connect interested surgeons with successful implementers. As healthcare shifts towards value-based care models, quality improvement becomes increasingly important, and the APSA QSC toolkit will continue to adapt to the evolving needs of the pediatric surgery community.

Discharged on Enteral Nutrition: What Now? The Poor State of Outpatient Support for Patients on Enteral Nutrition Support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While the use of enteral nutrition (EN) has increased, and more medical centers have developed inpatient programs to address the unique needs of these patients, our collective experience at a few large institutions indicates that there is very little systemic support for patients after discharge. Here, we discuss what we have observed to be some of the barriers to providing outpatient follow up care, summarize the impact we have seen on patients, and propose some possible solutions.

RECENT FINDINGS

We have observed and identified some of the root causes to include financial barriers; uncoordinated care transitions; high complexity of care, including medication management; and diffuse leadership to a multidisciplinary problem. Systematic support for outpatient care for patients discharged on enteral nutrition is rare and limited, due to many root causes. There are a few tools and tips that we have summarized here for individual providers, and a few promising methods in development, but a systematic approach is in great need.

Gastrostomy Tube Use in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Despite frequency of gastrostomy placement procedures in children, there remains considerable variability in preoperative work-up and procedural technique of gastrostomy placement and a paucity of literature regarding patient-centric outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This review summarizes existing literature and provides consensus-driven guidelines for patients throughout the enteral access decision-making process.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies were identified through a combination of the search terms "gastrostomy," "g-tube," and "tube feeding" in children.

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant data, level of evidence, and risk of bias were extracted from included articles to guide formulation of consensus summaries of the evidence. Meta-analysis was conducted when data afforded a quantitative analysis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Four themes were explored: preoperative nasogastric feeding tube trials, decision-making surrounding enteral access, the role of preoperative imaging, and gastrostomy insertion techniques. Guidelines were generated after evidence review with multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement adhering to GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Nearly 900 publications were reviewed, with 58 influencing final recommendations. In total, 17 recommendations are provided, including: (1) tTrial of home nasogastric feeding is safe and should be strongly considered before gastrostomy placement, especially for patients who are likely to learn to eat by mouth; (2) rRoutine contrast studies are not indicated before gastrostomy placement; and (3) lLaparoscopic placement is associated with the best safety profile.

LIMITATIONS

Recommendations were generated almost exclusively from observational studies and expert opinion, with few studies describing direct comparisons between GT placement and prolonged nasogastric feeding tube trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional patient- and family-centric evidence is needed to understand critical aspects of decision-making surrounding surgically placed enteral access devices for children.

The effect of standardized discharge instructions after gastrostomy tube placement on postoperative hospital utilization

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gastrostomy tube (GT) placement is a common pediatric procedure with high postoperative resource utilization. We aimed to determine if standardized discharge instructions (SDI) reduced healthcare utilization rates.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing postoperative hospital utilization of patients who underwent initial GT placement pre- and post-SDI protocol implementation from 2014-2019. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests, multivariable adjusted logistic regression, adjusted Cox proportion hazard regression, and adjusted Poisson regression models when appropriate.

RESULTS

197 patients were included, 102 (51.8%) before and 95 (48.2%) after protocol implementation. On primary analysis, SDI patients did not have significantly different total postoperative hospital utilization events at 30-days (48.0% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.25). On secondary analysis, SDI patients had lower rates of ED (8.4% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.026) and office visits (11.6% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.017) at 30-days. Non-SDIs patients had greater odds of ED visits (OR2.7, 95%CI 1.3-5.9, p = 0.01), office visits (OR3.7, 95%CI 1.7-8.1, p = 0.001) and phone calls (OR2.6, 95%CI 1.2-5.7, p = 0.016) at 1-year. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.0 (95%CI 1.4-3.0, p < 0.001). Incident rate ratio were 1.8 (95%CI 1.2-2.5, p = 0.002) at 30-days and 1.9 (95%CI 1.5-2.4, p < 0.001) at 1-year post-discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

SDIs post-GT placement may reduce multiple aspects of postoperative hospital utilization.

Partial Enteral Discharge Programs for High-risk Infants

Premature infants or infants born with complex medical problems are at increased risk of having delayed or dysfunctional oral feeding ability. These patients typically require assisted enteral nutrition in the form of a nasogastric tube (NGT) during their NICU hospitalization. Historically, once these infants overcame their initial reason(s) for admission, they were discharged from the NICU only after achieving full oral feedings or placement of a gastrostomy tube. Recent programs show that these infants can be successfully discharged from the hospital with partial NGT or gastrostomy tube feedings with the assistance of targeted predischarge education and outpatient support. Caregiver opinions have also been reported as satisfactory or higher with this approach. In this review, we discuss the current literature and outcomes in infants who are discharged with an NGT and provide evidence for safe practices, both during the NICU hospitalization, as well as in the outpatient setting.

Addressing ethical clinical dilemmas with quality improvement methodology

Application of Quality Improvement methodology to nuanced clinical scenarios may be useful to ensure consistent delivery of equitable and comprehensive care. The purpose of this article is to inform the pediatric surgical readership of opportunities where quality improvement methodology may aid in navigating ethical nuances of complex surgical care. We present three case scenarios and discuss how quality improvement methodology could be utilized to address issues of provider autonomy, patient autonomy, and justice.

Actual and Potential Impact of a Home Nasogastric Tube Feeding Program for Infants Whose Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge Is Affected by Delayed Oral Feedings

OBJECTIVE

To compare healthcare use and parent health-related quality of life (HRQL) in 3 groups of infants whose neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge was delayed by oral feedings.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, single-center cohort of infants in the NICU from September 2018 to March 2020. After enrollment, weekly chart review determined eligibility for home nasogastric (NG) feeds based on predetermined criteria. Actual discharge feeding decisions were at clinical discretion. At 3 months' postdischarge, we compared acute healthcare use and parental HRQL, measured by the PedsQL Family Impact Module, among infants who were NG eligible but discharged with all oral feeds, discharged with NG feeds, and discharged with gastrostomy (G) tubes. We calculated NICU days saved by home NG discharges.

RESULTS

Among 180 infants, 80 were orally fed, 35 used NG, and 65 used G tubes. Compared with infants who had NG-tube feedings, infants who had G-tube feedings had more gastrointestinal or tube-related readmissions and emergency encounters (unadjusted OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.3-12.7, P = .02), and orally-fed infants showed no difference in use (unadjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.1-1.7, P = .225). Multivariable adjustment did not change these comparisons. Parent HRQL at 3 months did not differ between groups. Infants discharged home with NG tubes saved 1574 NICU days.

CONCLUSIONS

NICU discharge with NG feeds is associated with reduced NICU stay without increased postdischarge healthcare use or decreased parent HRQL, whereas G-tube feeding was associated with increased postdischarge healthcare use.

Emergency department utilization following pediatric gastrostomy tube placement is driven by a small cohort of patients

PURPOSE

Pediatric gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are associated with frequent postoperative problems and consumption of healthcare resources. We hypothesized that a small cohort of patients disproportionately drives healthcare resource utilization after G-tube insertion. This study aimed to characterize this population in order to implement evidence-based pathways to reduce healthcare utilization after G-tube insertion.

METHODS

All surgically placed pediatric G-tubes at a quaternary care center between March 2011 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Healthcare utilization including radiographic studies, emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, procedures, and diagnoses was abstracted. Encounter specific charges based on CPT codes were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with Mann Whitney U, Fisher's Exact Test, and multivariate nominal logistic regression. Institutional review board approval was obtained.

RESULTS

During the study period, 189 patients underwent G-tube insertion; 24% of patients presented to the ED two or more times and accounted for 82% of ED visits. This cohort of high ED utilizers was more likely to present with G-tube dislodgement [both within the first three months (early) and after three months (late)], required more radiographic studies, and accrued significantly more charges compared to low ED utilizers. Multivariate analyses demonstrated high ED utilization was significantly associated with non-Caucasian race and the surgeon performing the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, a significant proportion of healthcare utilization following G-tube placement is consumed by a relatively small cohort of children. Future efforts will target patients with two or more G-tube related ED visits or an early G-tube dislodgement for additional education and integration with outpatient resources.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Implementation of a gastrostomy care bundle reduces dislodgements and length of stay

PURPOSE

Pediatric gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are associated with considerable utilization of healthcare resources. G-tube dislodgement can result in tract disruption and abdominal sepsis. We aimed to reduce early G-tube dislodgement by 25%.

METHODS

An interdisciplinary team convened to identify key drivers of G-tube dislodgement and implement initiatives to reduce this complication. A G-tube care bundle was implemented in 2018. Rates of early G-tube dislodgement (within 90 days of insertion) were tracked. 15 months of cases after bundle implementation were compared to 20 months of cases before implementation. Length of stay (LOS, balancing measure) and bundle compliance (process measure) were tracked.

RESULTS

G-tube dislodgements decreased 47% after bundle implementation. Overall, dislodgements after G-tube insertion decreased from 43% to 19% dislodgements per tube inserted, p = 0.004. Reductions were observed for dislodgements occurring in both the inpatient (14% vs. 1.5%) and outpatient (29% vs. 18%) settings. Median LOS was reduced from 15.3 to 7.1 days following implementation, p = 0.004. Process measures demonstrated 75% or greater compliance one year after implementation.

CONCLUSION

An interdisciplinary team using quality improvement science methodology can significantly reduce G-tube dislodgement and improve value after pediatric gastrostomy tube insertion.

TYPE OF STUDY

Longitudinal cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.