The survival benefit of low molecular weight heparin over unfractionated heparin in pediatric trauma patients

Screening and Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee conducted a systematic review to describe the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric surgical and trauma patients and develop recommendations for screening and prophylaxis.

METHODS

The Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried from January 2000 through December 2021. Search terms addressed the following topics: incidence, ultrasound screening, and mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Consensus recommendations were derived based on the best available literature.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four studies were included. The incidence of VTE in pediatric surgical populations is 0.29% (Range = 0.1%-0.48%) and directly correlates with surgery type, transfusion, prolonged anesthesia, malignancy, congenital heart disease, inflammatory bowel disease, infection, and female sex. The incidence of VTE in pediatric trauma populations is 0.25% (Range = 0.1%-0.8%) and directly correlates with injury severity, major surgery, central line placement, body mass index, spinal cord injury, and length-of-stay. Routine ultrasound screening for VTE is not recommended. Consider sequential compression devices in at-risk nonmobile, pediatric surgical patients when an appropriate sized device is available. Consider mechanical prophylaxis alone or with pharmacologic prophylaxis in adolescents >15 y and post-pubertal children <15 y with injury severity scores >25. When utilizing pharmacologic prophylaxis, low molecular weight heparin is superior to unfractionated heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

While VTE remains an infrequent complication in children, consideration of mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis is appropriate in certain populations.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic Review of level 2-4 studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-4.

Inadequate prophylaxis in patients with trauma: anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dosing management in critically ill patients with trauma

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant morbidity in patients with trauma despite advances in pharmacologic therapy. Prior literature suggests standard enoxaparin dosing may not achieve target prophylactic anti-Xa levels. We hypothesize that a new weight-based enoxaparin protocol with anti-Xa monitoring for dose titration in critically injured patients is safe and easily implemented.

Methods

This prospective observational study included patients with trauma admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2021 to September 2022. Enoxaparin dosing was adjusted based on anti-Xa levels as standard of care via a performance improvement initiative. The primary outcome was the proportion of subtarget anti-Xa levels (<0.2 IU/mL) on 30 mg two times per day dosing of enoxaparin. Secondary outcomes included the dosing modifications to attain goal anti-Xa levels, VTE and bleeding events, and hospital and ICU lengths of stay.

Results

A total of 282 consecutive patients were included. Baseline demographics revealed a median age of 36 (26-55) years, and 44.7% with penetrating injuries. Of these, 119 (42.7%) achieved a target anti-Xa level on a starting dose of 30 mg two times per day. Dose modifications for subtarget anti-Xa levels were required in 163 patients (57.8%). Of those, 120 underwent at least one dose modification, which resulted in 78 patients (47.8%) who achieved a target level prior to hospital discharge on a higher dose of enoxaparin. Overall, only 69.1% of patients achieved goal anti-Xa level prior to hospital discharge. VTE occurred in 25 patients (8.8%) and major bleeding in 3 (1.1%) patients.

Conclusion

A majority of critically injured patients do not meet target anti-Xa levels with 30 mg two times per day enoxaparin dosing. This study highlights the need for anti-Xa-based dose modification and efficacy of a pharmacy-driven protocol. Further optimization is warranted to mitigate VTE events.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Lack of Health Insurance Coverage and Emergency Medical Service Transport for Pediatric Trauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric trauma patients who lack insurance coverage may have less access to transport other than emergency medical services (EMS) or face financial barriers that prevent utilization of these services. We analyzed the association between health insurance coverage and EMS transport while controlling for injury and patient characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

De-identified Trauma Quality Programs registry data were queried for pediatric trauma patients age <18 y. The primary outcome was arrival by EMS (excluding interfacility transfer) versus private transport or walk-in, and the primary exposure was insurance coverage (any versus none). After exact matching on injury and facility characteristics, propensity matching was used to balance demographic covariates and comorbidities between insured and uninsured patients.

RESULTS

Of the 130,246 patients analyzed, 9501 (7%) did not have insurance coverage. After matching 9494 uninsured cases to 9494 insured controls, fixed-effects logistic regression found that uninsured patients had 18% greater odds of using EMS transport, compared to insured patients (odds ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.26; P < 0.001). Results were similar when comparing uninsured patients to privately insured or publicly insured patients only.

CONCLUSIONS

Uninsured pediatric trauma patients have a higher likelihood of using EMS transport compared to insured patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics, including the exact same score of injury severity. Lack of access to private transport may drive higher EMS utilization in uninsured patients with minor injuries and contribute to higher costs of pediatric trauma care borne by institutions and families.