Enough is enough: Radiation doses in children with gastrojejunal tubes

A clinical consensus paper on jejunal tube feeding in children

BACKGROUND

Feeding problems are common in children with complex medical problems or acute critical illness and enteral nutrition may be required. In certain situations, gastric tube feeding is poorly tolerated or may not be feasible. When feed intolerance persists despite appropriate adjustments to oral and gastric enteral regimens, jejunal tube feeding can be considered as an option for nutrition support.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert working group of the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition was convened. They identified topic questions and five key areas of jejunal tube feeding in children. Literatures searches were undertaken on Pubmed, Embase, and Medline for all relevant studies, between January 2000 and September 2022 (n = 103). Studies were assessed using National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines to generate statements, which were discussed as a group, followed by voting on statements using a modified Delphi process to determine consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 24 consensus statements were created for five key areas: patient selection, type and selection of feeding tube, complications, clinical use of jejunal tubes, follow-up, and reassessment.

CONCLUSION

Jejunal tube feeding is a safe and effective means of providing nutrition in a select group of pediatric patients with complex medical needs, who are unable to be fed by gastric tube feeding. Appropriate patient selection is important as complications associated with jejunal tube feeding are not uncommon, and although mostly minor, can be significant or require tube reinsertion. All children receiving jejunal tube feeding should have multidisciplinary team assessment and follow-up.

Routine Elective Gastrojejunostomy Tube Changes Are Associated With Reduced Tube Complications and Radiation Exposure

Gastrojejunostomy tubes (GJTs) can be a long-term solution for patients with intragastric feeding intolerance. Our retrospective study of 101 patients correlates the frequency of routine and urgent GJT changes, as well as complications and radiation exposure. Over a 2.75-year median duration, 60%, 33%, and 28% of patients had >1 episodes of a tube dislodgement/malpositioning, blockage, or leakage, respectively. Aspiration pneumonia hospital admission was required for 23% of patients. Patients with <1 routine tube change/year had more urgent changes/year (3.0) compared to patients with 1-2 (1.2) or >2 (0.8) routine yearly change. These patients required more frequent sedation for tube placement (21% vs 4.7%, P = 0.03) and experienced greater annual radiation exposure (9599 vs 304.5 and 69.1 μGym 2 , P = 0.01 and 0.008, respectively). Overall, aiming for a routine tube change at least every 6-12 months is associated with fewer urgent changes and complications as well as reduced radiation exposure and sedation requirements.